Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Fed Up with the lies, and the disinformation? Support AlterNet and keep it honest.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Baghdad Embassy Investigated for Labor Trafficking and Abuse

By David Phinney, IraqSlogger. Posted June 1, 2007.


New evidence reveals previously unreported instances of appalling living conditions, abuse and coerced labor in the building of the U.S. embassy in Baghdad.
Advertisement

Editor's note: Rumors of labor trafficking and abuse have plagued the building contractor now completing the $592 million Baghdad embassy building project, but a State Department inspector general investigation reported finding nothing untoward. Now David Phinney reveals previously unreported instances of appalling living conditions, abuse and coerced labor, making clear that the allegations against the contractor managing the embassy project remain unresolved.

In the months following September 2005, complaints began coming in to the U.S. State Department that all was not well with its most ambitious project ever: a sprawling new embassy project on the banks of the ancient Tigris River. The largest, most heavily fortified embassy in the world with over 20 buildings, it spans 104 acres-- comparable in size to the Vatican.

Soon after the State Department awarded a $592 million building contract to First Kuwaiti General Trading and Contracting in July 2005, thousands of low-paid migrant workers recruited from South Asia, the Philippines and other nations poured into Baghdad, beginning work to build the gargantuan complex within two years time. But sources involved in the embassy project tell Slogger that during First Kuwaiti’s rush to the finish the project by this summer on schedule, American managers and specialists involved with the project began protesting about the living and working conditions of lower-paid workers sequestered and largely unseen behind security walls bordering the embassy project inside the U.S.-controlled Green Zone.

Interactive renderings of the U.S. Embassy by architect Berger Devine Yaeger

The Americans protested that construction crews lived in crowded quarters, ate substandard food and had little medical care. When drinking water was scarce in the blistering heat, coolers were filled on the banks of the Tigris, a river rife with waterborne disease, sewage and sometimes floating bodies, they said. Others questioned why First Kuwaiti held the passports of workers. Was it to keep them from escaping? Some laborers had turned up “missing” with little investigation. Another American said laborers told him they were been misled in their job location. When recruited, they were unaware they were heading for war-torn Iraq.

After hearing similar allegations during much of 2006, Howard J. Krongard, the State Department’s inspector general, flew to Baghdad for what he describes as a “brief” review on Sept. 15. He now reports that the complaints had no substance.

“Nothing came to our attention,” he wrote in a nine-page memorandum posted recently on the State Department's website. More importantly, after interviewing an unstated number of workers from the Philippines, India, Nepal and Pakistan, Krongard said no evidence was found of labor smuggling, trafficking or other abuses. Krongard makes no mention of an ongoing investigation by the U.S. Justice Department of First Kuwaiti and others for such alleged practices and other matters.

One former labor foreman at the embassy site who recently read Krongard’s review called it “bull shit.” Another former First Kuwaiti employee viewed it as “a whitewash.”

Meanwhile, Justice Department trial attorneys Andrew Kline and Michael J. Frank with the civil rights division have been contacting former First Kuwaiti employees and others for interviews and documents, but declined to comment on the investigation other than to say they are looking into allegations of labor trafficking.

Ticketed to Dubai, diverted to Iraq

Dozens of migrant workers from Nepal and the Philippines have previously accused First Kuwaiti of pressuring them to work in Iraq under U.S. military contracts against their wishes. Late last year several Americans also claimed they boarded separate chartered jets in Kuwait loaded with work crews holding boarding passes to Dubai, but the planes then flew directly to Baghdad. Just this week, another American reported to Slogger that he was told by workers from Ghana on the embassy site that they were led to believe they would have jobs in Dubai but were then taken to work in Iraq.

First Kuwaiti general manager Wadih al Absi flatly dismisses the accusations as unfounded and false.

“I am telling you that First Kuwaiti has never violated any visa violations or forced people to work,” he said during a telephone interview last January. “In the coming months, you will see that First Kuwaiti is the best company working in the Middle East.”


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, embassy

David Phinney is a journalist and broadcaster based in Washington, D.C., whose work has appeared in the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times and on ABC and PBS. He can be contacted at: phinneydavid@yahoo.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is the nature of government....
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Jun 1, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and even more so, the nature of warfare. War IS force. War IS coercion. This is all the more reason to oppose every single war that the government engages in.

We've trusted our politicians with far too much power for far too long. Bush is the culmination of this - and has used great power for things we find repugnant.

Unless we start looking at this reality, and severely limiting the power of the politicians to abuse people here and abroad, it's only going to happen again and again and again.

When we trust good politicians to do good things with great power, eventually we'll get bad politicians that do evil things with that same power. Bush is simply proof of this principle.

It's not the abuse of power we should be most concerned with, but rather, the power to abuse.

Some further reading if you're interested:

"Overlooking the Obvious" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Symbolic of What We've Become...
Posted by: CatDad on Jun 1, 2007 11:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No longer a beacon of hope, Democracy and good government...but just another superpower bully along the lines of past imperial powers of Britain, Rome and Japan. We've defeated communism and now the power elites have zero incentive to create a compassionate capitalism to ideologically compete with communism. A neo-Gilded Age has begun..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Name one organization or department in the Bush administration that isn't corrupt.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 1, 2007 12:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I won't hold my breath while you're searching for the answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush loves the Suadi-Kuwaiti system, and wants to import it to the US
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 1, 2007 1:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
King George occasionally reveals his true hatred of democracy and his desire to run a slave economy - which he calls an 'ownership society'. The guy isn't that bright, and sometimes things just slip out of his mouth... such as "A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it."

Want to see what a "guest worker program" in the United States would look like? Just read this article again. Bush loves the idea of a large underclass of captive slave workers, who can be treated like dirt and killed or deported if they start causing problems. Where did he and his cronies get this idea? Why, from their good friends and longtime allies, the Kuwaiti and Saudi oil shieks.

How ridiculous is it to claim that you are promoting 'democracy in the Middle East" while giving massive support to two of the most undemocratic regimes on the planet? The only way one could sell such garbage is with the help of a compliant state propaganda system - also known as the US corporate media.

Still, Bush is just a tool of the new American aristocracy - see How The Ruling Class Thwarts Democracy, by John Kirby, Jun 1 2007

Reform movements are an ever-present worry for both parties’ bosses, because any successful reform put forward by regular citizens and insurgents in Congress tends to excite the electorate with the possibility of actually controlling their own government. The ruling class well understands that as the engagement of the citizenry waxes, their own power wanes. And it is war and the threat of war that provide the best excuse for not passing social-welfare legislation, and calling anyone who demands it “unpatriotic.”

The tactic of imperial expansion as domestic diversion, begun in Cuba and the Philippines a century ago, has achieved its ultimate expression in the “War on Terror” and the over 130 countries where our military presence is felt.

The cost to Americans is not just measured in our thousands of dead and wounded child soldiers, but in the persistent lack of national health care, decent schools, adequate housing, fair wages and a livable environment.

Our dear old republic, the hope of a New World free of aristocracy and injustice, has now fallen so low into the muck of corrupt privilege and imperial pretension that it rivals the excesses of the worst European autocracies. Though we posses powers and riches undreamed of by the Sun King himself, as of the early 21st Century our rulers have done virtually nothing to raise the great mass of Americans out of ignorance and poverty, and much to ensure that they stay there.

In our film, former Secretary of State James Baker tells us that he “doesn’t buy this argument that the defense budget takes too large a percentage of our gross national product.”

But one might fairly ask: Does the defense budget, 51 percent of discretionary federal spending, take too large a percentage of our national hope and promise?

How will our two young graduates answer this overwhelming question? Will they try to rule the world . . . or save it? Can they do it from the inside, as Walter Cronkite urges? Or does there need to be a “revolt of the guards,” as Howard Zinn insists?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» re: Posted by: CatDad
» re: Posted by: CatDad
» Beta test: Northern Marianas Posted by: eddie torres
After all this years
Posted by: Knobby on Jun 1, 2007 6:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just amazes me that after all these years, centuries, eons,etc. rising from our caveman ancestors, to the start of the 21st century, in the year 2007, we're still killing, maiming, abusing,sexually demeaning, and generally treating other humans like dog s**t. And that doesn't even include what we do to the Earth we live on and the other inhabitents...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: After all this years Posted by: willymack
» RE: After all this years Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: After all this years Posted by: wisegalah
Believe it or not...
Posted by: HeroesAll on Jun 2, 2007 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, I'm going to test your tolerance for wacky ideas here, so please forgive me. Disclosure: I'm an atheist, but I've read a fair amount of biblical stuff and have a reasonable knowledge of some of the texts and histories. Reasonable, I say, not good. And I'm not in the least siding with or denigrating either Christians or non-Christians here.

So here goes: this article has a number of echoes of the Old Testament story of the Tower of Babel, enough to make me feel a tad spooky. There's the location, of course, which is just 60 miles north of the historical Tower of Babel (or at least the most likely site for it).

Then there's the confusion of languages, which was apparently caused by God's wrath at humans getting uppity. I'll say no more on this, except that the God cited in many mainstream versions of this story seems a cranky old bugger, who didn't seem to like his creations getting along with each other.

Anyway, there's also some mention of ill-treatment of the workers in some accounts of the Tower. These accounts are from works that weren't necessarily included in the Old Testament as put together by various ecumenical councils over the centuries, but were of similar provenance to other works that were (translation: bishops have been deciding what's hot and what's not for centuries, and were often quite arbitrary in their decisions).

If anyone's interested in reading further about this process, which I find quite interesting but might reduce you to catatonia, consider the wikipedia entries on the Biblical Canon (what's hot) and the Apocrypha (what's not).

Side note for anyone plagued by religious extremists who insist that "The" Bible is a literal translation of God's word and a complete and independent document: point them at those two links. Hopefully they might get the idea that what they think of as one single book was cobbled together over centuries of squabbling.

Anyway, back to the Tower of Babel. One of the most fascinating of the biblical stories, with many parallels with the Embassy To End All Embassies in Baghdad. My favourite bit is that one of the kings thought to have been responsible for constructing the Tower was known as Nimrod. I rest my case.

The difference, though, is that in Genesis, the language confusion came after the Tower was destroyed, not before. So I propose that we invoke Terry Pratchett and the trolls' view of the world, and assume that the Genesis story is simply reading the world backwards.

This means that humankind will all come together as one, speak one language, and everything will be peachy on the face of the earth.

Yah, I know, I'm delusional. But you must admit it's a nice fantasy. And I still think that Bush is a total Nimrod.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Believe it or not... Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Believe it or not... Posted by: cougian