Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Launching the 2008 Presidential Campaign With Ethnic Cleansing in Iraq

By Tom Hayden, Huffington Post. Posted January 9, 2007.


How the escalation in Iraq is both a campaign move and a way to force Sunnis out of Baghdad and into second-class status.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Tom Hayden

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Politically, the coming escalation by 20,000 U.S. troops in Iraq is best understood as the comeback strategy of the neoconservative Republicans rallying around Sen. John McCain's presidential banner.

The political spin-doctors are calling it a "surge," an aggressive term implying a kind of post-election erection for Bush and the neoconservatives. In fact, or course, it is an escalation, a term apparently carrying too much baggage from Vietnam.

The hardcore neoconservatives, their ranks thinned by defections publicized in Vanity Fair, leaped immediately to salvage the war from November's voter disapproval. Frederick Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute and William Kristol of the Weekly Standard began promoting an increase of 50,000 troops, mainly to Baghdad. Bush, who all along said he was listening to his generals, now sacked generals Casey and Abizaid, who had plans to reduce troop levels over one year ago, and who now opposed more American soldiers in Iraqi neighborhoods. John Negroponte, a specialist in the black arts of counterintelligence, became the State Department's point man on Baghdad. U.S. ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, a Sunni who has been critical of the Shi'a-controlled interior ministry, was removed from his Baghdad post. An Ivy League general, David Petraeus, with a counterinsurgency agenda to prove, took over command of U.S. troops.

Right after the election, Sen. McCain was touring Baghdad with his potential running mate Sen. Joe Lieberman, promoting the plan to escalate, although supported by only 20 percent of Republicans, 11 percent of independent voters, and a statistically-insignificant 4 percent of Democrats (L.A. Times/Bloomberg, Dec. 11, 2006).

It is a brilliant strategy -- for a faction dealt a losing hand.

If and when the 20,000 Americans plunge into Baghdad neighborhoods, there will be dramatic television coverage of soldiers at risk. It is possible, though far from easy, to "stabilize" a Baghdad neighborhood for several months or one year, carrying the surge into the next presidential cycle. The strategy fits the polling data showing only 21 percent of Americans favor immediate withdrawal, while the moderate middle might be open to an undefined new strategy if convinced it will shorten the war and bring the troops home.

More likely, the ranks of the peace movement are likely to swell with people angry over the perceived betrayal by Bush of the November voter mandate. A failure by majority Democrats to prevent the escalation will convince more people to take to the streets or look to 2008 for a fix.

If the proposal to escalate somehow is blocked by congressional Democrats along with a few Republicans facing reelection, McCain and the neoconservatives will be able to salvage a narrative blaming the "loss of Iraq" on Democrats. Their Plan B is to claim the United States should have escalated from the very beginning.

The Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group report offered a hint that this escalation was coming in its formulaic compromise stating that it "could" support a "short-term redeployment, or surge," but only if "the U.S. commander in Iraq determines that such steps would be effective." With the arrival of a new commander in Iraq, that mission is accomplished. The word "could" represents one of the partisan trade-offs in the writing of the report. The Republicans on the ISG would have been advocating the optional language on behalf of the White House, while others tried to weaken the "could" by relying on a commander like Gen. Casey to nix it.

U.S. sides with Shiites in civil war

Meanwhile, as the politicians position themselves in Washington, urgent appeals from Iraqis warned of Shi'a death squads being unleashed against Sunni neighborhoods. The Baghdad security plan agreed in a teleconference last week being Bush and Prime Minister al-Maliki already is underway. According to al-Jazeera the Shiite militia attacks and roundups began on Sunday. The parliamentarian and peace advocate Saleh al-Mutlaq denounced the plan as an attempt to cleanse Baghdad of the Sunni majority it had in 2003. The Association of Muslim Scholars and Iraqi satellite TV stations began transmitting cries for help from relatives and neighbors in Baghdad.

Already tens of thousands have fled Baghdad, the largest percentage of the nearly one million Iraqis who have been displaced, according to the United Nations. Forty thousand have relocated in Falluja. There they stand in a parking lot surrounded by razor wire, are hand-searched, given retinal scans, and provided IDs to enter Falluja, or weeded out (L.A. Times, Jan. 4, 2007).


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: surge, escalation, mccain, iraq, sunnis

Tom Hayden was a leader of the student, civil rights, peace and environmental movements of the 1960s. He served 18 years in the California legislature, where he chaired labor, higher education and natural resources committees. He is the author of ten books, including "Street Wars" (New Press, 2004). He is a professor at Occidental College, Los Angeles, and was a visiting fellow at Harvard's Institute of Politics last fall.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Tom, Ya still got it!
Posted by: edith on Jan 9, 2007 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ol SDS'er Hayden comes up with the logical strategy of the Dim duke with ease and grace. (Ten years of deciphering the gyrations of McNamara and Laird will do that to you).

The ultimate way to win a guerilla war is to drain the sea of water so the fish die. It's never really been done, but the strategic hamlet program of Vietnam and Hayden's prediction of Sunni cleansing have their similarities.

I will make one modest amendment to the Master's(I'm not being sarcastic here) analysis: the real model for what they are about to do in Iraq is Palestine. Is the "new" strategy something "America's only ally" in the Middle East suggested?

After all, look how successful Sunni cleansing in Palestine was: it's called the "State" of Israel.

Where are they going to dump all the refugees this time? Saudi Arabia? Or they can give them green cards like the Cubans. After all, there is never enough cheap labor in the world, and who can resist the import of thousands of Iraqi doctors who would work for minimum wage? Sure solve the coming "surge" in Medicare expenses!

Tom, I remember you romping the streets of Newark. You still got it, Man!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tom, Ya still got it! Posted by: colinmeister
Note to the Dems - To Words: RALPH NADER
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jan 9, 2007 2:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It just might do the Democrats good to remember why we sent them to Washington in the first place. It wasn't so that their re-election would be assured the next time around. It was to end the war in Iraq. Period. The sooner they do it, the easier it will be for them in '08 - as if politics should really matter in a case where the lives of millions - that's right, "millions" - are at stake.

It might do them well to remember that the only reason we are in this mess to begin with is because seven years ago, alot of fed up people (myself included, I'm sorry to say) went over to Ralph Nader and the Green Party for the simple fact that the Democrats had all but abandoned their base. If they don't get on the ball right away and put an end to the obscenity that half-wit from Crawford, Texas has engendered, I fear the same mass party exidus might replay itself out next year. We don't want that to happen, do we? Ah! I thought as much

Iraq has been destroyed. By pulling out now they'll be hell to pay in the opinion polls - no question about it - but by November of '08, people will have simmered down and realized that it was the right thing to do. Otherwise this obscenity will just drag on into the next administration - an administration that only a fool believes will not be democratic.

We have a razor thin window of opportunity here, folks. Let's not blow it.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank You.... Posted by: CatDad
War for Israel - God Bless IsrealErica
Posted by: mat38 on Jan 9, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some people are willing to admit the fact that the Likud Party and America's monstorous Israel Lobby (AIPAC, American Enterprose Institute, NEOCONS and others) are the principle architects of the Iraq War. Getting America bogged down in the Middle East is great for Israel who is now able to ramp up it's Occupation/Apartheid policies to keep trying to rid itself of millions of non-citizens, or at least have enouhg time to steal all of their property and resources. Now they (The Lobby) want to take the fight (and our money and blood) to Iran and assholes like John McCain and Joe Leiberbush are chomping at the Israel Lobby bit to escalate becasue they want the White House Ring and the Israel Lobby, which also includes most of the U.S. corporate media, will be happy as stink in shit because they will be in charge, really. And Hillary and the Demcrats? Useless as any crap in the gutter. We are doomed.
God Bless America, uh, I mean IsraelErica.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Anti-War IS Left Code for WE HATE JEWS Posted by: cheneybush2008
» RE: War for Israel Posted by: CatDad
wolfboy
Posted by: wolfboy on Jan 9, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It concerns me to see the same tired pattern repeated when we resurrect blind faith in a Democratic party that shares the blame for our invading Iraq. Now we expect these same pundits for special economic interests to somehow act differently than their nature, to suddenly return to some altruistic, days of yore and " do the right things" ?

2008 would be truly exciting if there were more party choices. Instead we seem to be preparing to watch the duopoly meter spring back to the left without any real change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forget The Surge - We Need A PURGE....
Posted by: Nez46 on Jan 9, 2007 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of these Dem & Republican warmongering, warporifteering, shortsighted, out-of-touch, ignorant, imperialistic, greedy, brutish, immoral, unethical, thugs who have stolen our country and are hellbent on taking her straight through the gates of hell.
And for those morons who think a "surge" will be effective, hows about you show us all your conviction by becoming the point people on all those S & D missions occurring in Baghdad?

Jesus, what in the fuck has happened to my country?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough, Get out and stay out. Yankee Criminals Go Home!
Posted by: IanA on Jan 9, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Article said : “the execution of Saddam Hussein, now causing a public relations nightmare for American officials” NO KIDDING? Clearly the NY Times has a PR contract with the Pentagon. On 01-7 they give us: Before Hanging, a Push for Revenge and a Push Back
, a heart rendering saga strait out of Hollywood movie or a TV special about how hard the US tried to delay the execution of Saddam….. and all that was done at every level… but Iraq is a “sovereign” nation and finally Condi had to bow to the demands of its government… after a “fair” trial and appeal process…

What a load of BS!!

Today Saddam speaks…. Hussein’s Voice Speaks in Court in Praise of Atrocities
Even after he’s hanged, suddenly tapes are produced with him ordering chemical weapons genocide at Halabja knowingly defying the consequences of foreign shock and disdain……

Convenient is it not???

Is anyone else familiar with the Israeli company VIR (voice imitation and recognition) and the many other voice recognition software companies who can produce such effects as to make anyone sound like anyone else?

This is pathetic and represents such obvious American orchestrated mind games that one wonders if there is anyone out there that believes anything coming out of the US media.

The sectarian violence, the civil war, is directly caused by the US’s illegal invasion and occupation. Tactics from Israel and the Pentagon are being used to set one faction against the other and stimulate terror with terror escalating violence. Personally, I have no doubt at all now that the UN offices and Golden Mosque bombings, which were blamed on “Alqaeda” in Iraq, were US false flag pump priming actions.

The US is in every way a state sponsoring and conducting terrorism, and genocide. Whether other states in the world can or cannot act against this vicious regime it should not preclude the actions of any and all individuals in the world who value truth and justice to use ANY MEANS at their disposal and that they see as effective and fit to bring the American perpetrators of these crimes to justice.

A further escalation in Iraq, planned attacks on Iran are all insane, vile, attempts to spread American hegemony with chaos across the whole region. Enough is enough. The US and Israel are the worlds enemies. One need not be Muslim or radical or extreme to understand the crimes being committed and understand that these regimes must be “changed” if the people of the world seek peace. Without change all people, black, white, brown, yellow; American, European, Asian, African, whatever, will face perpetual oppression and war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HO CHI TOM YOU IGNORANT SLUT
Posted by: cheneybush2008 on Jan 9, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(as sung to
You IS A Human Animal)...

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Flunk the Diebold, you blame Bush,
Not your flaming leftist push,
For jobs without some work
Which you can't heed.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Whether Soros or George Lucas,
You'd prefer Saddam had nuked us,
Instead of ending any threat you
couldn't see.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Burn the flag, chew a pill,
You'll abort more children still
than the UN or EU will ever need.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Whether gay or chat show hack,
or just a hoe on mostly crack,
There's nothing you won't do to
not succeed.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Shrill and strident, you'll be true,
To all the things with which you've screwed,
FICA, unions, schools, and Medicrap indeed.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Young or Carter, fat or bland,
Old France thinks you're still grand,
Though Vermont is where you'll make your
final stand.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Uncle Teddy, Cousin Lerch,
Any pardon selling perch,
Be better than the nation you
besmirch.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
When you speak, forests cry,
Booboo Boxer lets them fry,
Never mind the fuzzy critters that
all die.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
To the center Hillary runs,
Never mind you don't like guns,
That never stopped you once from
Shrieking MORE SEX WITH NUNS.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Diss the troops, hit a cop,
As long as cable you don't drop,
So skip the latest CBS News numbers
flop.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Cindy Shiite or Martin Sheen,
There's no time for Listerine,
But boiling smelly Birkenstocks is
keen.

You IS A Huffie Liberal,
You IS A Very Special Breed,
Suckled on the teet of state,
Your mantra daily MASTERBATE,
As cure for all ills foreign and
obscene...

OK, your turn, go...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cheney's Bush? Posted by: ignition
Hitler never attacked New York or DC, Timmy.
Posted by: cheneybush2008 on Jan 9, 2007 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Were we then wrong to invade Germany?

After 9-11, waiting around for Saddam to jerk off again in mass public death was not going to happen - whether Bush, Gore, or anyone else was POTUS after that sad day. That IS the point of the 9-11 references in speech after speech (9-11 known in lib loon circles as "Tuesday"), for the limp anarchists bent on blaming Bush for all war, tooth decay, and anything else that pops into their small Blame America 1st brain stems.

Doubt it?

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."SENATOR TED KENNEDY (D, MA), in 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." – NANCY PELOSI, in 1998

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." – AL GORE, in 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), in 2002

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, in 1998

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." – BILL CLINTON, in 1998

Saddam?

Our collective mistake was waiting another 12 years to finally remove the sorry murdering son of a bitch from power.

That's the only thing anyone in this nation really needs to explain, where a now free though certainly still dangerous Iraq is concerned. (Detroit and South Boston, weekends? Not much safer.)

Freeing slaves and defending the free isn't for everyone, to be sure. If it was easy? Everyone would do it.

They don't.

= THANKS TO AMERICA'S ARMED FORCES =

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pre-emptive presentation of DNC co-presenter remarks...
Posted by: cheneybush2008 on Jan 10, 2007 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My fellow Armenians, I am troubled, seriously and effeminately troubled, by the ongoing yet circumspect CBS memo fashion in which we appear to seem to perhaps to allege for about 4 months give or take plus medivac comp time that beyond a quickie Cambodian abortion mud hut shadow of a doubt, heretofore and forthwith, with appropriate President Peanut resolution and re-consideration of any overriding legal authority not stuffed in associated tube socks, in as much as I must impress upon France and all the other three nations that I call home, with vichy and just ski wax for all, but not in any way to demean or demand or demolay the point, for without a confident air of SUV transmission for the sake of private Idaho puppies and many other local animals, to have and to hold, for richer or even richer, and with sparkling North Korean fan fare if not more so the systematic and uncomfortable omen of Clintoid cop secrecy and fine wine, we must, truly must abridge any notion and eventual support for the complete global test and full hearing of matters before us as beloved Boston Blue Caps fanatics, and that no man should look asunder under Allah with lib sheep and butt wipes for all...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]