Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ann Coulter's 'Faggot' Remark Smears Mitt Romney Too

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted March 3, 2007.


But Coulter is unlikely to go away because "she provides an outlet ... for the twisted psychological impulses and truly hateful face that drives the entire pro-Bush, right-wing spectacle."

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Don Hazen

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The right-wing "slime bowl," the attacks by conservative media and surrogates to attempt to bang up Democratic politicians, had another big event Friday, at the meeting in Washington of the Conservative Political Action Conference. And this time the smell of Ann Coulter's hate speech is all over 2008 presidential candidate Mitt Romney, an emerging darling of the Republican party.

Coulter, who spoke after Romney and was warmly acknowledged by him, essentially endorsed the former Governor of Massachusetts for president in her speech. But that's something he's probably already regretting because of her bigotry that concluded her talk:

"I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I -- so kind of an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards," Coulter said.

Shortly after the faggot remark, when responding to questions, Coulter said said that "Romney is the best candidate we have." She said Rudy Giuliani is too liberal -- "when both candidates for president support abortion I think we can hang it up as a country." After dumping on McCain, and saluting Gingrich as a brilliant guy who's time has passed she embraced Romney: "He tricked liberals into voting for him. I like a guy who hoodwinks the voters so easily."

McCain and others attacked Coulter's hate speech, and thus far, according to the New York Times, Romney has distanced himself from the remark, but not the hate spewer herself. Romney spokesman Kevin Madden told the press, "It was an offensive remark. Governor Romney believes all people should be treated with dignity and respect." One might expect that Romney would go further and help put the venemous Coulter out to pasture.

But in reality, this is all part of a dance and charade in which conservatives gleefully participate. As Glen Greenwald wrote on his blog on Salon:

... [T]he single most prestigious political event for conservatives of the year is a place where conservatives go to hear Democrats called faggots, Arabs called ragheads, and Supreme Court justices labeled as deserving of murder -- not by anonymous, unidentifiable blog commenters, but by one of their most popular featured speakers.

Greenwald was talking about Coulter, of course, and also wrote:

Everyone knows what a rancid hate-monger she is, yet (or rather: "therefore") she continues to be invited to the highest-level "conservative" events, be drooled on with admiration by presidential candidates like Mitt Romney, and have little right-wing warriors wait in line around the corner to get her signature on their copies of the books she wrote.

... The more delicate ones will claim to repudiate her comments in the most limited terms, but their actions speak far louder than their cursory and reluctant words. Anyone who went to this event -- and that includes Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, and Dick Cheney -- knew exactly what they would be getting. Coulter's face was prominently plastered on the promotional material. The right-wing political candidates who accepted the invitations to speak there knew exactly the type of people would be there -- namely, the type who continously cheer on Ann Coulter's bigoted and nakedly hateful screeds. Anyone who makes themselves a part of that event is purposely associating themselves with those sentiments. That is what this Conference is for.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ann coulter

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Good article,Don
Posted by: MrAllen on Mar 3, 2007 2:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've defined the modern conservative perspective quite nicely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes, quite so. Posted by: Ghoulman
» RE: Hate is a four letter word Posted by: christee
» RE: Hate is a four letter word Posted by: willymack
Karp's disciple
Posted by: Karp's disciple on Mar 3, 2007 4:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no point in attacking Ann Coulter. She is impervious to reason. It may, however, be more worthwhile in attacking the pathetically low class and inhumane people who support and encourage her. Hitler was regarded as a crackpot when he first wandered around Vienna with his rants. He got nowhere until thugs and mindless citizens in Germany supported him. Without them he might have died without even becoming a footnote in history. Lift Coulter's present supporters out of Coulter's sewer and she will go the way of Father Coughlin, Joe McCarthy and other hate spewers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Karp's disciple Posted by: cvstoner
» RE: Coulter as albatross Posted by: dangerouslysane
Ku Klux Koulter
Posted by: Quasar on Mar 3, 2007 5:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always thought that the best way to respond to the Ku Klux Klan was to greet their marches with parades of gleeful derision.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Its best, with Coulter... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Coulter: "Convert the Muslims in the Middle East to Christianity"
Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon on Mar 3, 2007 5:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw her speech on CSPAN yesterday.

During it she said something to the effect of [paraphrasing]: "We need to convert all of the Muslims in the Middle East to Christianity."

After she said this the 'conservative' crowd was cheering, laughing, and all around having a good time, i.e. they made a lot of noise after she said these inflammatory comments. Personally, I found her comments idiotic, dangerous, and DISGUSTING.

I'm sure the video will be either on YouTube or Google video soon -- her comments will probably be used by radical Muslim propagandists to inflame hatred against The West even more...so keep an eye out for it if you're interested.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Go for it, crazy Christians! Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Coulter's Crucifix Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon
» RE: Coulter's Crucifix Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Not alone
Posted by: Melvin on Mar 3, 2007 7:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She is not alone. The Republicans seem to be coming apart at the seams. I was on a Right wing website where they were merrily discussing the use of Nuclear weapons against Iran!
The comment on the origins of Hitler were right on the mark.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coulter is not a problem
Posted by: rac on Mar 3, 2007 8:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our reactions to her must make her feel giddy. To be ignored would be her worst nightmare. I don't read or listen to Ann; I only know of her from everyone else's misplaced outrage, etc. She's Ms. Macacca to a Republican's better half and comic relief for the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

license to hate
Posted by: ES3 on Mar 3, 2007 8:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There seems to be an assumption that only liberal Democrats can use hate speech, name calling and personal attacks. Apparently they think they have some kind of special license to attack conservatives with profanity, false accusations and derogatory names, but as soon as a conservative or other Republican says one word that is politically incorrect, that person is crucified. Ann Coulter is an intelligent, independent thinking, talented communicator, who is also a private citizen, who has the right to make fun of a political figure just as much as David Letterman has to make fun of President Bush. And she does it so much better than he does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: license to hate Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» David Letterman Posted by: ISlamIslam
» RE: David Letterman Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: David Letterman Posted by: ISlamIslam
» Yes. Because they are. nm Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: David Letterman Posted by: dangerouslysane
» That wasn't your point. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: That wasn't your point. Posted by: ISlamIslam
» RE: That wasn't your point. Posted by: Byronik
» JLS* Posted by: particle
» RE: David Letterman Posted by: murt
» Letterman is a liberal?? Posted by: spanky
» RE: license to hate Posted by: stonehinge
» RE: license to hate Posted by: liberalibrarian
» Must...not...take...bait Posted by: doctorsquared
» Keep on truckin' Posted by: cvstoner
» RE: license to hate Posted by: kkb1963
» RE: license to hate Posted by: dougo
» RE: license to hate Posted by: yogendra2
» License To Suck C--K Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: license to hate Posted by: zorr0gris
» RE: license to hate Posted by: MrAllen
» RE: license to hate Posted by: Thomas Mendip
» RE: license to hate Posted by: philipcfromnyc
MINDLESS DRIBBLE is sapping our energy
Posted by: MISSING on Mar 3, 2007 8:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New film coming out on global warming called "The Great Warming" looks like a good one. Also sign up for unity 08 and try to get Gore to run that way. I personally am thinking of a gore / hagel ticket. there is still hope for us if we just stay focused on the issues, when you are subjected to mindless dribble from either side just post something more important.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» HAGELMANIA!?! Posted by: PJAW
» RE: Ann Coulter Looks Like an Alien From Outer Space Posted by: impeachbushandcheneynow
Strange idea of the word 'ignore'
Posted by: YogiBear on Mar 3, 2007 9:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frequently there is discussion among progressive and liberal journalists about how to reduce the impact of Ann Coulter. Some suggest ignoring her, including this author, but others are addicted to the attention that comes from attacking Coulter, and insist on her being responded to, talked to, etc.

"including this author"? But you're doing just that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to take your Thorazine
Posted by: YogiBear on Mar 3, 2007 10:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ann Coulter is an intelligent, independent thinking, talented communicator,

I have quite a few conservative friends and every one of them would cringe to hear you praising her. But I respect your right to put rose petals on an acid bath and call it sweet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coulter Merely Speaks Authentic Republican/Right Wing Views
Posted by: sofla100 on Mar 3, 2007 10:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All Coulter does is tell the truth about what Republicans and Right Wingers think. They all pretty much would like to see Muslims slaughtered or converted to Christianity, Iran nuked, and homosexuals jailed. Just why do you think the neocons are doing what they are doing? You can see then what the support of Israel is all about and the invasion of Iraq. As for Coulter, if she were not saying what Repubs. and Right Wingers really think and want, why do they all fawn over her?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

May the Force be with you, Ann
Posted by: rg on Mar 4, 2007 12:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is one force that Ann KKKoulter cannot escape - gravity - as it takes its toll on what little skin hangs on her anorexic skeleton. She's a vain woman - time will only increase her bitterness to a point that even her peak-hooded sycophants will start to cringe at a bitter woman's rants.
It happened to all of the harridans before her; she can't escape the force.
Be patient.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Anti Homosexual
Posted by: gellero on Mar 4, 2007 1:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Methinks the term 'faggot' in this context was not anything hateful or anti Gay (plenty of gays in the Republican community - most notably Newt Gingrich and VP Cheney's daughters !! )
I would say she meant it in the sense of 'sissy', in the same way a bunch of guys talk about hetero non friends when they say 'he's such a 'fag'. And regarding Mr Edwards, she's probably right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not Anti Homosexual? Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Not Anti Homosexual? Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: Not Anti Homosexual? Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Not Anti Homosexual Posted by: Randall808
» RE: Not Anti Homosexual Posted by: kelt65
» LOL to Kelt.... Posted by: gellero
» Is Edwards a sissy?? Posted by: gellero
» N word Posted by: gellero
» RE: Plenty! Posted by: Plexius
» RE: Not Anti Homosexual Posted by: philipcfromnyc
Ann Coulter & Michelle Malkin
Posted by: lorenwrigley on Mar 4, 2007 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can one person with a shred of decency have a bowel movement without thinking of one of them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America's Freudian slip in a miniskirt
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 4, 2007 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She's the drunken uncle at the family Thanksgiving dinner, who breaks through the politeness and exposes all the dysfunction.

She kind of looks like Beaker from The Muppet Show, with the long, skinny face and the buggy eyes...except Beaker was cool and devoted his life to science.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MEE MEEE MEE MEE MEEEE! NM Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Thank you for that one! Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian
name the sin, ignore the sinner
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Mar 4, 2007 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could we please stop using this woman's name and photo, which only fuels her fire and strengthens her? I agree that we should call attention to her unconscionable actions as representative of a heinous mindset, but would like to see us focus on the disease rather than the symptom.

The vicious comments about her appearance do none of us credit either. Why bring ourselves to her level?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: name the sin, ignore the sinner Posted by: liberalibrarian
» That's very much what I had in mind, Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
Wasted education
Posted by: reeldrlaura on Mar 4, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ALL that amazing education WASTED on Ann Coulter! She has ZERO credibility. That poor little blonde brain just can't quite wrap itself around anything but stupid, radical comments befitting a stereotypical BEEACH!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SHE WON'T GO AWAY UNTIL SHE GETS IGNORED
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 4, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is too much coverage for someone who serves no useful purpose. And coverage is all she wants. Thanks, Anna

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please Stop!
Posted by: indiewave1 on Mar 4, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi everyone,

Please, please stop comparing these rabid right-wing idiots to Hitler! It doesn't help anything!

Hitler served his country, was wounded in battle and decorated for it.

The American Right wants to talk the talk and send poor people to die for it. In a way, more shameful.

Hitler wiped out six million Jews. Bush will get at least that high a body count in Arab Muslims. And our young boys and girls in the Armed Forces will die doing his bidding.

It makes me sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Please Stop! Posted by: antileft
Coulter has the self destructiveness gene
Posted by: drricklippin on Mar 4, 2007 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ann Coulter like many other hate-mongers ultimately "wants" to publically self destruct.

She cannot help it and she is in fulfilling that unconscious desire with her bizarre remarks. (Pat Robertson redux)

A twisted psyche indeed. Ignoring her is her worst possible nightmare.

I agree with others -just give her more rope to hang herself and let the process proceed

Dr. Rick Lippin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Sort You Don't Invite
Posted by: edith on Mar 4, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Coulter has a potty mouth. That itself was reason enough for most of civilized history, to justifiy exclusion from community and public events.

We live in the say what you feel age. In truth, it is the liberal cultural legacy-Lenny Bruce, Sandra Berhard, Dave Chappelle and Al Franken-which knocked down legitimate taboos in humor and satire. [I consider these all fine satirists but their popularity caused media to cater to the profane in music, comedy and "celebrity" generally.]

Hip Hop music, discussed recently on Altenet, also made profanity a substitute for thoughtful or just entertaining speech. In the case of hip-hop, profanity and simplistic couplets allow additional stereotyping of blacks as ignorant and simple, as if there were not enough stereotypes already!

The conservatives, ironically, have run with the new Amorality of Speech. As the article rightly states, hatred and verbal abuse is the core of [neo]conservative speech.

It used to be called "red meat". In the case of the Anorexic Ann, perhaps "pale purging" would more accurate as to what seeps out of her thin, puckered lips.

Yet the Left can get potty mouth too; the periodic if understandable tossing of personal epithets at Bush and Cheney.

This is all interesting for political junkies. The average commuter or PTA parents doesn't know who Ann Coulter is or even who John Edwards is.

People have more important things to worry about nearly two years before an election. Come fall, 2008 most adults will more or less know who's running and what the general orientation of the candidates is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Potty mouth upsets you Posted by: Ellie1
Supporting Coulter is to "Appeal to the Base"
Posted by: sofla100 on Mar 4, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today in the NY Times, some of the Repubs. are now trying to distance themselves from Coulter. Although, at the same time, the Repubs. don't want to distance themselves from the Conservative Forum that sponsored her. Well, this is nothing new. The Repubs. have always know about the selective use of code words and catch phrases. Although, "faggot" is undeninably negative, like the "N word" for Blacks, it shows how the Repubs. consistently work to "market" themselves not just to the "respectable" in the front rows, but to the boys in the back who own the white sheets. Plenty of them around, especially but not exclusively in the South. They are mostly busy now trying to figure out if they should peel off the "W" stickers on their pickup trucks or wait till Sunday to see what the Pastor tells them to do. Regardless, they and the Right-Wing spectrum, from the Evanaglicals to the boys in the sheets still have quite a bit in common. They all sort of wonder why women have gotten "so-uppity" lately (Coulter an exception of course), why "the blacks" get so much and so much of that there welfare, that them "A-rabs" can't be trusted, and lastly, as Rush tells them, everything wrong with America, to this day is really "Clinton's fault," if we would just look long and hard enough. So, the Repubs. will simultaneously distance themselves and cater to Coulter at the same time, to do otherwise is to risk "alienating the base."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The "Base" is Broken.... Posted by: CatDad
Republican Intelligentsia
Posted by: boing007 on Mar 4, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ann Coulter is an intelligent, independent thinking, talented communicator...

intelligent? possibly somewhere near the bottom 10%, grade six or thereabouts.
independent thinker? aren't we all?
talented communicator? would make a respectable standup comedian, otherwise just a typical Republican attack dog.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epublican Intelligentsia Posted by: helenwheels
It's a dog's life
Posted by: boing007 on Mar 4, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just went back to look at the photo of Mitt and Ann.
Ann looks like a two-legged version of an Afghan hound.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's a dog's life Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: It's a dog's life Posted by: boing007
» RE: It's a dog's life Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: It's a dog's life Posted by: rg
» RE: It's a dog's life Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: It's a dog's life Posted by: mountainsrock
Alternet Stupidly Gives Top Billing Coulter - Enabling the Right Wing Media Agenda...
Posted by: CatDad on Mar 4, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People like Coulter and Rush are part of the Right’s sophisticated media plan to stifle civilized debated on real issues such as health care, foreign policy and free trade/outsourcing....As long as they can make political debate deteriorate into Left vs. Right shouting matches (the model of Faux News)...they win. They win because they’ve the censored real debate on issues where progressives excel...and they also win by making the political system seem out-of-touch/broken...thereby discouraging voting and widespread citizen participation in the democratic process.

I guess I expected more out of Alternet...giving this charlatan top billing for the sake of ratings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"To Coulter"/ and to counter-Coulter
Posted by: dmacauley on Mar 4, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"To coulter" (verb; also nascent social virus):

To vomit up (like a bulimic feline who has swallowed too many hairballs) a bile of baseless, fact-free political rhetoric and hate at everything left of Atilla the Hun or the Grand Inquistor (especially evil Liberals and godless Secularists) for the purpose of inflaming the venom and unbridled vitriol of
Joe Six Packs, Jane Rednecks, George Survivalists and John Unilateralists.

Often accompanied by a sudden loss of gray matter, a corresponding emotional anorexia and a tendency to contradict reality.

Sometimes thought to be a variation of "Maggie Thatherism" with legs, though absent a heart.

Thought to orginate in reptile world; destination unknown.

[That was a first rudimentary attempt to define this political plague.]

On a more practical note, I would like to see folks drive this wingnut off of the Yahoo opinion page (and other locations) where she has her columns (read: rabid manifestos). If readers object en masse, it might help to send her into obscurity. One can best ignore this kind of stuff sometimes, but one also needs to fight back at times too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DO NOT GIVE THAT LADY FREE PUBLICITY
Posted by: ZPaul on Mar 4, 2007 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DO NOT GIVE THAT LADY FREE P