Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Tila Tequila’s Bisexual Dating Show Is More Than Just Trashy Fun

By Nicole Kristal, American Sexuality Magazine. Posted December 13, 2007.


MTV's reality dating show A Shot at Love With Tila Tequila takes on some of society's worst stereotypes about gender and sexuality.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Nicole Kristal

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

For those of you who haven't noticed, we bisexuals finally scored our own show -- A Shot at Love with Tila Tequila. Unfortunately, it's a reality program made by a former producer of The Bachelor that places Tequila, an exotic Asian American femme with plenty of tattoos, cleavage, and low-cut halter tops, at the center of a battle between sixteen straight men (who have the maturity of frat boys on Jägermeister) and sixteen trashy lesbians (many of whom resemble strippers much like the woman they're pursuing). Despite the contestants, the show proves to be trashy fun that grows less superficial -- mostly due to the maturity of its star -- with each episode. A surprising feat considering that most of us, that is most of us over the age of twenty-one, didn't even have a clue who Tequila was until MTV aired this show.

Known for having two million MySpace friends, writing provocative songs like "Fuck Ya Man" and "Stripper Friends," and being a Maxim cover girl, Tequila (for obvious reasons) isn't the ideal bisexual poster child. During the first episode Tequila's slutty behavior and ignorant commentary made me want to hurl things at my television. Aside from her penchant for approaching the contestants in the house and randomly making out with them then walking away, Tequila also reinforces another major bisexual stereotype -- she keeps her sexuality a secret from her potential suitors. When they arrive at the house, Tequila hasn't told any of the men or women that she's bisexual, let alone that they will be competing with members of the opposite sex for her affections. Even worse, when she tells them her sexuality in a dramatic ending to the first episode, she says, "I'm a bisexual," not "I'm bisexual." That's like Ellen DeGeneres saying, "I'm a gay." Not exactly confidence inspiring. Neither is her admission that she's a complete horndog. Tequila confides to a male Italian contestant that she has to masturbate nine times a day in order to be satisfied. Not exactly helping our image there, either, lady!

Despite claiming that both men and women have broken her heart, Tequila's clearly a new bisexual, which makes her comments and influence somewhat dangerous to seasoned members of the bi community like me. In earlier episodes she has a proclivity for turning to the camera and saying unintentionally damaging things like, "This show's the perfect experience because it's really going to help me figure out -- do I really like a guy or do I really like a girl?" Umm, the point isn't to determine whether you're straight or gay. You're allegedly bisexual, you idiot!

The point of a bisexual dating show shouldn't be to prove that we all eventually develop a preference, abandon our fence-sitting ways, and settle into a heterosexual or homosexual lifestyle. And it definitely shouldn't be to center an entire show around a bi-curious straight girl who'd make out with a woman at a nightclub after a few cocktails for the pleasure of her boyfriend. And after watching the first few episodes of the show, I wasn't entirely sure Tequila wasn't that girl. When she screams things like, "I don't know about you guys but I love strip clubs. Are you ready to party?" I can't help but miss Ani DiFranco.

The competitions on the show are designed to highlight gender roles and thus help Tequila better decide whom to eliminate. In many cases she behaves like a straight man. In the first episode she makes the female contestants play dress up and walk a runway in maid, Catholic school girl, and dominatrix-style outfits so she can objectify them like a dude, then eliminate the least sexy ones. She eliminates the male virgin for inexperience in the first few episodes, but keeps the female virgin around, excited about exploiting her innocence. She doesn't hesitate to scream, "Look at that ass!" as both men and women slither around in a tub full of bath bubbles looking for chips that will grant them alone time with her. But as the season progresses Tequila also proves to be genuine and multi-faceted despite her superficial packaging and dirty talk.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bisexuality, tila tequila, mtv, a shot at love with tila

Nicole Kristal is the co-author of The Bisexual's Guide to the Universe: Quips, Tips, And Lists for Those Who Go Both Ways.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Article a bit off-putting
Posted by: davmills on Dec 13, 2007 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of this article seems a bit vulgar and judgemental herself. Her reference to people's behaviour as "trashy" and "slutty" evidences this. As for strippers, there's nothing wrong with them or what they do; no more so than those who pay to watch them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Article a bit off-putting Posted by: diptutod
» EMPTY-V Posted by: snideelf
I Know When I Want Insight
Posted by: apophenia_monkey on Dec 13, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to sexuality, i turn to the world famous MTV known for its ability produce quality documentaries and peer reviewed papers on the subject. nevermind discovery channel, bbc america, etc all of which show nothing but mindless pop culture trash...

c'mon, it's freakin' MTV--a single show on its network is about as relevant to societal commentary as faux news o'reilly factor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Know When I Want Insight Posted by: johnclark
» RE: I Know When I Want Insight Posted by: juanpecan81
Glad I ain't got cable ...
Posted by: johnclark on Dec 13, 2007 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or I would have been forced to watch it. Thank you for doing it for me. I did stay up to watch Tequila on one of the late night talk shows, she admitted to having multiple personalities. Her nervous giggling also put me off. I'm still not sure if a bisexual reality dating show represents progress, especially if all of the contestants are monosexual. I mean, isn't that the only chose we're ever given -- straight or gay world? I guess it's progress, since most of our previous exposure in reality TV has been on Jerry (or the one bisexual on Oprah).

To the comment above, I don't see the author being judgmental at all. We are ALWAYS (at least 99% of the time) portrayed as "trashy" and "slutty". That or the married bisexual becoming gay in the classic coming out story. It's 2007 and I still see the gay/lesbian media calling us "confused". You see, we get it from all sides. If the slutty bisexual were only one of the many ways we were portrayed in the media, we wouldn't have a problem with it. As we all know, every stereotype is true once in a while. But when the stereotype is the only way we're portrayed, we get pissed.

At least the BBC has a show with positive portrayals of bisexuals - Torchwood.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Forced to watch it"? Posted by: defrag
ONLY 9 TIMES A DAY??
Posted by: goldmarx on Dec 13, 2007 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it bad for the image of bisexuals if Tequila masturbates nine times a day?

Would it be better if she played with herself more?

Or is it that masturbation is a bad thing because lust is one of the seven deadly sins and not a real emotion?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ONLY 9 TIMES A DAY?? Posted by: johnclark
» RE: ONLY 9 TIMES A DAY?? Posted by: diptutod
» RE: ONLY 9 TIMES A DAY?? Posted by: goldmarx
» Furthering Stereotypes Posted by: wheresarah
» RE: Furthering Stereotypes Posted by: CharliePatton
» RE: Furthering Stereotypes Posted by: goldmarx
» RE: ONLY 9 TIMES A DAY?? Posted by: lamar
yawn
Posted by: ankhet on Dec 13, 2007 7:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh how cute! The old wine in a new bottle....why would I want to watch that on national television? Get over yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

anon
Posted by: theshadowknows on Dec 13, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who cares?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mostly mindless entertainment, but I like the message.
Posted by: vietnamsyndrome on Dec 13, 2007 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most TV (especially reality TV) and other commercial entertainment sucks. I try to avoid it as much as possible. However, when they co-opt ideals I support like multiculturalism and openmindedness about sexual identity to push their products, I smile a little bit. I have seen this show a few times, and a lot of other people will see this show too. Exposure like this is just a part of how ideas become more mainstream over time in the public sentiment. This show also isn't a completely exploitative gay minstrel show like Queer Eye that just makes a spectacle out of the people involved and which breaks no stereotypes. The last lesbian left on that show, the "soft butch" mentioned, was really an interesting character that defied a lot of stereotypes and seemed to have a really good heart. I agree with the author, I admire what the show is doing, even though it is at first glance just another run of the mill reality show.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mtv? C'mon. That's for kiddies.
Posted by: lamar on Dec 13, 2007 8:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Tila Tequila article? Really?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And people wonder why I refuse to watch TV
Posted by: CharliePatton on Dec 13, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does the term "vapid" mean anything to you, Nicole?

Actually Nicole, I believe you say it all when you state--and I quote--"Shut up."

Optimally Nicole, you'll take your own advice and "Shut up."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Her "Bi-Sexuality" is an Affectation
Posted by: screwjack2000 on Dec 13, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, for ratings. I read an article about her recently that said they just decided it was more titillating that way, but that she's really strait.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Her "Bi-Sexuality" is an Affectation Posted by: vietnamsyndrome
Odd, disparaging comments here
Posted by: defrag on Dec 13, 2007 10:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only references I've seen in print to Tila Tequila before this have been from right-wing columnists decrying her show. That alone made me think there must be something good about her! One was even horrified at her name - egads, she's encouraging youngsters to drink!

Well, uh, yeah, if the show has any cultural influence it is with young people. It doesn't matter if the highfalutin' 40 & 50-somethings reading AlterNet have cable or not. Sheesh. Whaddaya want, a medal?

Perhaps more significantly, I don't notice any parents chiming in to say they prohibit, or allow, their kids to watch this show.

Myself, I'm not too proud to have cable & now I'll take a look. As a gay (not bi) man I'll probably see kids having an easier time with their sexuality than I did. I think that's a great thing but maybe I'm in a minority in this patrician crowd here, looking down your noses at TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Odd, disparaging comments here Posted by: screwjack2000
» RE: Maybe "Hairspray" as a comparison Posted by: screwjack2000
» RE: Odd, disparaging comments here Posted by: screwjack2000
» A lot of PRUDES here maybe? Posted by: defrag
stormy7
Posted by: dpodlogar on Dec 13, 2007 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i think the reason the author has a problem with tila is because tila says she's bi but she really isn't. this is another fake reality show.
now an even trashier show, watch i love new york on vh1. this wacked flavor flav cast off no brains and all fake boob. guys love that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all about the money
Posted by: Knot_Rich on Dec 13, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone really think MTV is looking to make social commentary here or has this high minded goal of improving the human race? I guess Beavis and Butthead and Jackass failed to make the social improvements they desired. MTV is a business, owned by big businss, who are in the business of making money, by any means. Sexploitation sells, it's that simple. Put on a sleazy woman, mention the word sex a few times, shit, I might turn it on once just to see what's going on, and I can count the number of hours I watch TV in a month on my fingers. Now, before any of you jump to conclusions that I'm some troll prude or something as you often do, I'm as open minded as the next person. I could personally give a shit less what lifestyle anyone chooses to follow, and I've had my share of experimentation. But c'mon, this is MTV, one of the most youth exploitive for money pieces of media drivel you can put on cable. If it feels good in the bank account, do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this show sounds like a sad mess
Posted by: madaha on Dec 13, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"puts looks aside"?? How can the author say that, after just stating that Tequila made the women walk a catwalk, then eliminated the unsexy ones? This article, like the show, makes no sense. If anything, it makes bisexuals sound confused and self-contradictory, which I'm sure people don't want. Y'all can do better than that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

reality tv plays by different rules
Posted by: hylasdrowned on Dec 13, 2007 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason she's choosing from straight men and lesbians is because bisexuals dating bisexuals makes for MUCH less drama. I think it's that simple. There wouldn't be NO drama, and I can say that from personal experience. But one source of possible conflict and misunderstanding (and hence, apparently, excitement) would be eliminated even with one bisexual contestant among them. And oh, by the way, at least one of them is bisexual, make no mistake. You just won't hear that on TV because they are playing a role that is almost but not quite exactly like themselves.

I'm delighted to hear that she and/or the show's puppeteers are making somewhat surprising stories and showing "character development." I'd still love to see a scripted show with bisexual characters who display anything like a sympathetic arc; I can't think of one offhand. I've never seen Torchwood, but it seems unlikely that relationships are a big focus for it.

I have to say that a lot of these comments are hilarious. I can understand being offended by the show, though I think that's rather a dull and simplistic reaction. TV is frequently ugly but it's part of our society and worth engaging with and understanding.

But "this article is offensive"? Really? Because you didn't agree with the conclusion? Because you feel that MTV reality shows are so far beneath you that any discussion of them within your frame of attention demeans you? I thought it was a thoughtful, balanced discussion of something that, like it or not, young people are going to view and take seriously to some small degree, and it will influence their perceptions of a phenomenon a lot of people still fail to understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Torchwood Posted by: BenCaxton12
"exotic" Asian?
Posted by: apa on Dec 13, 2007 4:51 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think what's really unfortunate is that an Asian American femme is being described in this article as "exotic."
And I think it's unfortunate that this article disparages sex workers (strippers, etc.)
Finally, as for the comments claiming that Tila is "not really bisexual": the only people who are not bisexual are those who say they aren't. If this woman says she's bi, then she is. Talk about biphobia mixed with sexism! What's so difficult about believing a woman when she talks about her sexuality?
Very unfortunate, indeed...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "exotic" Asian? Posted by: screwjack2000
» RE: "exotic" Asian? Posted by: apa
I G N O R A M I
Posted by: L-boogey on Dec 13, 2007 5:38 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I won't spen too much time criticising the author, since that would be as pointless as pointing-out that an MTV REALITY TV program is not the place to cultivate your views on gender and sexuality. Let's make this one an attack on the fool who put it on this site. Is AlterNet beginning to use the same marketing tactics as the news sources it so often rips on? ie attacking Fox for using gratuitous footage when claiming to be reporting on how filthy they are?
EDITOR...DON'T STOOP SO LOW! This article is a vacuum! This site is where aware people try to get their news, and aware people see through hollow marketing campaigns! Read the thing again! It's lack of substance, insight and meaning is truly frustrating and offensive in quite a direct way!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's that fact that anyone cares...
Posted by: davidg on Dec 13, 2007 7:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that's the problem. Some guilt for even reading this. The US, Canada and a few others are destroying environmental accords in Bali and still, tragically, pop culture candy floss rules. The Titanic is going down and we are titillated about whom the cabin girl is sleeping with. Such anaesthetics! We'll deserve what we get.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is there no trash this culture won't lap up ...
Posted by: Philip Newton on Dec 14, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in the name of "diversity?"

The world burns and we peep.

Grade: F-

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shallow Thinking
Posted by: JohnU on Dec 14, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article exhibits some really shallow thinking, particularly where the author conflates bisexuality with the universal "problem" of loving two people at the same time. The "eternal triangle" transcends time and culture, and is not the exclusive territory of bisexuals.

People who are attracted to more than one gender are bisexuals. People who are attracted to more than one person at a time are human. If they act on this attraction ethically, they are polyamorists or swingers. If the act on this attraction unethically, they are adulterers or rapists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GREAT AMERICA
Posted by: brucerise on Dec 18, 2007 7:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a time when our positive role models were men who were proud to be men and did things that were honorable and likewise women that were proud to be women and did honorable things.
http://www.findbilover.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Author NK tries too hard to make bisexuality visible
Posted by: Silenceisgolden on Dec 21, 2007 11:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, who cares. This show is shallow and not the best choice in media programming to represent bi people. Maybe when they get rid of the skanky image, bisexuals will be taken seriously. Tila has her perspective on bi, Nicole has hers -- everyone is different. I think NK needs to take a step back, and focus on something else for a change -- besides sexual orientation. I'm not saying to forget about it, just don't make a big issue out of it because I don't believe the general populations really cares about the visibility of bis because they're too busy living their own lives. Okay, okay -- so some people like men and women. Next! Let's move on please... (yawn)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]