Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

More Than Marches: Growing Latino Power is all About the Demographics

By Joshua Hoyt, AlterNet. Posted May 12, 2008.


62 percent of the recent growth in the Latino population has been through births, not immigration.
Advertisement

Most of the people who know me think of me as a fiery activist for immigrant rights, but I would like to confess that I have a secret, quiet quirk.

I love demographers. Doug Massey of Princeton; Audrey Singer of Brookings; Dowell Myers of the University of Southern California; and Chicago's own Rob Paral of Notre Dame: Wow! Superstars and heroes, one and all!

I know that these demographers are an understated, tweedy sort of crew, and I doubt that they will ever make the cover of Rolling Stone. But I have discovered that they have a wondrous ability to shine a light on the future and, just as usefully for advocates and activists, they also can paint a road map for political extermination campaigns.

On Thursday, May 1, most of the television crews in the country were out filming the latest immigration marches. I was there myself in Chicago, enjoying the great parade and doing the rabble-rousing speaker thing. But that day, tucked in the inner folds of the nation's newspapers, the demographers were using their numbers to paint an even fuller picture of the future.

Between 2000 and 2007 the nation's Latino population grew from 35.7 million to 45.5 million, an impressive 27 percent jump. Even more significant was that, in the last two years, 62 percent of this growth has been through births, not immigration. In other words, to those who would rather that the newcomers just go home: Sorry. Too late. This is home!

Are these numbers a good thing or a bad thing? Well, like everything else, it depends.

Writing from my particular vantage point as a 52 year old baby boomer, these Latino numbers look pretty good. It turns out that the average white in America is 40.8 years old and the average Hispanic is 27.8 years old. Dowell Myers points out that currently there are some 23 seniors for every 100 workers. However in 20 years (when I am 72) the ratio will have changed drastically to 41 seniors for every 100 workers! The answer to the old Beatles song about who will feed me when I'm 64 is already clear -- Latino immigrants and their children. In addition, undocumented immigrants pay an estimated $7 -8 billion a year into the Social Security Trust Fund -- money they rarely collect -- and a recent report by the Social Security Administration credits them with reducing the long term deficit by 15 percent. Speaking as an aging boomer, these young Latinos look great to me.

But if I were a Republican politician, I might feel differently. Unfortunately for the GOP, it appears that the Republicans don't have a demographer on staff. They continue to allow their party to be defined by the anti-immigrant bellowing of the likes of Congressman Tom Tancredo or Jim Oberweis, for example. Oberweis is a national leader in the anti-immigrant movement who just lost what was considered the solidly Republican seat of former House Speaker Dennis Hastert. If millionaire Oberweis had used his fortune to buy himself a demographer, he might have been warned that the suburban Illinois district is over 29 percent immigrants and their children!

Demographer Rob Paral just released a report on the potential immigrant vote in California. He found that immigrants and their children are poised to become 1/3 of our nation's most populous state's voters. Just as significantly, these voters are a third of the electorate in twenty percent of California's Republican statehouse districts. A similar analysis by Paral a few years ago in Illinois drew a road map for political action for immigrant advocates. Since 2002 the Republicans in Illinois have lost seven statehouse seats and Hastert's Congressional seat in areas that have large concentrations of immigrants. New suburban Democrats have names like Hernandez, Crespo, and Chapa la Via.

But in Congress right now the Republican Party continues to bang the anti-immigrant drum, pushing for a vote on the Shuler - Tancredo SAVE Act, a harsh 'deportation first' immigration bill. They don't appear to have a staff demographer who can warn them about our nation's changing electorate -- for example the 1.4 million applications for citizenship last year, a jump of more than 100 percent over the previous year!

So until the GOP can acquire a vice similar to mine and finds a demographer to love, their numbers will continue to decline. It is a pity for them, really. Demographers could help them set good immigrant policy in education, identify good investments to be made in English learning, and find gaps in our workforce to be filled with strategic training.

Plus a really good demographer is a great thing for every politician, because they know how to count!

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: demographics, electorate, latinos, immigration

Joshua Hoyt is the Director of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Republicans have at least two demographers on staff
Posted by: war_on_tara on May 12, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their names are George W. Bush and John McCain. They count on socially conservative Latinos to vote Republican when they get rich enough, and to get all hopped up on the usual anti-abortion, anti-feminist and anti-gay Republican propaganda.

For someone who claims to be interested in demographics, this guy doesn't seem to know much about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sanity v. Hannity!
Posted by: Pico Pico on May 12, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for a sane piece that shares with all of us some basic facts about a real phenom shaping our tomorrow.

We have two choices. We can, like Tanton/Tancredo/Dobbs, etc., try to stop history. Or we can adapt and seize on demographical changes like these to formulate win/win public policies for all concerned.

Me, I'd far rather take the fence money being funneled to a few well-connected Republican corporatists and build a stronger democracy. I think it makes a whole lot more sense to capture the hearts and minds and souls of incoming Hispanics for freedom, democracy, and progress than it does to alienate them, infuriate them, and turn them into warriors in the jihadist threat to the USA.

The fact is that we need incoming workers for our economy to prosper. We also need a high-wage economy, a la New Deal, to have the prosperous middle class that formed "the greatest generation."

If we want more great generation types, we have to rebuild the place they came from. We'd better be using all that fence money and privatization plunder to fund free high-quality classic liberal arts public education for everyone, and to to revive strong, worker-centered fair labor practices for both guestworkers and native workers so that a healthy profit incentive doesn't become an imbalanced greed that plays one group off against the other.

Going again for a high-wage society directly undermines the disasters that NAFTA and outsourcing and the race to the bottom have created. Using our leverage politically, economically, and if necessary, militarily to create fair labor practices abroad stops the race to the bottom that we're all dying from now.

Therefore, these workplace and education strategies will help both to moderate the NAFTA-driven diaspora of Latinos unable to find work at home, and help to mold new immigrants and native-born folks alike into a promising new force for the future.

My, what can happen when policy is based on fact and not on rhetoric.

We really are all on this ball together. We might as well make it a clean, healthy, and prosperous place for everybody. We do have the means to do that. We just have to learn from the past the all too obvious fact that racist, imperialist, and elitist schemes don't work, but New Deal strategies do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just hispanics......
Posted by: paintchips on May 12, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This makes sense but at the same time I'm not Latino and immigration ranks pretty high up there in issues for me. In fact 2 of my native born white friends just voted for foster in an effort to beat Oberweis because of the immigration issue. I think simply concentrating on Hispanics greatly underestimates how much power this issue has in predicting the political landscape.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not just hispanics...... Posted by: chi-town-gal
» RE: Not just hispanics...... Posted by: Joshua Holland
Cold Hard Numbers
Posted by: kyledeb on May 12, 2008 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the cold hard numbers that no nativist/racist can dispute. Their hate can only last so long before the electorate makes them irrelevant.

In the meantime, we have to act now to end the suffering of migrants in the U.S.!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice Article... Question for Joshua Hoyt
Posted by: Mexitli on May 12, 2008 5:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you believe that whites and, in particular, white males will subject themselves to a majority "Latino" rule?

In other words, lets flip things around. Do you think that in the future white males will submit to a majority Hispanic rule the same way men like me are forced to submit to Anglo rule?

I believe they will not. I believe it will be them who opt for cession. Presently there are more than 2 dozen secessionist movements in the U.S.

I make this point because, as you know, it is the anti-migrant nativists that frequently raise the "Aztlan," Reconquista" conspiracy theories.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funny :)
Posted by: Mexitli on May 12, 2008 6:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, when I was in the Army and my buddies and I would go on leave and tour the south traveling from state to state. All my buddies were white guys and when we'd get to Tennessee the locals would say something like "watch you friend when you get to Alabama, they don't like brown peoples there." Then we'd get to Alabama and the locals would say "watch out for you friend in Mississippi, they don't like brown people there."

People are people. Folks is folks.

My dad was a white guy. He was German and Spanish. My mother was Chichimec> Zacatec. My granddaughter is so white she's pink :)

My son in law is a Nebraska corn farmer.

I grew up with white guys.

I don't hate white people.

I guess I just get butt hurt when it comes to all this anti-Meso-American sentiment and it makes me an a-hole sometimes.

-Dan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you really want to understand the issue...
Posted by: RegularAmerican on May 13, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want the truth...

you need to accept that our country can only grow and increase its international presence through an increased workforce. This workforce must be both skilled and unskilled labor, both of which we are lacking.

The problem is that, while our economy is suffering, we are also trying to push out the much needed labor our country's companies need. With immigrants ALSO comes more tax revenue and more industries. How many of the US's top Fortune 500 companies were started by immigrants?

We all need to read more about immigration instead of acting without
thinking. http://www.mshale.com/article.cfm?articleID=1446

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]