Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

One Person's Dumpster Is Another's Diner

By Becca Tucker, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2007.


A subculture of people make a statement by living off the waste of millions. For three days, a reporter gave it a dumpster-diving go in the "freegan" paradise of Manhattan.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

America's Frightening Alzheimer's Epidemic
Rebecca Hyman, AlterNet

Dire Consequences with a McCain Supreme Court?
Robert Parry, Consortium News

CNN's Lou Dobbs Is Clueless When It Comes to the Drug War
Tony Newman, AlterNet

California Gay Marriage Ban Overturned
Huffington Post

Election 08: Misogyny I Will Not Miss
Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group

Three Things That Won't Help End the Foreclosure Crisis
Dean Baker, Liz Chimienti, Center for Economic and Policy Research

More stories by Becca Tucker

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Day One

No coffee, no beer. The significance of those words sank in with each heavy footfall that took me past my regular Starbucks on my way to the subway.

It was only Tuesday morning, and already I was having second thoughts. Three days of eating only food recovered from the garbage might have been excessively ambitious. Two years in the city have solidified my habits into those of quite the little consumer. I could already feel a bad mood encroaching. I needed my caffeine.

But my breakfast that morning -- a toasted onion bagel, a banana and a Greek yogurt, all recovered from garbage bags the night before -- was a step up from my usual oatmeal. And the anticipation of the lunch I was carrying -- a still-packaged Starbucks egg salad sandwich and another banana, also the products of last night's dumpster dive -- sustained me, for now.

The guided "trash tour" I'd participated in the night before left no doubt that this three-day experiment was a doable feat. If I'd had more hands, I could have gathered a week's worth of food from the garbage left on the sidewalk outside D'Agostino's, three Gristedes, and a Dunkin' Donuts. (Dunkin' Donuts tosses everything every twelve hours, according to an employee.) On top of uncountable loaves of bread and bagels, leaves of lettuce and slightly brown bananas, treasures that turned up included black-and-white cookies, ginger root, beets, Lunchables, and scallion pancakes. According to Madeline Nelson, who looks like your favorite librarian and dumpster dives for most of her food, dumpstering once a week can fulfill about 85 percent of your grocery needs. Twice-weekly dives can cover 90 to 95 percent. She didn't need to come out to the trash tour, because a friend recently stayed at her apartment, and as a thank-you gift he dumpster dove her fridge stock-full.

But she was there anyway, chatting and digging, offering around the orange peppers she found, stomping her feet to stay warm. Freegans are a sociable bunch.

There is an organized group of freegans in the city, called freegan.info after its website, which draws between seven and twenty-odd members, ranging in age from teens to seventy-year-olds, to its various events. But there is no knowing how many freegans there are city-wide, or nation-wide, or worldwide, because the term freeganism is a broad belief that covers a broad range activities. If you've found a bookshelf on the street and taken it home, well, you're sort of a freegan.

Freeganism (a conjunction of "free" and "vegan") is the philosophy that participation in our capitalist economy makes a person complicit in the exploitative practices that are used to create consumer goods. One freegan defines the term as "living beyond capitalism," which can involve any number of practices: urban foraging, hopping trains, volunteering in lieu of working a paying job, repairing things like bikes and clothes instead of buying new ones, squatting instead of paying rent.

Leia Jools, 22, does many of those things. She and her boyfriend are on a "rent strike," Jools explained as she ate blueberries out of a container from the D'Agostinos trash. In other words, they are refusing to pay to live in their Bushwick, Brooklyn apartment, a tactic that Jools predicts will work for about eight months. The last time their landlord saw them in court, she says, "he looked like he was going to cry." Jools doesn't work for a living, which leaves her plenty of time to bike around looking for promising garbage piles. She was a raw vegan for awhile, which was fortunate, since she had no gas with which to cook. Now she is paying for electricity, after a stint in the dark, because she uses her apartment to build and repair bikes as part of a freegan bike recycling workshop.

One or two of the foragers at the trash tour appeared to be homeless, and not interested in chatting (although being homeless and freegan are not mutually exclusive, as is commonly assumed). They wolfed down a sandwich or two and then wandered off into the night. But the majority were brimming with culinary gusto. Shrieks of "Mushrooms! I found mushrooms!" sent a middle-aged woman scuttling over garbage bags. When a Gristedes employee yelled somewhat disdainfully, "I hope y'all here digging through the trash have enough respect to close the bags back up, cause otherwise the rats come through!" Nelson simply reminded the group to re-tie the bags. Everyone seemed cheerfully indifferent.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: freegan, food, dumpster diving, new york, waste, garbage

Becca Tucker is a reporter for Our Town downtown newspaper. Previously she has worked for the New York Sun and Manhattan Media.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cool!
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 21, 2007 2:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd love to see more practical articles on where and how we can tap into "alternative" sources of food and other necessities.

I wouldn't mind going dumpster diving, but with my luck I'd get arrested. If we knew what's legal and what isn't, that would help. Not all of us are ready to live completely underground with all the risks and hardships.

It's probably easier in NYC because there are so many homeless people and oddballs doing all kinds of strange things, and NYers are notoriously indifferent to what they pass on the street. In the suburbs, I'm sure there is plenty of good trash, eg. outside malls, shopping centers, restaurants...but you would draw much more attention.

Our system deliberately creates "scarcity" to feed the greed...It throws away perfectly good resources so it can make us pay for the resources it wants to sell us. Very criminal, and very wasteful.

Good article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cool! Posted by: fork
?????
Posted by: oneyedjack on Mar 21, 2007 3:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the writer of this drivel is saying all of this to say what?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dumpsster diving Posted by: Willy
» Yeah, amazing how some people... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: ????? Posted by: Krain61
Dumpster diving as necessity
Posted by: Madam Hatter on Mar 21, 2007 3:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I admire these people for what they stand for, -less consumerism; reduce, reuse, recycle, etc.- (though the part about squatting kind of bugged me) but I was a little dismayed at the somewhat light and airy tone of this piece.

While the author focused on those who do this as a CHOICE, the fact that many people HAVE to do this just to survive was hardly acknowledged. Living like this might sound like quite the fun adventure, but belive you me, it's not so great when you a) don't live in New York City with all its apparently easy pickins, and b) maybe have to maintain a somewhat more normal lifestyle - like having a couple of kids to support.

I've had to basically start over 3 times in life. Each time, I managed to fully furnish and equip an entire house - and the 3 of us living there - by dumpster diving, garage sale-ing, thrift store shopping, and barter. So I know it can be done. It's great if you have the time and energy (and especially the room to store unique finds that you may not want or need but that you can trade off for something you do). But it IS tiring, extremely time consuming, and is not greeted with either pleasant curiosity or indifference when witnessed by passerby or cops in the light of day in my area. Unlike NYC.

Thus, it must be done under cover of darkness. Which automatically raises suspicions. It's also not easy transporting a couch - for insatnce - on your back, so a vehicle is usually necessary. An older, run-down car creeping along the back of strip malls (where the dumpsters are located) at 2 or 3 am attracts a bit of curiosity if spotted. A lot (most, actually) stores around here now put padlocks on their dumpsters... and then it IS illegal to dive on them, even if they happen to be left unlocked.

But I've never had to dumpster dive for food.

I guess we're lucky here in Portland. They have several programs that collect good food that will be discarded from restaurants and other items from grocery stores (and the like) that are close to expiring, and then distribute it via various food banks, community centers and programs like "Gleaners."

Gleaners are local neighborhood-based organizations where members pay a minimal monthly fee (usually like $15, but it's on a sliding scale so some get it free) and they get lots of this type of food and also tons of locally-grown produce. At Christmas time, we all got a turkey, a ham, and mounds of baked goods: pies, cakes, rolls, bread, etc. In the spring and fall we get salmon. All summer long, there are so many fresh fruits and veggies, we can barely eat them. It's a really cool way to supplement your pantry. But it is hit -or- miss, so I've never been able to use it solely, not if I want to give my kids a balanced diet.

I can attest though, it is shameful the amount of perfectly good and usable stuff - not just food - that is thrown every single day while people are in need and our landfills are choking on it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I haven't had it that bad... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
The end-times of America
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 21, 2007 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A nation of greedy, self-absorbed fatties who eat more food than they need while a small minority of fit citizens fight and die in Iraq doesn't deserve to survive.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The end-times of America Posted by: govindas
» are you a devotee? Posted by: veggiegrrrl
challenging the system by living in its waste?
Posted by: wmoss2 on Mar 21, 2007 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate to be harsh here, because I agree with a lot of what these people believe in: reducing waste, living frugally, sharing, etc.. However, I'm not sure how this does anything to challenge the capitalist system. If a handful of white people, living in 'hip' places, choose to eat from the trash and live as deadbeat tenants, then where's the challenge? I would have been more impressed with the article if the author had tried to dumpster dive in a working class neighborhood in the Bronx or Staten Island. That would have at least made for an interesting article. "I found a glorious head of cabbage, then felt the impact of the baseball bat on my spine..."

On a more fundamental level, this is hardly a sustainable life. Being able to urban-forage means being able to live on waste. That waste can only come from capitalist excess. So, rather than being a challenge, these folks are more like the catfish of capitalism. I think what they do is just fine, and I think that we should take to heart some of their message. But, please don't put on any pretension that this will offer anything to replace capitalism. After all, to live off of discarded produce, someone got to produce it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Today's freegan, tomorrow's CHUD Posted by: eddie torres
hartsmartliving
Posted by: hartsmart on Mar 21, 2007 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Happy hunting and eating. My anti-obesity battle cry--- NEVER CLEAN YOUR PLATE, is it gaining? Food must not be gobbled or guzzled just because it's there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What does vegan have to do with it, really!?!
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 21, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What does vegan have to do with it, really!?! Cinnamon buns and most breads aren't vegan so "Freegans" are not really vegans. Most freegans I've spoken to say if it's free but it's animal-based, it's okay to eat. I just wish they had a different name, other than freegan, which compares the "movement" to vegan, which it isn't. It may have vegan tendencies but it's certainly not vegan. If 10 pounds of gourmet cheese was found, well...cheese isn't vegan, but it would be be a jackpot for the dumpster divers....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How much we eat...too much!
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 21, 2007 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We eat too much. I easily eat three or four meals every day. Not full meals but full enough. I wonder what amount/volume of food the average person in the less-developed/less wealthy world eats. What would that be? One cup of rice, lentils and a slice of bread daily? It would be an eye-opening experience to find out the daily caloric intake of most of earth's children and then live on that for a month or so. Anyone game?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hunter Gatherers
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 21, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, I am struck my a statement about the friendliness and sharing that goes on among freegan folks. It reminds me a bit of what one finds in hunter gatherer societies. This could have something to do with the fact that money is not involved, that cooperation is often very helpful, and that one doesn't necessarily need to compete all that much to get enough because there is always more out there at the next dumpster.

It is a sort of small resurection of community, or at least of temporary community... those with a shared purpose that directly affects each member.

I'm not really surprised that getting around the cash economy can bring out good things in people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Use Homeless people to clean up the cities is a great idea.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Mar 21, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the past bums would pick up used aluminum cans and glass bottles. This was because there was a deposit on glass bottles and aluminum cans could be sold for cash. It was a great system because the hobos would, essentially, comb the streets, alleys, and fields around towns and clean up the trash that inconsiderate idiots threw out into the streets. However, now many states have eliminate deposits on glass bottles, manufacturers are using evil plastic instead of healthy glass, and the police harass homeless people and scare them away from cleaning up the town. We should encourage the scrounging since its a productive purpose and far better than just sitting on a sidewalk pan-handling for change!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some good points, some not so
Posted by: bttl on Mar 21, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well- a couple of things come to mind here. It does point to the level of waste in our society; throwing away perfectly edible food or other items. Nothing of value should be thrown out in the trash- it should all be offered for use by others in some way. If food is not edible, it should be composted.

I've worked for fast-food restaurants, bookstores, etc while in college and was appalled at the waste. Staff is forced to do this and threatened with dismissal if they attempt to rescue any of these items for their own or others use.
This is obscene.

Thrift stores are a great way to recycle stuff, as well as "free-stores", etc.

The bit with the landlord wasn't too cool however- why is it ok to cheat someone out of their rent money? It seems like these people have decided that a landlord is a capitalistic pig and while they want to take advantage of the apartment they don't want to pay. I do hope they get what they deserve for this. Not all landlords are rich; many are not. They can go live in a box. The thing is, if you don't want to work, or just want to work a bit that is ok- but don't expect everyone else to support you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some good points, some not so Posted by: juanpecan81
Some things are tossed out for a reason
Posted by: Torgo on Mar 21, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last summer a neighbor put a cat jungle gym out by the dumpster, and after a few days I decided to take it in for my 2 (indoor 100%) kitties. 2 weeks later, my cats were scratching and had visible flea feces in their fur.

2 months of topical flea preventives solved that problem soon enough, but I won't soon be dumpster diving and taking anything into my body (or feeding to anyone else who is dependent on me) that has a history of post-preparation exposure to unknown insects, animals, bacteria, fungi, etc.

As a genetic cardiac patient, I'm not about to endanger my health and life by recklessly consuming such items. I can produce enough services to exchange for an adequate diet of safe food, so I'll continue to focus on enjoyable production rather than merely necessary consumption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, there is a difference... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
One Person's Dumpster Is Another's Diner
Posted by: pfm on Mar 21, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This question or comment ought to be a lightning strike which permeates every human being, especially those in the USA, this ought never be the case. It is morally wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Purchasing food from these places is in itself the problem
Posted by: pjwhite on Mar 21, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If people took food into their own hands, they wouldn't need to dumpster dive because grocery stores and fast food wouldn't exist (or would be diminished). As a college student, people often look at me as if I'm simply cheap because I pack a lunch rather than subsist on what they are selling. But think of how much food is wasted simply by people going to Subway for lunch, eating 2/3 of a 12'' sub, and throwing away a lot, when they could have taken the extra 2 minutes in the morning and packed a smaller, healthierlunch (for cheaper)

The best way to get food is to buy it direct from a farmer's market it and either can (or freeze) it yourself, or grow it yourself. This may be less of an option for urbanites, but one can still grow some vegetables in their apartment year round.

As for meat? Well, there's always the time honored tradition of hunting. Think about it - shooting a large deer supplies all of the meat one needs (maybe two, if you have a family). Raising chickens supplies a steady source of fresh, organic eggs, and also can lead to a change of pace every now and then.

While I am not 100% self-sufficient (yet), it is reassuring to know that it is possible to live a healthier, cheaper, self-sustaining life full of fresh food. People just need to take their food into their own hands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deadbeats
Posted by: FightTheGiant on Mar 21, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rent strike? If you really want to live an unwasteful life go live in the woods and grow your food. Not paying rent is just passing the cost on to others. If you want to be totally independant you can't be a parasite. This article is just silly. These people are just glorified bums. (although I do agree with their recycling of used items)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Proto-CHUDs? Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Proto-CHUDs? Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Deadbeats Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: Deadbeats Posted by: deejayvee
» Fomer Landlord here Posted by: Phenix
Lots of people live this way,
Posted by: Ghoulman on Mar 21, 2007 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... it's a necessity really. The thing is making it seem hip I guess. lol! :D

New Yorkers, gotta love 'em.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oddly inspiring article, mostly
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Mar 21, 2007 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was prepared to be disgusted but I liked the article, except for the rent strikers. Bushwick is a "troubled" neighborhood slowly improving from the nightmare neighborhood of the '77 blackout riots. It doesn't need more foreclosures. The landlord is probably barely hanging on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Compacting trash cans
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Mar 21, 2007 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a disturbing new trend toward new trash cans that CRUSH everything that's put into them. I don't know if this has caught on nationwide yet, but Boston has put a bunch of them in Downtown Crossing (a "downscale" shopping area but a bit touristy, with historic sites & Filene's Basement). If this catches on it would be a bad trend for freegans and for the homeless and poor in general, just from the can deposit angle. Will most dumpsters be crushers 20 years from now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They are also on Newburry Street. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
What a crock.
Posted by: dwatkins9 on Mar 21, 2007 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The dumpster divers are as much a part of the system they pretend to decry as is anyone. Why are there fifty leftover bagels for them to take in the first place? - because of the "system," which is almost unbelievably productive of wealth. Real hunter gatherers don't find plastic packages of Mexican lettuce lying around out in the forest, lol.

The fact that the "freegans" don't pay doesn't make them any less a part of the capitalist system. They still feed off of it. Let them actually forage in the wild, or take up subsistence farming. Otherwise, they are about as "revolutionary" and "anti-capitalist" as my Aunt Minnie.

And how charming of the young woman to take pride in making her landlord cry. I'm sure he's just an "evil plutocrat," not some poor schmuck trying to make a living for his family.

Disgusting hypocrites. More evidence, were more needed, that self-styled and self-indulgent "progressives" are doomed to political loserhood, in perpetuity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What a crock. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: What a crock. Posted by: dwatkins9
» RE: What a crock. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: What a crock. Posted by: Benjaminsjw
uh, safety???!!
Posted by: asirame on Mar 21, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've dived a lot of food in the past, but Never, Ever ate as I was doing it. Did you ever notice how in some dumpsters there is a sealed but often dripping bag of trash from the deli? E.coli bacteria, anyone? And plenty more.

Always wash that s#*t, yo. ALWAYS. (And with breads or other absorbent foods, be careful about where you get them-- bread from bread dumpsters is preferable, unless it's in a separate plastic bag.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Diving is bad for business?
Posted by: richabot on Mar 21, 2007 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made it through college and beyond back in the 1970s by diving into the dumpsters behind the local Safeway. Made some great vegetable soups from the quality offerings. Now everything is ground up, sealed, and locked to keep people out. They fear lawsuits and a loss of people paying for their goods. I'm happy to hear that the art and mindset of dumpster diving continues on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gleaning is great, often the dumpster "radical" crowd is not
Posted by: si.se.puede on Mar 21, 2007 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having lived on the West Coast around lots of 'divers for years, I think that dumpstering food that would otherwise be wasted is a great idea. The grotesque amount of waste involved with the production of so many goods-- certainly using them up is better than letting them go.

That said, I am always struck by the CrimeTHINK mentality of these white, middle/upper middle class individuals. Yes, it is best to opt out of an unethical system, but this cannot be an excuse for a such a self-involved lifestyle. These people, and the many I know like them in the NW, are fully capable of procuring their own food and resources. Yet they do not. Maybe a few volunteer at a bike shop, but few if any seek to truly address solutions to the system they are resisting/feeding from.

Yes, exactly, there are people starving in the streets as this wealth of food is being wasted -- yet I never, ever have encountered these gleaners, with their web services for dumpstering clubs, networking to distribute their finds to those truly in need in their communities. They bring it to shows, share it with their roommates, and ignore the larger community out there that could benefit from a gleaning system (until we achieve a better one, obviously). Would it not be more responsible to organize a system of communication about gleaning between individuals in need, the ones who aren't "bein' radical, and ya know, bombin the system" but truly need this service RIGHT NOW?

Those without homes in the U.S. are NOT generally NYC young bike people who just don't pay rent on their comfortable apartment. Those who want to opt out of the rent system join community squats of abandoned or available buildings, they don't simply refuse to pay rent to their (individual in this case! not even corporate!) landlord.

I wholeheartedly agree with many of the positions espoused by those highlighted in the article, but I find their lifestyle to be self-centered and ill-informed at best, enlightening but setting no example. I prefer my C.S.A., activism WHILE working/attending school, and volunteering at a community garden which provides wholesome produce to the neighborhood food bank. I prefer utilize my position as an able, young citizen in an overdeveloped nation, to work to help others before I just help myself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You make some really good points. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
This rent strike thing bothers me
Posted by: magickalrealism on Mar 21, 2007 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to know more about this rent strike people were on. If they had legitimate reason for it, such as a landlord who was not fulfilling his end of the contract, maybe. But it seems more like they decided to move in and then not follow through. While going through garbage is one thing - it's reducing some of the American excess in a positive way - moving into an apartment and then just squatting there without good reason is shameful behavior. Someone still has to pay for them to be there, probably their neighbors- possibly the same people providing them their free groceries.

I can respect squatting in abandoned buildings or refusing to pay rent to a dirty landlord, but what it sounds like these people are doing is theft and entitlement behavior in the name of "anti-capitalism." No matter how much they do to reduce landfills by living off of excess, the world and society owes them nothing - not even free rent. It is they who owe the world, as do we all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» entitlement behavior Posted by: Torgo
» RE: entitlement behavior Posted by: JoshuaLudd
How their rent strike hurts the poor
Posted by: DrSuess on Mar 21, 2007 5:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a landlord, I can answer to the other side of the "rent strike" equation. I am in Indianapolis, and I rent one bedroom apartments for $350 per month, and two bedrooms for $450 per month. For the people on the East and West coast- I did not leave off a 0. $450 per month is really a common price for a thousand square foot two bedroom apartment in Indianapolis. But I also can get a non-paying renter out in three weeks. I file- get a court date two weeks later- and the person has a week to move. Because I can get the person out so quickly, I can allow more marginal people to move in. I don't need first months rent, last months rent, and deposit. So I am much more affordable than my NYC counterparts. For about $500 a person can move into my apartments.
While I screen my tenants carefully, I can allow people with unpaid medical bills, and other problems to move in. I would never be a landlord on either the east or west coast. People who work there have to double their rents to deal with the "deadbeat" equation. This hurts the poor- who have to pay a larger and larger share of their income to find a place to live.
I also see how the poor live, and struggle to make ends meet. Here in Indianapolis, we have groups like "Feed Everyone" and "Second Helping" who gather food from someof the grocery stores, and take it to the food pantries in town. I have once seen someone dumpster diving- but with the availability of food at the food pantries, it is not necessary. It is a sad state of affairs that in the wealthiest nation on Earth, we have such problems. However, some, but not all of the deepest poverty is drug and alcohol related. We will never truely solve the problem of hunger until we solve those problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who says healthy eating has to be expensive?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 21, 2007 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yogurt, bananas, edible greens, an egg-salad sandwitch, all from dumpsters. Hell, that faire is healthier and less fattening than what many people eat at fast-food joints. Morton Spurlock might have found it harder to supersize himself and get sick from eating out of dumpsters for thirty days than from eating at McDonald's. I also bet that we throw away enough still edible food in a day to keep a small Third World nation fed for a week.

. . .And we of "The American Way Is the Only Way" wonder why the environment's collapsing and the rest of the world hates us. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Egg salad sandwich
Posted by: fork on Mar 22, 2007 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A great article, but I would never have eaten the egg salad sandwich, and I suspect neither would an experienced dumpster diver. You have no idea how long it had been sitting at room temperature, and that's deadly for egg salad. Whoever threw it out probably did so because it had been sitting out too long and they didn't want to risk giving food poisoning to the customers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I thought the same. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
A slightly different food skill.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 22, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anyone is interested I can post a set of directions I've been working on about the basics of making sourdough bread. Its just flour, water, olive oil or butter, sugar, and salt.

A good chance to learn how to do something for yourself, even if it does require some small investment in buying food staples.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» bread Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Making starter Posted by: JoshuaLudd
a different world
Posted by: lindalee on Mar 22, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dumpster diving in my neck of the woods would make you sick - nothing gets thrown out that isn't bad in small towns. All the extra food and outdated bread in my small town go to the local survival center. I see folks picking through my dumpster and can't imagine what they'd want with rotten food and picked apart chicken carcasses. The dangers seem to far outweigh the benefits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The original Freegans....
Posted by: morticia on Mar 22, 2007 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...are raccoons. They're not so conscientious about tying up the bags when they're done, though. And be careful not to throw out a credit card bill with your info on it, because the furry little masked marauders will charge stuff to your account.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bizarre
Posted by: ateo on Mar 23, 2007 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This strikes me as a really strange way to go about "protesting the system." Doesn't it occur to you at some point during your dumpster diving that the only reason you can subsist on other people's garbage is because society in general is extremely wasteful? If the system were changed or more people followed this philosophy in their lives you yourselves would be unable to continue "foraging" because the available resources would diminish. Either way I'm glad this article was written because I don't think the subject is exposed to the masses often enough. My upbringing and general way of thinking developed around a very consumerist philosophy for no apparent reason. The only thing I can look at is television as the culprit because my actual day to day life was anything but representative of the American market hedonism we all know so well.

Beyond that I have to add that diving in dumpsters next to people who are genuinely homeless seems a little cruel. Those people need the food whereas you are merely a tourist in their world - stealing the only resources available to them. To you it's a game or a hobby, to them it is a matter of life and death.

Honestly the thought of dumpster diving for food never occurred to me and seems a little ridiculous. I'd like to say good job to the guy who said he made it through college diving in dumpsters for his food. That's pretty resourceful and isn't an extreme I was willing to go to...at the time, although having been through some things in life there isn't much I wouldn't do to survive. However, my method of survival wouldn't entail diving in dumpsters, it would involve using my gun for "survival." I know that comment won't go over well here but, that's the reality of things. A gun is the ultimate urban survival tool.

To each his own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm not lazy! I'm just a protestor!
Posted by: b33fj3rky on Mar 23, 2007 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for the interesting and informative article! I learned several things:

1. Always pour bleach on my trash. Otherwise, I might have hippies, drug addicts, and writers trespassing on my property and sifting through my garbage cans.

2. Never rent to freegans. Not only will they steal rental space from you--they won't feel remorse, and will claim that screwing you over is some sort of righteous political act.

3. Freegans don't think of themselves as unemployed or lazy. They just believe the world owes them a meal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]