Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama Wins NC Decisively, Clinton Hangs on by Thread

By Michael Carmichael, Huffington Post. Posted May 7, 2008.


In a nutshell, the Reverend Wright strategy backfired.
Advertisement

Editor’s Note: As AlterNet went to press on Tuesday night, Hillary Clinton maintained a narrow lead of 51 percent to Barack Obama's 49 percent in Indiana, with 99 percent of precincts reporting.

During a week of reverberations over the sayings of Reverend Wright, the political calculus in Clintonland hopefully reckoned that white voters would swiftly abandon the good ship Obama in a flight of fear following a paroxysm of soul-searching racial uncertainty.

The highly paid strategists of the Clinton campaign sharpened their pencils and carefully calculated their arcane political equations. Following a series of deft tactical maneuvers designed to manufacture a withering crisis, the mainstream media would subject Obama to another week on the defensive against the phantasmagorical sayings of Rev. Wright following his madcap spree of ill-advised press conferences manufactured to stimulate the undercurrents of racial intolerance still roiling just beneath the surface tension of America.

The Clintonian rationale for this round of "strategy" was at once stark and simple. The Reverend Wright machinations would be especially effective in the Jim Crow-obsessed South and that great state of Indiana, once the home of the national headquarters of the Ku Klux Klan where 30% of the white male population donned the iconic white hoods and robes of the Rolls Royce of race baiting organizations to march 500,000 strong down Pennsylvania Avenue proudly brandishing banners proclaiming their brand of lily white masculine supremacy.

The Clinton campaign's happy coincidence was simplicity itself for the North Carolina and Indiana primaries fell on the very same date. This miraculous synchronicity provided the sacred crucible for the latest media-driven experiment in race-baiting. In gambling terms -- and that is precisely what the strategists were doing -- they bet the house on the Reverend Wright gambit and then rolled the proverbial dice.

The results are now in hand. Obama's support has held relatively firm in spite of the provocative statements of Reverend Wright. The majority of Democrats are now satisfied with Obama's handling of his former pastor.

Even more importantly, Obama carried North Carolina decisively. According to analyses from North Carolina's political experts, Obama trounced Clinton via a new and unanticipated surge in black turnout that was almost certainly triggered by the massive mainstream media overreaction to the stage-managed appearances of Reverend Wright.

In a nutshell, the Reverend Wright strategy backfired. Polls indicate that voting in Indiana is heaviest in counties where Obama has commanding leads. While Indiana is another "open primary" state, and Rush Limbaugh's legions of followers could effect yet another Clinton upset via Operation Chaos, it will not matter.

With a population of nearly nine million, North Carolina is the very last large state to hold its primary this year. If Hillary Clinton had upset Obama in North Carolina, the nomination calculus could have been rewritten. The Clintons mustered the governor, Mike Easley, to endorse her campaign last week in hopes of creating a surge of "white flight." The Clintons said that Easley's endorsement was politically significant especially with white, working class voters, but the final tally is not even going to be close.

That sagacious Congressman, G. K. Butterfield of Goldsboro, North Carolina warned the Clintons that they were in danger of permanently alienating the black vote. Between Governor Easley (now serving the final months of his last year in office) and the eloquent Congressman Butterfield, it is simply no contest. The trophy goes to Butterfield for intelligent candor.

The Southern state of North Carolina is going to be remembered as Barack Obama's firewall against the latest gasp of the politics of racial intolerance. The state that gave us the now rather unfashionable James K. Polk of manifest destiny fame who presaged the neoconservative visions of Leo Stern and William Kristol and Andrew Johnson who preceded Bill Clinton in the annals of impeachment, is also the home of Terry Sanford who nominated JFK and Sam J. Ervin, Jr. who removed Richard Nixon from his high office.

The Clinton calculus now goes into overdrive and moves into parliamentary procedure and resorts to Roberts Rules of Order to seat the outlaw delegations from Michigan and Florida. Hillary Clinton is winding down her campaign with hopes for minor state wins in West Virginia and Kentucky while Obama will roll on to win the majority of delegates in the remaining states.

In North Carolina, the last large state to cast its votes this primary season, Obama's firewall holds in the South, and none other than Dick Morris says that his nomination is now bankable.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: clinton, obama, election08, hillary clinton, north carolina, indiana

Michael Carmichael is a political consultant, historian, author and broadcaster.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on May 7, 2008 12:17 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clinton / Clinton in '08

(kidding)


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Terrorist Posted by: carbon-based
Barack needs about 15%, Hillary needs about 86%, of remaining democratic Democratic primaries.
Posted by: aouie01 on May 7, 2008 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a simple majority ignoring superdelegates (who aren't part of the democratic portion of the Democratic primaries), a candidate would need to have about 1617 delegates. There are 217 remaining delegates to be won democratically in the Democratic primaries.
Barack needs about 33 more, 33/217 ~ 15%.
Hillary needs about 204 or 186 if John Edwards' candidates back Hillary, 186/217 ~ 86%.

Hope most superdelegates will voice support for the results of the democratic portion of the Democratic primaries so the media will stop propagating the notion that candidates need to win 2025 delegates, and that neither candidate can do so without the help of the superdelegates. As though that were a failure on the part of the candidates. Anyone who makes 1617 is deserving of the full support of the superdelegates absent some very significant offense (think impeachable) on the part of the candidate. For superdelegates to not do so, is wrong.

Ideally a fair and valid primary election would be held in all states, but Michigan and Florida are not likely to have them. To push for allowing the flawed votes of those states to count is almost as bad as pushing for no elections in those states.
Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to Go Home, Hillary
Posted by: AlexLawyer on May 7, 2008 12:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary needs to pack up her traveling pitbull fight and lie-a-thon and go back to New York where she doesn't have to rub elbows with all of the rubes, one of whom she's been pretending to be. She's tearing the party apart, improving the odds of the slow-witted, clueless Bush wannabe McCain, and alienating the young, highly educated and African-American constituencies (not mutually exclusive, of course) who could propel Obama to victory in November. She's down to rednecks and retirees as her constituency, the same gullible folks who put George Bush over the top. But they can't do the trick for her.

I actually used to defend her against my conservative friends' attacks back when she was FLATUS (First Lady of Arkansas and The United States), but I'm chagrined to admit they were right. William Safire once called her "a congenitial liar," and so she has proven herself. i'm tired of her boundless narcissism, her vicious and disingenous attacks, her lies and her consultant-prescribed personality du jour.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Definitely Project Limbaugh! Posted by: thoughtcriminal
False Hope
Posted by: Mystery Solver on May 7, 2008 12:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Clinton could walk into any state and automatically get 90-95% of the white vote, Obama would have dropped out long ago. In states with disproportionately large black voter populations - or high concentrations of black voters in districts with more delegates - Clinton starts out 20-30% behind and has no chance to win. In these states, issues are irrelevant. You know it and I know it. For Obama to win in November, he would have to beat McCain in purple swing states using a narrow coalition of blacks & new (18-28) voters plus any of Clinton's base he can persuade not to vote for McCain. This is an unlikely electoral strategy, but the Democratic Party seems determined to go right over a cliff to feel good about themselves. The feel-good part should end right around McCain's inauguration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Really? Posted by: supercrisp
» McCain won't win Posted by: westomoon
» McCain can't win Posted by: agathena
» Republican blogs for Project Limbaugh? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» McCain can't even secure his own base Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: clever! and Posted by: cwilsondrum
The Black Factor
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 7, 2008 12:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What amazes me is the argument that many have been making that Obama's victory is merely due to the fact that Black people have come out in droves for him. Well, Okay, by that logic, it can be said that Shirley Chisolm lost in 1972 because White people were overwhelmingly for Dick Nixon. I mean it's crazy!

For the Clinton campaign to think that they can win this thing by seating the Florida nad Michigan delegates is silly. Obama (and Clinton accepted the Democratic National Committee's decesion from the start that those states didn't play by the rules and wouldn't be counted. Indeed, Senator Obama's name was not even on the ballot in Michigan! How fair is that?

On to November!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Tomorrow Never Knows

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Black Factor Posted by: writer7
» Hillary induced seizure control Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: The Black Factor Posted by: Longdream
» RE: The Black Factor Posted by: Sissy
» RE: The Black Factor Posted by: Prairie Waif
» I'm in Michigan, Posted by: hurricane hugo
Link to on-going racial discussion:
Posted by: dave1616 on May 7, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
please see www.discussrace.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE NEED
Posted by: paula.c on May 7, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a regime change in the USA. And I think many of us (Democrats and Republicans) can see and feel that breath of fresh air with Obama as President. He will be a great Statesman!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WE NEED Posted by: Knot_Rich
Something's Rotten In D.C. The Brutality of Their Control.
Posted by: williameon on May 7, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Duke it out with the FAUX media now!
While their guard is down!

Repeat after me: No more Lying,
Spying,Torture or
Pentagon Controlled Propaganda?

Would stopping the Red Herring now mean eating less of it later? Or
Will The Bologna Factory ever stop churning out BU__! SH__?
U-bet they would but, only if you made them!

They only respect Power.
They hate weakness.
That is what got us here in the first place.

Power talks to Power.
What is, is.
Either protect what belongs to you or loose it.
The free lunch is over in these Shark infested waters.

Two Thousand High Priced Parrots
Protecting their jobs.
At a Beggars Banquet monitored by their handlers.

How long do you think a Propagandist would last if they really told the truth?
About two seconds.

Georgie would wave his Magic Wand
And he would disappear forever.
Who did he really work for,
The Corpirate Mafia

A twist of a finger, a threat or both:
If necessary to put him back on track.
Into the The Corpirate's bill-fold.
Spewing a Monolithic Delusion!

We’ve all seen it happen!
Somebody momentarily wakes up.
Leaves the script and starts telling
The TRUTH!
Starts being a Human instead of a Robot!

Next thing you know.
They’re microphone is cut off!
The Show goes to commercial and he
Magically disappears from the screen.

Within hours they reappear on center stage, back on message
Recanting everything they've said.
Now Towing the Corporate Line.

What power! What control!

What are they so afraid of that they
Swallow their laughter?
If anyone does they surely do.
That Laughter can really KILL you!

Gone would be: their job, big house, chauffeured driven limousine and fancy cars.
Replaced by a broken bone or worse.
Everything Joe Schmoe already gets for free.

Sounds pretty awful to me.
Even though they deserve it!
For screwing us.

Sound familiar?
Make your choice it’s either
Now or later!
More Torture, Treason and Hypocrisy or?
The Buck Stops here.

Stop talking about
Doing something later and about passing our problems off
On our children.

The Propagandists protect their way of life by continuing to sell us out.
Except that without us?
There is none
No life
Nowhere

It is a dirty job and someone has to do it.
Blah, Blah, Blah!
It is the biggest joke on the planet and
The People
The American People have yet to get it.

The Patsy is always the last to know.

It is a sham.
Out with the old mass Delusion and
In with the new.

The world is falling apart and they must continue the Illusion.
Dead bodies everywhere and the stink never reaches their nose.
Something’s Rotten in D.C.!

The Shrub and Dead Eye are striking up
The Military Band
For one last march
Over a cliff.

ROVIEN Hand Puppets for everyone!
Picked for ability to
Repeat everything they’re told.

There is no subtlety here.
Totally Corrupt
Stink Tank
Propaganda.

It is their complete utter disdain for the common man and
The ruthlessness in which they dehumanize their victims
I have trouble understanding?
Their ruthless
Inhumanity to Man.

They paint a pretty face on a horrible picture
To make it easier to live with:

The Brutality of their Control.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bobble-heading to the End
Posted by: ChicagoPaul on May 7, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truthfully, I'm going to miss seeing Senator Clinton's bobble-head imitation during applause breaks in her speeches. It is comical; be sure you take a look since you probably won't have too much more time to catch it.

Now some say she looks smug while bobble-heading. Perhaps that is true, but her smug-o-meter is dipping dramatically since she doesn't have much to be smug about anymore.

I hope her campaign assesses the complete picture as it now appears here on May 7. As a supporter of Senator Obama, I believe she should continue campaigning as long as she wants to. I would assume that she would want to campaign as long as she thinks she can win the nomination, not just because she's the new Rocky. (That's just plain delusional.)

The bottom line is that Senator Clinton hasn't been able to put Senator Obama away. She was the presumptive nominee just six months ago. She was stunned in Iowa, but in New Hampshire, she couldn't put him away. Nevada was so close that it didn't put her in a demanding lead role. South Carolina was a devastating blow to Clinton, but even with some victories in Super Tuesday, she couldn't knock him out. (And, on and on....) Now, "Rocky" is bruised and bloodied and on the ropes, but she just can't put him away. How come?

I know that Hollywood stages a positive outcome for Rocky, but that's fiction. Last time I looked, this primary is for real.

Let's get real.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bobble-heading to the End Posted by: ChicagoPaul
» Foreverhope Posted by: Prairie Waif
» what a crock of shit Posted by: foreverhope
» I admire her endurance Posted by: agathena
My aunt lives in Valparaiso, IN and she knows a hell of a lot about the mistreatment of Gary, IN.
Posted by: maxpayne on May 7, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know most of the Hoosier state is different from Gary, IN. I even heard that Chicago doesn't take Gary seriously though I'll need some confirmation on it. Sadly, IN has been left out in most elections with a GOP projection first time every time. I really don't think it's that much of a hick state anymore than IA. I hear that IN might actually be in play in the general election for the first time ever. As for Hillary winning, my strong hunch is that it all has to do with Evan Bayh. How the hell do the Hoosiers put up with that sellout even as he makes Lugar look "moderate" at times?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Indiana Posted by: dustinblythe
» RE: I Was Born In Gary Posted by: desidid
YESSSSS!
Posted by: Longdream on May 7, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After her poor showing, Clinton is going to start harping on the Florida and Michigan delegates. Even if Obama gives her Florida, because he wasn't on the ballot in Michigan, she can't win it, and she knows it. Her slightly schizoid "victory speech" last night included for the first time that she will support whoever becomes the Democratic nominee.

The super-delegates are about to tell her to stand down.

I almost felt sorry for her last night. The Clintons, all three, are people whose emotions show on their faces, and their faces were crestfallen through their big smiles. Supporters and volunteers standing behind the podium weren't so skillful at hiding their emotions. Some of them wiped away tears, and others had difficulty keeping their happy expressions intact.

She fought hard, but wrong. Bill Clinton singlehandedly lost her a 50% margin in the black vote. Working class whites, supposedly her last voting block, voted for Obama in respectable numbers in both contests. The gas tax holiday did not play. A poll said that 65% of the people believe Clinton says what people want to hear as opposed to 35% who believe she says what she really feels.

It's over. It played out the right way. I'm tired.

Now everybody, go to the Obama website and ask what you can still do to insure his nomination, and don't rest until he's in the White House. After he's President, we can't rest either. It will be a new day for Americans to be involved in their local, state and Federal government.


BARACK OBAMA, THE 44TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: YESSSSS! Posted by: HomerScarborough
» RE: YESSSSS! Posted by: Longdream
The light at the end of the tunnel
Posted by: Quasar on May 7, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that Obama is still ahead at this point is testament to the resiliency of his candidacy. But it also bodes very well for his "electability" because he is the clear choice against McCain. Clinton's populist(read: republican) gambit, if anything, has reduced her chances against McCain if that were the case, which it won't be.

I just can't see any democrat vote for McCAin over Obama - so that argument don't wash either unless they are republican leaning independents. In any case, that's Limbaugh speak. All they have to look forward to is helping Clinton bring down Obama so McCain can get in and then out after four years. He's weak ethically -- they'll have him do whatever they want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» cracks me up Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: cracks me up Posted by: writer7
» RE: cracks me up Posted by: dgleason
» RE: cracks me up Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: cracks me up Posted by: Longdream
» RE: cracks me up! LOL! Posted by: foreverhope
Your supporters need cover, Hill.
Posted by: PaulK on May 7, 2008 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They like you, but they want to support Sen. Obama now because he won. They also want to stop giving you your millions of dollars, at least for this year's campaign.

Call it. Time of the campaign's death, about a month ago really, but they kept going with CPR.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PHONE DEAN, PELOSI AND REED
Posted by: foreverhope on May 7, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Demand that Hellary stop using the race card in a pathetic effort to force Obama out of the election. It is SICK SICK SICK!

REAL DEMS ARE NOT NOT NOT RACIST BIGOTS, NOT EVER!!!

It is contradictory to everything the dem party represents. It is the most unforgiveable tactic of all the kitchen sink tactics the Clintons have tried so far and the one she is counting on to 'win'. BAH!

'White blue collar working voters' my Aunt Bessy's patutti, code language for closet racists. Hellary can keep them, whatever, to hell with them. Barack will more than make up for them with the many new voters he has brought into the dem party and the democratic process.

SUPER D's! STOP THE DRAMA, VOTE OBAMA! DO IT NOW! YES YOU CAN!

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Harry Reed:

1-202-224-3121

Chairman Dean and the DNC:

1-202-479-5100

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PHONE DEAN, PELOSI AND REED Posted by: ChicagoPaul
» RE: PHONE DEAN, PELOSI AND REED Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: PHONE DEAN, PELOSI AND REED Posted by: ChicagoPaul
WHY WE WILL HAVE 4 MORE YEARS OF THE GOP
Posted by: bbfmail on May 7, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The MSM has been falling over themselves in support of Obama, and for whatever reason, they are neglecting to inform the public of the intricacy of some of his more questionable relationships. I, like so many accepted that Ayers only sat on a board w/Obama, gave him a lousy $200 toward his campaign,and did a small meet and greet party for him. Then comes Andy Martin and others who have taken a closer look:

One guess as to why Obama does not play up his educational experience more thoroughly now – it certainly could be of use to him one would think in beefing up his “I have the experience to be President” argument – is that it would lead to a renewed discussion of the Ayers connection, which is clearly toxic for Obama. This likely explains why Obama tried a kind of head fake when asked about Ayers by George Stephanopoulos in the TV debate with Clinton prior to the Pennsylvania primary. Obama said Ayers was a "professor of english." Yet, Obama chaired the Annenberg Challenge for three years and served on its board for another three years, working closely with Ayers on grants (50 million) to Chicago schools. And he did not know that Ayers was a professor of education? That strains credulity.

Perhaps this would be of just historical interest if it could be firmly established that Bill Ayers no longer has any role in the Obama campaign. But that is not something we know for sure yet. In a recent television interview with Greta Van Susteren (granted, it was on Fox), John Murtagh, a Republican town council member from Yonkers, New York, said that Ayers is currently an "advisor" to Obama. Murtagh has a particular and understandable sensitivity to the Ayers-Obama connection besides his Republican politics: his father was a New York Supreme Court (in NY the Supreme Court is a trial court) judge who presided over a trial of the "Black Panther 21" in 1970-71.

Murtagh was 9 years old at the time. During the trial Murtagh's home was fire bombed and Murtagh claims the Weather Underground was responsible for that bombing along with several others in "solidarity" with the Panthers. He charges, specifically, that Bill Ayers' wife Bernardine Dohrn later took credit (apparently on behalf of the entire WU group) for the bombing.


The Hillary Clinton campaign did not use any of this information, but you can bet if the Dems are stupid enough to select Obama as the nominee, you can bet the Republicans will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why you are so full of shit Posted by: cwilsondrum
» MSM is what??? Posted by: Jeanne
Hillary Clinton is not hanging on by a thread, she's done.
Posted by: fanny666 on May 7, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She has to win every remaining primary- including superdelegate count- by 80% to win.

She has not yet won a single (legal) primary by 80%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary's last chance -- to redeem herself for using Karl Rove's playbook.
Posted by: HughScott on May 7, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm an ardent Obama supporter who viscerally dislikes the former First Lady.

However, starting today, if she stops attacking Barack and focuses instead on the REAL enemies of freedom-loving Americans -- the rightwing Republican Party and their new leader, maverick patriot turned Bush-loving politician, John McCain -- I'm willing to forgive Hillary's dirty campaign tactics against Senator Obama.

Conversely, if she continues her baseless argument that Barack can't beat McCain in November, I will do everything I can to disgrace Mrs. Sniper Fire -- such as commenting on Alternet, Politico and other important blogs, writing letters to editors, and calling the DNC.

That's a promise, not a threat.

------------------------------

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, lifelong registered Republican, former McCain supporter (in 2000) and the editor of www.FreedomCentralUSA.com -- a nonprofit investigative website that exposes Bill Kristol's rightwing extremist organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), as the primary and profit-motivated instigators of Gulf War 2.

FreedomCentralUSA also presents a list of 225 PNAC members (called "signatories"), including Senator McCain, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Scooter Libby.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will Obama win if Bush attacks Iran..?
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 7, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question for me is will Obama win the general election..!

There is so much at stake..

Also when Bush attacks Iran and 70 million Shiites rise up in a nationalist frenzy will America decide to go with McCai who is viewed as the stronger more experienced leader in a real war a very dangerous war that is ever expanding throughout the region and may very well immediately involve Turkmenistan on Iran's side as well as Syria..

This with Russia and Red China both aiding Iran with arms shipments and supplies if not covert or blatant troops support..?

I think Obama's nomination makes this attack upon Iran even more likely..

Even if it attacking Iran doesn't put McCain in the White House it would frustrate any and almost all real reform and change if any Obama seeks to enact..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you liked Indiana, you will LOVE Puerto Rico...
Posted by: ChairmanMetal on May 7, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... where Hillary will conjure a relative who had a hand in writing West Side Story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People aren't as dumb as the American media thinks they are.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 7, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always find such evidence of public intelligence in the face of overwhelming media smear campaigns to be very encouraging, don't you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: W.C. Fields Posted by: Ghoulman
Mrs. Sniper Fire continues spreading BS
Posted by: HughScott on May 7, 2008 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today, speaking in West Virginia, Hillary Clinton called her Indiana squeaker a "come from behind" victory.

Never mind she was ahead in the polls before Tuesday. And never mind that thousands of Indiana Republicans voted for her as part of Rush Limbaugh's Operation Chaos.

Hillary should shut up and get out!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The MSM has convinced me!
Posted by: Crazy H on May 7, 2008 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I absolutely will not vote for Jeremiah Wright. Now, who else is running?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: that was good Posted by: cwilsondrum
A thread?
Posted by: JohnJlws on May 7, 2008 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We began this campaign in Iowa “Fired Up!” and “Ready to Go!”

After Iowa there was a soft, but growing whisper “Yes We Can!” that eventually grew into a deafening victory cry.

North Carolina and Indiana sent a clear message to Clinton that virtually everyone has seemed to get: You’re out of time, out of money and out of votes.

I watched this morning when I started my car a garden spider hurriedly spinning a web between the pole holding up my carport and the garage. When I read the title of this piece I thought “if she’s hanging on by a thread, it must be of a microscopic fiber finer than a single strand of that spider’s web.”

I appreciate our democracy. I appreciate the fact that many Hillary supporters are at least as rabid as I am for Obama. I appreciate the hard fought battle for the nomination. I appreciate all the false suspense and false hope and falseness of our MSM—it’s truly remarkable how poor this vehicle has again performed. I appreciate a country where we can yell at the top of our lungs for a candidate and no one has to die to perfect our union and continue this imperfect experiment. To my friends who are Hillary supporters, I am sorry that this time is not her time. I know the pain because this has been a mountain of a climb for Obama and there were a couple of times when I thought we were on the brink of the end and my heart sank and my belly felt empty. But he’s won. Now we need to join hands, sing Kum-ba-yah, or whatever and beat the son-of-a-bitches that are destroying this country. That should be the legacy of this difficult journey; to do otherwise will be a crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rn
Posted by: mnatra on May 7, 2008 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any one who thinks that this election is going to make a difference if a certain candidate or party
wins, is very inexperienced and naive.
The Dems will still make war, be in the pockets of the corporations, further shift wealth from us to around the world sleep with the ever present ruling class. wake up and vote a third party in.
Don't disappointe your selves by sleep walking and to wake up next year to same old outcome of these fixed elections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ah, the old Nader argument Posted by: westomoon
» RE: rn Posted by: carbon-based
switch voters
Posted by: charly on May 7, 2008 3:02 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw on tv where some republican were reregister as dem, so they could vote for Obama and then switch back in oct to vote for McCain. they feel he will be easier to beat than Clinton

[« Reply to this comment