Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Lies They Tell: How to Stop the Fox Propaganda Machine

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted February 22, 2007.


The "Sliming Bowl" is well under way, and Fox's influence is too big -- and too damaging -- to ignore. Can the progressive Internet media and blogosphere bring it down? Plus: A Brand New Video!
fox obama
Advertisement

As presidential aspirants announce their candidacies in an already mind-numbing procession, the "Sliming Bowl" is well under way. No candidate has been smeared more than Barack Obama, and no smearer more relentless than Fox News, as the short video (right) by Brave New Films demonstrates.

"Sliming" is the rabid, rapid, media barrage of persistently repeated lies and innuendo mastered by the right-wing media machine, which aims to tar candidates with negative associations before their campaigns get rolling. Or alternatively, to bruise them enough so that they will suffer under the burden of damaged goods as they try to gain footing.

The conservative roots usually puts out a speculative story through Fox News or Matt Drudge (of the Drudge Report), a powerful mouthpiece for the Bush White House. Then the right-wing echo reverberates as the lies make their way to talk radio and the right-wing blogosphere. Eventually, it gets picked up and carried by the mainstream media, with few understanding where the story originated.

In fact, disinformation conjured by the conservatives often has its most profound impact with the steady cooperation of the corporate press in repeating their lies. How many people still think that Al Gore said he invented the Internet?

The power of Fox and Matt Drudge to serve as kingpins of the Bush White House echo chamber, while at the same time being key agenda-setters for the mainstream press is a daunting problem for Democrats, progressive media makers, and bloggers.

Fox's ability to be blatantly partisan, yet be treated like serious news journalists, is an unprecedented and thus far successful, juggling act. Furthermore, Fox critics are perpetually frustrated with the counter-productive collusion of Democrats and some activists to cooperate with Fox by appearing on its shows, aiding Fox's claims of the legitimacy of its new organization.

But bloggers and activist groups are fighting harder to discredit Fox News for its bias. Just last week, it was announced that Fox News Channel, working with the Nevada Democratic Party and the Western Majority Project, will host an August 2007 Democratic Debate in Reno, Nevada, "which is expected to attract the top Democratic contenders for President."

Not so fast says MoveOn, Free Press, and others. Petition campaigns are under way, aimed at the Nevada Democrats and the DNC, applying serious heat to drop Fox's control of the event because it is not a legitimate news organization. There are also plans to target Fox's advertisers in a campaign reminiscent of an earlier successful one against Sinclair Broadcasting for its nightly rabid right-wing harangues that were forced upon their affiliate's news shows.

Push back on McCain hypocrisy

Willing to fight dirtier and make up bigger lies, the right wing has dominated smear campaigns going back decades -- remember Donald Segretti and Nixon's dirty tricks? Most recently the "Swiftboaters for Truth" campaign mercilessly and inaccurately maligned John Kerry's military record, playing a role in his defeat to Bush in 2004. The anti-Kerry campaign stands as the gold standard for conservatives' ability to get the mainstream media to carry their message without doing their own work -- even creating a new verb for the political lexicon -- swiftboating.

But the progressive internet media and blogosphere are pushing back, using the speed and versatility of the web to whack the conservative "wing nuts" and pandering candidates with some of their own tools -- albeit stopping far short of making stuff up.

Most recently John McCain felt the sting of the blogosphere as the hypocrisy of his "Straight Talk Express" persona, applauded and enhanced by the mainstream media, has been nailed in the video McCain vs. McCain produced by Robert Greenwald and his team at Brave New Films.

More than 300 blogs linked to the video and thrust Greenwald onto the front page of the L.A. Times to tell the story. Other media are now covering the hypocrisy angle as a N.Y. Times front page story focused on dissent in McCain's own back yard among the grassroots conservative Republicans in Nevada. There, Rob Haney, a Republican state committeeman in McCains's own district told the Nation's Max Blumenthal, "The guy has no core, his only principle is winning the presidency. He likes to call his campaign the 'straight talk express.' Well, down here we call it the 'forked tongue express.'"


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: 08 election, fox, obama

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Censorship They Condone: How to Stop the AlterNet Censor Machine
Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon on Feb 22, 2007 12:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AlterNet: I'd just like to commend you all on the excellent deed that your site performed when it stifled discussion and open debate on the recent 9/11 article "Short Changing 9/11: Popular Documentary Takes Us Nowhere"...the message board is now 'sealed off,' stating "Comments closed. The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone that participated."

Are open message boards just too much for this 'progressive' site to handle?

Good article on FauxNews, by the way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's Not The Heat It's THe Humidity Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Baboon Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Baboon Posted by: JMorse
» RE: Baboon Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Baboon Posted by: JMorse
» DEMS AND REPUBS ARE THE SAME Posted by: HistArch
» exactly Posted by: freedomhawk
» Silly ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: JMorse
» RE: Silly ...I STAND WITH ALTERNET Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: JMorse
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: JMorse
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Choke up cash and Alternet.... Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: JMorse
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: JMorse
» RE: Silly ... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Talkin' to me, prophit? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Gotta be careful ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
Dems NEED to be on fox news
Posted by: timebomb734 on Feb 22, 2007 12:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats also just need to grow a pair. Almost every democrat i've seen on foxnews has sat silent or sputtered incoherent replies when their ideology is being trampled upon by some ignoramuses with oversized egos. Jane Fleming is an excellent exception. I saw her on Hannity and Colmes last week with Anne Coulter (shudder), where she was not taking it sitting down. When Coulter was unable to answer an actual question from colmes and instead fell back on attacking murtha's record, Fleming called her out on it, and it was awesome.

Sidenote....Does Anne Coulter actually believe what she is saying? She's Ivy-League educated and quite accomplished, so she can't be completely brain-dead. I always just wonder how she is so hateful and single-minded with such an impressive educational and professional history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Liberal Media Bias Alive and Well Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: consevasurus Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: consevasurus Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: consevasurus Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: consevasurus Posted by: Conservasaurus
» I'd much prefer... Posted by: timebomb734
» Liberal media fair and balanced????? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: WHAT LIBERAL MEDIA?!?!?!? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: WHAT LIBERAL MEDIA?!?!?!? Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: Liberal Media Bias Alive and Well Posted by: mountainsrock
» RE: Liberal Media Bias Alive and Well Posted by: longlivecheney
» Issue...? Posted by: timebomb734
» RE: Issue...? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Dems NEED to be on fox news Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Dems NEED to be on fox news Posted by: maggzilla
Jennie
Posted by: Jennie on Feb 22, 2007 2:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Still I have difficulty understanding US politics and media. I know Fox is the most watched news in the US but I use it in lieu of medication to raise my (low) blood pressure. Go the blogs and Alternet

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jennie Posted by: run13one
FOX and Friends
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 22, 2007 3:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a confession to make: at least once (sometimes twice) a month, I tune into FOX and Friends. It is a perfect illustrtion as to why the poor bastards who rely on that network for their information are the stupidest people on the planet.

FOX and Friends is a program that was intentionaly designed to keep people ill-informed. Tell you what you can do - if you're reading thins in the morning, turn it on right now. Go ahead! I'll wager you anything that, instead of talking about matters essential (the war in Iraq, for instance) they're talking about Anna Nicole Smith or Britany Spears. Go ahead! Turn it on, I'll wait.......

[PAUSE FOR EFFECT]

What did I tell you! It's awful, isn't it? About three weeks ago, I watched the entire thing and Iraq wasn't even mentioned until almost thiry minuted into the program - AND ONLY IN PASSING! Brian Kilmede - or whatever his name is - said "and we're having some problems there, obviously" AND THAT WAS IT!

FOX News has the higest rating of any cable news network. Is it any wonder why we are the laughingstock of the planet?

Pray for peace.

tom Degan
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FOX and Friends Posted by: David V
» RE: FOX and Friends Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: FOX and Friends Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: FOX and Friends Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: FOX and Friends Posted by: tdragert
» HEY.... TOM DEGAN....-------- Posted by: Australia
"No candidate has been smeared more than Barack Obama"
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 22, 2007 3:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What else could that statement mean other than he must be the most decent or best that has been offered so far? I am dismayed that I read one of Obama's bigger contributors is ADM (Archer Daniels Midland) and that he is a proponent of ethanol. If somebody has to push a fuel for an internal combustion engine please make it biodiesel made from hemp or algae. From everything I read it is the lesser of the evils. Other than Obama's encouragement for ethanol (most likely derived from corn), I have not seen, read, or heard too much to make me dislike him.

He also needs to campaign to end the war in Iraq. I hope he will show some real integrity and not be complicit in war crimes. We need of government to act humanely and responsibly instead of possibly "Every one of the 535 members of the 110th Congress is liable to face criminal indictment from the International Criminal Court in The Hague if the US uses nuclear weapons in the impending conflict with Iran." We need to end being the criminals and pariahs this article reflects Congress' liability in a nuclear strike on Iran

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FOX, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC and ALTERNET
Posted by: wawa on Feb 22, 2007 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are all guilty of NOT reporting THE TRUTH that America should know!

WAWA is THE ONLY MEDIA in the world who has the 'Thatchers' to stream UNCENSORED video of the Whislteblower of Israel's WMD Program who has been on Trial for
FREEDOM OF SPEECH in a Mid East 'democracy'

Don is certainly correct that:

"if there's one thing bloggers don't hesitate to do, it is calling journalists to account when they have sinned."


But WAWA doesn't condemn you,



WAWA desires to liberate and educate

Because,

Only in Solidarity do "we have it in our power to begin the world again"-Tom Paine

Do Something-
e
WAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Relax you'll be dead soon.... Posted by: Michiganman
» I went to a link here once..... Posted by: Michiganman
How to REALLY fight FOX
Posted by: bleppo on Feb 22, 2007 4:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the Pocket book!

The Simpsons and other so-called progressive animation shows should pull themselves off FOX. They probably rationalize having their shows on FOX by thinking they'll fight the man from within.

What decent progressive would want to support FOX?

Harry Shearer must think his Le Show lets him off the hook.

This is serious business, though, and these weakling progressives need to pull their popular shows off FOX.

I've rejected right-wing clients from my computer business after they touted the wonders of Bush.

Can YOU imagine having YOUR show on FOX?

I wouldn't be surprised if Harry Shearer and Matt Groening set in the 1930s in Germany would be totally happy having their shows on Nazi TV if TV had been around then.

Their shows need to be pushed HARD to pull themselves off the air, even if it means violating their contracts.

If U.S. soldiers can bravely die for a pack of lies in Iraq, Harry Shearer and Co. should sacrifice their fat payoff-checks for the truth.

Money and their mortages have them supplying a big part of the wealth of FOX.

And Shearer has the GALL to talk politics.


FOX throws cartoons at progressives to mollify them into accepting the rest of FOX's crap. The originators of Fox animated shows think they're socking it to right wingers by putting a few snide remarks about Bush in their shows.

What a joke! That's just a wimp's mollification. Progressive FOX jesters get their jabs in but earn millions for their king.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» TURN OFF YOUR TV Posted by: HistArch
» IRONY IS SO IRONIC !!! Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: IRONY IS SO IRONIC !!! Posted by: bleppo
» RE: IRONY IS SO IRONIC !!! Posted by: Michiganman
LOW-BROW, RIGHT-WING RADIO 1000X WORSE THAN FOX !
Posted by: jaydiamond on Feb 22, 2007 4:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The most widely watched Fox News TV programs are dwarfed by the listenership of low-brow, right-wing talk radio by a huge factor. Even if each stupid and evil right-wing show is taken by itself, the numbers are not comparable. But if you add up all the dumb and lying right-wing radio coast to coast, it truly does approach 1000 to 1 in terms of cumulative listening hours compared to viewing hours on Fox !

O'Reilly is the highest rated Fox TV program. O'Reilly get about 1,000,000 viewers a night.

American Idol gets 40,000,000.

Network News gets about 50,000,000 combined on all three networks.

But talk radio gets over 500,000,000 listening hours a day.

Remember, you cannot watch Fox for a 2 hour commute or a 12 hour truck route.

So the real menace to the institutions of democracy is on low-brow, right-wing radio, not Fox TV. In addition, though the standard of ethics and objectivity is low on Fox TV, I can guarantee you that they are utterly NON-EXISTENT on moron level right-wing radio.

The trouble is that very, very, few people of normal or above intelligence listen to the odious drivel, and hence, it exists almost totally under the radar.

If the broad swath of American people had any clue as to noxious lies and ugly smears that these gargoyles use to manipulate the most easily swayed among us, they would concretely express their righteous outrage at the beasts. No radio station wants to be a pariah in the community because advertisers hate it...IF the public makes their disgust and anger very plain to the station and the advertisers.

Trouble is, as I've said, that almost no normal people listen to this stupid and vicious junk.

What needs to happen is a concerted and serious campaign to monitor the big network and smaller local programs and read the crap verbatim into the congressional record.....then the media will be engaged and media reformers will have a potent issue as many millions of Americas will be made aware of a political pestilence of which they have been dangerously unaware.

I am pretty sure that members like Conyers, Kucinich, etc., and Sherrod Brown and Ted Kennedy among others would be glad to read it into the record were this vulgar material provided to them.

Jay Diamond

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Money Money Money Posted by: eddie torres
» Your Leftist elitism is showing Posted by: ISlamIslam
Dirty Laundry
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 22, 2007 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This stuff pre-dates Faux. Even if Faux disappeared tomorrow, the dirt would show up elsewhere, like the local news stations.

We love gossip, whether it's true or not. It's supply and demand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fox News is scared and it shows
Posted by: justaperson on Feb 22, 2007 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be that people like the sexually perverted Bill O'
Reilly could invite a liberal guest and then just chew the guest up. It took a long time for Liberals to learn to just ignore the trashmouthing hosts on Fox, but eventually they got it. Now they just use the time to state their message. They also are loosening up and laughing at the ridiculous things the wingnuts preach. Right in their face! The air time is important, so boycotting the shows seems counterproductive. There's nothing more amusing than watching Big Fathead Bill struggle to make his guest squirm as they continue stating their obviously much more rational points.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» See, it's like this... Posted by: timebomb734
Provide Exact Things We All Can Do to Disrupt and Damage the Fox News Machine
Posted by: MikeNSwiss on Feb 22, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anyone provide a real to-do-list on how to disrupt or cripple FOX and the FOX news machine?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the average FOX viewer is 72 years old
Posted by: Ghoulman on Feb 22, 2007 5:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and the ratings for FOX have been halved every year for the last three years. This should be a clue that FOX is truely a propoganda machine as it would have been canceled ages ago. Hell, O'Reilly barely has anyone watching him but for the laughs.

But it didn't work. Not at all. OK, it got Bush elected in 2000. I'll give FOX, and it's Bush related employees, that.

But really, the racism and holy indulgence of the neocon FOX types shouldn't be allowed on TV. The FCC does have rules about smearing, slandering, etc. It's too bad Bush's political officers placed at the FCC (and every other government dept) only go after those horrible, horrible, people who display boobies on TV and say "shit".

Yea, that last bit was sarcasim. ;p

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fox News
Posted by: robchapman on Feb 22, 2007 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox News has the right to air whatever they want.
That their editorial and more importantly their news editting is skewed to fit the views of a hard right septugenarian Australian multi-billionaire is not illegal or immoral.

That Fox News is the recorder and disseminator of the GOP line on issues is not a problem. There is a long and honored history of advocacy journalism in this country.

The only problem that I see is treating Fox news as an obective, disinterested news network in the mold of the other four networks.

Due to ratings and finances we may see the other networks tilt more toward idealogy as the basis for reporting, but so far this a Fox feature.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fox News Posted by: AussieGeoff
» RE: Fox News Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Fox News Posted by: Logic's Edge
America the Police State
Posted by: edsmith on Feb 22, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you think you are truly free in America? You are not. You are livvng in a fascist police state. You think you have a choice in selecting a president by voting in the biggest fiasco and scama perpetrated upon a nation of people? Americans are extremely dumb and delusional to believe that voting for one or two people, from more or less the same party, selecetd by elitists, corporations, Fox News and the Israel Lobby, is an excercise in freedom. Let me tell you something, your vote means nothing. You are not free, you can't even hold a spontaneous public rally without being herded into fenced in prison yards called free speech zones - what a fucking joke you all have become - go on with your delusion, enjoy 24 and American Idol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AGREE 10,000% edsmith Posted by: Michiganman
» Voting is a joke Posted by: Artemis3
There is NOT much DOUBT...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Feb 22, 2007 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that anyone that watches Fox for anything remotely resembling the truth cannot have very sharp tools in the shed. But any progressive worth his or her salt MUST go on the programs to expose their form of lunacy.

And it is not that hard...truth will out...but you cannot let them turn themselves into martyrs. That is exactly what they would like, just like the religious.

Just look how foolish Colbert made OReilly look.

But to show you how out of touch their viewers are, a conservative friend of mine watched the Colbert-OReilly match and said "Who is this guy (Colbert), I agreed with most of what he said? "

They are not bright enough (or open enough, I cannot figure which) to understand the level of humor and truth that a Colbert brings to the table. I guess it is in their "training," i.e., they are taught from an early age NOT to question anything that comes from their pulpit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Too stupid Posted by: Jeanne
Mark Foley D-FL
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Feb 22, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The key to killing the Fox is to make a short 30 minute documentary that exposes exactly what Fox does, and why they do it. It has to be something any Fox viewer can feel at home watching, especially a senior citizen Fox viewer. It has to be done in the "Fox style".

OutFoxed is NOT a good documentary.

Orwell Rolls in his Grave is 5x better than OutFoxed, but it is too dry. If it were condensed into 30 minutes and if they threw in some flashy red/white/blue graphics, hehe, then they'd be onto something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: Provide Exact Things We All Can Do to Disrupt and Damage the Fox News Machine
Posted by: Ohh99 on Feb 22, 2007 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox News exists as an enabler for enrichment and will hurt anything and everything that stands in its way. If you want to "disrupt and damage" the "machine" use their very own tactics and weapons against them. The fear they are fighting is the gear to work with.

I don't think we need a step-by-step program to fight Fox News. If a reality is based on a lie and distortion, that reality will become the lie and the distortion. Why get involved in the tailspin?

If you take a lier seriously he (it) becomes a serious lier, and that's where Fox News is at this point in time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THERE'S VERY LITTLE NEWS ON 'THE NEWS'
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 22, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of what they babble about is just gossip. My gripe is the amount of money they get paid to piss people off. Accuracy, sources and fact checking don't apply to them. Since it really isn't 'news' they assume no responsibility for anything. They focus on character assasination which is tough to prove. Highly opinionated loud angry people are seldom well informed. That's why they need so many lawyers. Ignore them, they might go away. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Filmmaker Greenbrg is a coward and hypocrite to boot.
Posted by: DougScott on Feb 22, 2007 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Filmmaker Greenberg would have Democrats boycott Fox News, but, man, would he scream if Fox urged its viewers to give his documentaries the same treatment.

Rather than shun Fox, all Democrats, including Hillary, Obama and Edwards, should demand airtime on the neocon network. If they can't beat O'Reilly with their brains, then Bill should be running for president, not them.

Hugh E. Scott, creator/editor of www.King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]