Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

We Have to Keep Pressing Hard Against an Attack on Iran

By Marjorie Cohn, AlterNet. Posted November 26, 2007.


We've got to keep pressing hard against an attack on Iran: The security of the United States, as well as the Middle East, is hanging in the balance.
Advertisement

Rhetoric flowing out of the White House indicates the Bush administration is planning a military attack on Iran. Officials in Saudi Arabia, a close Bush ally, think the handwriting is on the wall. "George Bush's tone makes us think he has decided what he is going to do," according to Rihab Massoud, Prince Bandar ben Sultan's right-hand man. Saudi Social Affairs Minister Abdel Mohsen Hakas told Le Figaro, "We are getting closer and closer to a confrontation."

As Bush and Cheney try to whip us into a frenzy about the dangers Iran poses, their argument comes up short. They say Iran is developing nuclear weapons, but Mohamed ElBaradei, director of the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says there is "no evidence" of this. They say Iran is sending deadly weapons into Iraq to kill U.S. troops, but those devices can be manufactured in any Iraqi machine shop. Now the New York Times reports most of the foreign fighters in Iraq come, not from Iran, but from two Bush allies -- Saudi Arabia and Libya. An estimated 90 percent of suicide bombings are carried out by foreign fighters. And senior U.S. military officials believe the financial support for Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia comes primarily from Saudi Arabia.

Yet the Bush/Cheney polemics about Iran continue to escalate. In light of the lack of evidence Iran is actually developing nukes, Bush equated Iranian "knowledge" to make nuclear weapons with World War III. "If you're interested in avoiding World War III," he said recently, "it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon." This substantially lowers the bar for a U.S. attack on Iran.

A few days after Bush warned of World War III, Cheney called Iran "the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism," adding, "The Iranian regime needs to know that if it stays on its present course, the international community is prepared to impose serious consequences ... We will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon." These threats are eerily reminiscent of his rants in the run-up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

In an unprecedented move, the Bush administration labeled the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. It appears the administration applied that label in an effort to trigger language in the 2002 Congressional authorization for the use of military force in Iraq. That authorization says, "The President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States."

Like Bush's invasion of Iraq, an attack on Iran would violate international and U.S. law. The U.N. Charter prohibits the use of military force except in self-defense or with the approval of the Security Council. Iran, which has not attacked any country for 2,000 years, hasn't threatened to invade the United States or Israel. Rather than protecting Israel, U.S. or Israeli military force against Iran will endanger Israel, which would invariably suffer a retaliatory attack.

In making its case against Iran, the administration points to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad's alleged comment that Israel should be wiped off the map. But this is an erroneous translation of what he said. According to University of Michigan professor Juan Cole and Farsi language analysts, Ahmadinejad was quoting Ayatollah Khomeini, who said the "regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time." Cole said this "does not imply military action or killing anyone at all." Journalist Diana Johnstone points out the quote is not aimed at the Israeli people, but at the Zionist "regime" occupying Jerusalem. "Coming from a Muslim religious leader," Johnstone wrote, "this opinion is doubtless based on objection to Jewish monopoly of a city considered holy by all three of the Abramic monotheisms."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iran, bush, cheney

Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and the President of the National Lawyers Guild. She is the author of "Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law." Her columns are archived at marjoriecohn.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Don't let it happen!
Posted by: maestra on Nov 26, 2007 3:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in the UK and just heard the tail end of John Bolton (shudder!) being interviewed on BBC radio - he is so gung-ho to effect regime change in Iran and is dead set on wiping out Iran's nuclear anything at any cost.

(Who died and left him God?)

It will take a huge amount of opposition to stop this juggernaut, but it must be done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't let it happen! Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
Impeachment is the remedy to stop this insanity!
Posted by: aharlib on Nov 26, 2007 3:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ONLY IMPEACHING THE PERPETRATORS OF THIS MAD MILITARISM WILL STOP THEM!

Impeach Cheney NOW

Defense of the Constitution Knows No Party


The Bush administration has illegally seized and imprisoned Americans without benefit of their trial by jury, has spied on Americans without warrant in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, has lied America into a disastrous war, and has betrayed an American intelligence officer, who was working on weapons of mass destruction networks, to our enemies (Valerie Plame.)

Impeachment hearings against Vice President Dick Cheney are now a distinct possibility, thanks to a recent outpouring of public support for impeachment by Americans across the political spectrum. Your calls and faxes to House Judiciary Committee members are needed to keep up the pressure.

Leave a message for your Congressman, to demand he obey his oath to "defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Act now to restore your rights and the rule of law bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers, which brave men have died defending throughout our history.

Call the House Judiciary Committee

202-225-3951
and demand that Impeachment hearings begin ASAP!





*What Happened to Make This All Possible?

On November 6, 2007, Rep. Dennis Kucinich brought H.Res.333, for the impeachment of Cheney, to the House Floor for debate. It was broadcast on CSPAN. A sudden outpouring of public support for impeachment forced lawmakers to keep the resolution alive. Democrats, most of whom currently resist demands for impeachment, were unwilling to kill the bill with the public watching. Republicans and some Democrats, mindful of impeachment sentiment, voted to debate the bill, but failed. At the end of the day, Americans of both parties had made it clear whose "table" this is, and that they want to see impeachment on it.



For more information go to
NEImpeach.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

White House Warmongering
Posted by: Roy Eidelson on Nov 26, 2007 3:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The White House’s propaganda campaign laying the groundwork for military action against Iran dates back almost six years—to Bush’s 2002 State of the Union address in which he designated Iran as a founding member of the “axis of evil.” Since then, this drumbeat has waxed and waned as other concerns—primarily the disastrous invasion and occupation of Iraq—have often commanded center stage. Now, with the Bush administration approaching its final year in office, a renewed push and a shorter fuse are increasingly evident. My 3-minute YouTube video entitled “Forewarned Is Forearmed: Bush On Iran” is available HERE. It offers a very brief but deeply troubling chronicle of the president’s public warmongering and demonization of Iran.

Such manipulation of public sentiment has been a key part of the White House’s entire Iraq war enterprise, so we should not be surprised to see it play a similar role in any military attack on Iran. For those interested in a psychological analysis of this warmongering, I have also recently completed a 10-minute online video entitled “Resisting the Drums of War.” It examines how the Bush administration’s messaging targets five core concerns that often govern our lives--concerns about vulnerability, injustice, distrust, superiority, and helplessness. The video describes these warmongering appeals and offers suggestions for how to counter them. It’s available for viewing HERE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Logic not part of the equation
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Nov 26, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush thugs are attempting to sell the same tedious snake oil that they used to attack Iraq: "Iran with nukes will eventually nuke us; ohmigod, the sky is falling!"

What they fail to explain (because they can't)is exactly what the percentage would be for Iran to attack us, the Israelis, or any of our Western allies. Their premise assumes that the hellish monsters in Iran share the same death wish that Bush unknowingly attributed to Saddam Hussein; i.e., such an attack would unleash the hounds of hell to render their country as uninhabitable as the US has made Iraq. It would be nothing short of national suicide. Which is why Bush's minions are bending over backwards to paint Iran as the world's largest, open-air insane asylum.

As for "not allowing" Iran to acquire nukes, I must have called in sick the day God quit and gave the job to Cheney. What an astoundingly arrogant, grandiose old bastard he is!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NEImpeach.org, and: 202-225-3951
Posted by: sommeyah on Nov 26, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank-you, I am refreshed, to read accurate journalism...and HOPE that IMPEACHMENT is imminent..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politics
Posted by: Hans B on Nov 26, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article. My fear is that Bush will attack Iran for domestic political reasons, especially if Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee. Her vote for the 2002 Congressional authorization and for Kyl-Lieberman, read together, clearly give Bush the authority to bomb Revolutionary Guard sites. The result will be that Democratic voters will blame their candidate and stay at home on Election Day, while Republican voters will be rallied.

Few Presidents would start a war to buy an amnesty for themselves but Bush is one of them. If a new war increases the Republicans' chances of winning the White House, new war there will be.

Hillary Clinton had a good candidature but Kyl-Lieberman killed it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Nearly Broke My TV...
Posted by: BlackbirdHighway on Nov 26, 2007 4:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watching John Bolton on the Tweety show. He was saying that we absolutely have to attack Iran to keep them from getting nuclear weapons. Nevermind that the UN says they don't have them, and aren't anywhere near getting them. Those are the same UN guys who said that Iraq didn't have any WMDs.

Then when Tweety asks well what about the way that will really piss off the Iranians, and get us into real trouble, Bolton actually says no, the Iranians are "smart enough to understand" that it's an attack on the nuclear program, and not against Iran itself!

What complete rubbish! If the Iranians attacked one of our nuclear facilities, would we just say, ok, we are "smart enough to understand" that wasn't directed at our country, just our nuclear facility, and just let it slide?

If I punched John Bolton in the nose, would he regard that as an attack against his person, or would he be "smart enough to understand" that I just didn't like the shape of his nose?

How can these people put out these arguments that are so blatantly false, and just think that people will accept them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"government of the people, by the people, and for the people"
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 26, 2007 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suggest that everyone read the book "The Wisdom of Crowds" by James Surowiecki. He presents compelling empirical evidence that in many cases a crowd is smarter than any individual in the group. The same conclusion can be reached logicaly.

The voters are the people who should direct the course of the government. We shouldn't elect "leaders"; we should elect "public servants" who will carry out our agenda.

Many people don't want a democracy. they don't trust the intelligence nor the integrity of the majority. I ask them, "Which minority, of which you're not a member, would you prefer to be in charge instead of the majority?".
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Spot on Posted by: Hans B
Absolutely
Posted by: opeluboy on Nov 26, 2007 6:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And one way to do this, and prevent more wars for Israel in the Middle East (they've got several they'd like to start, folks) is to force AIPAC to register as an agent of a foreign government, which it most certainly is.

This might help our elected representatives in saying "no" once in a while.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Admirals won't stop the war --- the people will.
Posted by: amacd on Nov 27, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I talked myself into believing that the Generals/Admirals were our last hope in stopping the Bush Cheney madness of the next preemptive (and probably nuclear) oil-war in the ME.

And while some still hold out this hope (most recently Chris Hedges), I have concluded that Bush Cheney's change of Joint Chiefs Chairman and Vice-Chair has precluded this chance.

However, all my hope is not lost in preventing an attack on Iran and the certain spread of war's conflagration.

The anti-Empire 'movement' is really starting to pick-up speed and traction.

Ironically, the 'crash' of this corporatist Ponzi-economy will throw massive numbers of citizens into more 'shared sacrifice' and 'shared pain' than was ever caused by the Iraq war itself.

However, the cause of this coming economic pain is precisely the same as the cause of the Iraq war, the potential Iran war, the destruction of our liberty and constitution, and all other major problems that the faux candidates are dancing around --- namely, Empire itself.

With the near term and massive 'crash' of this Ponzi-economy, coming as it is before Bush/Cheney can 'pull the trigger' on Iran war expansion, the far more drastic PAIN that collapse of the economy will cause all average Americans will dramatically expand and 'bring to the streets' the anti-empire 'movement'.

The anti-Empire 'movement' (and not normal politics) will determine the outcome of 2008.

As more and more people see that all of these evils are directly caused by the one and only hidden cause, Empire, which none of the establishment candidates will even whisper, then 2008 will become a 'movement' not a campaign.

While the rallying-cry of 1992 was the only half-reveling, "It's the economy, stupid", the 2008 'movement' will be driven by the entire truth-to-power revelation of, "It's the Empire, stupid."

Like an elephant hiding in plain sight in the living room of democracy, the global corporatist Empire hiding behind this facade of 'Vichy America' will come out into the streets in 2008 --- and we will shoot that elephant of Empire.

And that exposure and shooting of the elephant of Empire behind our phony politics and phony MSM will be what stops the spread of war attack on Iran.

The last hope is in the people, not the Generals.

The people will see that Empire is our common problem and threat to humanity --- and the people will shoot the Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.