Belief

Right-wing Christians exposed in 'explosive report' detailing abuse

Religion News Service reports that the anti-LGBTQ, hyper conservative Anglican Church of North America is being hounded by new controversy connected to a troublemaking leader.

"Archbishop Steve Wood, who heads the Anglican Church of North America, faces allegations of sexual harassment, bullying and plagiarism, according to an explosive report released by The Washington Post on Thursday (Oct. 23)."

“I was in shock,” said former children’s ministry director Claire Buxton, who claims Wood tried to kiss her and later gave her more than $3,000 from church funds. “It’s just bizarre to me how far we — the Anglican Church in North America and its leadership — have gotten away from basic morals and principles.”

The young denomination was founded in 2009 after some 700 churches split from the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Church in Canada over a host of disagreements, including the acceptance of women priests, LGBTQ+ affirmation and the rewritten Book of Common Prayer.

Now the denomination is more known for a rector accusing Wood of preaching sermons he didn’t write, publicly cursing at colleagues and misusing a $60,000 truck provided by the diocese for church visits.

Buxton told reporters that Wood began acting inappropriately with her in 2021, repeatedly showering her with money, calling her “Claire Bear” and offering to send her to a luxury resort. Buxton said she was fearful Wood would attempt to start a physical relationship with her. When she confronted him, she claims Wood told her: “You know how special you are to me. You’re my favorite person in the world.” And when she got up to leave, she claims he put his hand against the back of her head and tried to kiss her.

This is not the denomination’s first shake-up, reports Religion News. In July 2021, a mother went public with allegations that Mark Rivera, a leader at Christ Our Light Anglican Church in Big Rock, Illinois, had sexually abused her 9-year-old daughter. And at least nine other people have shared grooming or sexual misconduct allegations against Rivera, who has since been convicted of felony sexual assault and felony child sexual assault.

“Additionally, more than 10 clergy and other lay leaders in the Upper Midwest diocese have been accused of misconduct as a result, and its bishop, Stewart Ruch, stood trial in a proceeding that concluded Oct. 15 — but not before two prosectors had resigned amid claims of procedural misconduct,” reports Religion News. “The church court’s order is expected on or before Dec. 16.”

Another bishop was defrocked in 2020 due to his use of adult content, and in 2024, another bishop, Todd Atkinson, was ousted for inappropriate relationships with women.

Read the Religion news report at this link.

Religious leaders mount 'moral counter' to Trump’s 'distortions of Christian values'

A coalition of Christians leaders are challenging President Donald Trump's approach to immigration, civil rights and poverty, saying his "distortions of Christian values sanctify exclusion and fear," according to Axios.

"Faith isn't owned by the Right," Rev. Eddie Anderson told Axios. "And God isn't a dirty word. God is the word."

Moderate faith leaders, Axios reports, are escorting immigrants to court hearings, blasting "rapid response" text alerts on sightings of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and leading vigils to try to prevent protest clashes.

These leaders are also calling their church members to stand up and speak out, too.

"We don't just pray for peace. We bring peace," Rev. Brendan Busse told Axios.

And while "conservative evangelical voters are a high-turnout, GOP-leaning bloc with clear spokespeople, tight message discipline and built-in media megaphones, from talk radio to megachurch stages," Axios says, moderate and progressive clergy have an opening.

"Moderate faith networks could give Democrats an opening to go after an estimated 15 million 'persuadable Christians,'" said Doug Pagitt, a pastor and executive director of the progressive Christian group Vote Common Good.

These religious leaders say they hope these "persuadable Christians" will join forces with them as they witness what the Trump administration is doing.

"People are bearing witness at prayer vigils and marches and processions. They're bearing witness in courthouses," PICO California executive director Joseph Tomás McKellar told Axios, adding that he hopes this new movement becomes "a political force rather than a partisan one."

The Trump administration has gone to great lengths to infuse a form of evangelical Christianity into the White House and the nation. In February 2025, Trump established a new White House Faith Office led by his longtime spiritual advisor, televangelist Paula White-Cain.

Cain has said that said that "Jesus would have been 'sinful' and not 'our Messiah' if he had broken immigration laws when fleeing persecution to Egypt as a baby with his family, as told in the Gospel of Matthew."

Moderate leaders like Dave Gibbons, lead pastor of multiethnic Newsong Church in Santa Ana, Calif., told Axios that those are distortions of Christian values that sanctify exclusion and fear.

"The Gospel's good news doesn't leave people out, especially the stranger," said Gibbons, adding that moderate and progressive Christians are countering MAGA's theology not with rallies, but with court side accompaniment, rapid responses and "the Beatitudes."

'Brainwashed': Inside the right-wing quest for more patriotic and Christian public schools

Reporting Highlights

  • Rightward Shift: Long before the Trump administration began pushing patriotic curricula and expanding private school choice, Oklahoma experimented with many of those conservative ideas.
  • Classroom Control: State law restricts how teachers handle lessons about racism and gender — and the materials they keep in their classrooms.
  • Pockets of Resistance: Some educators and parents have balked at the conservative movement in schools, with legal challenges slowing a number of mandates.

These highlights were written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.

The future that the Trump administration envisions for public schools is more patriotic, more Christian and less “woke.” Want to know how that might play out? Look to Oklahoma.

Oklahoma has spent the past few years reshaping public schools to integrate lessons about Jesus and encourage pride about America’s history, with political leaders and legislators working their way through the conservative agenda for overhauling education.

Academics, educators and critics alike refer to Oklahoma as ground zero for pushing education to the right. Or, as one teacher put it, “the canary on the prairie.”

By the time the second Trump administration began espousing its “America First” agenda, which includes the expansion of private school vouchers and prohibitions on lessons about race and sex, Oklahoma had been there, done that.

The Republican supermajority in the state Legislature — where some members identify as Christian nationalists — passed sweeping restrictions on teaching about racism and gender in 2021, prompting districts to review whether teachers’ lessons might make students “feel discomfort, guilt, anguish” or other psychological distress about their race. The following year, it adopted one of the country’s first anti-transgender school bathroom bills, requiring students to use restrooms and locker rooms consistent with the gender they were assigned at birth or face discipline.

While he was state schools superintendent, Ryan Walters demanded Bibles be placed in every classroom, created a state Office of Religious Liberty and Patriotism, and encouraged schools to use online “pro-America” content from conservative media nonprofit PragerU. He called teachers unions “terrorist” organizations, railed against “woke” classrooms, threatened to yank the accreditation of school districts that resisted his orders and commissioned a test to measure whether teacher applicants from liberal states had “America First” knowledge.

Many of the changes endorsed by the state’s leaders have elements of Christian nationalism, which holds that the United States was founded as a Christian nation and often downplays troubling episodes in the country’s history to instead emphasize patriotism and a God-given destiny.

Walters, who declined to comment for this story, resigned at the end of September and became CEO of the Teacher Freedom Alliance, an arm of the conservative think tank Freedom Foundation that aims to “fight the woke liberal union mob.” But much of the transformation in Oklahoma education policy that he helped turbocharge is codified in the state’s rules and laws.

“We are the testing ground. Every single state needs to pay attention,” warned Jena Nelson, a moderate Democrat who lost the state superintendent’s race to Walters in 2022 and is now running for Congress.

ProPublica has reported that Education Secretary Linda McMahon has brought in a team of strategists who are working to radically shift how children will learn in America, even as they carry out the “final mission” to shut down the federal agency. Some of those strategists have spoken of their desire to dismantle public education. Others hope to push it in the same direction as Oklahoma.

Walters tapped the president of The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank that published Project 2025 and the blueprints that preceded it, to help rewrite Oklahoma’s social studies standards. The Legislature did not reject the rewrite, so the standards now include roughly 40 points about the Bible, Jesus and Christianity that students should learn as well as skepticism about the 2020 presidential election results and the origins of COVID-19. If the new standards survive a legal challenge, they could be in place until they’re up for review again in six years.

But while Oklahoma made these shifts, it has consistently ranked near the bottom on national measures of student performance. Scores on eighth grade reading and math in national evaluations are abysmal. Only New Mexico’s proficiency rates rank lower. The high school dropout rate is one of the highest in the country, while spending on education is one of the lowest. Only three other states — Utah, Idaho and Arizona — spend less per pupil. And in the most recent federal data about average teacher pay, Oklahoma tied with Mississippi for dead last. Many school superintendents and parents say state leaders have been fixated on the wrong things if the goal is to improve schools.

“The attention to the culture war thing means that there’s a lot of distraction from the basic needs of kids being met,” said Aysha Prather, a parent who has closely followed changes in state education policy. Her transgender son is a plaintiff in a 2022 lawsuit challenging the state’s bathroom ban. That case remains on appeal.

“The school should be the nicest, happiest, best resourced place in a community,” she added. “That’s how we show that we value kids. And that is obviously not how most of our Legislature or state government feels about it.”

In a statement to ProPublica, the new state superintendent, Lindel Fields, said that he’s sorting through previous rules and edicts that have created “much confusion” for schools, including about the standards and the PragerU teacher certification tests. He said the public rightfully has questions about how the state Education Department changes after Walters’ tenure, but “given all these pressing tasks, we simply don’t have time for looking backward. Whether we are 50th or 46th or 25th in education, we have work to do to move our state forward,” Fields wrote. He said his first tasks are “resolving a number of outstanding issues that are hindering operations” including creating a budget for the agency.

Public school superintendents do not oppose all of the mandates from the past several years. When Walters directed schools last year to place Bibles in every classroom and teach from them, one district superintendent emailed to thank him for offering “cover” to incorporate Bible-focused lessons, according to news reports.

Another superintendent, Tommy Turner of Battiest Public Schools, said students at his schools have always had access to the Bible. The district still puts on a Christmas program and observes a moment of silence to start the day, and the school board prays before meetings.

“Christ never left the school,” he said in an interview in his office.

A lifelong Republican who works in a remote stretch of southeast Oklahoma, Turner said he is concerned about the state’s priorities and doesn’t see Bibles as the most pressing issues.

In his district, the cafeteria needs repairs even after the emergency replacement of a roof that had a gaping hole in it. Many of his teachers work second jobs on weekends because the pay’s so low. Nail heads are poking through the gym’s thin hardwood floors. The district has lost 15% of its students to an online charter school and homeschooling. Voters have rejected three bond issues in a row for building repairs and renovations.

Turner said he’d like to retire, but he loves the students and wants to protect his little district. He put on his cowboy hat, apologized for the pile of dead wasps on his office floor — the infestations barely register anymore — and walked over to the high school. He said he hadn’t even read the new social studies standards.

“I don’t have time to chase every rabbit,” he said. “I’ve got a school to run.”

Patriotism and Jesus

The changes to Oklahoma’s curriculum rules don’t just touch on national issues around race and gender. Here, teachers aren’t supposed to tell students that the Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921 — a defining incident of racial violence in Oklahoma history — was perpetrated by racists.

State social studies standards for years have included discussion of how white Tulsans murdered as many as 300 Black people. But once the 2021 state law that restricted teaching about race and gender passed, some teachers avoided the topic.

The law prohibits teachers from singling out specific racial groups as responsible for past racism. It specifies that individuals of a certain race shouldn’t be portrayed as inherently racist, “whether consciously or unconsciously.” In addition to teachers’ licensure being on the line, repeated failure to comply would allow the state to revoke district accreditation, which could result in a state takeover.

When educators questioned how to teach about a race massacre without running afoul of the law, state legislators and the Tulsa County chapter of the conservative parent group Moms for Liberty weighed in to say that white people today shouldn’t feel shame and that the massacre’s perpetrators shouldn’t be cast as racists. A Moms for Liberty chapter representative did not respond to questions from ProPublica.

At a speaking engagement at the Norman Public Library in 2023, Walters suggested teachers present the facts about the murders but should not say “the skin color determined it.” Even two years after the law went into effect, news reports said teachers were still treading lightly on the race massacre, wary of the state suspending or revoking their licenses for exposing students to prohibited concepts. Those fears are not hypothetical; the state has revoked at least one teacher’s license and suspended two others’.

Other historic episodes that reveal racism also are getting a new look in Oklahoma through the state’s partnership with PragerU Kids, which creates short-form videos to counter what its founder believes is left-wing ideology in schools.

Teachers in the state aren’t required to use the videos, but some like them and show them in class. The videos align with conservatives’ push to teach a positive view of America’s past and with the state’s rules on teaching about race and gender. For instance, PragerU Kids’ version of Booker T. Washington’s story is a cheery lesson in self-sufficiency and acceptance. Once freed from slavery, Washington toiled in coal mines, worked as a janitor in exchange for formal education and became a great American orator and leader of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama.

The video does not linger on his being born into “the most miserable, desolate and discouraging surroundings” or, as he wrote in his autobiography, that slavery was “a sin that at some time we shall have to pay for.”

“America was one of the first places on Earth to outlaw slavery,” a cartoon version of Washington tells two time-traveling children in the PragerU video, so “I am proud and thankful.” (The U.S. did ban importing slaves in 1808, but it did not enforce that law and did not outlaw owning people altogether until 1865, after Britain, Denmark, France and Spain had done so.)

The Washington character says in the video that he devoted his life to teaching people “the importance of independence and making themselves as valuable as possible.” And when one child says she’s sorry that he and other Black Americans faced segregation and discrimination, Washington thanks her for her sympathy but assures the child, who is white, that she’s done nothing wrong.

Echoing a conservative talking point, the cartoon Washington says, “Future generations are never responsible for the sins of the past.”

Jermaine Thibodeaux, a historian at the University of Oklahoma, said he is familiar with the PragerU videos and considers them an ideological tool of a “reeducation project nationwide” that can be misleading.

“I don’t think that’s something Washington necessarily uttered,” he said of the quote about future generations.

The value Washington placed on independence, Thibodeaux added, was “predicated on the notions of self-sufficiency post-slavery, when there was little help coming from the government.”

A spokesperson for PragerU declined to comment for this story.

Pressure to keep squeezing social justice and LGBTQ+ issues out of classrooms has been intensifying since 2021, when Republican state lawmakers began pushing “dirty book” legislation that would censor school libraries. One bill, which didn’t pass, called for firing school employees and fining offenders $10,000 each time they “promoted positions in opposition to closely held religious beliefs of the student.” That was the backdrop when the state accused Summer Boismier of “moral turpitude” and then revoked her teaching license last year.

The English department at Norman High School near Oklahoma City told Boismier and her colleagues they needed to pull titles that might be considered racially divisive or contain themes about sex and gender. Or they could turn books around on the shelves so students couldn’t see the titles.

“I remember just sitting in my seat shaking. I had colleagues in the room who were in tears,” Boismier said. Given the choice to purge books or hide their covers, Boismier did neither. She wrapped her classroom’s bookshelf in red butcher paper and wrote “books the state doesn’t want you to read” on it in black marker. She added a QR code linking to the Brooklyn Public Library, where students could get a library card and virtual access to books considered inappropriate in Oklahoma, then posted a photo of it all on social media.

Boismier, who resigned in protest of the 2021 law, challenged the license revocation in court, and the case is ongoing. She said she does not regret taking a stand against a law she views as unjust. The state has argued the revocation is valid.

“I am living every teacher in Oklahoma’s worst nightmare right now,” she said. “I am unemployable.”

In the Battiest district, where Turner is superintendent, an elementary reading teacher told ProPublica that just to be safe, she removed books about diversity and including others who are different. She said that was uncomfortable; half of her students are Native American, and so is she.

Adopted this year, the state’s new social studies standards provide even more specifics about what should be taught. They include the expectation that students know “stories from Christianity that influenced the American Founders and culture, including the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (e.g., the ‘Golden Rule,’ the Sermon on the Mount),” to second graders. A state court last month issued a temporary stay on requiring schools to follow the standards while a lawsuit against them plays out.

In addition, the new standards accept Trump’s false claims about the 2020 election. They dictate that ninth graders learn about “discrepancies” in election results including “the sudden halting of ballot-counting in select cities in key battleground states, the security risks of mail-in balloting, sudden batch dumps, an unforeseen record number of voters” and other unsupported conservative talking points. The Trump campaign and supporters filed at least 60 lawsuits covering these points; nearly all were dismissed as meritless or were decided against Trump. The election skepticism standard has left the superintendent of a roughly 2,000-student district north of Tulsa confused. He said he and other superintendents are unsure how they would navigate those but are hopeful that “standards rooted in fact prevail.”

“There comes a point where curriculum cannot be opinion,” said the superintendent, who didn’t want to be named because he feared retaliation. “I’m not trying to get involved in conspiracy theories.”

Fear and Resistance

The push by state leaders to embed more Christian values in schools isn’t what keeps many superintendents in the rural parts of the state up at night. They say the Bible has never left their classrooms.

“I am smack-dab right in the middle of the Bible Belt,” said the leader of a tiny district on the western side of the state. “We are small, but we have seven churches. You’re talking ‘Footloose’ here.”

While she doesn’t disagree with everything the Legislature and Walters have done, she said she feels like some of their actions undermine public schools and could “shut down rural Oklahoma.”

She and other leaders of public school districts worry that the state’s expanded school choice program, which allows families to get tax credits if they attend private and religious schools, will draw away students from their districts and, ultimately, erode their funding. Congress passed the first federal private school tax credit in July.

It’s just the second year of the statewide tax credit program approved by the Legislature that allows students to use public funds to attend private and religious schools. The credits cost the state nearly $250 million in tax revenue this school year and subsidizes almost 40,000 students. That money, superintendents say, is desperately needed in their districts.

The state also has encouraged the growth of charter schools, which are publicly funded but privately run and subject to fewer regulations. Last year, the state’s third-largest district, behind the Oklahoma City and Tulsa districts, wasn’t a traditional one. It was EPIC, a statewide online charter school. Walters and Gov. Kevin Stitt supported St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School in its efforts to become the country’s first religious charter school. The Supreme Court blocked it from opening.

Even communities with few private schools feel threatened by the state’s push toward privatization. At Nashoba Public School, in a rural part of southeast Oklahoma where there’s little else but timber and twisting roads, the roughly 50 kids who make up the elementary and middle grades are taught in split-grade classrooms. Like hundreds of other Oklahoma districts, more than three-quarters of which are rural, it’s not just a school, it’s the school; there are no private schools in Pushmataha County.

When students enroll in charter schools, they often take funding with them while districts have to maintain operations as before.

“You starve your public schools to feed your private schools and charter schools,” said Nashoba Superintendent Charles Caughern Jr. “Our foundation was set up for a free and appropriate education for all kids. All kids!”

Caughern fears students with disabilities will suffer as public schools are weakened. Private schools don’t have to admit students with disabilities, and many won’t, he said.

Erika Wright, a parent who leads the Oklahoma Rural Schools Coalition, which advocates for public schools, said the state’s deep-red politics might lead outsiders to think Oklahomans support state leaders pushing education far to the right. But that’s not the case, Wright said.

“They don’t understand what’s happening,” Wright said. “They just assume that public schools are always going to be there because they’ve always been there in their lifetime. I think the average Oklahoman does not understand the gravity and complexity of what is taking place.”

That’s not to say there isn’t resistance. A group of about 15 parents and public school advocates that Walters derided as the “woke peanut gallery” goes to State Board of Education meetings — a visual reminder that people care about education policy and public schools. A suburban Oklahoma City district is devising plans to deliver all of the Bible lessons contained in the new social studies standards on the same day, giving parents an easy way to have their children opt out. Court challenges to some of the state’s right-wing policies are pending.

Some are hopeful that Oklahoma will recalibrate the more extreme policies that marked Walters’ tenure. The State Board of Education last week decided not to revoke the licenses of two teachers who Walters wanted punished for their social media posts about Trump. The new superintendent said he would drop Walters’ plan to distribute Bibles to every classroom.

But many of the significant changes in classrooms came out of the Legislature, which has continued this year to propose bills to rid schools of “inappropriate materials” and proclaim that, in Oklahoma, “Christ is King.” A lot of damage already has been done to public schools, said Turner, the Battiest superintendent.

He was only half-joking when he said some parents have been “brainwashed” by right-wing TV news and Oklahoma leaders’ talk of liberal indoctrination to think the district is teaching kids to be gay or converting Christian kids into atheists.

A couple of years ago, one mom stopped him in the parking lot at school to say she was withdrawing her child from the district because its teaching didn’t align with her values. The superintendent was floored.

“That’s the power of the rhetoric,” Turner said.

He said he used to sit a couple of pews behind that mom in church every Sunday.

Megan O’Matz and Asia Fields contributed reporting.

'Thank God we’re rich': How Megachurches are using the Bible to justify wealth inequality

Does religion drive Americans to support or oppose economic inequality? That’s a question explored by a Ph.D. candidate at The Ohio State University who recently examined ten years of a megachurch’s sermons in a published paper: “‘I Thank God We’re Rich’: Justifying Economic Inequality in an Evangelical Congregation.”

“To investigate how evangelical leaders confront the conflict between inequality and egalitarian passages of the Bible, I conducted a sermon analysis study of New River, a Midwestern suburban megachurch,” wrote Dawson P. R. Vosburg.

“New River’s approach to inequality was one of clear justification of the status quo, centered on the justification of wealth accumulation and the minimization of inequality’s moral importance,” Vosburg added.

The church’s pastors, he found, “justified economic inequality in several ways: proclaiming that God did not condemn ownership of vast wealth; minimizing domestic inequality in comparison to global inequality; selectively spiritualizing economic passages of the Bible; and saying that God owns everything and thus the status quo distribution is justified.”

Hemant Mehta of The Friendly Atheist examined the paper. He writes that Vosburg found sermons “that discussed anything financial—by searching for terms like ‘rich,’ ‘tithe,’ ‘debt,’ ‘billionaire,’ etc.—and analyzed the results to see how this typical white evangelical megachurch minimized the wealth gap.” He also noted that Vosburg anonymized the name of the church.

Mehta looked at the four ways New River downplayed wealth inequality:

“They condemned ‘rich shaming’ anyone”
The pastor, Mehta found, “delivered an anecdote about a rich couple that left another church and came to his because they felt personally attacked when their previous pastor condemned wealth from the pulpit. (At their new home, of course, their tithes would go into New River’s coffers.)”

“They downplayed U.S. inequality by focusing on global inequality”
Essentially, pastors told congregants that compared to the world’s poor, they were doing quite well.

“They re-interpreted Bible verses about poverty—even the direct ones”
When it comes to preaching about the poor, Mehta wrote, the pastor was “not talking about financially poor people, he’s talking about spiritually impoverished people.”

Vosburg told Mehta that pastors stressed tithing “over 150 times across 16 separate sermons.”

“They said God owns everything, anyway”
Ultimately, Mehta explained, the pastor’s point was to not be mad “at people with private jets and yachts and multiple summer homes.”

“The takeaway from all this,” Mehta wrote, “is that conservative policies that benefit the ultra-wealthy at the expense of everyone else in society are going to be supported by congregations like this one that are being brainwashed into thinking God loves the rich and the poor deserve their lot in life.”

Mehta also blasted the New River pastor.

“Pastors like this one hollow out Christ’s teachings until all that’s left is a gilded throne for the wealthy. In their hands, Scripture is a weapon to shame the poor, a shield to protect billionaires, and a drug to keep their congregations quiet while the cancer of inequality grows around them.”

'Hate thy neighbor': Mike Johnson’s fundamental misunderstanding of 'biblical principles' revealed

In the days leading up to the No Kings protests of Saturday, October 18, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) attacked the gatherings as "Hate America rallies" that would be dominated by a combination of Antifa agitators, Hamas supporters, and far-left communists. But the protests, which attracted millions of participants nationwide, were considerably different from what Johnson predicted.

Expressing their opposition to President Donald Trump's policies, the demonstrators ranged from centrist Democrats to democratic socialists to liberals to right-wing Never Trump conservatives and libertarians. Conservative attorney George Conway, a Never Trumper and veteran of the right-wing legal movement, marched in the No Kings protest in Washington, D.C.

The New Republic's Michael Tomasky, in an article published on October 20, argues that Johnson's comments about the protesters show a fundamental lack of understanding about the U.S. population.

Tomasky explains, "It was one thing to distort the intent and nature of these rallies in the run-up to them by saying they were for violent terrorists who despise the United States of America…. But by late afternoon Saturday, the events had happened; the smaller ones like mine finished in the early afternoon…. There was no violence at all. Seven million people attended. There were American flags everywhere. The rallies were the very definition of patriotism: People who love their country and want to do what they can to save it from tyranny."

Johnson, Tomasky notes, "spent the days leading up to the rallies saying they were essentially going to be (George) Soros-backed terrorist gatherings."

"Last Friday," Tomasky writes, "Johnson said, 'You're going to bring together the Marxists, the socialists, the Antifa advocates, the anarchists, and the pro-Hamas wing of the far-left Democratic Party'…. He should be ashamed of himself. He should also have gone to one of the rallies in his congressional district — there appear to have been three of them, and two more right nearby — and seen for himself the flags and the 'I love my country' signs and talked to some of the good and decent people from all walks of life who attended."

Johnson and "others of his Trumpist ilk," Tomasky laments, showed that they "truly understand nothing about the United States of America."

"They think this is a Christian nation," Tomasky observes. "They want a country based on 'biblical principles.' I'm not sure which biblical principles he means. The biblical principles I was taught as a young Episcopalian were to love thy neighbor as thyself, be compassionate toward the poor and needy, treat the stranger among you with love, and don't ever lie. The principles Johnson follows as a legislator are hate thy neighbor, to hell with the poor and needy, throw strangers in detention camps, and worship a man who lies every time he opens his mouth…. And no, the United States is not a Christian nation and was never intended to be."

Michael Tomasky's full article for The New Republic is available at this link.

Religious leaders infuriated by Eric Trump claim his father is 'saving' Christianity

President Donald Trump's son Eric is now claiming that his father has saved Christianity and is "saving God," according to the Christian Post's Ryan Foley.

These latest claims come following a series of bizarre claims by the president's third child, who most recently claimed his "father was guided by God," and "saving humanity."

Trump, Foley writes, has credited a higher power for his father's notoriety.

"He made my father a household name to all of America," Trump said recently, adding "I think my father was also the imperfect man,” he added. “That’s exactly how the Bible worked.”

Trump also noted that his father has had “multiple wives” before saying that the Bible contains several examples of how “the unconventional imperfect person was the person who was actually always chosen to actually save kind of humanity.”

Following his father's admission that he's "not Heaven bound," Trump balked, saying, "Make no mistake, he is Heaven-bound," adding that he's "seen the hand of God" on his father often, pointing to the 2024 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania.

“We’re saving Christianity, we’re saving God, we’re saving the family unit," Trump said on a conservative podcast, adding, “We have a return to people going to church, … valuing their children and valuing society and believing in the white picket fence and what the American dream represents."

These claims come as religious leaders say that his father is actually doing the opposite, preventing freedom of worship with his harsh immigration policies that are keeping worshippers away from houses of worship out of fear, calling Trump's promise to make America beacon of religious freedom a "sham."

"Eric Trump’s comments, I think, fail to appreciate that Christianity predates the Trump administration. Christianity, of course, does not need saving," said David Closson, director of the Family Research Council’s Center for Biblical Worldview in an interview with The Christian Post.

"American Christians shouldn’t be looking to any administration for what only God Himself can do. And so, I think that’s important for Christians to understand,” Closson said.

How MAGA’s 'religious revolution' masks a 'Christian call for vengeance': conservative

Conservative journalist David French, in his New York Times columns, has often stressed that religion — including Christianity — plays a valuable role in American life. But in his October 16 column, the Never Trump conservative offers a grim critique on the state of U.S. Christianity almost nine months into President Donald Trump's second term.

French, on one hand, laments that many Americans are still turned off to religion in 2025. But he also fears that MAGA converts to evangelical Christianity are embracing a mean-spirited view of faith.

"Despite what you may have heard about the renewal of interest in religion in America," French explains, "we are not experiencing a true revival, at least not yet. Instead, America is closer to a religious revolution, and the difference between revolution and revival is immensely important for the health of our country — and of the Christian church in America. At this point, it's almost beyond debate that something important is stirring in American religion. There is too much data — and too many anecdotes — to ignore."

French argues that "as a Christian who has long lamented the decline of church attendance in the United States," he "should be very happy about" a growing interest in religion on college campuses. But he is worried about MAGA's role in these conversions.

"There is darkness right alongside the light," the conservative columnist warns. "Christians stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Christians have believed and applauded dark prophecies that compare Donald Trump to Jehu, a murderous Old Testament king who commanded the slaughter of the previous queen, Jezebel, and had the severed heads of the previous king's sons brought to him in baskets. Incredibly, Christians are attacking what they call the 'sin of empathy,' warning fellow believers against identifying too much with, say, illegal immigrants, gay people or women who seek abortions. Empathy, in this formulation, can block moral and theological clarity. What's wrong is wrong, and too much empathy will cloud your soul."

French continues, "There was the ReAwaken America tour that crisscrossed America during Joe Biden's presidency, during which angry Christians called for vengeance at sold-out venues from coast to coast. And, as I wrote last month, the (Charlie) Kirk memorial itself mixed calls for love — most notably, Erika Kirk's decision to forgive her husband's killer — with the Trump administration's explicit hate."

French finds the us-versus-them rhetoric of MAGA evangelicals especially troubling.

"Revival begins with the people proclaiming, by word and deed, 'I have sinned,'" French writes. "MAGA Christianity has a different message. It looks at American culture and declares, 'You have sinned.' And it doesn't stop there. It also says, 'We will defeat you.' In its most extreme forms, it also says, 'We will rule over you.' That's not revival; it’s revolution, a religious revolution that seeks to overthrow one political order and replace it with another — one that has echoes of the religious kingdoms of ages past."

David French's full New York Times column is available at this link (subscription required).

Minister warns Trump pledge to make America a 'beacon for religious liberty' is 'a sham'

President Donald Trump's promise to transform America into a "beacon for religious liberty" is "a sham," writes Liz Reiner Platt and Rev. Fred Davie in Salon.

Platt, a legal expert specializing in religious freedom, and Davie, a Presbyterian minister and former vice chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, say they are "gravely concerned about how the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant agenda is undermining our nation’s founding promise of religious liberty."

For over 30 years, a “sensitive locations” policy has restricted immigration enforcement activities at houses of worship, religious ceremonies, hospitals and schools, they explain, but Trump revoked that policy the day he took office, enabling "ICE agents to surveil and arrest people as they worship."

The authors also cite incidences of immigration agents seizing people seeking asylum after escaping religious persecution, and Republican leaders opening investigations into religious nonprofits that serve migrants — "baselessly suggesting that the organizations are only serving them to enrich their own coffers or, even more outrageously, engage in money laundering."

"All of these attacks have created a culture of fear that is further crushing religious liberty," they write, saying people have stopped going to houses of worship because they are afraid of being "confronted by ICE."

"Slowly but surely, this is weakening fellowship and community bonds — the hallmarks of many religious groups," they say.

But the authors say they are encouraged by history that has shown these persecutions can indeed be thwarted.

"We are well-equipped to meet today’s moment if we learn from this history. Many groups are already applying these lessons by engaging in protest, preaching, advocacy, direct support and litigation to fight for their immigrant neighbors," they write. "This includes championing our First Amendment right to worship freely."

They also advocate for using the legal system "to the best of our ability," and for more people to come forward to protect these rights.

"We need people with power and resources to vocally support and materially protect migrants. History shows that defending targeted communities requires us to emphatically reject fear-mongering and to provide the resources they need to stay safe," they say.

Many faith communities are stepping up, they say, but there needs to be more.

"We proudly support the prospect of a nation where everyone can worship freely. Unfortunately, if Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda continues, we’ll never achieve that vision," they write.

How 'narcissist' Trump makes 'God's plan' all about himself

During his second presidency, Donald Trump has been making a lot of humorous comments about the afterlife — often with a favorable response from his far-right white evangelical base.

Many evangelicals love it when Trump makes comments like "I think I'm not maybe heaven-bound" and "I'm not sure I'm going to be able to make heaven" — which, they say, really shows his humanity. Although Trump is a billionaire, quite a few white evangelicals contend, he isn't afraid to admit that he's a sinner just like them.

But journalist Will Saletan, in an article published by the conservative website The Bulwark, has a very different take on Trump's "heaven" comments.

Saletan argues that when "narcissist" Trump talks about religion, his comments are self-serving and underscore the fact that to Trump, anything and everything is about him.

"He envisions his parents in the afterlife — speculating that they 'made heaven,' as though it's an elite college or a country club — but the point of the story is always that 'they're looking down on me," Saletan observes. "Trump is a narcissist. He's interested in God only as an endorser, benefactor, or tool in his own career. He suggests that God helped him win the presidential elections in 2016 and 2024. He says if God, instead of those cheating Democrats, were to count the ballots, Trump would win California, too."

Saletan continues, "As to the 2020 election, which Trump still insists was stolen, he says that, too, was part of God's plan. Speaking last month to the White House Religious Liberty Commission, he gloated, 'You had some very bad people who rigged an election, and look what happened: I end up getting the Olympics, the World Cup, and the 250th anniversary of the United States. It's amazing the way God works, isn't it? It's amazing.'"

The Bulwark journalist laments that to Trump, "altruism" is "a baffling, alien concept he associates with 'suckers' and 'losers.'"

"Trump never sounds like he really believes in this afterlife," Saletan observes. "But the possibility of it — and the knowledge that at 79, he's running out of other options —clearly weighs on him."

Will Saletan's full article for The Bulwark is available at this link.

MAGA’s 'nonsense' obsession growing increasingly unhinged: analysis

After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Republican then-President George W. Bush made it clear that he didn't blame Islam in general for al-Qaeda's violence. Bush described Islam as a "great religion," drawing a clear distinction between non-violent Muslims and Islamist terrorism.

But fear-mongering over Islamist "Shariah law" is common on the far right. Former Rep. Michelle Bachman (R-Minnesota) was obsessed with "Shariah law" during Barack Obama's presidency, and according to MSNBC's Steve Benen, this obsession persists among MAGA Republicans in 2025.

In his October 14 column, Benen explains, "Younger readers might not be aware of this, but between 2011 and 2015, the threat of 'creeping Sharia law' became quite common in far-right circles, before eventually getting picked up by some Republicans eager to score points with the most rabid elements of the GOP base. Newt Gingrich, for example, included an anti-Sharia provisions in his 2012 presidential platform."

Benen continues, "The basic idea behind this paranoid nonsense was that Americans needed to fear the demise of the separation of church and state, which would give way to the imposition of Islamic rules on the public against Americans’ will. State-sanctioned Sharia law did not and does not exist — at least not in this country — and the idea that government officials would impose Sharia on the populace was obviously silly. But at the time, too many Republicans and their allies took all of this quite seriously, as part of a bizarre campaign to scare people and turn Muslim Americans into a threat in need of government action."

The "Rachel Maddow Show" producer cites Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Alabama), and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) as some of the MAGA Republicans who are trying to scare their voters by claiming, without evidence, that "Shariah law" is making inroads in the United States.

"The fact that this anti-Sharia nonsense is apparently back suggests that the GOP's existing list of boogeymen isn't delivering the kind of results the party wants to see," Benen argues. "So at least some Republicans are turning back the clock, pointing anew to an old threat that still does not exist."

Steve Benen's full MSNBC column is available at this link.

Breaking the rod: How the 'Christian parenting empire' misuses scripture

A new book has debunked many evangelical Christian parenting methods, including corporal punishment, arguing that they are not as biblically grounded or effective as their proponents claim.

In The Myth of Good Christian Parenting: How False Promises Betrayed a Generation of Evangelical Families, authors Marissa Franks Burt and Kelsey Kramer McGinnis argued that the Christian Parenting Empire — a network of influential figures and ministries — has marketed rigid discipline strategies as divinely ordained, despite evidence of their harm.

Religious News Service noted in an article published Sunday that the book critiques the widespread endorsement of corporal punishment, highlighting its prevalence in evangelical circles.

"Spanking is just one feature of what Burt and Kramer McGinnis call the 'Christian Parenting Empire,' an interconnected movement of evangelical authors and ministry leaders who’ve marketed their rigid parenting methods as God-endorsed. Citing the Bible, these leaders teach that instant obedience, corporal punishment, conformity and hierarchical family structures will guarantee faithful children," the article reads.

In an interview with the outlet, Burt and Kramer McGinnis challenged the theological justification for such practices, questioning the conflation of penal substitutionary atonement with parenting methods.

They argued that this misapplication of theology leads to harmful discipline practices that overlook children's humanity and individuality.

The authors also discussed the impact of these parenting methods on families, noting that many parents, influenced by authoritative figures like James Dobson, have adopted practices that prioritize obedience over emotional connection.

This approach, they stated, has led to relational damage and spiritual harm for both parents and children.

"Claiming something as biblical is claiming that it’s timeless and applicable for everyone, for all time. The authors and speakers in this genre claim you can extrapolate these timeless rules that will get you the results you want. New converts or overwhelmed new parents became particularly vulnerable to this. It displaces parental intuition, parental experience and an opportunity for parents to turn to other sources," Burt said.

Burt and Kramer McGinnis also called for a reevaluation of what constitutes biblical parenting, advocating for approaches that emphasize mutual respect, emotional safety, and authenticity in family relationships.

Fundamentalist evangelicals may be driving MAGA’s 'old-fashioned Protestant temperance'

Although President Donald Trump is known for consuming copious amounts of Diet Coke and food from McDonald's, one thing he doesn't consume is alcohol. Trump points to his late brother Fred Trump Jr.'s battle with alcoholism as a key factor in his disdain for alcohol.

Trump, who was raised Presbyterian in Queens, is not an evangelical. But far-right white evangelicals are among his most ardent supporters. And according to reporting by journalist J. Oliver Conroy in The Guardian, the influence of evangelical "Christian nationalists" may be driving a teetotaler trend in the MAGA movement.

Although many Catholics and Mainline Protestants believe that moderate alcohol consumption is OK, alcohol is considered a sin in quite a few fundamentalist evangelical churches.

"Perhaps this is another manifestation of the cult of personality around Donald Trump, a Diet Coke enthusiast," Conroy reports in an article published on October 9. "Maybe the rising tide of Christian nationalism has revived an old-fashioned Protestant temperance. Or perhaps red-blooded right-wingers, eager to 'Make America Healthy Again,' are eschewing beer, barbecues and bourbon to become the sort of smoothie-drinking health nuts they might once have mocked."

Conroy continues, "Prominent right-wing or right-adjacent abstainers include Trump himself, whose older brother died of alcoholism-related heart attack; Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has spoken about his own substance problems; Tucker Carlson, a recovering alcoholic; and the activist Charlie Kirk for health reasons. (Vice President) JD Vance drinks, but his predecessor Mike Pence, a devout born-again Christian, did not. Joe Rogan, the podcaster and gym-bro whisperer who endorsed Trump in 2024, quit drinking this year for health reasons."

According to "War Room" host Steve Bannon, many of his Gen-Z employees are teetotalers.

Bannon told The Guardian, "None of my core team (of colleagues) under 30 drinks."

According to Gen-Xer and former Fox News host Carlson, 2025's young Republicans are way more health-conscious than their counterparts of the past.

Carlson told The Guardian, "I'm just from a different world. When I was 25, the health question was 'filter or non-filter?' And I always went with non-filter."

Read J. Oliver Conroy's full article for The Guardian at this link.

'Biblical jabberwocky': How Trump’s 'prosperity gospel hucksterism' is robbing his followers blind

President Donald Trump, who sees himself as "a preacher for the white Christian church of MAGA" is taking his "messianic" far-right movement to the bank, writes Salon's Chauncey DeVega.

Although America has had religious presidents before — Presidents Biden, George W. Bush, and Clinton have all expressed some form of piety — Trump is different, as seen in a recent fundraising email sent to his supporters, DeVega says.

"Never before has a president sent an appeal steeped in Christian nationalism," DeVega writes, "promising that 'the fight to restore America’s foundation of FAITH, FAMILY, and FREEDOM is just beginning,' and requesting that, 'if you can afford it, chip in and show the Radical Left that we will NEVER surrender…we’ll RESTORE the values that made America GREAT.'"

"Trump closed his sermon-like email with a familiar evangelical pitch," DeVega says. "By giving money, supporters will be," in his own words, "sowing a SEED OF FAITH into the future of our nation."

The president's sales pitch continues, saying, "The Bible tells us faith as small as a mustard seed can move mountains."

“But if you cannot give right now, I want you to know this: your PRAYERS, your FAITH, your SUPPORT are worth more than all the gold in the world. With God as our refuge, and with YOU by my side, we will SAVE AMERICA," it adds.

DeVega says that "to outsiders — and especially non-evangelicals — Trump’s religious appeals may sound like biblical jabberwocky, absurd and surreal. But for the MAGA faithful and much of White Christian America, such sermons and promises hold real power."

That power, DeVega writes, taps directly into the wallets of Trump's most loyal followers.

"Like Trump’s attempt to hawk MAGA Bibles for a profit, the appeal to ‘sowing a seed of faith’ also copies the tactics of the worst of white evangelical prosperity gospel hucksterism, where God is a kind of divine slot machine,” said Robert P. Jones, author and president and founder of Public Religion Research Institute.

DeVega agrees, saying that "as a master marketer and performer, Trump understands the psychology and needs of his followers and how to manipulate them for maximum effect. His sermonizing and role as MAGA preacher are extensions of that power."

With MAGA viewing Trump as a messiah of sorts, his sermons become a shell game, and, according to Jones, there is "no level below which the Trump political campaign will not stoop to manipulate his followers or raise money.”

“You invest your dollars — not with God directly of course but with an authority claiming to be a conduit to God — and if you have enough faith, that investment will pay out, sprouting into health, wealth, and happiness,” Jones said.

Katherine Stewart, author of the book “Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy,” calls Trump's email "another fleecing operation" describing his fundraising efforts as “a pretty good example of how Christian nationalism works, why it is bad for the country, and why it has little to do with Christianity as most Americans understand the faith.”

DeVega says Trump's base will "not abandon him," despite the fact that "Trumpism is a form of religious politics where faith, emotions, culture, storytelling, disinformation, misinformation and conspiracism dominate."

Matthew Taylor, author of “The Violent Take it by Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy,” compares Trump's religious appeal to "the tropes of old-school televangelism," making Trump the "chosen ... vessel for America's redemption."

“All of this baptizes Trump’s authoritarianism and tells his base that Trump has to crush his enemies because they are filled with demons and are trying to thwart God’s agenda,” Taylor says.

“This is how you get church-going, Bible-believing Christians — who claim to follow a sacrificial savior who taught them to love their enemies — to hate their LGBTQ neighbors, to be terrified of migrants and ‘the Left’ and to unquestioningly support a wannabe tyrant. These are the voters who will likely never abandon Trump, because their attachment to him is not merely political; it’s religious," Taylor says.

'Truly horrendous': MAGA melts down at 'awful' Pope Leo XIV for denouncing Trump policy

In a rare moment of direct commentary on American politics, Pope Leo XIV ignited a firestorm among conservative Catholics and MAGA-aligned figures after defending Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich’s decision to honor longtime Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill) — a pro-choice Democrat — for his decades of public service.

Speaking to reporters at the Vatican on Tuesday night, Pope Leo XIV called for a broader, more consistent interpretation of Catholic social teaching, particularly around what it means to be "pro-life."

“I think that is very important to look at the overall work that this Senator has done during, if I'm not mistaken, 40 years of service in the United States Senate,” the pope said.

“I understand the difficulty and the tensions, but I think, as I myself have spoken in the past, it’s important to look at many issues that are related to what is the teaching of the Church," the pontiff said. "Someone who says 'I'm against abortion but I'm in favor of the death penalty' is not really pro-life. So someone who says 'I'm against abortion but I'm in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants who are in the United States' — I don't know if that's pro-life.”

The remarks came just days after Cardinal Cupich announced that Durbin would receive the Archbishop Bernardin Award for Public Witness, praising the Illinois Democrat’s “lifelong commitment to human dignity, social justice and the common good.” The reaction from the MAGA wing of the American Catholic community to Pope Leo XIV's remarks was swift and vitriolic.

Conservative influencers, commentators, and clergy accused both Cupich and Pope Leo XIV of "selling out" the pro-life cause and elevating politics over doctrine.

MAGA filmmaker and anti-DEI advocate Robby Statbuck wrote: “Pope after Pope has been a disappointing profile in cowardice who I just can’t look to as a leader. If Robert Sarah was Pope, this would not happen. Many would come back to the church then. Leo sounds like another Francis.”

Joe Rigney, an associate pastor, wrote: “I know that Protestants are supposed to be sheepish in the face of Catholic social teaching (‘deep in history,’ layers of tradition, antiquity, etc), but when the ‘Vicar’ of Christ and the successor of Peter morally equates abortion, deportations, and the death penalty for heinous crimes, and then proceeds to bless a block of ice in order to save the planet from climate change, I admit to being decidedly unimpressed with the ‘seamless garment.’”

Far-right podcaster and self-described traditional Catholic Matt Walsh wrote: “Really terrible answer from Pope Leo. God Himself prescribes the death penalty in the Bible. Is the Pope saying that God is ‘not pro-life’? And who exactly is advocating for ‘inhumane treatment of immigrants’? What sort of inhumane treatment is he referring to? Deportations? Also, how can he say that ‘nobody has all the truth’ on any of these issues? We know the truth on abortion. It isn't complicated. Awful stuff from the Pope. Truly horrendous on about five different levels.”

He continued: “Even if you disagree with the death penalty, to draw a moral equivalence between executing convicted murders after a fair trial and dismembering children in the womb is moral madness. Reddit-tier nonsense coming from the Pope. Very disturbing.”

Michael Heinlein, a Catholic commentator, wrote: “A terribly unclear question made this all the worse. As Cardinal George used to say ‘don’t tell me how you feel, tell me what you think!’”

Christopher Hale, a former Democratic nominee for Congress, mocked the MAGA backlash and wrote: “Maybe if he said it in Latin while wearing the papal tiara, MAGA would listen to him.”

MAGA tech bros are fueling the evangelical obsession with Armageddon and 'the Antichrist'

Within Christianity, evangelicals and mainline Protestants can have radically different approaches when it comes to the parts of the New Testament that they zero in on.

Mainline Protestants — Lutherans, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, the AME Church —will read the Book of Revelation, but as a rule, they aren't obsessed with it the way that evangelicals are. Evangelicals are often fixated on Armageddon and the End Times, and that includes evangelicals in the tech world.

Many evangelical tech bros, often described as "TheoBros," are aggressive supporters of President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement. And they are much more socially conservative than the right-wing libertarians one finds in the tech field.

In an article published by Wired on September 30, reporter Laura Bullard examines the relationship between tech bros and evangelical Christian fundamentalists.

Bullard asserts that billionaire tech bro and MAGA supporter Peter Thiel's is heavily focused on the Antichrist and Armageddon.

"Peter Thiel's Armageddon speaking tour has — like the world — not ended yet," Bullard explains. "For a full two years now, the billionaire has been on the circuit, spreading his biblically inflected ideas about doomsday through a set of variably and sometimes visibly perplexed interviewers…. Depending on who you are, you may find it hilarious, fascinating, insufferable, or horrifying that one of the world's most powerful men is obsessing over a figure from sermons and horror movies. But the ideas and influences behind these talks are key to understanding how Thiel sees his own massive role in the world — in politics, technology, and the fate of the species."

Bullard notes that "according to some Christian traditions," the Antichrist "is a figure that will unify humanity under one rule before delivering us to the Apocalypse."

"For Thiel," Bullard writes, "its evil is pretty much synonymous with any attempt to unite the world. 'How might such an Antichrist rise to power?' Thiel asked. 'By playing on our fears of technology and seducing us into decadence with the Antichrist's slogan: peace and safety.'"

Read Laura Bullard's full article for Wired at this link.

'How can this horrible tragedy help me?' Latest shooting opens new front in Trump’s 'spiritual war'

Investigators are still scouring the motives that drove Thomas Jacob Sanford to fire on a Mormon church in Michigan, killing four people, but “Daily Blast” podcaster Greg Sargent said President Donald Trump and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt were quick to link the killing to an alleged rash of anti-Christian violence.

“This appears to be yet another targeted attack on Christians,” Leavitt insisted, amplifying an earlier, similar claim by Trump.

This time, their effort to connect the violence to anti-Trump, non-Christian forces backfired as evidence emerged that the shooter may be a Trump supporter motivated by anti-Mormon bigotry.

Christian nationalism, according to host Greg Sargent and author Sarah Posner, may play a crucial factor in the tragedy.

Christian nationalists, Posner observed, consider non-evangelicals impure — and that includes Mormons.

Posner told Sargent, "To jump to the conclusion that he was motivated either by anti-Christian bias or anti-Mormon bias is premature, notwithstanding the evidence that we have that he did say anti-Mormon things to a candidate for political office who had canvassed at his house. The difference between anti-Christian bias and anti-Mormon bias is sort of an interesting one. For the audience that Trump is trying to reach when he claims that something is evidence of anti-Christian bias, that's largely an evangelical audience. It’s also a right-wing Catholic audience."

Posner continued, "But many in the evangelical world, including many Trump supporters, don’t really consider the LDS church to be Christian. They don’t consider Mormons to be Christian, mainly because of their views of the role of the prophet Joseph Smith in the founding of their faith, and of the use of the Book of Mormon in addition to the Old and New Testaments, and other what they would consider to be extra-biblical teachings of the LDS faith."

Sargent and Posner say the administration is working hard to brew up passion among supporters by fomenting animosity at non-Christians.

“His family is cooperating … [to help police] dig in and get to the bottom of why he committed this heinous act of violence,” Leavitt told reporters over the weekend. “And as the president put in his Truth Social post yesterday this looks like another targeted attack on Christians.”

Posner, who covers right-wing thought and tactics, said she wasn’t surprised at the attempted exploitation. The first thing that enters Trump’s mind in most any given situation is how best to exploit it.

“[Trump] sees the world in black and white,” Posner said. “He sees everything as ‘How can this horrible tragedy help me? It can help me because I can frame it as this thing that I know gets my base excited, reminds my base that I’m on their side, that I am their savior and that is here to save them from these evil elements in America that are trying to destroy Christianity in America.’”

Posner said Trump used the same “us vs Them” tactics to exploit the death of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk. “It’s just more of the same: Trump taking advantage of a horrible tragedy to continue to frame this ‘us vs Them’ mentality.”

Sargent warned that Leavitt’s announcement that the administration was “going to investigate and prosecute these crimes” was highly suggestive language.

“She doesn’t come out and say they’re gonna start using law enforcement to go after people they say are committing anti-Christian crimes but that’s what it sounds like,” Sargent said.

Posner reminded Sargent that Trump promised a task force within the DOJ to combat anti-Christian bias, and has used his avowed crusade against antisemitism to silence freedom of speech on U.S. college campuses, and called it “menacing” to use law enforcement to combat somebody saying something that they think is anti-Christian.

“Remember: they think it’s anti-Christian to disagree with a pastor who’s against same-sex marriage,” Posner said.

“He campaigned on a Christian nationalist platform without outright saying it,” Sargent said. “… [Secretary of Defense] Pete Hegseth said were in a ‘spiritual war.’ Benny Johnson said the Defense Department … is functionally an instrument of God. … Far right influencer Jack Prosobiec called on followers to put on the armor of God and get ready for spiritual warfare.”

Posner pointed out that a lot of their followers “literally think of Democrats and liberals and anyone who disagrees with them as part of a satanic force that’s anti-American,” and that Trump is fomenting their good vs evil, spiritual warfare mindset.

Sargent said Hegseth proclaiming a spiritual war after the death of a very prominent Christian was killed “is highly problematic, particularly when, A) he’s got troops marching into cities, and B) he’s recalling generals from all over the world for some shadowy meeting that’s unknown at this point.”

“Don’t be too naïve about what we’re seeing, is where I’m getting at,” Sargent said.

Hear the podcast at this link.

Trump is 'an almost perfect inversion of the moral teachings of Jesus': GOP speechwriter

The former speechwriter for three Republican presidents and a senior fellow at the non-profit Christian organization The Trinity Forum explains what he calls "fully MAGA-fied Christianity" in his latest piece for The Atlantic.

Peter Wehner, who served under President Ronald Reagan and both Bushes, says that when President Donald Trump admitted at the memorial service of slain MAGA podcaster Charlie Kirk that he hated his enemies, it was hardly a surprise.

"President Trump has in the past made clear his disagreement with, and even his contempt for, some of the core teachings of Jesus. So has his son Don Jr., who told a Turning Point USA gathering in 2021 that turning the other cheek has “gotten us nothing," Wehner says.

Trump has "acknowledged that he’s a man filled with hate and driven by vengeance. It’s not simply that those qualities are part of who he is; it is that he draws strength from the dark passions," he adds.

And despite the fact that Trump has, Wehner explains, "spent nearly every day of the past decade confirming that he lacks empathy. He sees himself as both entitled and as a victim. He’s incapable of remorse. He’s driven by an insatiable need for revenge. And he enjoys inflicting pain on others."

"It’s no longer an interesting question as to why Trump is an almost perfect inversion of the moral teachings of Jesus; the answer can be traced to a damaged, disordered personality that has tragically warped his soul." Wehner says, adding, "What is an interesting question is why those who claim that the greatest desire of their life is to follow Jesus revere such a man and seem willing to follow him, instead, to the ends of the earth."

"Trump and the MAGA movement capitalized on, and then amplified, the problems facing Christian communities, but they did not create them," Wehner explains.

Pastor and author Brian Zahnd posted on Bluesky that “It grieves me to see people I’ve known for years (some as far back as the Jesus Movement of the 1970s) seduced by a mean-spirited culture-war Christianity that is but a perverse caricature of the authentic faith formed around Jesus of Nazareth."

Russell Moore, editor in chief of Christianity Today, has said that Jesus is a “hood ornament” for many American Christians, Wehner writes.

"The expectation of, among others, the Apostle Paul wasn’t human perfection. He believed that original sin touched every human life, and many of his Epistles were written to address serious problems within the Church," he says.

Wehner also points to culture wars as a commonality that draws Christians to Trump.

"Politics, especially culture-war politics, provides many fundamentalists and evangelicals with a sense of community and a common enemy,: Wehner explains. "It gives purpose and meaning to their life, turning them into protagonists in a great drama pitting good against evil. They are vivified by it."

Leaders within the Christian MAGA movement, Wehner adds, are also autocratic and they like what they see with Trump's attempts to consolidate power within the excutive branch.

"Many of the leaders within the Christian-MAGA movement are autocratic, arrogant, and controlling; they lack accountability, demand unquestioned loyalty, and try to intimidate their critics, especially those within their church or denomination," Wehner says.

And as Wehner pointed out, grievance politics also plays a role.

"The grievances and resentment they feel are impossible to overstate; they are suffering from a persecution complex. Fully MAGA-fied Christians view Trump as the “ultimate fighting machine,” in the words of the historian Kristin Kobes Du Mez, and they love him for it."

Why Trump’s MAGA evangelicals are much worse than past 'Christian conservatives'

Liberal Georgia-based journalist Zaid Jilani, who was raised Muslim, has a long history of criticizing the Religious Right. Jilani, back in the 1990s and 2000s, often argued that while there's nothing wrong with faith and religion, "theocracy" has no place in a constitutional democratic republic like the United States.

But in an op-ed published by the New York Times on September 26, Jilani lays out some reasons why he finds 2025's MAGA Christian nationalists much more troubling than the fundamentalist evangelicals he criticized in the past.

"As the George W. Bush years rolled on," Jilani recalls, "I joined my fellow liberal activists in watching documentaries like 'Jesus Camp,' which warned of an impending Christian theocracy. I argued vigorously for separation of church and state, and I waited on pins and needles for the end of a movement I viewed as stifling freedom of religion and freedom of expression. But I'm starting to miss the Christian conservatives I grew up with. Unlike the Christian Right of my childhood, today's variations — some of which see President Trump as a religious figure — seem incapable of being compassionate toward outgroups like mine."

Jilani recalls that after al-Qaeda's 9/11 terrorist attacks, then-President George W. Bush was careful to make a distinction between jihadist and non-jihadist Muslims. Bush described Islam as a "great religion," making it clear that he didn't blame all Muslims for 9/11.

"I think back to the days right after September 11, when Mr. Bush — the politician most closely associated with the 21st-Century Christian Right — visited a mosque in Washington, D.C., to emphasize that Muslims were just as American as anyone else," Jilani explains. "It's easy to laugh this off, given what happened afterward — he set off a bungling war on terrorism that included an unnecessary war in Iraq that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. Yet Mr. Bush set the tone for the millions of devout Christians who voted for him."

MAGA's "Christian nationalism," Jilani laments, "can be distinguished more by cruelty than kindness."

"These new Christian conservatives are represented by people like Matt Walsh, a popular right-wing Catholic commentator," the Georgia-based journalist warns. "Conservatives spent years working across the aisle on criminal justice reform. Mr. Walsh has floated the return of whipping and amputations as punishments and said that by resisting Mr. Trump's militarization of law enforcement in Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson had committed treason and should be 'given the requisite punishment for a capital offense'…. There is no issue where the current crop of Christian Right politicians departs more from the old than immigration."

Zilani, who is Pakistani-American, adds, "Christians like Mr. Bush condemned nativism. These new activists embrace it."

Trump's 'vengeance': Conservative explains why white evangelicals may be drawn to MAGA

During a Sunday, September 21 memorial for Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk in Glendale, Arizona, a speech from his widow, Erika Kirk, was followed by a speech from President Donald Trump — who told attendees that unlike her, "I hate my opponents."

The following day on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," host Joe Scarborough discussed Trump's call for revenge with one of his guests: New York Times columnist and fellow Never Trump conservative David French, who warned that the obsession with revenge is one of the things white evangelical Christians like about Trump.

French told Scarborough, a former GOP congressman, "You have, on the one hand, a church that will rise and rightly applaud the incredible words of Erika Kirk and then turn around and happily go to the polls not in spite of Trump's vengeance, but because of Trump's sense of vengeance….. If you've been paying attention to American religion and American politics over the last decade, it wouldn't surprise you to see that Erika Kirk speech and to hear the applause and then to hear the Donald Trump speech and hear the laughter and applause to that as well — and realize that, in many ways, that is what politics is doing to American Christianity."

French continued, "It is creating this face of vengeance. Because Americans know he has the power to work his vengeance because of the church. It is the church that put him into office — the evangelical church — more than any other American constituency. And so, what we watched unfold in front of us — when he spoke like that, this wasn't in contradiction of what so many Christians wanted out of their president here. It is exactly why so many Christians voted for this president…. That is the frustrating complexity of what is happening in this moment."

Scarborough, who was raised Baptist in the South, argued that the vengeance theme of Trump's speech was a major contrast to what former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) — a vehement critic of Trump — said about the U.S. president.

Scarborough told French, "This takes me back to practicing Catholic Nancy Pelosi saying that she prayed for Donald Trump every day. As Jesus commanded us in Matthew 5, you love your enemies. You pray for those who persecute you."

'I hate my opponents': Trump at Charlie Kirk memorial www.youtube.com

'Blood of the martyrs': These extremists view Kirk murder as call to 'holy war'

Far-right MAGA pundit Candace Owens is claiming that Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk was getting ready to convert to Catholicism near the end of his life, but evangelical Christian fundamentalists are denying that claim. And reporters Sam Stein and Will Sommer appeared skeptical about that alleged conversion during a conversation for the conservative website The Bulwark.

Kirk, who was 31 when he was fatally shot in Utah, was closely identified with evangelical Christian nationalism. And The Guardian's J. Oliver Conroy, in an article published on September 20, reports that Christian nationalists are "positioning Charlie Kirk as a martyr for their movement."

After Kirk's murder, his widow, Erika Kirk, posted, on Instagram, that the "world is evil" and declared, "They have no idea what they just ignited within this wife."

Author Jeff Sharlet, known for his writings on Christian nationalism, discussed Erika Kirk's comments with The Guardian — warning, "That's holy war, that's accelerationism, and it's incredibly powerful."

Conroy notes some of the other things far-right Christian nationalists have been saying since Kirk's death.

In a video, megachurch pastor Matt Tuggle said of Kirk's murder, "If your pastor isn't telling you the left believes (in an) evil demonic belief system, you are in the wrong church."

Sean Feucht, a Christian nationalist pastor who worked with Kirk, said, "We know that the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church. The devil is not gonna win. The forces want us to be silent; they want us to shut up.… We need to be more bold."

Conroy describes Christian nationalism as "the belief that the U.S. is and should be an explicitly Christian nation."

"Kirk had been an evangelical Christian since childhood but earlier in his career, expressed reluctance at politicizing his religious views," Conroy explains. "That changed during the peak of the early pandemic, when Kirk made the acquaintance of several charismatic megachurch pastors protesting church lockdowns. He began to traffic in ideas influenced by the (New Apostolic Reformation), including the seven-mountain mandate. Turning Point USA also began to forge partnerships with churches."

Read J. Oliver Conroy's full article for The Guardian at this link.


'Thousands of Charlie Kirks': 'Martyr for Christ' dominates GOP youth conference

THE WOODLANDS — Thousands gathered Friday night to kick off a conference of young Republicans in which Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist killed last week, was memorialized as a “martyr” whose death is galvanizing youths across the nation.

Speaker after speaker, from state lawmakers to influential MAGA cultural tastemakers, shared stories at the Texas Youth Summit about how Kirk — who began rallying young conservatives as a teenager — made them and others feel like their Christian-guided views mattered and their perspectives were shared by many.

They called him a “hero,” “miracle,” and “martyr for Christ." Amid the mourning, they said that the fight Kirk had embarked on was far from over but one that could be won by the young people in attendance.

And it appeared, according to some of the speakers, that more people were learning Kirk’s name and his vision for a faith-led American future every day since his death.

The speeches caused roars of applause from the mostly young audience, some wearing white t-shirts that said “We are Charlie,” which glowed in front of bright red and blue stage lights.

“Be like Charlie,” Republican U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, the final speaker of the night, told the crowd, which had thinned by the time he took the stage past 10 p.m. but was still several hundred strong. The state’s junior senator recounted how he texted Kirk upon hearing about the shooting, asking if he was OK.

“I’m praying for you right now,” Cruz said he texted, adding: “Obviously, I never got an answer.”

Kirk was killed Sept. 10 while speaking at a Utah university, the first stop of his group’s “The American Comeback” tour. He often debated students who disagreed with him on his tours while firing up young conservatives.

“There's a lot of value in a bunch of young conservatives coming together and (feeling) like they're not alone. Charlie created that environment — single handedly,” U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Houston said in a video that was played. “No one else did that kind of thing.”

The memorial was just the latest instance of Texans gathering to share their sorrow over Kirk’s death. Vigils at college campuses, town squares and churches have drawn thousands, with speakers and attendees saying Kirk changed how they viewed politics, debating and their own beliefs. Others vehemently opposed what Kirk stood for but attended the homages to condemn his killing as an unacceptable act of political violence.

“We weren’t alive for JFK or MLK, and this is the first big assassination,” said Harley Reed, one of more than 1,000 who gathered last week at Texas A&M for one such candlelight vigil. “This is the first big movement, if you will, that we’ve seen interrupted in a way.”

Also grieving publicly are the state’s leaders, including some Republicans who are set to speak at the conference on Saturday. Some have also urged a close examination of reactions to Kirk’s death from educators and students; Gov. Greg Abbott, for one, has called for the expulsion of students who publicly celebrated Kirk’s death, prompting blowback from critics who say such calls run afoul of the First Amendment’s free speech protections.

Such scrutiny has done little to slow the momentum that’s erupted among conservative youth who just became old enough to vote or will reach the threshold in time for next year’s midterms.

Turning Point USA, the group Kirk launched as an 18-year-old to organize other young conservatives, said it received an explosion of more than 50,000 requests to establish new chapters at colleges and high schools in the days after its founder’s death.

In Texas, where the GOP has dominated state government for longer than current college-age students have been alive, organizers of this weekend’s youth summit said they anticipated record-breaking attendance after getting an influx of interest leading up to the event.

“Charlie Kirk cannot be replaced,” Christian Collins, the summit’s founder and leader, said Friday night. “But what I will say is, what will happen in this community, and in this country, is thousands of Charlie Kirks will rise up.”

The event was another example of how Kirk’s death has invigorated a growing movement of young conservatives nationwide, and added fuel to efforts from Texas’ GOP leaders to turn the red state an even deeper shade of red.

State GOP leaders and lawmakers have pointed to that outburst of interest and solidarity as evidence of a Christian awakening among the state’s youth that they say will only grow stronger and usher in a new culture in America.

While the state’s leading young Republican organizations were once lukewarm on Trump, the voter bloc they represent proved crucial to Trump’s victory last year throughout the country.

The president has reportedly said that was thanks, in large part, to Kirk’s work.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/09/20/texas-youth-summit-republican-charlie-kirk-memorial/.

@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.