Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

One Step Closer to a Cheney Impeachment

By Marjorie Cohn, AlterNet. Posted January 23, 2008.


More than a third of the House Judiciary Committee's Democratic members want to see Cheney ousted.
Advertisement

Nine out of 23 Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee favor starting impeachment hearings against Vice President Dick Cheney. Six of the nine are co-sponsors of H.R. 799, which contains three articles of impeachment.

Articles I and II of H.R. 799 accuse Cheney of purposely manipulating intelligence to deceive Congress and the American people about a fabricated threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and about an alleged relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, respectively. Article III charges Cheney with openly threatening aggression against Iran absent any real threat to the United States. All three articles say Cheney's actions have damaged our national security interests.

Three of the nine Judiciary Committee Democrats who advocate launching impeachment hearings against Cheney, Reps. Robert Wexler, D-Fla.; Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill.; and Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., co-authored an op-ed that appeared on Dec. 27 in the Philadelphia Inquirer.

They wrote, "The issues at hand are too serious to ignore, including credible allegations of abuse of power that, if proven, may well constitute high crimes and misdemeanors under the Constitution. The allegations against Cheney relate to his deceptive actions leading up to the Iraq war, the revelation of the identity of a covert agent for political retaliation and the illegal wiretapping of American citizens."

There is also credible evidence that policies set in Cheney's office authorized the torture of prisoners in U.S. custody, in violation of three treaties the United States has ratified, as well as the U.S. Torture Statute and War Crimes Act. The policies on the treatment of prisoners emanating from Cheney's office triggered the abuse and torture, according to Lawrence Wilkerson, former Secretary of State Colin Powell's chief of staff.

"It was clear to me that there was a visible audit trail from the vice president's office through the secretary of defense down to the commanders in the field," Wilkerson, a former colonel, said on National Public Radio's Morning Edition. In November, the House of Representatives sent the impeachment resolution to the House Judiciary Committee for further proceedings. However many Democrats oppose impeachment, citing the year and a half of testimony about Bill Clinton's personal relations. They think impeachment will detract from Congress's other pressing business.

Yet, the three congresspersons noted, the Clinton impeachment "must not be the model for impeachment inquiries. A Democratic Congress can show that it takes its constitutional authority seriously and hold a sober investigation, which will stand in stark contrast to the kangaroo court convened by Republicans for Clinton."

And, they argue, the hearings would "involve the possible impeachment of the vice president -- not of our commander in chief -- and the resulting impact on the nation's business and attention would be significantly less than the Clinton presidential impeachment hearings."

Seventy percent of American voters think Cheney has abused his powers and 43 percent say he should be removed from office, according to a Nov. 13 poll by the American Research Group. Organizations, including the National Lawyers Guild, have called for the impeachment of Dick Cheney.

Impeachment hearings against Cheney would not only fulfill the Constitution's command that high officials who commit high crimes and misdemeanors be brought to justice. It would also deter the vice president from committing additional crimes that threaten the national security of the United States.

Any impeachment proceeding would have to start in the House Judiciary Committee. The nine Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee who favor impeachment hearings are: Robert Wexler, Fla.; Luis Gutierrez, Ill.; Anthony Weiner, N.Y.; Tammy Baldwin, Wis.; Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas; Steve Cohen, Tenn.; Keith Ellison, Minn.; Maxine Waters, Calif.; and Hank Johnson, Ga.

Here is a list of the entire House Judiciary Committee: http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMembership.aspx. For information about the campaign to impeach Dick Cheney, see http://impeachcheney.org.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: impeachment, cheney, dick cheney

Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, president of the National Lawyers Guild and the U.S. representative to the executive committee of the American Association of Jurists.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
DO IT NOW!
Posted by: rockpicker on Jan 23, 2008 12:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeach Cheney NOW! An honest and open impeachment process will undoubtedly lead to answers concerning the energy task force and Mr. Cheney's ultimate involvement with the misdeeds of 9/11. A lot of people will go down with him. It will be painful, but it is a necessary catharsis. If we don't do this, the corporate thugs and politicos running this dog and pony show will have won, and we may as well kiss our collective asses good-bye. This is it!

ps-- Let Sibel Edmonds speak!! Give us a REAL 9/11 investigation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DO IT NOW! Posted by: EncinoM
» 9/11 Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: 9/11 Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: 9/11 Posted by: rockpicker
» RE: 9/11 Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: 9/11 Posted by: rockpicker
» RE: 9/11 Posted by: Kipper
» RE: DO IT NOW! Posted by: symcokid
» RE: DO IT NOW! Posted by: Kipper
» RE: DO IT NOW! Posted by: TVJD
a little nit picking...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jan 23, 2008 12:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why was dennis kucinich's name absent from this piece? he is the author of h.r. 799.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a little nit picking... Posted by: allUneedislove
» RE: a little nit picking... Posted by: popeurbanxxiii
» RE: a little nit picking... Posted by: willymack
» RE: a little nit picking... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» go dennis. Posted by: tjwilson
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Jan 23, 2008 2:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will the last person to believe any member of the Bush administration is ever going to be punished under the existing system please remember to take your meds.

A Vote of Confidence Amendment will enable the American voting public to dismiss and hold over for criminal prosecution any elected official who fails in their obligation to serve the people of the United States.

VOCA, now

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Terrorist Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Terrorist Posted by: blondesprite
» RE: Terrorist Posted by: steven w
» RE: Terrorist Posted by: Redwinged
» RE: Terrorist Posted by: gathaiga
Other Fears
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 23, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know what? I'm more terrified that this "criminally insane" V.P. will get us into more trouble before we finally see the backend of him next Jaunaury. I'm talking about Iran. I honestly don't think he's done with that one yet and he doesn't give a tinker's toot what the American people think, let alone those Intelligence reports that say the Iranians quit the Nuclear program in '03.

I believe its imperative that any attempt by this Administration to "route out" Iran should be shut down before they ever leave the ground. Do you know what I find even more terrifying? The fact that Rudy "admires" this twit and would "love to have him for his vice-president". Now, doesn't that give you nightmares?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's 935 False Statements About Iraq
Posted by: left_libertarian on Jan 23, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must not allow these criminals to go free.


http://www.publicintegrity.org/default.aspx

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WITHOUT IMPEACHING BUSH TOO?
Posted by: shd1230 on Jan 23, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I DON'T SEE HOW IMPEACHMENT OF CHENEY WOULD BE POSSIBLE WITHOUT BRINGING ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST BUSH, WHO ALONG WITH CHENEY HAS VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WITHOUT IMPEACHING BUSH TOO? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Even Worse
Posted by: PJAW on Jan 23, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's even possible, Cheney is worse than Bush. Getting him out first removes the possibility of him assuming the Presidency if Bush were impeached. I guess that must be the motivation for "Cheney first".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ven Worse Posted by: steven w
» impeach Cheney first Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: impeach Cheney first Posted by: TheLimit
If Cheney doesn't deserve impeachment, no one does
Posted by: Democritus on Jan 23, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1770 the famous conservative British jurist, Edmund Burke, said, "Impeachment, that great guardian of the purity of the Constitution, is in danger of being lost, even to the idea of it."

This is what we face today if impeachment hearings on Dick Cheney are not brought forward. Cheney's offenses are so egregious, so hurtful to our Constitution and its requirement of checks and balances, so damaging to its assignment of war-making powers, so cavalier in ignoring its Preamble to "promote the general welfare," that if he is not impeached, then no future law-breaker will ever be impeached.

This is what the Democrats in the House will carry with them to their graves if they do not instigate impeachment proceedings against Cheney. They will have sounded the death-knell of one of the main bulwarks of our Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I could go for a Cheney Perp-Walk, but....
Posted by: GarrisonPayneLeonard38H on Jan 23, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes he needs to be impeached, or at least investigated with impeachment ON the table:
1. It would probably cause Emperor Fratboy-Chickenhawk the 1st to think twice (or more accurately to genuinely think once) about further military adventures.
2. It would put the Cheney cadre on the defensive, where they belong.
3. It would remove at least some of the tarnish the Cons gave impeachment in 1998, by refocusing it on high crimes instead of below-the-navel indiscretions.

BUT....

Would it not also give Vice-Emperor Dickie Chickenhawk-Parasite a chance to dial back his Pacemaker, change to a grayer shade of rouge, and pull the Suffering Elder Statesman Besieged By Heartless Jackals act?

The law of unintended consequences has its name for good reason, and the last thing I want is for it to accrue to a sympathy vote for Dickie. I have no doubt that Karl Rove would be exhumed to do his part.

So yes: Go get him, but go carefully.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

go figure
Posted by: solrev on Jan 23, 2008 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lying about a blowjob or lying about a war, the real problem seems to be congress. Until that nest of fork tongue vipers is cleaned out nothing will change. Do not hold your breath, there are just too many snakes in the grass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: go figure Posted by: steven w
» RE: Real problem seems to be us Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
» What is the "we" crap? Posted by: fsuthai
What OTHER PRESSING BUSINESS?
Posted by: weslen1 on Jan 23, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress spends MORE TIME renaming post offices and dedicating other buildings and congratulating sports teams and other inane useless things than they would ever spend on impeachment hearings. And the most important thing about HOLDING those HEARINGS is that THAT would give congress the absolute right to ALL correspondence between president Bush, Dick Cheney and ANYONE inside or outside the administration. It makes everyone subject to testimony UNDER OATH on any subject necessary to get to the truth and makes them unable to use Executive Privilege as an excuse to keep their secrets. And it stops Bushies from destroying MORE evidence. I personally think they don't WANT that because so many of them, starting with Nancy, Impeachment is OFF the table, Pelosi and Harry, telecom immunity hack, Reid also have much to hide. Let's not forget Nancy was briefed on torture practices in 2003 or 2004, while the tapes were still in existence. And, just as an aside, I don't really think those tapes were destroyed. They kept them for a long time. I think there are people high up (Cheney?) who get a kick out of watching people get tortured and some day someone will show up with copies.
Bush has made himself and all his cohorts IMMUNE from prosecution for war crimes, NSPD51 and HSPD20, and the Republican congress rushed to pass that bill just before the 2006 elections. But so far as I can find out, that is illegal AND there is no statute of limitations on war crimes, so down the road, they can be prosecuted any time. Also, his bill is not binding on other countries. The one most worrying is Executive Order 13301 which is the one under which Bush can declare an emergency and suspend the 2008 election and stay in office under martial law. He already "tested the waters" with those allegations about the Iranian "War Boats" harassing our battleships.
These people are SICK, they're CRAZY and they WILL STOP AT NOTHING TO GET THEIR WAY. Why do you think Bush SALIVATES over the possibility of making this a dictatorship?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: War Crimes Posted by: TarryFaster
» RE: What OTHER PRESSING BUSINESS? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Vote Them Out!
Posted by: TarryFaster on Jan 23, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a list of Representatives of the Judiciary Committee who deserve to be voted out, the next time you/we get a chance:

Democrats:

Hon. Berman
(D) California, 28th
 
Hon. Boucher
(D) Virginia, 9th
 
Hon. Nadler
(D) New York, 8th
 
Hon. Scott
(D) Virginia, 3rd
 
Hon. Watt
(D) North Carolina, 12th
 
Hon. Lofgren
(D) California, 16th
 
Hon. Delahunt
(D) Massachusetts, 10th
 
Hon. Sánchez
(D) California, 39th
 
Hon. Sutton
(D) Ohio, 13th
 
Hon. Sherman
(D) California, 27
 
Hon. Schiff
(D) California, 29th
 
Hon. Davis
(D) Alabama , 7th
 
Hon. Wasserman Schultz
(D) Florida, 20th


Republicans:

Hon. Sensenbrenner Jr.
(R) Wisconsin, 5th
 
Hon. Coble
(R) North Carolina, 6th
 
Hon. Gallegly
(R) California, 24th
 
Hon. Goodlatte
(R) Virginia, 6th
 
Hon. Chabot
(R) Ohio, 1st
 
Hon. Lungren
(R) California, 3rd
 
Hon. Cannon
(R) Utah, 3rd
 
Hon. Keller
(R) Florida, 8th
 
Hon. Issa
(R) California, 49th
 
Hon. Pence
(R) Indiana, 6th
 
Hon. Forbes
(R) Virginia, 4th
 
Hon. King
(R) Iowa, 5th
 
Hon. Feeney
(R) Florida, 24th
 
Hon. Franks
(R) Arizona, 2nd
 
Hon. Gohmert
(R) Texas, 1st
 
Hon. Jordan
(R) Ohio, 4th
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vote Them Out! Posted by: fsuthai
» RE: Vote Them Out! Posted by: lynmarenjensen
jailer
Posted by: davy on Jan 23, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't think America can stand another year of those boys, throw the lot of em in jail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jailer Posted by: Dboy
If America Is To Redeem Itself
Posted by: blackie4aces on Jan 23, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush Administration has caused the deaths directly or indirectly of tens of thousands, some say hundreds of thousands, of human beings. It has done this through the use of disinformation and outright falsehoods. To cause the wrongful death of just one person is an extremely serious crime in the United States and the rest of the post-industrial world, dare I say the "civilized" world. There is a large body of evidence that this Administration willfully and with malice violated international law concerning offcial torture directives and violated human rights with regard to their detention and rendition policies. The rest of the world is well aware that the Bush Administration lied to the U.N., lied to its allies, lied to any and all who would listen or had to listen as to its true motives in invading a sovereign nation.

If America is to be redeemed in the eyes of the rest of the world, and, indeed, in our own perception of ourselves, this level of criminal behavior must be dealt with. To allow this to happen and do nothing about it is to make us all tacitly complicit. A modicum of respect and confidence could be regained through the impeachment of those truly guilty of subverting the American constitution and laws, violating international law, waging agressive war, and trampling on internationally accepted human rights. To NOT impeach says to the rest of the world that although we talk the high fallutin talk of human rights, justice, and the basic equality and freedom for all mankind, it's in the end just a con job, that when it comes down to something really on the line, Americans fold; they are just an overly fat, corrupt empire that cares only for itself and all else is no more than a sham.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If America Is To Redeem Itself Posted by: Mr. Terrific
IMPEACH, TRY, CONVICT, SENTENCE
Posted by: Turiye on Jan 23, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SITE OF THE CITIZENS CHOOSING AFTER SENTENCING AT THE HAGUE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry--No Hague. Posted by: Longdream
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
So get on with it!
Posted by: fsuthai on Jan 23, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of America would much rather watch the Chaney Impeachment proceedings than all of this current drivel regarding the phony presidential debates & sham election race. Just please, Congress, don't forget to get the other major criminal, 'dubya', else he will just pardon Chaney and they'll both laugh all the way to the banks to get the rest of our money! We need them to be out on the streets where they can be picked up, tried for treason, and then hung by the neck until dead, dead, dead for attaching America and their other crimes against humanity!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: which.... Posted by: Dboy
Wishful thinking
Posted by: Rod on Jan 23, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They ran out the clock. There is not enough time for a trial in the senate considering the glacial pace over there. Sure you can send the articles of impeachment over, BIG DEAL. Symbolic gestures are worthless.

All we can do is focus on voting all their supporters out, penalize the war and oil profiteers and such. Get people to vote on ballots that are traceable and difficult to fix.

YES! I am upset too, but that is the way it is.

Real world folks, you can dream if you want, see how well that works. Me, I going to get active, vote, support canidates, work for canidates etc.

Rod

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wishful thinking Posted by: left_libertarian
EXCUSE ME!!!!!
Posted by: ordaj on Jan 23, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"They think impeachment will detract from Congress's other pressing business."

There is no more important business that investigating HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS and the SUBVERSION of our Constitution.

We need to get rid of anyone who thinks differently on this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AMEN TO THAT! Posted by: Mareen
Google & Dell Search blocking this article
Posted by: Charles Dixon on Jan 23, 2008 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google & Dell Search are blocking this article by switching to a "could not find" display AFTER the AlterNet site and article are already visible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's OUR turn at bat, folks
Posted by: willymack on Jan 23, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time to flood the House and Senate with calls, letters, and emails demanding the impeachment of cheney. It's an election year, and we DO have some leverage. Tell our gutless officials it's time for them to do the job they're being overpaid for or face being sacked, come November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I've already started Posted by: Mareen
» RE: I've already started Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Cheney didn't molest an intern in his office...can't impeach
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jan 23, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He only lied about getting us into an illegal war.

That ain't worth an impeachment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cheney may not have been behind Posted by: kellysgarden
Yvonne
Posted by: pana on Jan 23, 2008 12:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When is Cheney going to get his due???? Impeach him and then put Cheney in jail. That is where he belongs, and I don't mean a 5-star one, either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

After the fact
Posted by: IntlDad on Jan 23, 2008 1:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do any of the legal scholars in the Alternet readership know the procedures for pushing a prosecution after the fact? I think that we have to resign ourselves to the fact that Pelosi et al won’t act in a timely manner, but that doesn’t change the statue of limitations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: After the fact Posted by: left_libertarian
What if?
Posted by: warrior woman on Jan 23, 2008 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if something happens to Bush so that he can not continue his presidency? All of the rhetoric points to the fact that he is guaranteed to remain in office. Many things could happen. IF, by chance, he's no longer in office, who takes charge? Who names a replacment VP? What about the Military Commissions Act, martial law authority? Hmmm. This is actually something that gives great advantage to the vice president. Given his lucifer tendencies, one could bet that he's already thought this through. DOn't want to scare anybody but no one ever mentions this. Actually, I fear for my safety and detention camps if this surreal imagination were to actually occur. Strategically speaking, pushing him into a corner where he is no longer able to affect US policies is the very best option. This includes the action of impeachment or whatever it takes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you, Dennis Kucinich! Please assist Dennis to assist us.
Posted by: AlaskaSteven on Jan 23, 2008 2:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This discussion would not even be happening if it were not for Congressman Dennis Kucinich championing the effort to impeach Cheney from the start right through to this moment.

Dennis Kucinich is a threat to the corporately-sponsored status quo whether manifested as Cheney shilling for military industrialists or as the Democratic party "leadership" seeking to silence him. This March Dennis Kucinich is up for re-election to congress in his Ohio district; the corporations have already donated over $30,000 to their candidate in hopes of pulling the Kucinich thorn in their side. While he is fighting for us all in D.C. his seat is under attack by massive TV ad buys in Cleveland. If you want to thank Dennis Kucinich for courageously initiating impeachment of Cheney and refusing to be silent and give up even when the "Democratic leadership" sought to silence him, then please go to his website and donate whatever money you can to assisting him preserve his seat in congress.

Show the love, folks, tangibly. Dennis Kucinich operates on a shoe-string budget and is absolutely sincere. The man and his wife both labor tirelessly for the preservation of our constitutional rights, social justice, and ending the war. Please donate to his congressional campaign fund and invite others to do likewise. Who else is courageously speaking for us and working for us like he does in DC?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» boycott! Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Dennis for President
Posted by: Deborah47 on Jan 23, 2008 4:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the longest time I was against impeachment, but here is something to think about, because I have thought about it. This is a criminal war for oil and war profiteering only. These men at the top, Cheney and Bush are businessmen who do not care that over a million civilians have died, including children, in Iraq. They don't care that they have ruined the American economy with their greed. They really really don't care. If they did, that million Iraqi civilians would still be alive, and children in our country would not be going hungry. These evil people are starving large groups of people to death on this planet while they kill others with carpet bombing, with bombs built by General Electric and Raytheon. Let's take GE as just one of the corporate pigs that is destroying our planet. They have 78 sites that are on the list from the EPA for cleanup that they paid fines for and then didn't clean up. These people, Cheney and Bush are pushing the agenda of a war and earth destroying corporate elite. They are evil. And I don't call people evil lightly. To let these two propagators of this hideous lie in the name of corporate war profiteering escape unscathed would be unspeakable. They are at the head of one of the most corrupt, evil governments to date. The corporate profiteering Democrats and Republicans on the Judicial Committee who wax poetic about their inability to do anything about this group of evil doers, makes them as bad as the evil doers themselves. Just like Hitler should not have been let go, or any of his high crime buddies during WWII, these monsters should not be allowed to get away with the murder of over a million Iraqi citizens (don't forget the children) and the death by starvation that they are causing all over the planet. There is a time to forgive, but this is, by no means, it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pelosi and Hoyer
Posted by: carcinoid112 on Jan 23, 2008 4:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until Steny Hoyer and Nancy Pelosi can get their brown-nosing under control and quit playing up to the psychopaths...

Well, they'll never get their brown-nosing under control, and the psychobastards win again.

The Democratic Congressional Leadership, snatching defeat from victory every time you turn around!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aversa
Posted by: Aversa on Jan 23, 2008 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never mind impeach, bring him up before the International Court of Justice as a war criminal responsible for thousands of crimes against humanity, the "collateral" Iraqis, then impeachment will naturally follow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Intl. Court of Justice Posted by: VickyinSD
False Flag Terrorism 101
Posted by: centexan on Jan 23, 2008 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
False Flag Terrorism 101

http://mail.moment.net/~michael/Terrorism101.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gee, thanks. Just what I always wanted.
Posted by: Longdream on Jan 23, 2008 6:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When is this glacier supposed to pull up at the Capitol? January 19, 2009?

I would truly love to see Cheney go through hearings. I'd be glued to C-Span, with popcorn, snowcaps and a coke. I'm sure he'd make up some new swear words I could use.

In the meantime, wake me up when you see somebody alive in the House start taking a vote. Look carefully, because it would have to be someone who uses a brain to think, i.e. who doesn't view the outrageous Clinton impeachment as a reason to avoid getting justice done for real crimes against the country. That breed is not exactly thick on the ground over there.

I'll be right over here, not holding my breath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Jan 23, 2008 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try 'em & fry 'em.

A Vote of Confidence Amendment will enable the American voting public to dismiss and hold over for criminal prosecution any elected official who fails in their obligation to serve the people of the United States.

VOCA, now

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let the impeachments begin!
Posted by: veggielady on Jan 23, 2008 6:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes,I think Cheney and Bush should be impeached.
While we are at it,lets take a look at the heads of office at the FDA,USDA and EPA as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hi veggielady! Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» IT COULD HAPPEN... Posted by: Mareen
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Jan 23, 2008 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under the current system, not a single participant in the Bush conspiracy is going to be punished and the same pattern of lawlessness is going to happen over and over and over again.

A Vote of Confidence Amendment will enable the American voting public to dismiss and hold over for criminal prosecuti