Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Water

Are We Ready for Water Shortages in Western States?

By Sarah Bates, Science Progress. Posted May 19, 2008.


Global warming is already affecting water in western states. The EPA has some proposals on what to do, but will they be enough?
Advertisement

The rivers are rising as spring arrives in the Rocky Mountain West. In the annual pattern that sustains the environment and much of the economy of this region, water generated from melting snow feeds the streams, soaks the soil, and is diverted into ditches and reservoirs to serve millions of people and water their landscape. Here at the crown of the continent, the snowcapped peaks are far more than a pretty picture -- they are an interest-bearing savings account we draw on throughout the year.

Unfortunately, the principal of this account is being depleted by the increasingly obvious impacts of global climate change. Even this winter's abundant snowfall fails to overcome decades-long trends of increased temperatures and altered patterns of precipitation and spring runoff. The latest documentation of these impacts is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Water Program Strategy: Response to Climate Change.

The EPA, which is seeking public comment on the report by May 27, 2008, provides an overview of the effects of observed and projected climate change on national water resources, with a focus on water quality and aquatic species. The draft National Water Program Strategy offers a whopping 46 "key actions" that the federal agency proposes to implement in response, ranging from water and energy conservation incentives to new and modified water quality regulatory programs. The proposed national actions are organized into four major goals:

  • Use water programs to contribute to greenhouse gas mitigation
  • Work with states and tribes to adapt water programs to projected new conditions due to climate change
  • Strengthen the link between water programs and research activities
  • Educate water professionals and stakeholders about projected climate change impacts on water resources.

Like many reports on water issues from Washington, however, the EPA's National Water Program Strategy offers precious little detail about the projected conditions and appropriate policy responses to those projected conditions for the arid West. In part, this is explained by the frustrating lack of regional- or local-scaled modeling to project more accurately the effects of climate change on our western river basins and watersheds. The EPA proposes further work to better define projected conditions and responsive policies in particular regions of the country, including special attention to issues of drought and water supply in the West.

The world's leading climate change research consortium, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is working to produce the finer-scaled regional models that will inform the EPA in this follow-up work. In the meantime, the IPCC's 2007 report documented substantial changes already underway in the western United States, among them:

  • Earlier runoff of snowmelt, stressing some reservoir systems
  • Decreased spring and summer snow cover
  • Increased annual precipitation falling as rain rather than snow
  • Threats to reliable supply complicated by high population growth rates in western states where many water resources are at or approaching full utilization
  • Increased wildfire potential

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, west, climate change, global warming, epa

Sarah Bates has written extensively on western water law and policy. She currently serves as deputy director for policy and outreach at Western Progress, a regional policy institute with offices in Missoula, Mont., Denver, Colo. and Phoenix, Ariz.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Water, water everywhere .....
Posted by: countingdaisies on May 19, 2008 6:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But none is fit to drink. Since the time of our ancestors' determination to 'domesticate' this land, we have continued the decimation of everything natural. The natural flow of water has been dammed and rerouted for the benefit of human migration, to areas not suitable for human habitation, and the growth of corporate domination of everything in our lives. This has led to overdevelopment, overpopulation and horrendous pollution. When the ice melts and once again covers areas where we rerouted the flow and filled in for development, or the sun burns hotter in the southwest . . . only then will we realize that Mother Nature knows best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"nurture welcome growth " ?
Posted by: mmckinl on May 20, 2008 12:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The authors words, not mine. And there it is everywhere you look~ the growth mantra. Humanities whole problem is just that ; Growth!

No matter how much money is spent, how much water is recycled, conserved or restricted there will be less water to use, on average, every year.

Maybe we should start thinking about a sustainable economy, an economy that works well within the limits that nature has to offer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

questionable planning
Posted by: sophiej on May 20, 2008 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
despite the uncertainties, professional water managers are planning infrastructure improvements to support much larger populations.
Here's a report from Northern California.
http://lakeconews.com/content/view/438/764/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's wrong with using Desalination Plants?
Posted by: Libsrule on May 22, 2008 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides the problem of what to do with all the extra salt produced, because you CAN NOT put it back in the ocean without upsetting the ecological balance, there is nothing wrong with building desalination plants along with a push for ZPG.

Most people today don't remember that from the 60's and 70's but it was a push, A VOLUNTARY ONE, for every to only reproduce themselves.

Over population and greedy developers along with politicians who can't see beyond tomorrows' polls have brought this problem to the breaking point.

BUT Desalination plants work well and a few dozen of them on the West Coasts would help a great deal.

I do not understand the refusal to talk about these plants.

Don't know what to do with the salt but I am sure someone can figure that part out.

Hmmm maybe pack those tens of thousands of empty containers sitting around all of our ports with the salt for storage???

Ideas?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pardon Me!?! Posted by: djnoll