News & Politics

'He's made it so obvious': Former judges reveal how Trump is undermining DOJ's Comey case

Former FBI Director James Comey’s newly filed federal indictment could falter, and legal analysts point to President Donald Trump’s own public statements as a jeopardizing force.

Comey — whom Trump dismissed in 2017 — now faces charges of making false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding. Prosecutors allege he misled a 2020 Senate committee about authorizing leaks during the Russia‑collusion investigations.

CNN noted in a report published Monday that the timing of the indictment is noteworthy. Trump has publicly pushed Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute his political adversaries. In a Truth Social post, he pressed her to act without delay, naming Comey, Sen, Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) as targets.

Given that backdrop, legal experts cited in the report say Comey may succeed in arguing the case should be tossed on constitutional grounds, asserting selective or vindictive prosecution. While such defenses rarely succeed, Trump’s overt public campaign against his foes may strengthen Comey’s position.

“It’s a better case for Comey, because the president won’t shut up,” said retired federal Judge John Jones, per the report.

“And that’s admissible, so he’s got a fighting chance, I think, on vindictive prosecution.”

Former federal Judge Shira Scheindlin went further, calling the prosecution “clearly vindictive,” and arguing a court could be more receptive to both selective and vindictive prosecution claims.

“He’s made it so obvious that he’s targeting them, regardless of the evidence, that I do think a judge would be far more receptive to probably both concepts, selective prosecution and vindictive,” Scheindlin said.

Other factors bolster Comey’s defense. Randall Eliason, a former U.S. prosecutor, flagged the firing of Erik Siebert, who was the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia who declined to bring charges against Comey. Eliason also blasted his replacement by Lindsey Halligan — a Trump loyalist with little prosecutorial experience. That move, Eliason argued, “sets off all kinds of red flags.”

Comey has denied wrongdoing and declared he intends to prove his innocence. Meanwhile, Trump has continued to escalate his rhetoric. On Truth Social, he demanded that Comey “pay a very big price,” labeling him a “Dirty Cop” and condemning the judge overseeing the case, as he was appointed to his position by former President Joe Biden.

When asked to respond to commentary from judges, the White House said the indictment “speaks for itself,” while pledging the Trump administration looks forward to “fair proceedings in the courts.”

'Give them a little taste': GOP rep demands Trump bully Democrats 'like you've never seen'

U.S. Rep. Mark Alford (R-MO) called for President Donald Trump and his senior administration officials to treat House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer in the same manner they treated Volodymyr Zelenskyy earlier this year when they appeared to gang up on and berate the Ukrainian president.

President Trump has not met with the Democratic leaders since he took office in January, and canceled a meeting with them slated for last week. They will be meeting in the Oval Office on Monday afternoon to discuss ways to avert a federal government shutdown at midnight on Tuesday.

Congressman Alford, a member of the far-right Republican Study Committee, told NewsNation on Monday, “let’s give them a little taste of what we gave Zelenskyy back in the spring.”

READ MORE: ‘Tone-Deaf’: Mass Shootings Rock U.S. as Trump Brags About Oval Office Gold

President Trump has falsely claimed that Democrats are “threatening” to shut down the government “unless they can have over $1 Trillion Dollars in new spending to continue free healthcare for Illegal Aliens.”

He, also wrongly, has claimed Democrats want to “force Taxpayers to fund Transgender surgery for minors, have dead people on the Medicaid roles, allow Illegal Alien Criminals to steal Billions of Dollars in American Taxpayer Benefits, try to force our Country to again open our Borders to Criminals and to the World, allow men to play in women’s sports, and essentially create Transgender operations for everybody.”

Congressman Alford echoed some of those allegations in his Monday remarks.

“So, this is what they wanted, all this crazy spending, going back to the woke policies and giving illegal aliens health care. Trump said, ‘There’s no way, why should I meet with them?'” Alford said.

“I think, over the last couple of days, he’s rethought that. Let’s bring them into the Oval Office. Let’s give them a little taste of what we gave Zelenskyy back in the spring,” the Missouri Republican declared.

READ MORE: ‘Genius All Around’: Pentagon Ordering 800 Officers to U.S. Mocked as Agenda Becomes Clear

“This is going to be live viewing, I believe, in the Oval Office,” Alford said, “like you’ve never seen before, maybe an hour long meeting, and the American people can see for themselves the ridiculous request and demands as the Democrats hold them hostage.”

Leader Jeffries on Monday told reporters, “We’re headed into the meeting [with Trump] to have a good faith negotiation about landing the plane in a way that avoids a government shutdown but does not continue the Republican assault on the healthcare of the American people.”

Democrats are “using one of their few points of leverage to demand Congress take up legislation to extend health care benefits,” PBS News reported. “Trump has shown little interest in entertaining Democrats’ demands on health care, even as he agreed to hold a sit-down meeting Monday with Schumer, along with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Speaker Mike Johnson and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. The Republican president has said repeatedly he fully expects the government to enter a shutdown this week.”

READ MORE: Shutdown Meltdown: Trump Hits Democrats With ‘Transgender for Everybody’ Charge

CEO of far-right 'dark money' group warns Trump's latest move will 'come back to haunt us'

Following the murder of Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk, President Donald Trump and his allies are calling for criminal investigations of not only individuals, but also of philanthropic groups that are favorable to liberal or progressive causes.

But Lawson Bader, president and CEO of the right-wing nonprofit DonorsTrust, thinks that is a bad idea.

Bader told the Free Press that MAGA "has the potential to weaponize philanthropy in a way that is antithetical to philanthropic freedom" and "narrows the important boundary between citizen and state."

In an article published on September 29, Gabe Kaminsky of conservative writer Bari Weiss' Free Press website reports, "Bader's comments reflect the deep concern that is spreading throughout the pxhilanthropic world — regardless of political orientation — since President Donald Trump vowed to go after liberal groups that he said have done 'tremendous damage to our country.' The assassination of Kirk, who was one of America's most influential conservative activists, has incited Trump administration officials to consider potential retribution against groups like the Open Society Foundations, funded by Democratic megadonor George Soros, and the Ford Foundation, whose philanthropy also funds left-leaning causes."

Kaminsky adds, "On Thursday, (September 25), the president signed a memorandum aimed at fighting 'domestic terrorism and organized political violence.' When he was asked who might be investigated, Trump floated the names of Soros and Reid Hoffman, another Democratic megadonor."

Kaminsky notes that the Alexandria, Virginia-based DonorsTrust "offers what are known as donor-advised funds tailored to conservative and libertarian-minded philanthropists who want to donate money anonymously and receive tax breaks."

"Democrats have used the phrase 'dark money ATM' to describe DonorsTrust, which had over $1.2 billion in assets at the end of 2023 and paid out $351 million that year," Kaminsky explains. "The organization says it has routed about $2 billion to over 3000 charities, including the Heritage Foundation, Manhattan Institute, and Turning Point USA, which Kirk started in 2012 and is now led by his wife, Erika Kirk."

Bader told the Free Press, "The whole conversation needs to tone down. I think it's going to come back to haunt us."

Read Gabe Kaminsky's full Free Press article at this link (subscription required).

Trump is 'an almost perfect inversion of the moral teachings of Jesus': GOP speechwriter

The former speechwriter for three Republican presidents and a senior fellow at the non-profit Christian organization The Trinity Forum explains what he calls "fully MAGA-fied Christianity" in his latest piece for The Atlantic.

Peter Wehner, who served under President Ronald Reagan and both Bushes, says that when President Donald Trump admitted at the memorial service of slain MAGA podcaster Charlie Kirk that he hated his enemies, it was hardly a surprise.

"President Trump has in the past made clear his disagreement with, and even his contempt for, some of the core teachings of Jesus. So has his son Don Jr., who told a Turning Point USA gathering in 2021 that turning the other cheek has “gotten us nothing," Wehner says.

Trump has "acknowledged that he’s a man filled with hate and driven by vengeance. It’s not simply that those qualities are part of who he is; it is that he draws strength from the dark passions," he adds.

And despite the fact that Trump has, Wehner explains, "spent nearly every day of the past decade confirming that he lacks empathy. He sees himself as both entitled and as a victim. He’s incapable of remorse. He’s driven by an insatiable need for revenge. And he enjoys inflicting pain on others."

"It’s no longer an interesting question as to why Trump is an almost perfect inversion of the moral teachings of Jesus; the answer can be traced to a damaged, disordered personality that has tragically warped his soul." Wehner says, adding, "What is an interesting question is why those who claim that the greatest desire of their life is to follow Jesus revere such a man and seem willing to follow him, instead, to the ends of the earth."

"Trump and the MAGA movement capitalized on, and then amplified, the problems facing Christian communities, but they did not create them," Wehner explains.

Pastor and author Brian Zahnd posted on Bluesky that “It grieves me to see people I’ve known for years (some as far back as the Jesus Movement of the 1970s) seduced by a mean-spirited culture-war Christianity that is but a perverse caricature of the authentic faith formed around Jesus of Nazareth."

Russell Moore, editor in chief of Christianity Today, has said that Jesus is a “hood ornament” for many American Christians, Wehner writes.

"The expectation of, among others, the Apostle Paul wasn’t human perfection. He believed that original sin touched every human life, and many of his Epistles were written to address serious problems within the Church," he says.

Wehner also points to culture wars as a commonality that draws Christians to Trump.

"Politics, especially culture-war politics, provides many fundamentalists and evangelicals with a sense of community and a common enemy,: Wehner explains. "It gives purpose and meaning to their life, turning them into protagonists in a great drama pitting good against evil. They are vivified by it."

Leaders within the Christian MAGA movement, Wehner adds, are also autocratic and they like what they see with Trump's attempts to consolidate power within the excutive branch.

"Many of the leaders within the Christian-MAGA movement are autocratic, arrogant, and controlling; they lack accountability, demand unquestioned loyalty, and try to intimidate their critics, especially those within their church or denomination," Wehner says.

And as Wehner pointed out, grievance politics also plays a role.

"The grievances and resentment they feel are impossible to overstate; they are suffering from a persecution complex. Fully MAGA-fied Christians view Trump as the “ultimate fighting machine,” in the words of the historian Kristin Kobes Du Mez, and they love him for it."

'Depraved': Trump's latest social media gaffe shows he is 'vulnerable to being influenced'

In President Donald Trump's most recent social media spree in which Salon's Sophia Tesfaye says he "flood[ed] the zone with chaos, and then pretend[ed] it never happened," it appears he may have been duped by "what he seemingly believed was Fox News footage."

But, alas, Salon reports, it was not Fox footage.

Trump "shared an AI-generated video promising fake alien health care technology from a conspiracy theory popular in QAnon forums," Salon explains.

The footage he shared featured an AI-generated image of himself on a fake Fox News segment touting "a new era in American healthcare" and something called a "med bed card," a fake item sold as part of a QAnon-affiliated conspiracy theory involving nonexistent medical technology. The cards supposedly provide access to "med beds," which are falsely claimed to use advanced, futuristic technology to cure any disease, regenerate limbs, and reverse aging.

That AI video, Tesfaye explains, " did not air on “My View with Lara Trump,” as it claimed, or any other Fox News show."

As for the video's well-debunked claims, investigative journalist Jacqueline Sweet discovered that the earliest mention of the video’s claim "comes from a now-deleted Instagram page that 'uses a common fake name for fake doctors in romance scams.'"

Tesfaye says that by sharing the AI footage of himself, "Trump is giving his MAGA followers false hope that he will soon grant them access to the elites’ magic product."

The Salon writer says this is "depraved and heartbreaking" because many MAGA believers have "refused medical treatment because they believe med bed tech will restore their health in minutes."

Although the president deleted the video on Sunday after huge online backlash, Trump's deep fake dupe is dangerous, Tesfaye says, and likely to continue.

"As the med bed example demonstrates, Trump is growing more vulnerable to being influenced by selective or sensational media coverage — and less likely to vet whether what he is seeing or hearing on those segments is grounded in current facts."

'I do not work for you': These MAGA congresswomen are publicly breaking from Trump

In a show of rebellion within the Republican ranks, Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) and Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) are resisting mounting pressure from Trump officials and senior House GOP leaders to withdraw their support for a bipartisan effort demanding the full release of government files related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, Politico reported Monday.

Their signatures and public backing are pivotal to the success of a discharge petition spearheaded by Reps. Thomas Massie (R‑Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D‑Calif.), which aims to force a House floor vote on the transparency measure.

The Massie‑Khanna “Epstein Files Transparency Act” is legislation introduced in July that would require the Department of Justice to publicly release all unclassified files related to Epstein and co‑conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. The bill allows redactions for victims’ identities and other legally protected content.

Because leadership has been reluctant to bring the issue directly to the floor, Massie and Khanna are using a discharge petition — a procedural tool that, once signed by a majority of the House (218 members), forces consideration of the bill even without support from House leadership.

"The timeline for a potential vote is unclear with House GOP leaders considering keeping the chamber out on recess next week," Politico noted.

Meanwhile, according to a New York Times report published Sunday, Greene said she was angered after an unnamed aide to President Donald Trump signaled that supporting legislation to release government documents tied to Epstein would be seen as a “very hostile act.” In response, she says she phoned a senior West Wing official and pushed back hard.

“I told them, ‘You didn’t get me elected. I do not work for you; I work for my district,’” she recalled in her comments to The Times.

“We aren’t supposed to just be whipped on our votes because they’re telling us what to do … or saying ‘We’ll primary you,’ or that we won’t get invited to the White House events.”

'Tone-deaf': Mass shootings rock US as Trump brags about Oval Office gold

There were six mass shootings across the United States over the weekend — two in Louisiana, two in North Carolina, one in Texas, and the most widely covered, at a church in Michigan. President Donald Trump is facing criticism for largely ignoring the gun violence — as well as the growing cost of groceries — while boasting instead about the gold fixtures he’s installed throughout the Oval Office and Cabinet Room.

A gunman who drove his truck into a Michigan church on Sunday morning as hundreds worshipped reportedly shot and killed at least four people, set the building on fire, and wounded another eight people. Police, according to ABC News, said they expect to find more victims.

Just after 1:00 PM on Sunday, Trump posted to his social media site, calling the mass shooting “yet another targeted attack on Christians in the United States of America,” while demanding an end to the “epidemic of violence in our country.”

It does not appear that the President has acknowledged the other five shootings, but just hours after mentioning the Michigan church shooting, the President gloated about the White House gold.

“Some of the highest quality 24 Karat Gold used in the Oval Office and Cabinet Room of the White House,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Foreign Leaders, and everyone else, ‘freak out’ when they see the quality and beauty. Best Oval Office ever, in terms of success and look!!!”

The President also added a video.

Critics blasted Trump.

“How tone-deaf can you get? Americans can’t afford groceries or housing, but Trump posts video showing off more gold trinkets he’s plastering the White House walls with,” wrote former NBCUniversal executive Mike Sington, who also reposted the Trump video.

“While Americans struggle to feed their families and keep the lights on, and Trump just signed billionaire tax cuts adding $4 trillion to the debt, Trump is very proud of the gold he installed in the new White House ballroom aka Mar-a-Lago North,” observed former Biden White House official Jesse Lee.

Another social media user wrote on X: “Nero fiddled while Rome burned. Trump hugs his gold while Americans are shot dead.”

“Multiple mass shootings over the last 24 hours, and Donald Trump is online bragging about the amount of gold in his office,” wrote social media commentator Alex Cole.

The Bulwark’s Sam Stein noted, “Trump posting about the quality of the 24 karat gold he’s adorning the White House with is the type of tone deaf stuff that only he seems to get away with.”

New York Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul also blasted the President over the cost of living as he posted about White House gold in this post on X:

Republicans head to swanky 5 star resort as government shutdown looms

As the government threatens to grind to a halt in a shutdown that both side are blaming on each other, The Daily Beast reports Republicans are planning swanky, five star vacations at a five star luxe resort in Sea Island Georgia.

Should the shutdown happen, essential government workers from federal agencies such as the Transportation Security Administration and the military will be working without pay, while non-essential workers will be halted completely.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee, the official campaign organization of the U.S. Senate Republicans, is heading to an October 3-5 getaway at the Sea Island Resort, The Daily Beast reports.

According to the event invitation obtained by Politico, while Americans face a devastating government shutdown, Senate Republicans will pay $500 to $600 to attend the festivities.

Among the activities: a welcome dinner, a Saturday “General Session” and nightly drinks receptions — plus an afternoon filled with golf, pickleball, fishing, shooting and lawn games.

The resort also features a spa, as well as three championship golf courses.

While the Daily Beast asked Republicans and the White House if this weekend still plans to go on in the event of a shutdown, they have yet to reply.

Though Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) told Meet the Press Sunday that firings did not have to happen, the Trump administration has said that it’s prepared for mass firings of federal workers in lieu of furloughs.

The 35-day shutdown in December 2018–January 2019, during the first Trump presidency, cost the government $5 billion, and furloughed 380,000 employees.

Trump official’s false claims about 'left-wing terrorism' thoroughly debunked

In a Sunday, September 28 post on X, formerly Twitter, Deputy White House Press Secretary Abigail Jackson echoed President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance's claim that the majority of domestic terrorism in the United States is coming from the left. Jackson posted, "Democrats, calling your political opponents Nazis has consequences. Study: Left-wing terrorism climbs to 30-year high."

Jackson tried to prove her point by linking to an article by Axios reporter Zachary Basu. But Jackson's critics, including the Daily Beast's Tom Latchem and former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann, are pointing out that Basu's reporting doesn't say what she claims it does.

Olbermann tweeted, "Wow! Left wing terrorism is all the way up to one quarter of right wing terrorism. Bad news, lady: your employers are the terrorists."

Latchem, in an article published on September 29, explains, "When one of Donald Trump's most prominent mouthpieces came across an article she believed backed the government's claim that left-wing terrorism is engulfing America, she didn't miss the opportunity to share it online. Unfortunately for the MAGA loyalist, who is at the heart of White House communications, the article cited didn't say anything of the sort."

Latchem notes that Basu's Axios article "did report that left-wing attacks have 'outpaced' far-right incidents so far this year for the first time in three decades — but not that left-wing terrorism is at a 30-year high."

Axios changed the headline for Basu's article and added an editor's note at the end: "This headline has been corrected to reflect that left-wing terrorism is outpacing far-right terrorism for the first time in 30 years (not that left-wing attacks overall are at a 30-year high)."

The article's headline now reads, "Study: Left-wing terrorism outpaces far-right attacks for first time in 30 years."

Basu reported, "Far-right violence has historically been more frequent and more lethal, but plunged dramatically over the first six months of 2025."

Latchem observes, "The underlying study behind the Axios article, from the Center for Strategic & International Studies, found that, through July 4, 2025, researchers logged five left-wing plots or attacks versus a sharp drop on the far right. Yet it also revealed left-wing violence remained far less lethal over the past decade, with 41 attacks and 13 deaths since 2016, compared with 152 attacks and 112 deaths from the right over the same period.

The authors also warned against using the data "as an excuse for a crackdown on legitimate organizations."

Read Tom Latchem's full article for the Daily Beast at this link (subscription required).

Fox News analyst: 'Incoherently drafted' and 'ill-conceived' Comey case should be dismissed

In a column in the conservative National Review, Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andy McCarthy says that President Donald Trump's Department of Justice indictment of former FBI Director James Comey is so devoid of facts that it should be tossed.

Comey was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of making false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding related to his handling of the FBI's investigation into Russian election interference and Hillary Clinton's emails.

Comey has said he is innocent and ready to go on trial, one which many legal experts predict will be found in his favor.

McCarthy's column, titled “With More Scrutiny, the Trump DOJ Indictment of Comey Gets Worse,” says that the case against Comey “is so ill-conceived that the longer one analyzes it, the worse it gets."

”It is incoherently drafted, such that it fails to fulfill an indictment’s constitutional purpose,"McCarthy adds.

McCarthy, an assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York who led the 1995 terrorism prosecution for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, analyzed the Comey case and came to the same conclusion as his colleagues on all sides of the aisle.

“There is no way the government could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Senator [Ted] Cruz was asking Comey about someone other than [former FBI deputy director Andrew] McCabe, much less that Comey understood that Cruz was doing so and willfully lied about it," he explains.

"To summarize, there is no provable false-statements case against Comey," McCarthy writes.

After telling Fox News correspondent Molly Line last week that the case should never have been brought in the first place, McCarthy doubled down, saying, “The indictment is inadequately plead and factually without foundation. It should be dismissed."

'They are not his generals': Conservative warns military is being 'used as pawns' for Trump

In his latest piece in The Bulwark, conservative writer William Kristol warns military service members not to allow themselves be used as political pawns during Tuesday's gathering of top brass and President Donald Trump at the Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia.

Following Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's summoning of the military to Tuesday's gathering, Trump told Reuters, “I want to tell the generals that we love them, they’re cherished leaders, to be strong, be tough, and be smart and be compassionate.”

Trump's intentions are dubious, Kristol says, and "One might think there are far less expensive ways — ones with fewer inconveniences and security challenges — to have a nice talk with generals and show them some love, if love is all they need."

However, if Trump's aim is true, then he should use this opportunity, Kristol says, to "apologize for his repeated public and private denigration of military leaders."

In 2020, The Atlantic famously reported that Trump, while president, privately called American soldiers killed in war "losers" and "suckers".

Kristol also takes issue with Trump's reference to the military as "my generals."

"Indeed, one might think that this would be an occasion for President Trump to explain that he understands that general officers in the United States military cannot and should not be — as he’s called them before — his generals," Kristol says.

He also notes that Tuesday's gathering would be an opportune time for the president to retract some of his more controversial statements.

"Trump could even state that he regrets saying, in a conversation in the White House in his first term that, 'I need the kind of generals that Hitler had. People who were totally loyal to him, that follow orders,'" Kristol writes, adding, "He could apologize directly to retired Marine general John Kelly, his chief of staff at the time, for asking petulantly, 'Why can’t you be like the German generals?'"

Kristol, however, realizes none of this will happen, and instead, says he will pull pages from his playbook of patting himself on the back.

"I expect he’ll praise himself for ordering the killing of civilians on fishing boats in the Caribbean that the administration insists, with no evidence or legal analysis, are drug runners engaged in acts of war," Kristol says. "He may well defend his deployment of troops within the United States against 'domestic terrorism.' He could seek approbation for other problematic policies or opinions."

This, Kristol says, will likely "force" members of the military to applaud the president's statements, signaling, "that the military brass is on board with Trump’s authoritarian agenda. The message would be that this is not simply the United States military but that it is Donald Trump’s military."

"It would be good if all the general and flag officers present could quietly agree ahead of time not to let themselves be used as pawns for political purposes. It would be useful if they could agree not to applaud, not to cheer, but to sit silently and respectfully as the president speaks," Kristol says.

To those who are compelled for whatever reason to clap while the cameras are rolling, Kristol says, be selective with the applause.

"If they feel they have to applaud, to do so for uncontroversial statements of praise for the courage and dedication of those under their command, and not for political rallying cries."

Kristol says it is entirely possible for the generals to resist at Tuesday's meeting.

"The United States military is justly respected. It holds itself to high standards. It should do so tomorrow at Marine Corps Base Quantico," he says.

'Unacceptable': GOP gov blasted by members of her own party for 'scandalously defying Arkansas law'

After pushback from members of her own party, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders late Friday changed the date of the general election to fill the vacant District 26 Senate seat from November 2026 to June.

The new general election date still comes after the end of the Legislature’s 2026 fiscal session, giving rise to complaints from Republicans and Democrats that citizens of the district will be unrepresented in next springs legislative fiscal session

Republican candidate Ted Tritt of Paris posted on Facebook Saturday: “Any step to shorten the time our people go unrepresented is encouraging,” but the new date remains “unacceptable.”

Tritt is one of three Republicans who have announced their intent to run; the others are Brad Simon, also of Paris, and former state Rep. Mark Berry of Ozark. No Democrats have entered the race so far.

The special election is being called to replace Republican Sen. Gary Stubblefield, who died Sept. 2.

State law requires a special election be held not more than 150 days after a legislative seat becomes vacant, unless the governor determines it is “impracticable or unduly burdensome” to do so.

Tritt, Simon and Arkansas Democratic Party Chair, retired Army Col. Marcus Jones all criticized the election dates as unfair to residents of the district, which includes parts of Franklin, Johnson, Logan and Sebastian counties.

Stubblefield was a vocal opponent of a proposed 3,000-bed state prison in rural Franklin County supported by Sanders, and Simon and Tritt expressed concerns Friday that the area’s residents will be left without representation during likely discussions of prison funding in the fiscal session.

In her original and updated proclamations Friday, Sanders declared that holding the election within the 150-day window would be impractical and burdensome.

She originally set the special primary for the District 26 seat for March 3 and the general election for Nov. 3, 2026, dates which coincide with the state’s regular election schedule.

The revised election schedule kept the primary election on March 3, but moved the general election to June 9.

In a press release announcing the revised election dates, Sanders said that “after receiving feedback from the community and getting confirmation from election officials that a change while difficult is doable, I have decided to move up the general election date to expedite representation for the River Valley.”

Arkansas Democrats, in a Saturday press release, said Sanders is still “ignoring the law.”

“This is nothing but a bandaid to the serious bipartisan backlash she’s receiving, but she is still openly and scandalously defying Arkansas law,” Jones said in the release. “The Governor has a legal responsibility to fill this vacancy within 150 days, and the updated election date is still 130 days after that deadline.”

“This general election date still leaves more than 85,000 Arkansans without representation in the Senate for 280 days: not only does that take away their say in the 2026 budget, but that means there is no one to reach out to when they need resources or assistance from Arkansas’s highest legislative body,” Jones said.

Tritt wrote on Facebook that “the reality remains: District 26 will still go through the spring fiscal session without a senator and clock over 250 days without representation. That’s well beyond what the law calls for, and far beyond what our families deserve.”

“Budgets will be written. Priorities will be set. Votes on the Franklin County prison project will be taken. Decisions will be made that affect our schools, our hospitals, our farms, and our jobs. And through all of it, the people of District 26 will not have a seat at the table,” he said.

Simon posted on Facebook Friday that letting the seat remain vacant for so long is “unconscionable, unacceptable, and unconstitutional.”

Data expert explains why Trump’s approval numbers are even more 'horrible' than you think

Eight months into his second presidency, Donald Trump continues to be adored by his hardcore MAGA base. But when polls take into account voters on the whole — Republicans, Democrats, independents, and third party members combined — Trump is struggling.

Recent polls show Trump's approval rating at 39 percent (the Associated Press), 40 percent (Gallup), 41 percent (Reuters) or 38 percent (Quinnipiac).

The New Republic's Greg Sargent discussed Trump's approval numbers with Lakshya Jain (co-founder of the data firm Split Ticket) in an episode of the "Daily Blast" podcast posted on September 29. And Jain laid out some reasons why these polls are "horrible" for Trump at this point in his second presidency.

"This is the second term, but it's still the period in time at which the president's approval ratings are generally at their highest," Jain told Sargent. "You know, (former President) Joe Biden ended his tenure extremely poorly in the court of public opinion, but it's really important to remember that Biden was not this unpopular at this point in time in his first year. Trump is at levels that have only really been approached by Trump 1.0. That's it. That's the only historical comparable. But Greg, what's interesting to me, if I may, is that the disapproval this time is of a completely different nature — and I would argue a far more damaging nature than the first time around, because the first time around, it was centered around his abuse of the office, or so to say, people thinking he was unfit to lead the country. But people liked the economy."

Jain continued, "People really liked the economy under Trump. His economic numbers were consistently positive or break even the first time around. This time, what’s happening is people really hate Trump not for the abuse of office. They hate him for the economy."

The Split Ticker co-founder noted that inflation proved to be a major liability for former President Joe Biden — and now, the economy is hurting Trump's poll numbers.

"This time around," Jain told Sargent, "they think he's been obsessed with things like the woke culture wars and about persecuting his political opponents, and not focused enough on issues that they care about. You know, when people say like, 'the American people don't care about all these things that elites think they do' I mean, that goes both ways, right?.... It is also true that Trump trying to focus all of his efforts on, you know, prosecuting his political opponents and going after them is also seen poorly because people don't care about that. They're like, 'Why are you focused on that? My bills are so high.'"

When Sargent noted that "the Democratic Party is polling as badly as it has in a very long time," Jain responded, "Democrats are unpopular because Democratic voters dislike the Democratic Party for not doing enough to stand up to Trump. But people have taken that to mean that the Republican party enjoys an edge with independents and with swing voters. And that is just not true."

Jain continued, "Look, whether a Democrat voter disagrees with the Democratic Party does not change the reality that, you know, among independents where the battle is generally won and lost, Democrats actually lead the Republicans. And that's a very big thing no one talks about."

Listen to the full New Republic podcast at this link or read the transcript here.


Conservatives fear Republican is dooming her campaign in crucial swing-state race

On Tuesday night, November 4, Democratic and GOP strategists will be paying very close attention to the outcome of two gubernatorial races: one in Virginia that finds Democratic former Rep. Abigail Spanberger (an ex-CIA agent) up against Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, and one in New Jersey that finds Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill competing with Republican ex-State Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli.

Both races are viewed as largely a referendum on Donald Trump's second presidency, and political strategists believe they could offer some signs on what to expect in the 2026 midterms.

The New Jersey race appears to be tightening: an Emerson College/The Hill poll released in late September finds Sherrill and Ciattarelli in a dead heat. On the Sunday, September 28 broadcast of "Inside Story" (a Philadelphia talk show that featured conservative/libertarian Michael Smerconish in this pre-CNN days) a panel of two liberals and two conservatives agreed that Sherrill should be "running away" with this race and not in a virtual tie with a Republican.

But in Virginia, Spanberger seems to have the advantage — at least for now.

Polls released in September find Spanberger ahead of Earle-Sears by 12 percent (Christopher Newport University), 6 percent (co/efficient) or 5 percent (Pulse Decision).

In an article published on September 29, The Hill's Julia Manchester reports that GOP strategists in Virginia fear that Earle-Sears is hurting her campaign by emphasizing "cultural issues…. in an off-year election likely to be dominated by economic concerns."

"Earle-Sears, in particular, has attacked her Democratic rival, former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, over transgender issues, especially in regard to schools," Manchester explains. "This week, the lieutenant governor's campaign rolled out an ad labeling Spanberger as being for 'they/them' and supporting policies that allow 'men in girls' locker rooms' and parents to be unaware when their children seek gender-affirming care. In another ad, Earle-Sears accuses Spanberger of wanting 'boys to play sports and share locker rooms with little girls.'"

Manchester adds, "The strategy of invoking trans issues played well for Republicans in 2024, and Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) arguably won in 2021 on the parents' rights issue. But critics question whether Earle-Sears' message is meeting the moment when the cost of living and jobs are dominating voters' concerns."

Virginia was once a deep-red state, but it has evolved into a swing state in recent years and is arguably Democrats' best state in the South. Democrats have carried Virginia in every presidential election since 2008, although Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin enjoyed a single-digit victory in 2021.

"Overall, Spanberger has remained highly focused on the issues of rising costs and federal employment in Virginia following the Trump Administration's widespread purge of government jobs under its Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)," Manchester notes. "Earlier this week, in the wake of conservative attacks over the issue, Spanberger rolled out an op-ed in The Washington Post on DOGE's impact on Virginia’s economy. The state is notably home to a large swath of federal employees given its proximity to Washington, D.C., and its military presence…. Spanberger's strategy appears to be paying off in the polls. The Decision Desk HQ polling average of the race has Spanberger leading Earle-Sears with 50.1 percent support to 43.1 percent."

Read Julia Manchester's full article at this link.

Meat-gorging 'MAGA people' unwelcome in 'extremely liberal' DC's hottest restaurants

New York Magazine's Adam Platt says that while "MAGA people are not welcome in a lot of places" in still-liberal Washington D.C., there has emerged a far-right dining scene to which "creatures of the new Trump revolution" are flocking.

At Butterworth's, the so-called Elaine's of the MAGA movement, according to co-owner Raheem Kassan, referring to the 1970s Manhattan canteen of the chic elite, podcaster and former Trump White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon maintains a "regular corner table," Platt says. Far-right influencer Jack Posobeic is also a regular.

Kassan, incidentally, also happens to be the editor-in-chief of a right-wing website called the National Pulse, Platt says, and though President Donald Trump has yet to come in, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has.

"“I think MAGA One’s attitude was ‘Let’s go in there, let’s smash things up a bit, let’s leave the globalist apparatus a little worse than we found it," but this current version of MAGA, or MAGA Two, as he says, is different.

"This new MAGA scene is younger, he said. People want to create lasting change; they want houses and careers," Platt explains.

Butterworth's isn't the only MAGA hot spot, Platt says, noting that Donald Trump Jr.’s 200-members-only private club, Executive Branch, "costs a cool half-million dollars to join . . . featuring, among many other things, a tech-bro-heavy members list (crypto czar David Sacks, the Winklevoss twins) and a state-of-the-art sushi bar."

Immediately following Trump's second stint in DC, restaurants started to close as the president's crackdown on alleged crime and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents took over the streets saw locals losing their appetites to dine out. But not MAGA. Only, there was a slight problem.

“Washington is still extremely liberal, which means MAGA people are not welcome in a lot of places, which means they tend to gather in groups in venues where they know they’re not going to be harassed,” said Jessica Sidman, who covers restaurants forWashingtonian magazine.

Sidman accurately called popular chain steakhouse The Capital Grille "the swampiest restaurant in Washington, a red-meat, red hat hot spot where, Sidman says, "Republican fat cats still outspend Democrats here by a ratio of 13 to one."

DC lobbyist Mark R. Smith, a Capital Grille regular, weighed in on MAGA eating habits, saying, “My Democratic friends have a distinctly different and more global palate than my steak-loving Republican friends."

Smith, a Trump supporter, did say that younger MAGA are refining their own palates to consume copious, carnivorous amounts of roasted marrow bones in addition to red meat.

"“There are those of us who have been with the president from 2015 forward,” Smith said. “We’re still here and crushing it, and now there are a new generation of younger kids who are learning and doing some very good things. They have to eat too.”

And while most MAGA hangouts are just that, MAGA hangouts, there's one that's bringing both sides of the aisle together, albeit at a hefty price.

At Ned's Club, a standard membership in D.C. costs a $5,000 one time fee to join with $5,000 dues annually, but an invite-only Founding Global Membership costs $125,000 to join and $25,000 each year.

While the Treasury Secretary Bessent has the founding membership, CNN's Kaitlan Collins is a regular member, as is former junk bond king Michael Milken.

But it's Butterworth's that seems to be command central for MAGA. And while co-owner Kassan told Platt that "he’s much less of 'frothing-at-the-mouth right-wing hot head' than he used to be, those flocking to his restaurant are frothing in their own right.

“The tables are heaving. I don’t see many familiar faces. The place is actually a success. It’s time to sell!" he said.

Busted: Right-winger pushed for race-based college enrollment for daughter of political ally

In January, Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller declared “war on DEI,” directing his agency to stop working with businesses that embrace policies that give advantages to people based on “race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion, or national origin.”

He condemned the Biden Administration for allowing “unfair” diversity, equity, and inclusion policies “to infect all aspects of our federal government, major corporations, financial institutions, the medical industry, and institutions of higher education,” Miller said in a press release.

But in May 2023, he wrote a letter to leaders of the University of Texas at San Antonio and the University of Texas at Austin emphasizing a student’s ethnicity and socioeconomic status as he urged the schools to reconsider her enrollment.

He said the student was a “biracial Latina,” whose father had “retreated” to Argentina a decade ago, leaving her mother to raise the student and her brother by herself. The student, he said, had been accepted but missed the enrollment deadline earlier that month. She did not have a computer, and did not know to look for the acceptance letter online, Miller wrote.

The commissioner, who is serving his third term leading the state’s agriculture agency, said in his letter he was using the “full weight of my office” to implore the school officials to admit the student.

“To do so would honor your mission to ensure underserved minorities have access to the same education as those from wealthy and elite educated families,” Miller wrote in a letter obtained through a public records request. “Based on her circumstances, to deny her the offered admission by eliminating her based on a technicality would be completely contrary to that proclaimed mission.”

The Texas Tribune confirmed the student is the daughter of one of Miller’s political associates, Lisa Pittman, an Austin lawyer who specializes in cannabis law and calls herself the “First Lady of Texas Cannabis Law” on social media and in news articles. Miller appointed Pittman to the agency's Industrial Hemp Advisory Council in 2020, just after the Texas Legislature legalized growing and selling industrial hemp in 2019.

In 2020, she was hired by a Texas law firm as a cannabis business law specialist. Miller was quoted in the firm’s announcement praising the hire.

“Lisa was one of the first people that I approached to become a member of my Industrial Hemp Council, and she sure has been worth her weight in Gold,” Miller said in the release, which has been removed from their website but is accessible via Internet archives. “I depend on Lisa’s expert guidance and practical experience to help the TDA formulate the rules and regulations that will govern the hemp industry in Texas as we prepare the State to lead the nation in hemp production like we do with so many other agricultural commodities.”

In his letter to the universities, Miller said the student had been accepted to UT-Austin through a program where students can attend another University of Texas System school for one year before transferring to the flagship, if they maintain certain academic criteria during their freshman year. The student hadn’t realized she had been accepted and missed the May 1 enrollment deadline for students to accept an admissions offer and pay an enrollment deposit, Miller wrote. He said the student was told she could still enroll in the program, but would need to start at the University of Texas at Tyler. Yet she preferred to attend UTSA to study art and psychology, and to be closer to home for health reasons.

“I understand you may consider your class ‘full,’ but one more who is exceptionally deserving can't hurt,” Miller wrote. “I am respectfully writing this letter with the full weight of my office — that is how important this special case is, and I urge you to reconsider your position on her.”

Miller said the family’s lack of experience with the inner workings of higher education contributed to her missing the deadline, adding that her high school mishandled her college applications. Her mother was the only member of her family who had graduated from college, he said.

“Unfortunately, it is students like [this student] that fall through the cracks and often end up receiving the least support,” Miller wrote. “But you can change that.”

In 2022, Pittman, the student’s mother, started her own boutique law firm focused on cannabis law and policy, and is a non-resident fellow in drug policy at the Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University in Houston. Pittman graduated from the University of Texas at Austin in 1997 and graduated from the University of Houston School of Law in 2001. She attended the Kinkaid School in Houston from 1985 to 1992, according to her LinkedIn.

The Tribune confirmed the student graduated from Westlake High School in West Austin in 2023.

The Tribune is not naming the student because it is unclear if she was aware that the letter was sent on her behalf. She did not respond to requests for comment.

UTSA confirmed she enrolled in the summer of 2023 through Spring 2024, but declined further comment on her situation. UT-Austin said they had no records showing the student enrolled. UT-Austin allows admitted students to appeal to reinstate their admission offer if it was previously declined. It’s unclear if the student filed for an appeal.

Pittman declined to comment. Miller did not respond to requests for comment or to a list of written questions.

Miller is running for reelection as Texas’s Agriculture Commissioner, which regulates the farming industry and provides support services to farmers in the state with the largest number of farms in the country and the number one producer of beef and cotton.

Miller sent the letter to the universities during the apex of the 2023 legislative session, when Texas lawmakers debated a bill to ban diversity, equity and inclusion policies and offices in the state’s public universities and colleges. The legislation was passed, making Texas the second state in the country to prohibit public universities from spending money on programs, offices, or employees that provided support and resources for specific underrepresented groups.

Miller has consistently railed against DEI programs and policies since conservatives began to raise concerns with the programs on college campuses in early 2023.

He has posted messages on social media that say “DEI = Didn’t Earn It,” and the DEI agenda is “un-American.”

Earlier this summer, Miller celebrated online when President Donald Trump issued an executive order demanding universities provide more transparency about their admissions processes. The declaration came two years after the U.S. Supreme Court prohibited universities across the country from considering a student’s race or ethnicity in the admissions process.

“YUGE!” he wrote. “The Supreme Court said no discrimination, but colleges are dodging the law to keep the DEI, racist admissions, and the woke mind virus alive. No more!”

Miller is not the first elected official in Texas to write letters to university leaders on behalf of students looking to attend. An outside investigation commissioned by the university system into admissions practices at UT-Austin in 2014 revealed a consistent pattern of lawmakers and other powerful elected officials often writing letters of recommendation for students who had applied.

The outside report found dozens of instances where current and former lawmakers wrote letters of recommendation to help students with powerful connections get admitted to the selective flagship university.

Disclosure: Rice University, University of Texas System, University of Texas at Austin and University of Texas at San Antonio have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

Keep reading...Show less

'Hates Trump and MAGA': Right-wing rages as a critic is chosen to headline Super Bowl halftime

On Sunday, September 28, the National Football League (NFL) announced that Puerto Rican reggaetón superstar Bad Bunny has been chosen to headline the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show. And many MAGA Republicans are furious, as Bunny is an outspoken critic of President Donald Trump's immigration policy and excluded the United States from an international tour because of raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

In a September 28 post on X, formerly Twitter, far-right radio host Benny Johnson posted, "This is Bad Bunny. He was just announced as the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show. - Massive Trump hater - Anti-ICE activist - No songs in English He even canceled his entire U.S. tour for this reason: 'F------ ICE could be outside my concert. And it's something that we were talking about and very concerned about.' The NFL is self-destructing year after year."

Liberal firebrand and former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann was quick to call Johnson out, tweeting, "And yet it's still there raking in billions and you haven't put a dent in it Also if you have an issue with his appearance...do you OWN a mirror, Sonny?"

MAGA filmmaker Robby Starstruck is railing against Bunny as well.

Starstruck tweeted, "Roger Goodell and the @NFL just decided to make the Super Bowl political by picking Bad Bunny as the 2026 Super Bowl music act. The guy literally says he isn't touring the US because of Trump's ICE raids and just released a video mocking President Trump."

Although Starstruck is Cuban-American, he has a problem with the fact that Bunny performs in Spanish.

Starstruck posted, "Also, most of his songs aren’t even in English. This is not a pick designed to unite football fans or let people just enjoy the show. It was a pick designed to divide fans and no doubt Bad Bunny will find some way to push a woke message. Are NFL owners in on this idiocy or are they just culturally that disconnected from reality and how Roger uses the NFL to push left wing social issues? Is it that hard to pick a unifying music act who doesn't want to peddle woke propaganda? Does this guy really scream American football to anyone? Be for real with me. No one thinks he does. This isn't about music, it's about putting a guy on stage who hates Trump and MAGA."

Radio host Dan O'Donnell wrote, "The NFL just announced Bad Bunny as its Super Bowl halftime show. Bad Bunny said two weeks ago he won't perform in the US because he's scared ICE agents would deport his fans. Turns out his business sense far outweighs his moral convictions."

There are the 'two looming disasters' expected in the next Supreme Court term: analysis

As the Supreme Court readies to kick off its new term next week, there are two particular issues that are "looming disasters," according to a report in Vox.

And though there is also a lot of uncertainty as to "whether the Court will strike down President Donald Trump’s ever-shifting tariffs," Vox reports, "There’s less mystery about how the Court will handle two other groups of cases, which concern election law and LGBTQ issues."

One of the three Supreme Court liberal justices, Elena Kagan, wrote in her dissenting opinion in 2021 that SCOTUS “has treated no statute worse” than the Voting Rights Act — the landmark 1965 law that banned race discrimination in elections.

And as Trump pushes Republicans to gerrymander their states to keep Democrats out of power, the court's majority conservative justices, Vox says, are "widely expected" to abolish the Voting Rights Act’s longstanding safeguards against racial gerrymandering.

"A decision abolishing those safeguards is likely to devastate Black representation in red states where voting is racially polarized — meaning that Black people overwhelmingly vote for Democrats while white voters similarly favor Republicans," Vox explains.

The other "big loser" as Vox deems it of the upcoming SCOTUS session is likely to be the LGBTQ community as the court seems poised to strike down bans on controversial conversion therapy, dangerous and discredited practices that attempt to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity.

Although about half of U.S. states have laws restricting conversion therapy, Vox explains, and despite the fact that "“every major medical, psychiatric, psychological, and professional mental health organization opposes the use of conversion therapy," the case in question raises "a difficult First Amendment question," Vox says.

"Justices will, at least, need to wrestle with how to distinguish speech by a lawyer or doctor from speech by a therapist," they explain.

According to Vox, the court is also predicted to uphold state laws requiring student athletes to play on a sex-segregated team that aligns with their sex assigned at birth.

"And, of course, the Court is dominated by conservative Republicans who, in United States v. Skrmetti (2025), recently held that states may prohibit minors from receiving gender-affirming health care. So trans advocates face a difficult uphill climb," Vox explains.

Revealed: Trump admin issued 'declaration of war' against his enemies in this overlooked memo

In between his highly publicized designation of Antifa as a domestic terror organization and his indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, US President Donald Trump signed a little-reported national security memorandum that gives law enforcement new tools to target his critics.

Trump signed National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7) on Thursday. The directive, titled “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence,” focuses exclusively on “anti-fascist” or left-wing activities, and mandates a “national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts.”

“I don’t want to sound hyperbolic but the plain truth is that NSPM-7 is a declaration of war on anyone who does not support the Trump administration and its agenda,” journalist Ken Klippenstein wrote in a piece raising alarm about the directive on Saturday.

Klippenstein argued that the memorandum was worrying on several fronts. For one, its focus on preventing crimes before they are committed opens the door to rights violations.

“In other words, they’re targeting pre-crime, to reference Minority Report,” Klippenstein wrote.

For another, the memorandum casts a very wide net, targeting groups, individuals, funders, and “entities” and listing several protected beliefs as “indicia” of extremism.

These include:

  • “Anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity;
  • Support for the overthrow of the United States Government;
  • Extremism on migration, race, and gender; and
  • Hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.”

What’s more, the memorandum entrusts enforcement to the FBI’s over 4,000-strong Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF), which removes the legal challenges to directing the National Guard or other military forces to quash domestic dissent.

“For the Trump White House, the beauty of using an already existing network is that it bypasses Congressional oversight and scrutiny and even obscures federal activity to governors and legislatures at the state level,” Klippenstein wrote.

The types of activities that will be targeted are also quite broad, with the document defining “organized doxing campaigns, swatting, rioting, looting, trespass, assault, destruction of property, threats of violence, and civil disorder” as “domestic terrorist acts.”

The memorandum also targets any individual or group who might fund activity the administration deems terrorism and directs the Internal Revenue Service to “take action to ensure that no tax-exempt entities are directly or indirectly financing political violence or domestic terrorism,” which could be a means of threatening the status of nonprofits.

Finally, as Drop Site News pointed out, the memo authorizes the attorney general to designate domestic groups as terrorist organizations for the first time in US history.

“By targeting beliefs and protest activity, the directive positions dissent itself as a potential crime,” Drop Site wrote.

The Trump administration’s focus on violence associated with left-wing beliefs and groups is not supported by the facts. National Institute of Justice data found that right-wing violence had led to 520 deaths since 1990 compared with 78 deaths due to left-wing violence. However, the administration removed that study from the Department of Justice website shortly after Charlie Kirk was killed, The Guardian reported earlier this month.

The administration’s efforts, while accelerated, build on processes that began during the US response to the September 11 attacks, as Klippenstein explained:

A “pre-crime” endeavor, preventing attacks before they happen, is core to the post-9/11 concept of counterterrorism itself. No longer satisfied to investigate acts of terrorism after the fact to bring terrorists to justice, the Bush administration adopted preemption. Overseas, that led to aerial assassination by drones and “special operations” kill missions. Domestically, it led to a counter-terrorism campaign whose hallmark was excessive and illegal government surveillance and the use of undercover agents and “confidential human sources” to trap (and entrap) would-be terrorists.

However, the Trump administration is expanding the War-on-Terror mandate with fewer guardrails.

“Now, with Donald Trump’s directive retooling the counter-terror apparatus to go after Americans at home, this means monitoring political activity, or speech, as an investigative method to discover ‘radicalism,‘” Klippenstein said, noting that the NSPM-7 breaks with post-Watergate national security documents by failing to mention the First Amendment rights to protest and organize.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller is already eager to make use of the document.

“We are witnessing domestic terrorist sedition against the federal government,” he wrote on social media on Friday. “The JTTF has been dispatched by the Attorney General, pursuant to NSPM-7. All necessary resources will be utilized.”

In an interview with Greg Sargent for the New Republic, Trump ally Steve Bannon confirmed that Miller and others in the administration were preparing to go after left-liberal groups and media whose criticism of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could be interpreted as “goading” on violence against the agency.

Referring to Miller’s comments that calling ICE authoritarian incited violence and terrorism, Bannon responded, “Stephen Miller is correct—more importantly he’s in charge.”

The threats of investigations put liberal and left-leaning organizations in a tough place. On the one hand, they want to prepare as best they can. On the other, they do not want to obey in advance.

“Officials at these groups tell me they must strike a balance between being clear-eyed about how bad this could get while not letting it discourage political activity,” Sargent wrote. “That latter form of surrender is exactly what Trump and Miller want. And under no circumstances should anybody willingly hand it over to them.”

'We can continue on without him': MAGA couple unleashes on 'king frog of the swamp' Trump

A Georgia couple that voted for President Donald Trump says they feel duped and that the president has not made good on his promises, according to a report in the Washington Post.

Jessie and Carter Meadows tell the WaPo that this is not what they voted for.

"“Is there anybody that can go up there and stay what they ran on?” she asked, saying she voted for Trump on his promises of "draining the swamp," among other things.

"“It seems like [he] went up there and just made himself the king frog of the swamp,” she said.

The Meadows' says business at their family shop has been greatly impacted by Trump's tariffs: "A box of faux berries from China recently arrived at the shop with a note explaining that they cost 17 percent more because of Trump’s tariffs," reports the WaPo.

"Fruit's getting outrageous now," Meadows said, adding that it's not just Trump's economy on which she is souring. She isn't the only one. A quarter of conservative voters disapprove of Trump’s handling of the economy according to the most recent polls.

Meadows' other big issue with Trump is one he is desperately trying to evade.

Meadows also says that she isn't happy with the president's "dismissive attitude toward MAGA Republicans who wanted to see the government’s full files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, after Trump said last year that he was “inclined” to release that information."


It is because of this that Meadows plans to vote against her local Congressman in the upcoming GOP primary. Vice President JD Vance, she says, is another she is leery about.

"Jessie said she planned to oppose her local congressman in next year’s GOP primary, upset by his stance on the Epstein files, and she wasn’t sure she could trust Trump’s vice president, JD Vance, whom many believe will run to succeed Trump," the WaPo reports.

Her husband, who runs the local funeral home, is struggling as well, saying he's having a hard time avoiding raising prices and blames Trump's policies for that, too, calling the tariffs "unplanned and childish.”

Jessie, who voted for President Barack Obama "because she liked what he said about free community college," says she and Carter were "quickly drawn, in 2016, to Trump’s pitch that he was a political outsider who would run the country like a business."

While they did well during Trump's first term and point to rising inflation during President Joe Biden's term, this time around, things are bleak.

Carter says Trump is "too focused on immigration," and told WaPo he was "ashamed"' of his vote after seeing a Trump Truth Social tirade about what the president deemed as the "Epstein hoax."

Jessie was angry, says the WaPo. "She was MAGA, she decided, but MAGA wasn’t synonymous with Trump."

Make America Great Again “does not depend on one man,” Jessie added. “And if he abandons the movement, then we can continue on without him.”

Trumpism isn't going 'to survive': analysis

In an article for the Washington Post published Sunday, Karen Tumulty, the outlet's chief political correspondent, argued that much of what once defined President Donald Trump’s foreign‑policy posture has become incoherent, inconsistent, or hollow. She contends that the traits which once gave Trumpism its shape — bold rhetoric, transactional diplomacy, personal negotiation, and disruption of norms — are now more show than substance.

Tumulty pointed out that Trump’s criticisms of institutions like the U.N. are no longer unusual; experts across ideological lines now share many of the same complaints, which dilutes what used to be an outsider posture.

She highlighted how Trump’s approach to Ukraine in particular has shifted: he once seemed to believe his personal leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin or pressure on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky could change the war’s course, but now manifests a kind of resignation, observing rather than driving policy. Tumulty suggested that ambition remains — Trump speaks more strongly about Ukraine and signals tougher stances, but the follow‑through is missing. She shows that despite changes in rhetoric, there is little in the way of concrete or consistent policies, especially on issues like sanctions or institutional reform.

Tumulty’s case is that many of Trump’s international goals have become symbolic or rhetorical rather than substantive. His expressions of power and intention are increasingly undercut by either institutional constraints or a gap between words and deeds. She argued that the movement built around him appears to be losing its distinctive force, not because he’s given up altogether, but because the arrangements and expectations that once sustained his foreign‑policy style are no longer working as advertised.

“I don’t think there’s a Trump doctrine. I don’t think he has a philosophy. I don’t think he does grand strategy. I don’t even think he does policy as that term is conventionally understood in Washington,” John Bolton, former U.N. ambassador under George W. Bush and national security adviser during Trump’s first term, told The Post.

“There isn’t any Trumpism that’s going to survive. It’s all about his interest and what he wants.”

The piece further noted: "For all of these swings back and forth, however, Trump remains focused on at least one international goal: the Nobel Peace Prize. Though a Washington Post-Ipsos poll indicated more than three-quarters of Americans think he doesn’t deserve one, he told the U.N. General Assembly that 'everyone says' he should receive the honor."

@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.