Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Water

The Triple Threat: Our Food, Water and Climate Challenges

By Shiney Varghese, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. Posted May 14, 2008.


Why the recent food and water shortages are making the climate crisis even worse.
Advertisement

Food prices rose 4 percent in the United States last year, the highest rise since 1990. All over the world food prices are on the rise. At the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank finance ministers wanted to focus the world's attention on food crisis rather than the credit crisis.

There are many factors contributing to this current crisis, including the rising price of oil, deregulated agricultural markets, financial speculation, and biofuels. Another key factor is climate change, which is affecting crop yield and food production. It is time for us to get serious about understanding the way climate change affects water resources for food production and conversely the way agricultural water use is leading to climate change.

In January, scientists at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in the U.S. published an article in the journal Science that said what many climate change experts had already been saying for some time: global warming is responsible for the extreme changes that we see in the hydrological cycle in the western U.S. Moreover, the scientists from Scripps found that up to 60 percent of the climate-related trends of river flow, winter air temperature and snow pack between 1950 and 1999 are human-induced.

While the Scripps scientists analyzed data for the western United States, similar changes have been happening around the world in the second half of the twentieth century. The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) found that "climate and freshwater systems are interconnected in complex ways and that any change in one of these systems induces a change in the other."

The IPCC further concluded that the changes in precipitation patterns and glacier melts are projected to significantly affect water availability for an entire range of socially valued water uses, including human consumption, agriculture and energy generation. The most dramatic effect of climate change is likely to be on agricultural production. The impact is already manifesting itself in countries such as Australia. The global price of wheat hit its highest level in decades in December, partly due to Australia's drought. Irrigated agriculture accounts for almost 70 percent of world water withdrawals and close to 90 percent of the total consumptive water use (the portion that is lost to the immediate environment for use). Existing irrigation and drainage infrastructures have been designed for stable climate conditions. They are very likely inadequate to cope with extreme climatic variations in precipitation and reduced water supply reliability and availability, as well as floods.

On the other hand, since irrigation accounts for such a large percentage of total water withdrawals, any reduction in irrigation water use (either through introducing water use efficient technologies or through changing agroecological practices) will go a long way in coping with climate-related water stress especially, in water-stressed regions.

While irrigated agriculture accounts for 40 percent of global food production, the remaining 60 percent of world's food crops are produced by those practicing rain-fed agriculture. Such agriculture covers more than 80 percent of global agricultural land. In these regions, particularly those without local water conservation measures, crop productivity depends solely on sufficient precipitation to meet both evaporative demand and soil moisture needs. Any variation in precipitation patterns and temperature increases can affect crop productivity substantially.

The IPCC predicts that in some countries, "yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by up to 50 percent by 2020." This would most certainly affect food security in many communities and nations. But it is not only that climate change-related water stress will affect agriculture. The converse is also true: current water use patterns and associated practices contribute to climate change.

It is noteworthy that the two sectors in the world that use the most water, chemical intensive agriculture and fossil fuel-based energy production, are also the biggest contributors to global warming, which in turn further increases water stress in many regions.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: agriculture, food, global warming, climate change, water

Shiney Varghese is a Senior Policy Analyst at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The article above grossly understates the case
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on May 14, 2008 9:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Downloaded FROM: Environmental Defense
http://environmentaldefenseblogs.org/
climate411/2008/01/14/global_winds/

This post is by James Wang, Ph.D., a climate scientist at Environmental Defense.

You may have heard about the persistent droughts in the western U.S., Australia,
and other regions. The Upper Colorado River Basin is experiencing a protracted,
multi-year drought that started in 1999. Australia's record drought is threatening
the livelihood of traditional farmers and ranchers.

At what point does a passing drought become a permanent shift to desert
conditions, and why would such a thing happen?

It can happen because of global warming. Climate change can alter global winds,
the strength and location of high and low pressure systems, and other climate
factors.

.........shortened.........Graphics and URLs omitted.

Global winds shape the Earth's climate, determining - in broad strokes - which
areas are tropical, desert, or temperate. Here's a simplified overview of how it
works.

The Sun heats the Earth most intensely in the tropical zone around the equator. The
heated air rises, cools, and then dumps its moisture as rain. That's why there are
rain forests in the tropics.

The now drier air is forced by the continuously rising equatorial air to move
towards the temperate latitudes on either side of the equator. At roughly 30° N and
S - called the "horse latitudes" - it can move no further due to the Earth’s rotation,
and settles to the surface. As the air sinks, it compresses and warms, creating hot,
rain-free conditions. This circulation pattern, called a Hadley cell, is why the
deserts of the world are located just poleward of the tropics, to the north and south.

Poleward of the desert belt, strong, high-altitude winds known as the jet streams
flow from west to east, carrying large storms with them. These mid-latitude,
temperate-region storms are an important source of rain and snow, especially
during the winter season. Much of the world's population lives in the temperate
region. It includes most of the U.S. and southern Canada, most of Europe, East
Asia, southern South America, southern Africa, and southern Australia and New
Zealand.

But climate regions aren't fixed. Several independent studies have found that
global winds are shifting due to global warming, and the shifts are faster than
predicted by climate models. Most recently is this new study in Nature
Geoscience. The tropical belt has widened by several degrees latitude since 1979.
This is consistent with other observations suggesting that the jet streams and storm
tracks have moved poleward.

The drought-stricken Upper Colorado River Basin, which includes Lake Powell, is
located just poleward of the horse latitudes at around 37° N. This has historically
been in the temperate zone, but the desert zone may be gradually encroaching upon
it. (Since nothing is simple, there are other factors contributing to this particular
drought, as well.) Similarly, water-starved Sydney, Australia at 34° S is just
poleward of the southern horse latitude.

What we may be seeing here is not so much drought as desertification - a shift in
global climate patterns due to global warming. Areas that used to be in temperate
zones may be shifting into desert, while areas that had been arid receive more
precipitation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Both of the above are understatements
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on May 14, 2008 9:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Environmental policy = energy policy
Energy policy = environmental policy
because Global Warming
can lead to Hydrogen Sulfide gas coming out of the oceans.

Hydrogen Sulfide gas will Kill all people. Homo Sap will go
EXTINCT unless drastic action is taken.

October 2006 Scientific American

"EARTH SCIENCE
Impact from the Deep
Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and sea, not
asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass extinctions.
Could the same killer-greenhouse conditions build once again?
By Peter D. Ward
downloaded from:
http://www.sciam.com/
article.cfm?articleID=
00037A5D-A938-150E-
A93883414B7F0000&
sc=I100322
....................Most of the article omitted......................
But with atmospheric carbon climbing at an annual rate of 2 ppm
and expected to accelerate to 3 ppm, levels could approach 900
ppm by the end of the next century, and conditions that bring
about the beginnings of ocean anoxia may be in place. How soon
after that could there be a new greenhouse extinction? That is
something our society should never find out."

Press Release
Pennsylvania State University
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, Nov. 3, 2003
downloaded from:
http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/2003/prPennStateKump.htm
"In the end-Permian, as the levels of atmospheric oxygen fell and
the levels of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide rose, the upper
levels of the oceans could have become rich in hydrogen sulfide
catastrophically. This would kill most of the oceanic plants and
animals. The hydrogen sulfide dispersing in the atmosphere would
kill most terrestrial life."

www.astrobio.net is a NASA web zine. See:

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/modules.php?op=
modload&name=News&
file=article&sid=672

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/modules.php?op=
modload&name=News&
file=article&sid=1535

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/article2509.html

http://astrobio.net/news/
modules.php?op=modload
&name=News&file=article
&sid=2429&mode=thread
&order=0&thold=0

These articles agree with the first 2. They all say 6 degrees C or
1000 parts per million CO2 is the extinction point.

The global warming is already 1.3 degree Farenheit. 11 degrees
Farenheit is about 6 degrees Celsius. The book "Six Degrees" by
Mark Lynas agrees. If the global warming is 6 degrees
centigrade, we humans go extinct. See:
http://www.marklynas.org/
2007/4/23/six-steps-to-hell-
summary-of-six-degrees-as-
published-in-the-guardian

"Under a Green Sky" by Peter D. Ward, Ph.D., 2007.
Paleontologist discusses mass extinctions of the past and the one
we are doing to ourselves.

ALL COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS MUST BE
CONVERTED TO NUCLEAR IMMEDIATELY TO AVOID
THE EXTINCTION OF US HUMANS. 32 countries have
nuclear power plants. Only 9 have the bomb. The top 3
producers of CO2 all have nuclear power plants, coal fired power
plants and nuclear bombs. They are the USA, China and India.
Reducing CO2 production by 90% by 2050 requires drastic action
in the USA, China and India. King Coal has to be demoted to a
commoner. Coal must be left in the earth. If you own any coal
stock, NOW is the time to dump it, regardless of loss, because it
will soon be worthless.
I have no financial connection to the nuclear power industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come in off the ledge guys
Posted by: uncleeddie on May 18, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All these doomsday scenarios are just smokescreens hiding the real truth which is CO2 does not cause global warming. It is this basic pretense that has not been thoroughly examined that is at the root of all the global warming hysteria. If instead of stubborn academic hubris the whole relationship between CO2(which is not a poison) and world temperature is examined thoroughly an uncomfortable picture arises. First is the realization that CO2 does NOT cause temperature rise, at least any significant rise. This realization then leads a person to consider why a former Bilderberger like Al Gore would lie and what are his motives? Secondly if all the climate analysis is correct and the earth is headed down the horrendous path projected we as humans should not waste precious time chasing a wild goose called CO2 emissions but begin to adapt to a very different hotter world. I suspect however that without the CO2 factor the doomsday models collapse into what they truly are which is a gigantic pile of BULLSHIT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Come in off the ledge guys Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» 31,000 Havers and Malarkey Posted by: particle
Answer #1 to uncleeddie
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on May 21, 2008 4:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Proof that CO2 is a greenhouse gas happened in the 19th Century
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/environment/85081

Physicists have put so much effort into measuring absorbtion and
reflection of every wavelength by every concievable form of
matter. There are also innumerable spectrometers in chemistry
departments. I haven't checked, but I would guess that other
departments would also have spectrometers. It is really hard to
understand how anybody could avoid the idea that the absorbtion
bands of every gas have been cataloged and re-measured about a
jillion times. Perhaps all high school students should be required
to take 4 years of physics in which they spend about a semester
measuring the spectra of CO2 and other things.

We have known since the 19th century that CO2 absorbs infrared.
Oxygen and nitrogen have windows where CO2 does not. That is
how we know that it is CO2 and other gasses that are causing
global warming.

We have satellites that are measuring the solar energy coming in
and the heat radiation going out. More is coming in than going
out, so the earth has to be getting warmer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point re water vapor but... Posted by: KeepsonTickn
How we know GW is real and caused by humans
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on May 21, 2008 4:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Downloaded from:
http://www.skeptic.com/
the_magazine/featured_
articles/v14n01_human_
induced_climate_change.html

Dr. Tapio Schneider discusses the science behind human-induced climate change.
He is a climate scientist and Professor of Environmental Science and Engineering
at the California Institute of Technology.

How We Know Global Warming is Real
The Science Behind Human-induced Climate Change

by Dr. Tapio Schneider

Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are higher today than at any time in at
least the past 650,000 years. They are about 35% higher than before the industrial
revolution, and this increase is caused by human activities, primarily the burning
of fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, as are methane, nitrous oxide,
water vapor, and a host of other trace gases. They occur naturally in the
atmosphere. Greenhouse gases act like a blanket for infrared radiation, retaining
radiative energy near the surface that would otherwise escape directly to space. An
increase in atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and of other greenhouse
gases augments the natural greenhouse effect; it increases the radiative energy
available to Earth’s surface and to the lower atmosphere. Unless compensated for
by other processes, the increase in radiative energy available to the surface and the
lower atmosphere leads to warming. This we know. How do we know it?

How do we know carbon dioxide concentrations have increased?

The concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in atmospheric
samples have been measured continuously since the late 1950s. Since then, carbon
dioxide concentrations have increased steadily from about 315 parts per million
(ppm, or molecules of carbon dioxide per million molecules of dry air) in the late
1950s to about 385 ppm now, with small spatial variations away from major
sources of emissions. For the more distant past, we can measure atmospheric
concentrations of greenhouse gases in bubbles of ancient air preserved in ice (e.g.,
in Greenland and Antarctica). Ice core records currently go back 650,000 years;
over this period we know that carbon dioxide concentrations have never been
higher than they are now. Before the industrial revolution, they were about 280
ppm, and they have varied naturally between about 180 ppm during ice ages and
300 ppm during warm periods (Fig. 1). Concentrations of methane and nitrous
oxide have likewise increased since the industrial revolution (Fig. 2) and, for
methane, are higher now than they have been in the 650,000 years before the
industrial revolution.

How do we know the increase in carbon dioxide concentrations is caused by
human activities?

There are several lines of evidence. We know approximately how much carbon
dioxide is emitted as a result of human activities. Adding up the human sources of
carbon dioxide — primarily from fossil fuel burning, cement production, and land
use changes (e.g., deforestation) — one finds that only about half the carbon
dioxide emitted as a result of human activities has led to an increase in
atmospheric concentrations. The other half of the emitted carbon dioxide has been
taken up by oceans and the biosphere — where and how exactly is not completely
understood: there is a “missing carbon sink.”
Human activities thus can account for the increase in carbon dioxide
concentrations.
......the article continues. Go to the URL above.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank You Shiney Varghese
Posted by: billgee on Jun 2, 2008 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a thoughtful article.

Howsoever, "Another Key Factor is Climate Change"

Why not put it even farther down your list.

Things are bad. Probably worse than you can imagine. Keep working for change but take a look outside your door and see what's happening in the REAL world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The reason why
Posted by: Last Chance on Jun 2, 2008 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is global warming, drought, food shortages and higher prices is because there are too many billions of people demanding too much from a now polluted Earth. Peacefully reduce the human population and recycle 100% of our garbage and there will be plenty of healthy food, clean water and fresh air for everyone. -- How To Save The Earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen, my friend. Posted by: KeepsonTickn
"Global Warming or Global Governance"
Posted by: opmoc on Jun 2, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Global Warming Brigade is a political movement, not a scientific one. Some of their objectives may be quite rational. Current and Former World leaders - Government/Religious/Corporate - have made appalling decisions resulting in the mess that we are in now.

The Global Warming Brigade's ultimate objective is World Government - ie One World under the Sun controlled by a "Benevolent Dictatorship" eg "nice" people like Al Gore and Tony Blair.

All wars will be eliminated, and all nuclear weapons disarmed. We will all live in peace and harmony and experience heaven on earth...

Well the 500 million that are left. Tough if you are one of the 6 Billion to be wiped out in a mass gen fest - but you know it makes sense. Why have democracy when you can have these lovely people in control.

Of course the global warming hysteria is just one of their many tools to effect this change.

These guys make Bush & Cheney look almost sane.

linked video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Satan is the government
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 2, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only real threat, to the world, is world government!!! In fact every problem, in the whole world, was created by these governments, in order to create a "NEW WORLD ORDER" Global warming is the direct, and planned effect, of outlawing the hemp plant! There would be no hole in the ozone, if it was not put there deliberately, N.A.S.A. could not, nor would not exist without it! ISIAH 14:12-14, tells how the worlds governments, plan to rule from above, in their high tech tower of Babel, where they think that they can escape Gods wrath, for not honoring the millennial sabbath!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

esthere
Posted by: estherme on Jun 2, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the secret spraying of "Chemtrails" by NASA governments causing the droughts, weather changes, air quality & food shortages? Is this planned to force control of the people, to force Europe to accept GMO foods? I think this is all related! We don't know what other dirty deeds they have up their sleeve! The corruption has gone on for a long time that it may be too late to do anything about it. When someone tries to alert the people, they are attacked or ridiculed. It seems that people are afraid to hear the truth & keep themselves in deliberate state of ignorance! It is pathetic that people re-elect these crooks over & over- they like being lied to & screwed as long as they vote the party line! When are they going to wake up? You just can't fix supid voters!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hoax
Posted by: uncleeddie on Jun 2, 2008 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here go the scare mongers again. Assuming CO2 is heating the earth without a single scrap of evidence and only an elite controlled UN hidden by a group of fools and liars called the IPCC. The earth has supported life with many times more CO2 in the atmosphere than todays present world but that's denial. Just think past the hysteria to where and when you were convinced by propaganda that CO2 is causing the earths temperature to rise. You then realize that you were just required to assume that as fact since no real debate has taken place about CO2 being the culprit and thus us bad bad humans. The UN being unbiased is the assumption that misdirects a person. Look at the ice core data carefully and from there a responsible and intelligent person can reevaluate the CO2 myth. Until then you are being duped by very sophisticated propaganda. The end goal is a carbon tax administered by tracking everything a human being does. I was once fooled but realizing that CO2 did not precede temperature rises I knew Gore lied when he said the two graphs fit together exactly. He is a bilderberg of 95 member. He is a lying member of the new world order. CO2 is not poison and is not causing temperature rise. Your children's future is at stake but not because of earth warming but because of the greatest hoax of human history designed by the greatest evil minds of human history. That took some doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hoax Posted by: vivachavez
Uncleeddie the hoaxer. Doubt and dismissal is your game.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Jun 2, 2008 12:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Other groups have also studied the ice core data and have come to the same conclusions following the ebb and increase in CO2. One thing that is noted is that CO2 increase also accompanies general temperature increases. We have more CO2 than ever in the past 625,000 years. Overall temps have also begun to climb. The climate and its weather are a dynamic system. It can't be reduced to simple talking points unless the caveate is included each time.
I don't care who Gore is a part of, it doesn't matter to me. You cast aspersions to the 1,300 scientists of the IPCC without proof. I then dismiss it. NO and methane are greater contributers to GHG, more so than CO2, and it needs to be covered in concert with carbon dioxide. Gore annoys me when he does it.Ignoring it won't make it go away.
Creating unsubstantiated conspiracies also don't help the situation. Nor change it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can't buy your way out of this one
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 2, 2008 5:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Higher taxes/ fines, and creating more and new criminals, never solved any problem!!! only more division, and more black markets, i.e. prohibition of alcohol, and the war against drugs, these were also created out of fear and propaganda!!! I'm not saying that there is no triple(man made) threat, the NAZI, RUSSAN, and U.S. scientists, have devoted years to create this problem! We just need to implement the triple cure "HEMP" The hemp plant would end world hunger (it's the must nutritious plant on earth) The hemp plant would solve the fuel crisis (the original diesel engines ran on hemp fuel) The hemp plant would cure the green house effect (it can be used to eliminate the need to use trees for anything except for building materials)and, The only thing that you can make from oil that you can't make from hemp is pollution! We've used up the earth's natural resources, we've reaped this garden paradise, and it's time to plant it! Mans plant is at war with Gods plant! The MAN-U-FACTURING PLANT is at war with the HEMP PLANT! The bible states that God will destroy those who are destroying the planet!!! IT'S TIME TO PLANT THE PLANET!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Can Accept That The Global Warming Movement Is Really About Disarmament of Nuclear Weapons
Posted by: opmoc on Jun 2, 2008 6:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WORLDWIDE


And I agree with that objective

Its also about a lot more - and I do understand

Love & Peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enteric gases from Livestock do not contribute to global warming
Posted by: pfgetty on Jun 2, 2008 6:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article, and then you had to go and screw it all up and make the same mistake as so, so many "environmental" article writers........that the flatulence of livestock add to global warming problems.
Can you not get your facts straight?
The enteric gases of livestock actually do contain carbon gases, like CO2 and methane, but that does not mean they contribute to global warming. The fact is that the carbon in their "farts" actually comes from the breakdown of the plants they have recently eaten, with the aid of microorganisms in their gut. Those plants recently grew during the previous months or maybe even a year or two ago. Those plants, while growing, removed carbon from the atmosphere in the form of CO2 and used that carbon to build their plant structures. If they had died at the end of the growing season, which would have happened had they not been eaten by livestock, that carbon would eventually be released into the atmosphere. Because they were eaten, that same carbon will also be released into the atmosphere. The carbon is just recycled. Nothing is added to the atmosphere. It is a neutral, zero added, cycle. It is preposterous that science minded journalists cannot see this simple process.
Just remember.............there is NO contribution to global warming by livestock. Period. That is fact. When you see any journalist presenting anything different, realize they are idiots.
I would love comments about this. Send to pfgetty@embarqmailcom

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]