Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Does Greed Fuel Stupidity in Corporate America?

By Sam Pizzigati, Too Much: A Commentary on Excess and Inequality. Posted July 10, 2008.


It's good to reward the best and the brightest, but when those rewards are too great they become incentives for bad, and dumb, behavior.
Advertisement

Smart, talented, ambitious people have a lot to offer. They also expect a lot. They expect our society's best and biggest rewards, and the bigger the reward, the harder they'll work to grab it. That's fine -- to a point. We certainly do want to see our "best and brightest" putting out, contributing as much as they can to endeavors that create wealth and advance the common good.

But if the rewards our society offers the smart and talented become too big, the smart can tend to start doing dumb things. The more outrageously large the reward, the more outrageous the dumb -- and socially damaging -- behavior.

Smart societies understand this dynamic and work, through tax laws and cultural norms, to keep rewards within reason. Here in the United States, we used to have many such laws and norms. We no longer do. We have swept away the restraints that once kept our society's rewards relatively reasonable.

And now we're paying the price. Our smart and talented today regularly do dumb things -- and cause great damage.

Our latest exhibit A: the career of Richard E. Dauch, Corporate America's latest superstar executive turned scourge of the late great American middle class.

Dauch currently serves as the CEO of American Axle and Manufacturing, an auto parts giant carved out of General Motors 14 years ago. Late this past May, after threatening to outsource "all of our business to other locations around the world," Dauch forced 3,600 striking workers at his company's five original American plants to accept a contract that cuts wages from $28 an hour down to as low as $14.35 and slices the company's U.S. workforce by half.

One month later, in June, Dauch pocketed his reward: a $8.5 million bonus from the American Axle board of directors for his "leadership role" in "the structural transformation achieved under our new labor agreements."

Dauch has now collected, over the last decade, over $258 million in compensation from American Axle -- and, in the process, tossed thousands of U.S. worker families out of the middle class.

Auto workers, ironically, once symbolized that middle class, and for good reason. Precedent-setting union contracts at GM and other U.S. automakers after World War II helped give birth to the first mass middle class in world history.

And the executives who signed those contracts? They did well, too, but not too well. In 1950, for instance, General Motors president Charlie Wilson pulled in $586,100 in income, a bit over $5 million in current dollars. Today, someone at that $5 million level will usually clear, after taxes, around $4 million. Wilson cleared the equivalent of only $1.25 million. He paid nearly three-quarters of his income in taxes.

Mid-20th century America, in effect, frowned on excessive incomes at the nation's economic summit. The result: America's biggest companies, back then, manufactured cars, not mega millionaires.

A young Richard Dauch would start his auto industry career in this mid-20th century manufacturing culture -- and thrive in it. The talented Dauch shot up the General Motors organizational charts. In 1965, GM named him a production foreman at the company's Flint assembly plant. Three years later, he was supervising all the plant's production. By 1976, Dauch was running all manufacturing for VW of America.

The rising young executive would go to similar heavy-duty responsibilities at Chrysler. By the mid-1980s, Dauch had established a reputation as one of the top managers in the entire American auto industry.

But that industry was now operating within an economy that had fundamentally changed. By the 1980s, the restraints on the size of the rewards the economy had to offer had begun eroding. The top tax on income over $400,000 -- 91 percent in the Eisenhower years -- would be 28 percent by 1986. Big money could now be made -- and kept -- and Corporate America's smart, talented, and ambitious were pushing the envelope to make it.

Corporate America's most ambitious operators were soon raking in more millions in a year than old-time executives like Charlie Wilson ever made in a career. And they were raking in these millions not by making and selling goods, but by making and selling companies. The action -- and the rewards -- had shifted. Dauch would shift, too.

In 1994, Dauch and another former General Motors executive rounded up a group of investors, bought up five mismanaged GM parts plans, and started up shop as a privately held company known as American Axle and Manufacturing.

Typically, in a buyout situation like this, the new owners follow some variation on what has come to be called the strip-and-flip script. They proceed to gin up profits at their new holding by any means necessary, then take their plaything public on the stock exchange and make a killing selling shares of their new company's stock.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ceo, auto industry, incentives

Sam Pizzigati is the editor of the online weekly Too Much, and an associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Its going to be this way until the bounce tests start
Posted by: Farasien on Jul 10, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The power between the elite and the people they step on goes back and forth in american history. During the late 1800's to early 1900's, the robber barrons (old-time mega-millionaire CEO's like JP Morgan and Rockafeller) held all the power and could do whatever they wanted to whomever they wanted, and did so with impunity. When it reached a critical mass, the unions rose and TOOK power from them. They did this because some of the unions literally threw members of management out of windows and brought alot of violence against those who were systematically grinding them down into poverty. During the 1950's era, people had massive power and management and authorities had a real fear for their well being, so they kept things sane, and what do you know, the middle class thrived as never before in history. In the 1970's, the management started picking away at the power of people, and ultimately brought us to where we are today.

The lesson from history here is simple... Management of any and all companies and those in government will only listen to those who are ready, willing and able (or currently doing) to threaten the lives of the power brokers directly. Its only when the elite fear that the pitchfork and torch-weilding mobs might slaughter them as a result of a strike or really bad policy decision will they do what is right. Without the threat, the CEO's will continuue the status quo and even chip further away at those they feel have stolen 'their' money and power and rightful place as the masters of the Little People. Until we learn this lesson, again, nothing's going to change and the bad news, as has been the case for the past decade or so, will keep coming and will be getting progressively worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Around 1999/2000, I went to American Axle and proposed some much needed
Posted by: thekidde on Jul 10, 2008 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
fluid power training for their skilled labor force. As proven since, my training has saved auto and other manufacturing plants millions in increased efficiencies, leakage prevention and correction and a myriad of other benefits. Dauch and American Axle would not pay for training. They wanted grants from the government, our tax money, to pay. This was during a period when Dauch's compensation exceeded $60M. I met Dauch once when he was a keynote speaker for a trade show I was on a committee for and he was impressive - he knew all of the cliches and buzzwords. This was when he was at Chrysler.

In spite of his early reputation, his goal has always been - enrichment of himself. My simple questions is: What in the hell do these ripoff jerks do with all of this money? How many homes, cars, bullshit hobbies can you have? The rest of the auto hierarchy are as clueless, inept and greedy as Dauch - they don't care about anything but themselves and their bank accounts. Oh, and the union heads are no better. I know firsthand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

best and brightest
Posted by: carolcarre on Jul 10, 2008 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wait a minute: let's define those two terms! Best con-men? Brightest hucksters? It used to be the best at something useful and creative. When we equate brilliance with arrogance and personability, and intelligence with low cunning, we start having problems. We reward cunning and arrogance, and punish honesty, fail to pay for brilliance, refuse to educate our future creators, and then we wonder where American ingenuity has gone!

The stupid! It hurts!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: best and brightest Posted by: VZEQICVA
Ponerology
Posted by: TheJamea on Jul 10, 2008 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Psychopathy has won the day!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good article... in a word...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jul 10, 2008 4:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... YUP!

greed is a human act, and corporations are not human beings with feeling...
they may have all the legal rights as a living breathing Human citizen but its not...
living or breathing... or Human!

its an unthinking machine that generates money and projects power
and influences scores of our peoples lives...

What gives them this power...
By the people who run them, and its this elitist and self empowered plutocracy that are sitting behind a throne made by them and for them to manipulate now, and can lay any blame to failure and collapse after... to their fictitious non-person, ala Frankensteins!

its also capable of laying a foundation for a perfect crime!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Otto .
Posted by: otto on Jul 12, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fantastic article! It could be used as a good sermon in Churches, Christian and otherwise, for those of us who take religion and spirituality seriously...on what I call the Christian attitude of "the common good" and "Love your neighbor as yourself".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Jul 12, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is only one way to stop this legalized robbery and destruction of the middle class, and it is not shareholder oversight...or compensation review, etc. That clearly has done nothing to stop the great money hemmorage where blood flows from the bottom to the top like a geiser, thanks to egregious tax cuts and enablement via lax regulations, etc.

This has to be stopped using an extremely progressive tax schedule. We should not allow corporations to write off compensation of any kind above a certain amount, nor should they be allowed to write off corporate jet use, health insurance, or any other perks (in particular after CEOs depart companies).

In addition, there should be retroactive taxes enacted on the CEOs who stole this money from the middle and lower classes throughout the last decades due to unsound and bogus economic policies and sophistry and deception....and that money should go where it should have originally: infrastructure, raising wages, healthcare, and affordable housing.

Lastly there should be punitive taxes for building environmentally and socially destructive McMansions such as the 30,000 SF monuments to which wealthy neighborhoods have been subjected - (i.e., teardowns, NIMBY, restrictive zoning, etc.)...for purchasing gas guzzlers, huge boats, and the like....so that we can discourage these harmful activities in the most direct way possible.

The concentration of money has done nothing for the middle class except depress their wages, raise house prices and everything else out of reach, and destroy the American dream. For this, retribution should be sought in order to have a fair democracy again.

Lastly, let's not admire these people by watching "Trump" shows and the like. As in Finland, it should be shameful to show your money like this (especially in the face of poverty, extreme inequality, and other injustices). We seriously need to bring back humility, old money style living, and public service as the traits to admire, and leave behind the amoral self enrichment that has come to characterize Wall Street's raison d'etre.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]