Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What It Means to Be a Leftist in the 21st Century

Democracy Now!. Posted March 21, 2007.


Professor, culture critic, and social justice advocate Cornel West talks about the need to make radical reformism fashionable among young people again.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Professor, culture critic, and social justice advocate Cornel West addressed a panel at the 2007 Left Forum in New York last weekend. West is a professor of religion and African-American studies at Princeton University and has been described as one of America's most vital and eloquent public intellectuals. He has written and co-authored numerous books on philosophy, race and sociology. His most recent book is "Democracy Matters: Winning the Fight Against Imperialism."

Below is a transcript of his speech. The video is HERE.

CORNEL WEST: What does it really mean to be a leftist in the early part of the 21st century? What are we really talking about? And I can just be very candid with you. It means to have a certain kind of temperament, to make certain kinds of political and ethical choices, and to exercise certain analytical focuses in targeting on the catastrophic and the monstrous, the scandalous, the traumatic, that are often hidden and concealed in the deodorized and manicured discourses of the mainstream. That's what it means to be a leftist. So let's just be clear about it.

So that if you are concerned about structural violence, if you're concerned about exploitation at the workplace, if you're concerned about institutionalized contempt against gay brothers and lesbian sisters, if you're concerned about organized hatred against peoples of color, if you're concerned about a subordination of women, that's not cheap PC chitchat; that is a calling that you're willing to fight against and try to understand the sources of that social misery at the structural and institutional level and at the existential and the personal level. That's what it means, in part, to be a leftist.

That's why we choose to be certain kinds of human beings. That's why it's a calling, not a career. It's a vocation, not a profession. That's why you see these veterans still here year after year after year, because they are convinced they don't want to live in a world and they don't want to be human in such a way that they don't exercise their intellectual and political and social and cultural resources in some way to leave the world just a little better than it was when they entered. That's, in part, what it means to be a leftist.

Now, what does that mean for me? It means for me in the United States -- and I go back now the 400 years to Jamestown. You all know this is the 400th anniversary of the first enduring English settlement in the new world. It was Roanoke before, but it didn't last. Jamestown last, right? And what do you have at Jamestown? The Virginia Club of London, an extension of the British Empire, makes its way over, the three boats whose names we need not go into at the moment. And what did they do? They interact with another empire, the Powhatan Empire, that's already in place, of indigenous peoples. You actually get the clash of empire. This is the age of empire.

But what are they here for? Looking for gold and silver and, secondarily, to civilize the natives. So already you get America as a corporation, before it's a country. Corporate greed is already sitting at the center in terms of what is pushing it. And corporate greed, as Marx understood it, capital as a social relation, an asymmetrical relation of power, with bosses and workers, with those at the top who will be able to live lives of luxury and those whose labor will be both indispensable, necessary, but also exploited in order to produce that wealth.

Then there's religion, to "civilize" the indigenous people. Now, you can't talk about the US experience -- and I think in many ways this is true for the new world experience -- without talking about the dominant role of religion as an ideology. And we also know one of the reasons why vast numbers of our fellow citizens today in the United States, one of the reasons why they're not leftists, is precisely because they have not been awakened from their sleepwalking. They have not been convinced that they ought to choose to live a life the way we have chosen, in part because we've been cast with the mark of the anti-religious or the naively secular, or what have you.

And that's 98 percent of fellow citizens. So no matter what kind of political organization Brother Stanley is talking about, he's going to get Gramscian about it. He's got to dip into the popular culture of the everyday people, and 98 percent them are talking about God. That's 97.5 percent of fellow Americans believe in God. Seventy-five percent believe Jesus Christ is the son of God. Sixty-two percent believe they speak on intimate terms with God at least twice a day. That's who we're dealing with in terms of our fellow citizens. You can't talk about organization that's sustained over time, unless you're talking in Gramscian terms of how do you tease out leftist sentiment, vision, analysis, in light of the legacy of these dominant ideologies -- Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, and so forth and so on.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: religion, slavery, book, leftist, 21st century, beliefs

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Being left actually means being anti-white!
Posted by: Temporary on Mar 21, 2007 12:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blacks are leftist(anti-white)by there very nature! If your black, hispanic, jew or asian, then being a leftist(anti-white)really comes out naturally! However if i were white, i'd probobly have an identity crisis right now. Whites used to be(far)right in the political spectrum, but today i would say they are somewhere in the middle. Typically whites want more economic and social benefits for the middle-class, and to finish the war in the middle-east(as long as they dont have to pay for it in anyway!)Probobly also want to start another war with China as well. However, they won't succeed! For once big business is on our side(for the moment)and America will turn multicultural without us having to even lift a finger! By the time even the rich whites wake up to notice whats actually going on, it will be WAAYYY too late for them to do anything except bitch and moan(thats what white people mostly do these days anyway) We will then simply pick up the fruits of there cold war victory, and split up America, and by then(within the next 10-years)there wont be a darn thing they'll be able to do about it! They'll have to kiss there little "Empire" goodbuy, and this time FOR GOOD;=)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Welcome to the New Boss Posted by: edith
» RE: Being left actually means being anti-white! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
A shot of populism with a Jesus Mixer, Please.
Posted by: edith on Mar 21, 2007 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"And we also know one of the reasons why vast numbers of our fellow citizens today in the United States, one of the reasons why they're not leftists, is precisely because they have not been awakened from their sleepwalking. They have not been convinced that they ought to choose to live a life the way we have chosen, in part because we've been cast with the mark of the anti-religious or the naively secular, or what have you."

I am not religious. But as long as the left considers religion "sleepwalking", see comment of "brother" West above, it will be considered weird and amoral if not immoral by most average Americans. King was successful in his campaigns because he merged politics with religion. I don't like that mix; but it's what it takes to succeed in US politics. the Dim Duke of Crawford is another unfortunate example of that religio-political "blend".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PinPoint Theology Please Posted by: edith
» RE: PinPoint Theology Please Posted by: edgar_michel
cornl west is a FAkE-LEFTIST
Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties on Mar 21, 2007 4:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cornel west is a fakeleftist, a member of the overclass working hard to divide the working class by race, A RICH IVY LEAGUE PROFESSOR PAID TO PROPAGANDIZE.

Some of the african slaves WERE named. some were not. And what do you expect when the namers used English and the african slaves used some other totally foreign language?

"Antonio, a Negro," (aka Anthoney Johnson) was a named African on that 1619 boatload. HE went on to OWN two WHITE englishmen, along with three african slaves. All were of course indentured for a period of time, or at least that was the legal fiction. Many of course were never released from their bondage. Antoney Johnson/"Antonio" went to court in the 1650's to KEEP PERMANENTLY one John Casor (a NAMED african slave Johnson had bought off the ship). Johnson --a black African -- pleaded in court that "the Negro is mine for life." That case set the legal precedent for chattel slavery.

Then, in the late 1600's the white plantation owners decided that they needed to split the blacks from the poor whites. Why? Well, because they were getting along too well. Interbreeding, having families, and also most importantly, fighting back against the slaveOWNERS. Yes, in Haiti, the white slaves joined up with black slaves to incide a rebellion against slaveowners.

And a mixed race group of poor whites and blacks rebelled in virginia in 1676 to burn Jamestown to the ground. To quote the politician who was there: the last 200 rebels were 20 percent white.

So, Cornel West here is doing his part to keep the races divided, to keep the white liberals steeped in race guilt, to keep them thinking that THEY were slaveowners, who all along their ancestors were SLAVES.

The growth of chattel slavery ONLY TOOK OFF AFTER Jamestown, when the ruling white elite divided the poor whites and white slaves from the black slaves using miscegenation laws and other laws. They divided to tie the poor whites to the rich whites by skin color. And they used laws to create a racial caste that would do that.

Remember that less than half of white men could even vote at that time. And SOME black men COULD VOTE. So the upper class who wrote the race laws were elected only by the upper class. NOT THE WORKERS.

So West here shows his TRUE overclass colors. Not black OR white. But green, the green of the monstrous overclass that rules america. THe lying filth that perch above us, ruling us, OWNING US. THey feed on us. THey own us an control us using propaganda such as West has created here in his interview.

NOTE that I will probably be banned for saying this. Alternet has a policy of banning any poster who attacks other posters OR Alternet writer. But West is not the WRITER of this column. He is an INTERVIEW SUBJECT.

But they will likely ban me anyhow because like all overclass members and wannabes, they practice lies and hypocrisy. For verification of this, see the recent article about gays where I write "GAYS GAYS GAYS 24-7". That post was responded to by two longtime poster who insulted me and called me names. Yet they were not banned. This happens on a regular basis here and on ALL political websites. Propaganda and lies and hypocrisy are the stock in trade of all political/ideological websites, as that is the model of all human overclass ideology.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cornl west is a FAkE-LEFTIST Posted by: OneAcre2012
» Divisions Posted by: hbw
» RE: cornl west is a FAkE-LEFTIST Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Left needs to organize
Posted by: robchapman on Mar 21, 2007 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don't think that the left has enough resources, has enough people to constitute a strong political organization

The above quotation, taken from Dr. West's text summarize the problem to me.

The left, by definition, represents the disenfranchised, the poor and the repressed. We will not be able to achieve significant power in society without taking over the government.

In America, this means capturing the electoral offices and using them for decades to appoint civil servants, judges and commissioners to carry out the progressive agenda.

In America, the left must be organized to win state and federal legislative elections so that we can write the laws needed to advance the cause of justice and empowerment for poor, disenfranchised and repressed people.

In America, the left must be organized to win local and county elections because that is where we build the electoral and political cadre needed to win elections at the higher levels and to provide political support for the reforms that need to take place here.

The American left would do well, in my opinion, to spend less time on history and more time on strategizing and coordinating a national strategy to capture decision making offices in all of America's 80,000 governmental jurisdictions.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Left needs to organize Posted by: Lincoln fan
Elitist liberal lip-service
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 21, 2007 4:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To evaluate Cornel West’s speech, I copied it into a Word document and gave the text my customary “Key-Term Test.”

Out of 4,315 words, he never mentioned “poverty.” Could it be West doesn’t have a clue about what the word means or feels like?

West did say, “Corporate greed is already sitting at the center in terms of what is pushing it. And corporate greed, as Marx understood it, capital as a social relation, an asymmetrical relation of power, with bosses and workers, with those at the top who will be able to live lives of luxury and those whose labor will be both indispensable, necessary, but also exploited in order to produce that wealth.”

What the hell does that mean?

If West was talking about our two-class society of “Haves” and “Have-nots,” which is growing exponentially, then why not say so? More importantly, how about some solutions?

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Defending Dr. West Posted by: hbw
» To hbw: Anyone can criticize... Posted by: HughScott
» Not quite right, Brad. Posted by: HughScott
» the problem is NOT poverty in america Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
» To Bob. I'm afraid you're right Posted by: HughScott
yes, the overclass rules by uniting together diverse peoples and holding it together by force
Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties on Mar 21, 2007 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
once you have a government, a state that rules over a populace that is separated by different cultures or languages, then you have very little accountability, and you have little trust.

This is a old old tactic used by the overclass--using propaganda to unite and rule over diverse factions. Once united and under the right kind of constitution, they cannot break free of the overclass.

Read Fresia's online book TOWARD AN AMERICAN REVOLUTION. James Madison wrote about how to do this in the Federalist Papers. That is exactly what the American nation was meant to accomplish--to unite the diverse states and make it easy for the rich to control the people, because once united and help together with force, the government is no longer very accountable. Madison explained how this works in the Federalist papers.

He got the idea from Montesquieu the french nobleman who came up with the idea of checks and balances, which is the crucial aspect of preventing innovation in government, which is how, once diverse factions are united under a checks and balances govt, especially a PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM, where the president is elected by a diverse and divided populace, the overclass maintains firm control.

The more united and less divided the populace, the better they are able to stave off the clutches of the overclass. A tightly united populace in a small area cannot be divided by the overclass. This is what was troubling the colonial elite of America, and that is why they had to start the american revolution--because they wanted to increase the return on their investment. But the tightly united towns of the states in the confederation then had a populace that trusted each other and looked out for each. THAT is the beauty of a HOMOGENOUS AND UNITED POPULACE. THAT is why the overclass controlled media is constantly talking up and promoting DIVERSITY. Because diversity is vital for the overclass--they need it to divide the populace. Also the overclass wants more mass immigration from poor nations, the better to drive down wages, so they want to propagandize the population that diversity is good.

THe smallest and most unified nations of europe are those that are richest and have the best quality of life for its workers. Lichtenstein, Denmark, Netherlands, Switzerland. Of course Holland has been overrun with third world immigrants, so they are losing to the overclass. But smaller and more united is best for the people and worst for the overclass.

Of course there is another side. Free trade can bring improvements in quality of life too. But it has to be done by and for the populace, not by and for the overclass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» well... Posted by: GenErik
At the foundation of the US, it includes a structure of corporate greed.
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 21, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reminder that slavery (economic exploitation), employed and enforced by corporate legal charters, is at the root of American history helps me to understand why nothing is done to change the corporation.

It worked so long as the US was driven by the manifest destiny myth of go west, young man. Now we must wrestle again with the possibilities of creative government. We are running out of clean air, clean water, and space to continue our suburban sprawl. Instead, poverty mounts, cities have become concrete jungles, education levels go down, and the middle-class disappears.

I hear West telling us to just look around; that's all you need to do. We broke the back of black apartheid in the 60s. His radical books are bestsellers without PR hype. So, the system can be changed if enough people notice.

And we better get a move on. An electorate that puts Bush in charge for 8 years, letting government corruption reach into our everyday lives, shows how much work there is to do. Time no longer heals wounds. We have to know what to do and to decide to do it. Time just makes things worse when people sleepwalk; what better way to describe electing the GOP to rape the public treasury for the last 30+ years?

Is it only Republican Kevin Phillips who notices that we are going through the greatest transfer of wealth to the rich in our nation's history? Are Americans so blind to our own greed that we cannot see the rot that has set in? Our world is not going to let imperial Washington, DC, feed off its resources forever. Justice will be served eventually, like it or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Radical Reformism?
Posted by: kbest on Mar 21, 2007 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When did it stop becoming fashionable in young people? The leftist ideology and radical reformism is driven into students constantly by the majority of professors who are extreme left themselves. Racism is driven by these same people, that is reverse racism. Affirmative action is reverse racism. True dialoge has disappeared on our college campuses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

who left my left?
Posted by: OneAcre2012 on Mar 21, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ah, the leftist professors...you know, and anybody who's done the college thing knows what I'm talking about, there are some professors who are kinda dorky and sheepish who tend not to rock the boat or have any personality, and then there are a few who are really excited for no reason. And there are some who are just unabashed in their assertions, whatever they are. But the best ones include everyone, one way or another, in the discussion because they understand that's how things get done. When people start feeling left out, then nothing happens. Why are we so indifferent as a culture to suffering? Probably because we focus on our own personal "suffering," you know, the what am I gonna wear today/what if I run into so-and-so/Man my credit card bill sucks. The biggest reason the left isn't "organized" is we don't have anyone trying to tie us together in any tangible way. It seems like an a la carte menu of causes and issues and how many you pick out and throw in your shopping cart determines how "down" you are or whatever. The "Left" is in all of us, deep down somewhere, and those leftist professors who preach too much will surely enrapture their own kind, but how many on the fringe will tune out simply because it sounds like, surprise, the "establishment" when coming from a professor. Remember, professors are teachers, and kids don't like teachers because kids don't like homework and having orders barked at them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Best example is wishy washy Canada Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: who left my left? Posted by: hbw
» RE: who left my left? Posted by: GenErik
But what kind of alternative do have we?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Mar 21, 2007 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't have an answer to that.

How can a person advocate radical reform without having a goal?

Here's my impression of the "radical" left. "I want change but I don't know what I want. They damn well better change or I'll vote for the other party. I mean it this time. Well, I would if the other party weren't so evil."
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You seem confused... Posted by: SteveB
Alternet
Posted by: Donna_Darko on Mar 21, 2007 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please have more Black and minority intellectuals on your front page.

Thank you,
DD

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alternet Posted by: brad
» RE: Alternet Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Serious anti-racism work Posted by: Donna_Darko
Why only Cornel?
Posted by: brad on Mar 21, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does Alternet only show one speaker from the left forum? I was at this presentation and the other speakers were, IMO, far better than Cornel. He is so ambiguous about what the problems and the goals are. He would make a great politician (or elite university prof).

Hey alternet, how about if you show the rest of this panel or others. I think the best one was a discussion of US Empire with Leo Panitch, David Harvey and Peter Gowan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On Writing Well
Posted by: veive on Mar 21, 2007 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
William Zinsser, in his book by the above title, writes, "Clutter is the disease of American writing. We are a society strangling in unnecessary words, circular constructions, pompous frills and meaningless jargon." It's as though he had the good professor in mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On Writing Well Posted by: Bobsays
» sophistry Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: On Writing Well Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: On Writing Well Posted by: albrechtkrausse
1971To the 21th CenturyAmericanPrisonerNYStateEmpire.
Posted by: Ame'rican from SanJuanBatista on Mar 22, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Auburn New York Courthouse on March 22,2007 Jalil
Mustaqim[Anthony Bottom N Y State American Black Prisoner] & Black Panther Party Cadre,appears in a courthouse before Judge Thomas G. Leone.
Jalil is in Prison 34 years,is now 2007 charged with the assassination of a San Francisco police in August 1971.
In 1971 the militantcy radicalized american black liberation movement was under assassination onslaught , local and federalpolicerepression,directed from J Edgar Hoovers Freak Conspiratorial [IT] Complex mind,evolvement from prosecution of Albert Eistein to Huey P. Newton of the BPP and assassination of Comrade GeorgeJackson by CorrectionalPersonal
fired a letal round@the Prisoner in a prison yard,george bled to death,george brother was killed@courthouse prior to that, on orders from above.
It is certainly a long way from Viet Cong tet offensive this 21th century.
In the mix from the past,in 1971 ,Sergeant John Young was shot to death during an attack by people firing a shotgun blast took 8 members to pull the trigger as alleged by conspiracy@California Dreaming of killing American Black Panthers in mass,eight8@a time in the 21thcentury.
7 American Black Panthers and 1 American Puerto Rican Panther were charged with murder and conspiracy in California in January2007. The Puerto Rican CiscoTorres had face 2 trials on Assassination NYPD 1971,ambush on the
lower east side of Mahattan NYCity.
Two trials on assassination of NYPD resulted in a hung jury,two [2]times.So Cisco and his brother Gabrial was released from the ordeal of another trial,plus the image of the BlackLiberation Army with the exclusion of the lighter Puerto Rican Members would go over ,more credible.
if any cares to view both sides of the trial of the 21thcenrury@SanFrancisco dreaming of killing in mass 8 american black panthers from the 20thcentury.
leap of faith,boundlessness,banafacror reaches from the chest of love and hope.
AmericanBlackPanther Party renounce War Violence Bloodshed.
Reparations are Due4JalilMustaqim/HermanBell/Justice @equality economic playing field for the 2Prisoners34years and counting 2008?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 1971To the 21th CenturyAmericanPrisonerNYStateEmpire. Posted by: Ame'rican from SanJuanBatista
anti wasp
Posted by: disgusted on Mar 22, 2007 3:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
think what it means. These people who came to the New World were the scourge, the outcasts and the neer do wells of europe, Out of fear they cut down the forest and burnt it. Later they gave the natives smallpox infested blankets, then there was the trail of tears- and Custers Last Stand. Now we
have Iraqui blood for our oil. If there is a Sky God and something other than Just Us- sooner is better than later

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HugRub
Posted by: HugRub on Mar 25, 2007 12:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hard to believe people actually think like this in 2007. Where's Cornel West been the last 20 years? Marxism died a miserable death decades ago, but West still clings to this dusty nonsense. On top of that, like most academics cloistered in the tower, the guy is infatuated with polysyllabic words and windblown sentences that convey an ounce of sense with a ton of verbiage. That this guy is a professor at a university is a disgrace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Proof
Posted by: ekipnrut on Mar 25, 2007 1:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....and I take very seriously Antonio Gramsci's concern about the historical specificity of the emergeous sustenance and development
From Dictionary.com:
Top Web Results for "emergeous"
No results found for emergeous
....QED

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]