Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lunatic Drug Warriors Still Ignore Powerful Pot Science

By Rob Kampia, AlterNet. Posted September 8, 2008.


Twenty years ago a DEA chief judge concluded that doctors should be allowed to prescribe pot -- and the government is still ignoring his ruling.
Advertisement

Twenty years ago, on Sept. 6, 1988, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's chief administrative law judge issued a landmark ruling, but don't expect any celebrations or commemorations in Washington, D.C. Our government has ignored this historic decision since the day it was issued, inflicting needless misery on millions.

Indeed, most Americans don't know it ever happened.

In response to a petition asking that marijuana be moved from Schedule I of the federal Controlled Substances Act, which bars medical use, to a lower schedule that would permit physician prescriptions, Judge Francis Young held extensive hearings that began in the summer of 1986. He heard from an impressive array of expert witnesses, resulting in thousands of pages of documentation.

Young laid out his findings in a detailed, 69-page ruling, walking readers through the scientific evidence. He concluded that the law didn't just permit moving marijuana to Schedule II, but required it.

"Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man," he wrote. "By any measure of rational analysis marijuana can be safely used within a supervised routine of medical care. ... The evidence in this record clearly shows that marijuana has been accepted as capable of relieving the distress of great numbers of very ill people, and doing so with safety under medical supervision. It would be unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious for DEA to continue to stand between those sufferers and the benefits of this substance in light of the evidence in this record."

Remember, this was no pot-addled "legalizer" writing. It was the chief administrative law judge within the top federal agency responsible for enforcing our drug laws. Unfortunately, the ruling had no legal force. In legal terms, it was a recommendation, not an order that had to be followed.

And the DEA chose not to follow it. Six years after top DEA officials rejected Young's recommendation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit ruled that the agency did have the right to ignore its own administrative law judge.

Because the federal government chose to disregard the results of its own investigation, the medical marijuana controversy continues to rage today. Losing patience with the feds, 12 states have acted to permit medical use of marijuana under their state laws. If Michigan passes the medical marijuana initiative on its November ballot, that number will increase to 13, comprising roughly 1 in 4 Americans.

But while those state laws provide considerable protection for medical marijuana patients, states cannot provide an exemption from federal law. Even in the 12 states that have medical marijuana laws, patients and caregivers have been arrested, terrorized and even had their children taken away.

Meanwhile, the medical evidence continues to mount. Another federally commissioned study, this time by the Institute of Medicine, confirmed in 1999 that marijuana has legitimate medical uses.

More recently, newly published clinical trials have found that marijuana effectively relieves certain types of hard-to-treat pain, including the nerve pain that often accompanies multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS and other diseases. Other research suggests that by relieving the nausea and vomiting often caused by the harsh drugs used to treat hepatitis C and HIV, medical marijuana can help patients stick to these challenging drug regimens -- and live.

Because our government has ignored science, needless suffering has been inflicted on millions of Americans who have benefited or could benefit from medical marijuana. In 2009, we will have a new president and a new Congress, and they should move quickly to end this sorry record of federal stonewalling.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: marijuana, controlled substances act, drug enforcement administ

Rob Kampia is executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Adverse Effects
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Sep 8, 2008 12:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sshhhh! Cindy McCain's big-bucks beer business might just dry up if pot were legalized!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Adverse Effects Posted by: richholland
» RE: Adverse Effects Posted by: aonghus36
yes, but,
Posted by: Erik1968 on Sep 8, 2008 3:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
20 years ago pot WAS good for you. Now it's super powerful! It's like the crack of pot! It's super-weed! The pineapple express!! Eek!!

Oh, wait, that's the same bullshit they told me in high school 20 years ago to scare MY parents...I can't believe how many people believe this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yes, but, Posted by: richholland
» RE: yes, but, Posted by: WireHedd
How many times do I have to say this. It's the 26000 Industrial uses of Cannabis that scares them.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 8, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is the vested Big Business interests.

However, Ron Paul is trying again to pass the Hemp Farming Act so I recommend you get in touch with your representative, D or R, and get them to support it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who?
Posted by: Godfather89 on Sep 8, 2008 4:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my question is who, or what group continues to lobby against marijuana legalization in America?

The only two that really jump to the fore front of opposition to Marijuana Legalization is:
- The Tobacco Companies
- The Pharmaceutical Industries

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Anheuser Bush Posted by: kittybrat
» RE: Who? Posted by: richholland
» RE: Who knows? Posted by: Lauren
» Not you, it seems Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Who? Posted by: LeaveMeAlone
» What if . . .? Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Who? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Who? Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Who? Posted by: GatoPreto
» retiredbiker Posted by: retiredbiker
Gramma Kitty
Posted by: kittybrat on Sep 8, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While marijuana is harmless and often helpful, the feds and big business insist on perpetuating the drug war against good people.
Are these folks who use marijuana pot-heads or patriots?
PATRIOTS!
I suggest this plant be grown everywhere... so save those seeds and scatter them along the roadways and in the meadows where you hike. Throw the seeds in the planters along your favorite businesses and the public parks.
Write your congress person and NEVER give up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gramma Kitty Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Gramma Kitty Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Gramma Kitty Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Gramma Kitty Posted by: NotJesus
» RE: Gramma Kitty Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Gramma Kitty Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Gramma Kitty Posted by: WireHedd
» RE: Gramma Kitty Posted by: countingdaisies
I am a graduated addict, I do not do drugs of any kind Man Made or God made for recreation.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Sep 8, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of the most powerful mind altering substances on planet earth occur in nature. Most of them can be benificial in proper dosages adjusted to body weight. To me pot is totally out of the question I hallucinate more heavily on it than Ergotomine Hydrocloride.

Never drink booze and smoke pot it is like pissing into the wind and it all comes right back on you. The only thing pot is good for in my drugethon is instant horrid paranoid delusions about DEA, CIA, FDA, FBI, NSA and CID spooks coming out of the walls to get me.

Heroin is a great pain killer, but man watchout for the comedown. The Opiates are all good for diarhea, you get bound up after just one use generally.

Demerol is the only painkiller other than Qualuden that will guarantee a whole hour of sex with no orgasm. Yuk. Don't take Valium or stellazine for sex either. Do not under any circumstances use Thorizine or Melarill. Never use Ritialin it is a chemical amygdalectomy that does irreversible brain damage.

Never take Lithium dioxide or Lithium hydroxide you will just have to deal with the problems it turns off later and they build pressure while you are waiting to come down BAAD drug.

Use natural Herbs when possible and stay away from chemicaly enhanced or bleached herbs. Their benifits are lost in denaturing. DO NOT use denatured alchohol as a rub use pure distilled grain alchohol like Everclear if you can find it or go consult some wise old woodsman in the Ozarks.

Man made chemical medicines with all their deadly contraindications God made Herbs: WHO DO YOU TRUST?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

make marijuana safe and legal (part 1)
Posted by: vasumurti on Sep 8, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A pamphlet entitled "10 Things Every Parent, Teenager and Teacher Should Know About Marijuana" produced by the Family Council on Drug Awareness tells us marijuana is not physically addictive. The 1980 Costa Rican study, the 1975 Jamaican study and the 1972 Nixon Blue Ribbon Report all concluded that marijuana use does not lead to physical dependency. The FBI reports that 65 to 75 percent of criminal violence is alcohol-related. On the other hand, Federal Bureau of Narcotics director Harry Anslinger testified before Congress in 1948 that marijuana leads to nonviolence and pacifism.

In a message to Congress on August 2, 1977, President Jimmy Carter insisted: "Penalties against possession of a drug should not be more damaging to an individual than the use of the drug itself."

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Law Judge Francis L. Young wrote on September 8, 1988: "Nearly all medicines have toxic, potentially lethal effects. But marijuana is not such a substance. There is no record in the extensive medical literature describing a proven, documented cannabis-induced fatality Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man."

After years of suppression by the government, the truth about medical marijuana is finally coming out. Dr. Tod Mikuriya, former director of marijuana research for the entire federal government, wrote in 1996: "I was hired by the government to provide scientific evidence that marijuana was harmful. As I studied the subject, I began to realize that marijuana was once widely used as a safe and effective medicine. But the government had a different agenda, and I had to resign."

Tobacco kills about 430,700 each year. Alcohol and alcohol-related diseases and injuries kill about 110,000 per year. Secondhand tobacco smoke kills about 50,000 every year. Aspirin and other anti-inflammatory drugs kill 7,600 each year. Cocaine kills about 500 yearly alone, and another 2,500 in combination with another drug. Heroin kills about 400 yearly alone, and another 2,500 in combination with another drug. Adverse reactions to prescription drugs total 32,000 per year, while marijuana kills no one.

A November 4, 2002 Time/CNN Poll found that eighty percent of those polled felt marijuana should be legal only for therapeutic purposes. 72 percent felt recreational users should get fines rather than jail time, which is essentially decriminalization. The complete legalization of marijuana was favored only by 34 percent of respondents, but this figure is twice as large as it was in 1986. Marijuana is safer than alcohol and tobacco, and our drug laws should reflect this reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

make marijuana safe and legal (part 2)
Posted by: vasumurti on Sep 8, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Throughout history, the legal and moral status of psychoactive drugs has kept changing. During the 17th century, the sale and consumption of tobacco were punished by death in much of Europe, Russia, China and Japan. For centuries, many of the Muslim domains that forbade alcohol sale and consumption simultaneously tolerated and even regulated the sale of opium and cannabis.

Each year, the U.S. government spends more than $30 billion on the drug war and arrests over 1.5 million people on drug-related charges. Over 318,000 people are now behind bars in the U.S. for drug violations, greater than the total number of people incarcerated for all crimes in England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain combined.

Our government is calling for billions of dollars to fight a drug war it can't win. Roughly 75 percent of this money goes to enforcing laws and regulations, but only 15 percent goes to drug education and prevention, and a only a meager 10 percent goes to treatment for addicts.

During the 1950s, long-term prison sentences against drug users choked the courts, strained and disrupted prisons and drove black-market prices even higher. The latest casualty in the drug war has been our civil liberties: mandatory drug testing so we can all be “drug free”. Some of these tests have been struck down by the courts, where the government is the employer. But others have been upheld. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia denounced these drug tests as “an immolation of privacy and human dignity in symbolic opposition to drug use.”

Even putting America under martial law will not solve the nation's drug problem. Iran executes hundreds of drug offenders. Malaysia has hanged dozens of drug users in the past few years. In neither country has the drug problem receded. In fact, in Malaysia, the addiction rate continues to rise. On the other hand, the Dutch government, with its liberal social and political philosophy, tolerates drug use, and the addiction rate is declining.

According to a 2003 Zogby poll, two of every five Americans say “the government should treat marijuana the same way it treats alcohol: It should regulate it, control it, tax it, and only make it illegal for children.” Close to 100 million Americans, including over half of those between the ages of 18 and 50, have tried marijuana at least once. Military and police recruiters often have no alternative but to ignore past marijuana use by job seekers.

In 1996, California voters passed a law to regulate medical marijuana within the state. In 2000, voters in California approved an initiative allowing people who are arrested for simple possession of drugs to go through a rehabilitation program rather than through the court process that would result in prison. Since the program began, most agree it has been very successful. It results in less recidivism and is considered cheaper than imprisonment.

Richard Posner, Chicago's chief judge of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and one of the nation's leading legal scholars, says marijuana use should be legalized as a way of reducing crime. Posner, a Reagan administration appointee once described by American Lawyer magazine as “the most brilliant judge in the country,” explained his views on marijuana in The Times Literary Supplement, a British publication, and in later interview:

“It is nonsense that we should be devoting so many law enforcement resources to marijuana," says Posner. "I am skeptical that a society that is so tolerant of alcohol and cigarettes should come down so hard on marijuana use and send people to prison for life without parole.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

make marijuana safe and legal (part 3)
Posted by: vasumurti on Sep 8, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posner is the highest-ranking judge to publicly favor the repeal of marijuana laws. Several judges of the federal district court, a level lower than the appeals court, have made similar calls, including Robert Sweet of New York and James Paine of Florida, both Carter Administration appointees.

New York University law professor Burt Neuborne said it's significant that “one of the leading intellectuals in the judicial system recognizes that the laws don't seem to be working well.”

Posner and other federal judges have complained that sentencing guidelines force them to give unjustly severe prison sentences to relatively minor drug offenders. Says Posner: “Prison terms in America have become appallingly long, especially for conduct that, arguably, should not be criminal at all. Only decriminalization is a sure route to a lower crime rate. It is sad that it appears so far below the horizon of political feasibility.”

Rufus King, a Washington, DC lawyer who has served on the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, calls the drug war, “A worthless crusade.” According to King, drug use is a social problem, not a law enforcement problem. He observes: “Cigarette use is declining through changes in cultural values in the population. Like most smokers and alcoholics, most users of illegal drugs poison themselves because they want to be intoxicated. No human force can do them much good until they want help.” King is optimistic that the current anti-drug hysteria will subside, and responsible and reasonable drug law policies will be adopted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

commercial and industrial applications of hemp
Posted by: vasumurti on Sep 8, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under our drug laws, even the growing of cannabis hemp -- the nonspyschoactive variety of the plant--is outlawed in order to enforce the marijuana laws.

Hemp has many economic uses. It contains the longest fiber in the plant kingdom and is one of the strongest and most durable. It can be used for commercial and industrial applications, including insulation, textiles, clothing, and rope. The fiber and pulp can be used to manufacture nondeteriorating paper using a relatively pollution-free process. The plant can also be used for biomass applications. Its seeds yield oil similar to linseed, which can be used in many commercial and industrial applications. In Eastern Europe and Central Asia, the seeds have been used for human consumption.

"Hemp. It's marijuana's nonspyschoactive sister," writes Ed Rosenthal. "You couldn't get a buzz if you smoked a bale of hemp, but it's still illegal to grow it in the United States." Industrial hemp is legally grown in over thirty countries. For thousands of years, people grew hemp and prospered. It flourishes without pesticides. Thomas Jefferson considered hemp so vital to America that he risked his life to smuggle hemp seeds out of France. George Washington grew hemp and instructed his caretaker at Mount Vernon: "Make the most of the hemp seed. Sow it everywhere."

Industrial hemp was first grown in Kentucky 250 years ago. It is currently grown in other countries across the globe, including France, England, Canada, Australia, China, Hungary and the Ukraine. Industrial hemp has virtually no THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. It cannot be used as a drug. None of the countries that allow industrial hemp production have experienced any drug problems relating to the crop. Using modern processing techniques, hemp can be used in place of petrochemicals. Instead of synthetic plastics made from oil, we can use natural fiber and processed bioplastic derivatives. Plastics and polyester rely on foreign oil, while cotton consumes enormous amounts of water, fertilizer, herbicides, and pesticides.

Industrial hemp is very clean, easy to grow and is one of the most environmentally sound sources of industrial fiber in the world. Environmentally friendly detergents, plastics, paints, varnishes, cosmetics, and textiles are already being made from it in Europe. Industrial hemp can meet our fiber needs while also revitalizing our struggling rural economies.

Hemp is already being used in place of trees for pressboard, particleboard, and core concrete construction molds. Paper made from hemp is acid-free, stronger and lasts far longer than paper made from trees. Hemp fabrics are far stronger and more resistant to mold than any other natural fiber. Builders in France and Germany use hemp for construction material, replacing drywall and plywood. Hemp can be used to manufacture plastic plumbing pipe, replacing such toxic materials as polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Hemp fiber is already being used in place of glass fiber in surfboards and snowboards. Hemp could also provide the resin itself.

For ideological reasons, the federal government refuses to allow farmers to grow hemp despite the fact that industrial hemp is currently grown legally worldwide. The current Bush administration took anti-hemp policy to a new extreme, attempting unsuccessfully to ban the import of hemp foods and cosmetics. Erwin "Bud" Sholts, director of the Wisconsin Agriculture Department's marketing division, said hemp "is the most value-added, prolific fiber crop man can grow." Sholts acknowledged that hemp is an emotional issue, but points out that "other nations with drug laws as tough or tougher than ours have overcome this hurdle." The U.S. is the only major industrialized nation that prohibits the growing of industrial hemp; anti-drug hysteria should not blind the public to the commercial and industrial applications of hemp.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easy to sort out dumb people
Posted by: xxdr_zombiexx on Sep 8, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They still believe the government tells the truth about pot!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Maroons.

(No...one doesn't refute reefer madness with facts. Facts don't matter because this is ENTIRELY an emotional issue with those who still believe the lies. They CAN'T hear the truth because they are SCARED. End of discussion. They have to be made angry before they can hear the truth.)

If facts ACTUALLY mattered, we'd already have cannabis reform done and we'd be talking about something else.

Dummies perpetuate this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

disgusting
Posted by: jstepp590 on Sep 8, 2008 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The part I find so disgusting is that the cannabinoids in marijuana have been shown to send cancer into remission and cure it, in cases where no other substance known to man can do. To make the point about how we are losing the War on Cancer, just read this Newsweek article called We Fought Cancer…And Cancer Won http://www.newsweek.com/id/157548.

With marijuana relegated to Schedule 1, no doctors can prescribe it or medical researchers study it. In the meantime, over 500,000 Americans are dying from it every year when we know a safe treatment that could have helped them and saved their lives! To me that is murder in the first degree by definition. I mean really, is the DEA scared that the doctors and medical researchers are going to gleefully run down to the local grade school and sell it as soon as they get their supply? Come on! The DEA is full of shit.

All so that some drunk in Washington with a morals hard on can feel like they are preventing people from smoking it?!? That is so senseless, especially when you realize that it is not stopping anyone. All they are doing is killing people so they can get a self-righteous fuzzy feeling.

Now, a lot of times I try not to get caught up in the manufactured arguments and just follow the money. Who should we blame for this disgrace. The police agencies who use it to support our police state and loss of rights? The politicians for being so weak minded as to not see it for what it is? Should we blame the lawyers who write our laws and who would lose massive amounts of revenue if we didn't have over 800,000 arrests every year? Wall street and their political access since they own our prisons and would lose revenue? Should we blame the alcohol companies who use their campaign contributions to eliminate the potential competition? Should we blame our average citizen for knuckling under to these pressures instead of educating themselves and making up their own minds?

I find the refusal of moving it from Schedule 1 to Schedule 2 to be disgusting and makes me wonder if we shouldn't just go to a new system of drug control and disband the DEA and start over. They cannot seem to learn from their mistakes and (obviously) will kill people to not have to admit them. If it was up to me I would charge their decision makers with murder in the first degree as an example to the next ideologically driven idiot who thinks theirs don't stink.

Quite frankly, it would save a lot of lives if we did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

marijuana safer than coffee
Posted by: drblack on Sep 8, 2008 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and more helpful as a medicine.
The only reason to keep it illegal are ignorance and self-righteous moralization.
ALL drugs should be made available to adults.Until a 100 years ago they were and the world had FAR less problems surrounding the use of drugs.
Supporting the War On Drugs is supporting criminals,corruption,violent drug gangs, and helping evil people become rich and powerful.
There is no rational reason for making ANY drugs illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: marijuana safer than coffee Posted by: GatoPreto
It is just ....
Posted by: FSadley on Sep 8, 2008 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't even think of the right or new word to describe just how stupid this whole thing is. It's more than that though because of our archaic laws too many people have suffered, financially, and with loss of freedom. While the criminal justice system has profited, and plundered people lives. And yet tobacco is considered safe and effective (I guess at population control, and the desease research subjects it provides). Congress should be ashamed, we should be able to sue them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HERBAL = WITCH = EXORCISM NEEDED
Posted by: caru on Sep 8, 2008 5:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YOOOW ... now our dear sweet female vice president who smoked pot ... her church has a list / map of all the demon infested places on the planet ... oh ye pot farmer! we must exorcise the wicked she-devil out of you! you wicked dirt eating, bud loving lot.... i cast yee devil out! (will use the christian blackwater if needed) ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the thing is...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Sep 8, 2008 10:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
judge young's ruling was "non-binding"...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Voice of reason
Posted by: brothert7 on Sep 9, 2008 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have uploaded several podcast on the subject from a Christian perspective. Contrary to popular beleif the Bible supports this plant as with the rest creation. Use is not abuse.
check the website

alternativechristianviews.info

Brother T.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Many Times
Posted by: doneman2000 on Sep 11, 2008 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
will we discuss the facts regarding cannabis with no reasonable hope in the near future to change the overly punitive laws that produces about 800,000 arrests (90% for simple possession) each year. Certainly the laws are great for people who manufacture belly chains and stun guns. To begin with cannabis is the lynch pin of the $50 billion industry commonly known as the war on drugs. Trying to dismantle a big part of any Washington entrenched bureaucracy is like beating your head against a brick wall. Unless you have an overwhelming amount of public support change will not happen.  With respect to medical marijuana the public IS on board to the tune of about a 75% approval rate. I believe that's a mandate and still most politicians won't touch the subject. Being a drug warrior is a safe bet politically and politicians are always looking for safe bets when it comes to issues. Maybe after 35-40 states have passed med. marijuana statutes, the feds will relent and pass some sort of law allowing the sick, the hurt, and the dying some sort of relief. That is compassion the public understands but congress doesn't. Get REAL it's only pot for Gods sake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How Many Times Posted by: xmvince