Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Iran: Spin and Reality

By AlterNet Staff, AlterNet. Posted February 28, 2008.


It's exceptionally difficult to separate fact from fiction when it comes to the Islamic state.
Advertisement

Iran Disputes Nuclear Arms 'Evidence'
Middle East Online

Iran accuses US of fabricating information to back up claims that Tehran is making nuclear weapons.

VIENNA - The UN nuclear watchdog said Friday that Iran is defying a UN Security Council ban on uranium enrichment and accusing the US and its allies of fabricating information to back up claims that Tehran is making nuclear weapons.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said there was a "very strong case" for moving forward with a third round of sanctions against Tehran, while Iran said the report's findings confirmed that its nuclear program is a peaceful one.

"There is very good reason after this report to proceed to the third Security Council resolution," Rice said, adding that the report "demonstrates that whatever the Iranians may be doing to try to clean up some elements of the past, it is inadequate."

The 11-page report said Iran "has not suspended its enrichment-related activities," despite two sets of UN Security Council sanctions over fears the program might be used to make weapons-grade uranium instead of the nuclear fuel Iran says it is interested in.

Instead, said the report, Iran "started the development of new-generation centrifuges" -- an expansion of enrichment -- and continued working on heavy water nuclear facilities. When finished, Iran could cull them for plutonium, a possible fissile payload in nuclear warheads.

At the same time, the International Atomic Energy Agency report said that Tehran has cooperated in other areas of an IAEA probe, leading the agency to put to rest for now suspicions that several past experiments and activities were linked to a weapons program.

Specifically, the report suggested the agency was satisfied with answers provided by Iran on the origin of traces of enriched uranium in a military facility; on experiments with polonium, which can also be used in a weapons program; and on purchases on the nuclear black market.

It said that in those areas information given by Tehran is either "consistent with its findings (or) … not inconsistent with its findings," suggesting it was content for now with explanations that these activities were not weapons-related.

Iran's UN Ambassador Mohammad Khazee said the report "clearly attests to the exclusively peaceful nature of the nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran, both in the past and at present."

The report "also serves to strongly and unambiguously support my country's long-standing position that the allegations raised by few powers against the peaceful nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran have been entirely groundless," Khazee said.

But the American UN ambassador said Friday that report should pave the way for passage next week of a new UN Security Council resolution tightening sanctions on Tehran.

"They're increasing their capabilities," US Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad said. "Not only have the number of centrifuges increased, but they're working on a second-generation, if you like, a more capable centrifuge.

"Things are getting worse in terms of the enrichment part."

Britain and France introduced a council resolution on Thursday -- with support from the United States, Russia, China and Germany -- to expand and toughen travel bans and the freezing of assets for more Iranian officials linked to the nuclear effort.

A declassified US intelligence report last December judged that the Iranians had put a nuclear weapons program on hold in 2003. But the US, Israel contend Iran's continued advances in the crucial centrifuge work will eventually give it a capability to quickly build a bomb.

Much of the information purportedly linking Iran to attempts to make nuclear arms came from the United States, with allies providing lesser amounts and the IAEA passing on selected material to Tehran, after approval by the nations that gave the agency the information.

IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, who drew up the report, said his team had "made quite good progress in clarifying the outstanding issues that had to do with Iran's past nuclear activities, with the exception of one issue, and that is the alleged weaponization studies that supposedly Iran has conducted in the past."

Ahead of the confidential report's release to the 35-nation IAEA board and the UN Security Council, US officials had repeatedly insisted that the IAEA probe would be incomplete unless Iran acknowledged trying to make nuclear arms in the past. That stance is shared by Canada, Japan, Australia and some US allies in Europe.

A senior IAEA official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the report was confidential, said that if the material provided by the US and other agency members on the alleged activities was genuine, most of Iran's work was "most likely for nuclear weapons."

But he said the agency was not reaching any conclusion until the Iranians went beyond rejection of the purported evidence and concretely addressed the issues it raised.

When confronted with some of the documentation from the US and other on its alleged weapons experiments, Tehran "stated that the allegations were baseless and that the information … was fabricated," the report said.

Iran explained some of its activities linked by the Americans to a weapons program as work on "air bags and for the design of safety belts," according to the report.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iran, neocons, bush, khamenei, ahmedinejad

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Falsely attributed statement
Posted by: hass on Feb 28, 2008 12:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is mostly correct except that "a senior IAEA official said the material is genuine" is false.

Jacquiline Shire has said that IF the material is genuine then it indicates a nuclear weapons program -- and she's not a senior IAEA official.

If you're going to attribute such a statement to the IAEA you must either provide the person's identity or cite the source/ Otherwise this is highly unethical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why can India, Pakistan, Israel have nukes, but Iran not?
Posted by: Don Pablo on Feb 28, 2008 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Spin or reality, whatever. Can somebody explain why India, Pakistan, Israel can have nukes, but Iran can not? Why do we have nuclear arms in the first place? Will the US show leadership and start dismantling its own arsenal to begin with?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Some quotes Posted by: Axiom69
Mehrnaz
Posted by: mehrnaz on Feb 28, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the purpose of your misleading headline and the leading paragraph: "It's exceptionally difficult to separate fact from fiction when it comes to the Islamic state". Is this the view of the Alternet? And if so, on what basis? This is not the line and statement of the IAEA. This is the type of poisonous and irresponsible propaganda which purport to provide an alternative for. You state in the article the fact that the IAEA has verified the peaceful use of all of Iran's stated activities, you state the fact that IAEA has been satisfied with Iran's answers on all the outstanding issues in IAEA-Iran Workplan and Iran's cooperation. Iran is also offering to accept the Additional Protocol if its file is returned to the jurisdiction of the IAEA, now that the outstanding issues for which its file was sent to the Security Council, are resolved. You also quote and un-named IAEA source with unsubstantiated accusatory comment confirming US's accusations. I would seriously request an explanation or acknowledged correction from the Alternet in relation to these.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More quotes
Posted by: hass on Feb 28, 2008 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some more quotes to keep in mind:

Neither Jewish ethics nor Jewish tradition can disqualify terrorism as a means of combat. We are very far from having moral qualms as far as our national war goes. We have before us the command of the Torah, whose morality surpasses that of any other body of laws in the world: "Ye shall blot them out to the last man."
-- Yitzhak Shamir, Israeli Prime Minister

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]