Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

U.S. Secret Air War Pulverizes Afghanistan and Iraq

By Conn Hallinan, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted September 14, 2007.


The U.S. military is increasingly relying on deadly air strikes in Iraq and Afghanistan as the ground occupations fall apart, killing untold numbers of civilians.
Advertisement

According to the residents of Datta Khel, a town in Pakistan's North Waziristan, three missiles streaked out of Afghanistan's Pakitka Province and slammed into a Madrassa, or Islamic school, this past June. When the smoke cleared, the Asia Times reported, 30 people were dead.

The killers were robots, General Atomics MQ-1 Predators. The AGM-114 Hellfire missiles they used in the attack were directed from a base deep in the southern Nevada desert.

It was not the first time Predators had struck. The previous year a CIA Predator took a shot at al-Qaeda's number two man, Ayman al-Zawahiri, but missed. The missile, however, killed 18 people. According to the Asia Times piece, at least one other suspected al-Qaeda member was assassinated by a Predator in Pakistan's northern frontier area, and in 2002 a Predator killed six "suspected al-Qaeda" members in Yemen.

These assaults are part of what may be the best kept secret of the Iraq-Afghanistan conflicts: an enormous intensification of US bombardments in these and other countries in the region, the increasing number of civilian casualties such a strategy entails, and the growing role of pilot-less killers in the conflict.

According to Associated Press, there has been a five-fold increase in the number of bombs dropped on Iraq during the first six months of 2007 over the same period in 2006. More than 30 tons of those have been cluster weapons, which take an especially heavy toll on civilians.

The U.S. Navy has added an aircraft carrier to its Persian Gulf force, and the Air Force has moved F-16s into Balad air base north of Baghdad.

Balad, which currently conducts 10,000 air operations a week, is strengthening runways to handle the increase in air activity. Col. David Reynolds told the AP, "We would like to get to be a field like Langley, if you will." The Langley field in Virginia is one of the Air Force's biggest and most sophisticated airfields.

The Air Force certainly appears to be settling in for a long war. "Until we can determine that the Iraqis have got their air force to significant capability," says Lt Gen. Gary North, the regional air commander, "I think the coalition will be here to support that effort."

The Iraqi air force is virtually non-existent. It has no combat aircraft and only a handful of transports.

Improving the runways has allowed the Air Force to move B1-B bombers from Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean to Balad, where the big aircraft have been carrying out daily strikes. A B1-B can carry up to 24 tons of bombs.

The step-up in air attacks is partly a reflection of how beaten up and overextended U.S. ground troops are. While Army units put in 15-month tours, Air Force deployments are only four months, with some only half that. And Iraqi and Afghani insurgents have virtually no ability to inflict casualties on aircraft flying at 20,000 feet and using laser and satellite-guided weapons, in contrast to the serious damage they are doing to US ground troops.

Besides increasing the number of F-16s, B1-Bs, and A-10 attack planes, Predator flight hours over both countries have doubled from 2005. "The Predator is coming into its own as a no-kidding weapon verses a reconnaissance-only platform," brags Maj. Jon Dagley, commander of the 46th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron.

The Air Force is also deploying a bigger, faster and more muscular version of the Predator, the MQ-9 "Reaper" -- as in grim -- a robot capable of carrying four Hellfire missiles, plus two 500 lb. bombs.

The Predators and the Reapers have several advantages, the most obvious being they don't need pilots. "With more Reapers I could send manned airplanes home," says North.

At $8.5 million an aircraft -- the smaller Predator comes in at $4.5 million apiece -- they are also considerably cheaper than the F-16 ($19 million) the B1-B ($200+ million) and even the A-10 ($9.8 million).

The Air Force plans to deploy 170 Predators and 70 Reapers over the next three years. "It is possible that in our lifetime we will be able to run a war without ever leaving the US," Lt Col David Branham told the New York Times.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: air war, ground war, air force, afghanistan, iraq

Conn Hallinan is a Foreign Policy In Focus columnist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
exporting war?
Posted by: hayduke1 on Sep 15, 2007 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It is possible that in our lifetime we will be able to run a war without ever leaving the US," Lt Col David Branham told the New York Times.

That coupled with a new-found "pre-emptive" ideal means no one in the world is safe from the greedy fingers of our corporate machine.

Somehow, we must get this government back from the traitors who have used and abused our system to such a point that we as a country have ignored the devil that attacked us for a devil that had oil.

NO MORE SQUANDERING THE WEALTH OF OUR CHILDREN FOR THIS ILLEGAL/IMMORAL INVASION/OCCUPATION OF A SOVERIGN NATION!


WE MUST REDEEM THE IDEA OF "THE COMMON GOOD"....before it's too late....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: exporting war? Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: exporting war? Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: exporting war? Posted by: jimmyaj
Nice
Posted by: vox persona on Sep 15, 2007 1:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So it is possible that in our lifetime we may be able to fight a war without ever having to leave the US. It is heartening to know we have brought killing to new heights of technology and effiency, sorry about the collateral damage.
Say, wasn't it the Afghan resistance fighters we armed in their resistance to the Soviets that brought us the Taliban? What were they called, the Majahadeen? How much blowback do we need in our face to learn that violence only begets more violence. Now we seem to be arming both sides in Iraq's 'civil' war. Bush single-handedly changed this world....rarely does one individual have that kind of effect on the Gestalt and zeitgeist.
Question for Christian armchair 'warriors': If God is Love, and Christ taught peace, what does that make war, especially 'preemptive war'? Wouldn't that be antiChrist-ian?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nice Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Nice Posted by: dmaciewski
Heh!
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 15, 2007 1:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
shock and awe;=))

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another well-kept secret
Posted by: Beagle17 on Sep 15, 2007 3:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The surge is definitely having an effect. The number of "internally displaced" Iraqis double in the first 6 months of the surge as compared to the first few years of the war prior to the surge. No shit. How can the MSM not report that widely?

(in NYTimes) http://www.gnn.tv/H15230

Reminder: Iraq has never attacked the United States. Nor has Afghanistan. The attack of 9/11 has never been conclusively linked to Al-qaida or Bin Ladin. It was a criminal act, not an act of war. They rewrote the dictionary, as they are so fond of doing.

I don't think America can ever regain moral credibility in this world. It is far and away the world's biggest rogue stae or terrorist state or whatever. All those US politicians who claim to believe in Jesus and so forth are clearly liars. Jesus was a pacifist who would have just as soon seen God smite those who do such things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another well-kept secret Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Another well-kept secret Posted by: badkitty
Both immoral and unproductive
Posted by: Democritus on Sep 15, 2007 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a principle of ethics that you do not do evil so that good may come. Killing civilians in order to kill a terrorist is immoral, and it cannot be excused by ephemistically calling it "collateral damage." Therefore, the devastating air war conducted against insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan is iniquitous, and its perpetrators are guilty of war crimes.

This air war is also unproductive of its mission to pacify a population. Hitler learned this when his blitz over England simply stiffened the resolve of the British. Our politicians and generals seem to learn nothing from history. They tried it in Vietnam and Cambodia, and it didn't work. It will not work in Iraq and Afghanistan, either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Both immoral and unproductive Posted by: Democritus
Shut It Down
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 15, 2007 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of misplaced power, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger out liberties and democratic processes."

Dwight D. Eisenhoer
Fairwell Address to the nation
17 January 1961

The military industrial complex that Ike spoke so presciently about forty-seven years ago this January should be permanently shut down. It has not only looted the economy of a country that has the potential to be the greatest place in the world in which to live (Dirty little secret: It's not) but it has also tuned this fragile planet into a powder keg. The United Nations - for the sake of life on this planet - has got to put the merchants of death out of business not only in this country but across the globe. Why is it that this manner of dialogue is always dismissed as the ramblings of a fool and a fanatic? Why is if that so many people who profess to be "Christian" would tolerate a situation that utterly flies in the face of the words of Jesus Christ in the Sermon on the Mount:

"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called 'sons of God'".
From the Gospel according to Matthew

From this day forth, I will no longer "support our troops". If "supporting" them means encouraging the murderous agenda of the Bush regime, then count me out brother or sister! I just want them to come home, safe and sound. I don't want them to kill or be killed any longer. I don't want them to have to deal with lost limbs or wasted lives anymore. Anyone who seriously believes that the war on Iraq is going to have a happy ending and that the USA will emerge from the carnage victorious has been watching too much FOX News (BREAKING NEWS: They've been lying to you from day one).

This war is over. This war is lost. Get used to the idea. Come to terms with it. Stop being in denial - GET A GRIP, FOLKS! The almost four thousand American kids who have lost their lives in this hideous atrocity (Not to mention a million or more Iraqi men, women and little children) have died for nothing. This obscene situation came about only because a handful of GOP-connected corporations wanted to loot a country that is in possession of the second or third largest oil reserves on the planet. Is that an "un-American" thing to say? Quite frankly, I could not care less if I tried. I refuse to be a "good German", thank you very much. Just call me a citizen of the good ol' planet Earth.

I was just curious: Is there anyone out there who still believes that sending this disgusting, half-witted little thug to the White House was a good idea? Anyone? Anyone??

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shut It Down Posted by: nonaste
» RE: Shut It Down Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Shut It Down Posted by: fearless flower
Sobering Comment
Posted by: chuff8 on Sep 15, 2007 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a chilling quote that will have wingnuts like Cheney salivating..."It is possible that in our lifetime we will be able to run a war without ever leaving the US," said Lt Col David Branham. So much talent, so much potential in America and it's wasted on irrelevant crap like this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Acceptable
Posted by: fearn on Sep 15, 2007 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In America today most people regard the killing of innocent people as acceptable. This is a gross violation of the 'golden rule' and can quite rightly be called murder. The 'might is right' policy that America has often used to seize a disproportionate share of this planets resources bites America far more than it seems to understand, 9/11 being just one example. Ironically Americans are no happier because they have more stuff so this greed has been a massive failure and has led to books like, 'Amoral America'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Acceptable Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Acceptable Posted by: badkitty
» RE: Acceptable Posted by: Maryanne
Enter the Cambodia era, with Nixon Jr. in charge.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 15, 2007 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Know Your History:

1969: "Nixon Begins Secret Bombing of Cambodia
In an effort to destroy Communist supply routes and base camps in Cambodia, President Nixon gives the go-ahead to "Operation Breakfast." The covert bombing of Cambodia, conducted without the knowledge of Congress or the American public, will continue for fourteen months."

1973: "Hearings on Secret Bombings Begin
The Senate Armed Services Committee opens hearing on the U.S. bombing of Cambodia. Allegations are made that the Nixon administration allowed bombing raids to be carried out during what was supposed to be a time when Cambodia's neutrality was officially recognized."

1974: "Report Cites Damage to Vietnam Ecology
According to a report issued by the National Academy of Science, use of chemical herbicides during the war has caused long-term damage to the ecology of Vietnam. Subsequent inquiries will focus on the connection between certain herbicides, particularly Agent Orange, and widespread reports of cancer, skin disease, and other disorders in individuals exposed to them."

1974: "Nixon Impeachment Hearings Begin
In May, the House Judiciary Committee begins impeachment hearings against President Richard Nixon. Among the articles of impeachment is a resolution condemning Nixon for the secret bombing of Cambodia."

A few dissimilar points: in place of Agent Orange in Vietnam, we have Depleted Uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan. We also have a gutless House that refuses to bring up impeachment charges against Bush, largely because they're afraid of the corporate media response. The corporate media, rather than showing images of the war abroad, instead focuses exclusively on the propaganda-laced speeches of Petraeus and other Bush apparatchiks. Hmm... what other historical period comes to mind?

1944: "Yes, things should be even better! Everyone should be able to work without worrying. All should be able to afford to travel, to fill their homes with beautiful things, and to fulfill their heart's desires, both large and small.

That is what Germany wants! For itself and for all the countries in Europe of good will. Together, we will work to secure and raise the standard of living!

That is what Germany is fighting for. And only a German victory will realize the goal of a European economic community."


I'd say the main difference between the Vietnam era and the present in the US is the vastly increased consolidation of the corporate media, and the coordination of media messages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Losing Armies Often Resort to Atrocities
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 15, 2007 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The result of the failed USA war in Iraq will be demonstrated by a steadily increasing volume of atrocities, war crimes, and civilians killed by USA and allied forces. Be it by bombings, firefights, or whatever, civilians will pay the price. As a demoralized USA force is increasingly "pressed against the wall," militarily, they will resort to even more atrocious behavior. This was the scenario in Vietnam. Losing Armies, across history, have often resorted to raping, pillaging, and destroying what is left in a country, while they are on the run. The fact that Iraq is an insurgency, makes this phenomenon even worse. Unfortunately, look forward to more atrocities as the war continues and the USA continues to lose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Can Not Help But Think of My Long Time Friend
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Sep 15, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is a "soldier." He "loves" his job. My long time friend and I, have spoken of the carnage produced by the U.S. military for some time now. He states he knows that the Iraq war was built on lies. He however defends the U.S. military against claims of dumping "tons" of Depleted Uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan. He states that is simply ridiculous! He states that perhaps at most a couple of hundred pounds have been dumped in each country. He says simply that journalists, the media and the academics, do not understand how much actual depleted uranium is used in each round of ammunition, so they make ridiculous assumptions.

He defends the U.S. military against claims of causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians. He states that it is simply a LIE, that the U.S. military intentionally targets civilians. He claims that the now close to 1 MILLION deaths in Iraqi, have mostly been caused by Iraqis killing each other, and not the U.S. military. He does agree that the U.S. military is indirectly involved in their deaths, due to its intervention in their country. However he believes, the U.S. military can not claim sole responsiblity for their deaths.

He has used the term "collateral damage" on more than one occasion when referencing the Iraqi war's civilian death total. As I look at the amount of technology created by the U.S. military industrial complex, and see the absolute horror of their creations, I can only wonder what will happen when allied nations begin to bomb our country and our most precious ally Israel, with Depleted Uranium, or use experimental weapons, and fly drones in our air space and the like. How many of our civilians and Israel's, will be killed due to "collateral damage." Will our media have excited little Fox News people posing counter arguments against U.S. civilian and Israeli "insurgents?" I doubt it. Why if allied nations attacked us and our little precious ally, we would simply be "defending" ourselves in the eyes of our mass media.

Yet eventually, if this country keeps attacking nations around the world, they will have to unite against us, as countries united against Nazi controlled Germany. This summation of mine is naturally disputed by my friend, in that he says "it will NEVER happen." I guess myself and other Americans can only hope so. Nonetheless, while our mass media continues to wrap itself up in nationalism, and claim innocence, little children, the elderly, wives, husbands, sons, daughters, cousins, nieces, nephews, so on and so forth, are losing their lives by the seconds, in the Middle East, due to the direct or indirect actions of this nation.

Many Americans as well, still wrap themselves up in the American flag, sing the national anthem, carry the "Holy Bible" as if it were a bucket of gold, and attend religious ceremonies in which they actually "pray" to God for our triumph. I passed a window of a small business in my neighborhood which has a sign stating, "Support America and Our Troops." If you turn on the television you can still see preachers talking about "Israel, Jesus, those Arabs, and the End times." I guess I can only wonder if God indeed exists, and I do believe in the Divine, what can one so wise be thinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Qui Bono?
Posted by: Reader11722 on Sep 15, 2007 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only Israel benefits from these endless Middle East wars. Iraq is the beginning. As we commit war-crimes in Baghdad, the US gov't commits treason at home by opening mail, eliminating habeas corpus, using the judiciary to steal private lands, banning books like "America Deceived" from Amazon and Wikipedia, conducting warrantless wiretaps and engaging in illegal wars on behalf of AIPAC's 'money-men'. Soon, another US false-flag operation will occur (sinking of an Aircraft Carrier by Mossad) and the US will invade Iran.. Then we'll invade Syria, then Saudi Arabia, then Lebanon (again) then ....
Final link (before Google Books bends to gov't demands and censors the title):
America Deceived (book)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'....run a war without ever leaving the US' ....
Posted by: Smiff on Sep 15, 2007 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It is possible that in our lifetime we will be able to run a war without ever leaving the US," Lt Col David Branham told the New York Times.

This surely begs the obvious question...

Then what the fuck are you doing there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for the info
Posted by: WhatNow? on Sep 15, 2007 7:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's terrible news but news that should be made better known.

america's air superiorty is and has been a strategic and tactical advantage this country has held since approximately 1943. You know a good nazi, imperialist, or warmongerer is gonna exploit that advantage even one as inept as the bush administration. I wish we could end all this waste.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seems like you boys...
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 15, 2007 11:57 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have already LOST this war!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Seems like you boys... Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Interesting
Posted by: civilized european on Sep 16, 2007 1:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like a bit of shock and awe is on its way to Iran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If this is all you got.. Posted by: civilized european
Possible
Posted by: marid on Sep 16, 2007 2:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every piece of armament we use costs money, when we use them it generates income for the Merchants of Death, who run this country (US), it in turn raises the GDP and so all Americans are better off. What a great system. Long distance Nintendo warfare is just up these creeps alley isn't it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Stupidity of our Mlitary Leaders
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 16, 2007 5:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LTC Branham needs to tell us how we can run the war in Iraq without the 150,000 plus US troops there now and how some fancy technology will "save the day." But the fact is, this war is an insurgency, the "enemy" does not wear uniforms or have specific and identifiable supply and assembly points, and can move around quickly. Even from a military perspective, I am not sure all this expensive technology makes much sense, not in Iraq at least. At best, it's a bonanza for the military contractors, once again one of the prime beneficiaries of this war. The belief in "silver bullets," sneaky peat "special ops" who can do a war quick and "on-the-cheap," seems to be what Rumsfeld dreamed up and much of what got the USA into so much trouble in the first place. If you ever try to do a war in an urban area with an insurgency, forget first of all about so much high tech, realize you are going to need massive and sustained manpower and it will go on for a very long time. You are always better off, of course, never going into such an environment in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do you mean by "untold"
Posted by: YogiBear on Sep 16, 2007 11:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S. military is increasingly relying on deadly air strikes in Iraq and Afghanistan as the ground occupations fall apart, killing untold numbers of civilians.

If it's truly untold, why do you present figures?:

"The result of the stepped up air war, according to the London-based organization Iraq Body Count, is an increase in civilian casualties. A Lancet study of "excess deaths" caused by the Iraq war found that air attacks were responsible for 13% of the deaths -- 76,000 as of June 2006 -- and that 50% of the deaths of children under 15 were caused by air strikes.

SFs called in an air strike last November near Kandahar that killed 31 nomads. This past April, a similar air strike in Western Afghanistan killed 57 villagers, half of them women and children."

What I'd like to know is anyone other than watchdog agencies reporting these figures? I know my daily newspapers are not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush has won at least one thing with this "war"
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Sep 17, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It is possible that in our lifetime we will be able to run a war without ever leaving the US," Lt Col David Branham told the New York Times."

This is possibly the single most chilling statement of deliberate evil I've read since this began. Recall that Bush kept pictures of our returning dead from us, and still does if he can. Remember that the military lies every way it thinks it can get away with about our own dead, and doesn't even count the Iraqis we kill, much less differentiate between "insurgents" and civilians! Then consider how much worse and in what ways the American economy is getting: fuel prices, food prices, real estate, pay and benefits, civil rights, even the right to be free of government-sponsored religious coercion. With MSM cooperation, Americans are deliberately kept ignorant of the occupation's real purposes, and of the real tolls in human life, including millions of innocents who are being deliberately targeted, as are genuine journalists who dare attempt to tell any part of the true stories Americans MUST hear in order to exercise anything like responsible judgment. Bush has even made dissent that might affect his Iraq and other war plans negatively a crime!

As long as Americans are distracted by their own difficulties in surviving, in keeping a roof over their family's heads, food in their mouths, keeping medical care an option for themselves and their growing children, and are also kept from seeing the human cost when bombs are dropped haphazardly in civilian areas, it will all remain distant and unreal to most. Imagination is something television discourages, as our schools have done for decades. If people don't see a school full of small children with their guts hanging out and their heads and chests crushed by bullets, fallen concrete and the occasional boot, they don't have the wherewithal to imagine it. If they don't even hear about such things, they haven't even a reason to imagine it.

If we can prosecute a war from our living rooms, genocide becomes a video game for war leaders, with no "real world" (which the Bush administration believes it dictates anyway) consequences. This is an almost unbelievable evil, alongside the detention and torture of people anyone but those in charge would know to be innocent. I had thought the alteration of America, and maybe it was more of a mask the would come off when we awoke, into something terrible almost complete short of totalitarianism, but I was wrong. This is a metamorphosis akin to the caterpillar-to-butterfly change, but more like changing a dedicated Peace Corps worker to a werewolf and giving it rabies, and then turning it loose in day care centers and elementary schools. This war-culture being built and conditioned is a very deliberate evil designed to have this country up to its chin in innocent blood before it realizes it has become a genocidal monster, killing everything it ccan kill almost because it can, creating terror on a heretofore impossible scale, all the while screaming progressive slogans!

I had thought that the oxymoronic (and simply moronic) term "humanitarian bombing" was the ultimate in axiomatic hypocrisy, and that its use would blow this whole idiot thing wide open, exposing its putrid guts to even the most unaware. I was wrong there too. People said, "Oh yeah, right - we're actually helping these poor people by blowing up their children and everything they need to a functioning society". And it just keeps getting worse. I am reminded of Heinlein's precaution: "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity". I would add "... or of human cowardice and the ability to rationalize anything, calling the worst of evils "good", believing the lie, and going to bed to sleep peacefully covered and surrounded by the blood of innocents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What goes around comes around...
Posted by: mgloraine on Sep 17, 2007 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is eerily reminiscent of the Nazi "vengeance" weapons, the V1 and V2, and it makes the US appear desperate and vindictive in much the same way.

The smartest of our smart weapons may be able to find and hit the programmed target with precision, but it cannot determine whether that target is full of soldiers or school children.

Everyone should remember that our country's most secret technologies rarely are actually secret , and they never stay secret. So the ability to kill people from a remote location is something which will eventually be turned against us. Then it will be some other general marvelling at how he can destroy American munitions factories in America without leaving the air-conditioned comfort of his home base.

All it takes is for one of these birds to go down where it can be recovered by someone with the resources to analyze it. Could that happen? It probably already has...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

answers/responses for all
Posted by: truthwatch9 on Oct 13, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From someone who has actually been to Iraq, Afghanistan and the surrounding area before and during the war. Don't beleive all you see on the mainstream news. It is sensationalized to get the viewer worked up. It is imbalanced to exploit the journalist opinion. I always admired Americans sense of balance, but when I see some of the comments posted it confuses me to know end.
Our team checks and triple checks media reports for accuracy. We ask multiple government agencies and from a variety of National governments.
Fact: Improvised Explosive Devices used by insurgents have killed more civilians than any military strike. Not to mention that military strikes are not deliberate. IEDs are deliberately targeting civilians.
Unlike the media would have you beleive, the opinion of the U.S. is not so bad. 9 out of 10 Iraqi's or Afghans you speak with in those countries wnat the U.S. there.
Daily Afghans and Iraqis turn in terrorist to U.S. or other forces. That's right others -- the French, British, Japanese, Korean, Canadian, New Zealand, Australian, Dutch, Tonga and others are with the U.S. side by side.
Yes, U.S. carries the bulk of the load, but we are also the most capable.
If you think U.S. attacks generated the violence then get some history books.
The U.S. did not create the Taliban. Mujahadeen were helped by us. They existed for more than 100 years prior though. As did what we currently refer to as Taliban.
Coalition soldiers are helping to build school, drill wells, provide medical relief, teach, and on and on.
You won't see it reported more than once in a blue moon, because your freinds in the media do not want you to know the truth.
I personally have seen what the Americans in particular have done.
I am amazed at how a U.S. Airman working on a provisional reconstruction team can go out day by day to help Afghan villagers and not complain about the work, despite knowing the Taliban will target him and his comrades when they return to their base camp.
If you are American and down talking your country, I plead with you to look again and rethink your comments.
What you have done is incredible.
Kyle

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

things to learn about
Posted by: truthwatch9 on Oct 13, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tried to keep my post short, but as I was closing my browser I thought, perhaps I should mention some things.
Nearly every strike you see is guided by a person on the ground who is looking at a target. Civilians are hit because, Terrorizers hold them their or force them to walk with guns. I have seen it, so don't doubt me please. Bad men who have just killed 10 or 20 or 100s of innocents run into hospitals to hide from Police or Coalition army. Terrorist attack hospitals tand schools, and only U.S. soldiers are there to protect them.
When an errant weapon hits a building with innocents it is a tragedy, but why does no one here complain about the deliberate weapons targeted at civilians by the Taliban or AQ?
Why do local translators risk their life to help Coaliton forces oust the AQ and Taliban?
Yesterday, men attacked a civilian gathering with mortars. An American stopped the attacks by calling an air strike on the mortars. No civilians were killed.
How is America bad?
Blogs are people's opinion -- not fact.
The AQ shot a U.S. camera man yesterday. He was only taking photos. Was he not innocent.
Praise be the maker, that some people are willing to fight for peole they do not even know.
Can any of you speak to the atrocities that occured before Sadam was ousted, or before America and allies came to aid Afghanistan?
You did not hear about the violence then, because people were silenced. In Iraq, Sadam killed more people a year than have died since the war began.
In Afghanistan, 100s of women were beaten daily. Expelled from their communities for talking wrong or reading. They were circumsized and raped by men who claim to be holy.
I am sorry, I must end this.
It upsets me that so many know so little.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]