Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why Smoking Marijuana Doesn't Make You a Junkie

By Bruce Mirken, Marijuana Policy Project. Posted December 19, 2006.


The idea that marijuana is a "gateway" drug has been once again squelched by two new scientific studies.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Bruce Mirken

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Two recent studies should be the final nails in the coffin of the lie that has propelled some of this nation's most misguided policies: the claim that smoking marijuana somehow causes people to use hard drugs, often called the "gateway theory."

Such claims have been a staple of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy under present drug czar John Walters. Typical is a 2004 New Mexico speech in which, according to the Albuquerque Journal, "Walters emphasized that marijuana is a 'gateway drug' that can lead to other chemical dependencies."

The gateway theory presents drug use as a tidy progression in which users move from legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco to marijuana, and from there to hard drugs like cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine. Thus, zealots like Walters warn, marijuana is bad because it leads to things that are even worse.

It's a neat theory, easy to sell. The problem is, scientists keep poking holes in it -- the two new studies being are just the most recent examples.

In one National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded study, researchers from the University of Pittsburgh tracked the drug use patterns of 224 boys, starting at age 10 to 12 and ending at age 22. Right from the beginning these kids confounded expectations. Some followed the traditional gateway paradigm, starting with tobacco or alcohol and moving on to marijuana, but some reversed the pattern, starting with marijuana first. And some never progressed from one substance to another at all.

When they looked at the detailed data on these kids, the researchers found that the gateway theory simply didn't hold; environmental factors such as neighborhood characteristics played a much larger role than which drug the boys happened to use first. "Abusable drugs," they wrote, "occupy neither a specific place in a hierarchy nor a discrete position in a temporal sequence."

Lead researcher Dr. Ralph E. Tarter told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "It runs counter to about six decades of current drug policy in the country, where we believe that if we can't stop kids from using marijuana, then they're going to go on and become addicts to hard drugs."

Researchers in Brisbane, Australia, and St. Louis reached much the same conclusion in a larger and more complex study published last month. The research involved more than 4,000 Australian twins whose use of marijuana and other drugs was followed in detail from adolescence into adulthood.

Then -- and here's the fascinating part -- they matched the real-world data from the twins to mathematical models based on 13 different explanations of how use of marijuana and other illicit drugs might be related. These models ranged from pure chance -- assuming that any overlap between use of marijuana and other drugs is random -- to models in which underlying genetic or environmental factors lead to both marijuana and other drug use or models in which marijuana use causes use of other drugs or vice versa.

When they crunched the numbers, only one conclusion made sense: "Cannabis and other illicit drug use and misuse co-occur in the population due to common risk factors (correlated vulnerabilities) or a liability that is in part shared." Translated to plain English: the data don't show that marijuana causes use of other drugs, but instead indicate that the same factors that make people likely to try marijuana also make them likely to try other substances.

In the final blow to claims that marijuana must remain illegal to keep us from becoming a nation of hard-drug addicts, the researchers added that any gateway effect that does exist is "more likely to be social than pharmacological," occurring because marijuana "introduces users to a provider (peer or black marketeer) who eventually becomes the source for other illicit drugs." In other words, the gateway isn't marijuana; it's laws that put marijuana into the same criminal underground with speed and heroin.

The lie that marijuana somehow turns people into junkies is dead. Officials who insist on repeating it as a way of squelching discussion about common-sense reforms should be laughed off the stage.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: drugs, marijuana legalization, gateway drugs

Bruce Mirken is communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hurray for no new news!
Posted by: timebomb734 on Dec 19, 2006 12:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who actually thought marijuana was ever illegal for a legitimate public health risk should be laughed off the stage. This is a disappointing article that rehashes the same old crap any knowledgable person already knows about marijuana.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hurray for no new news! Posted by: Radicalizer
» RE: Hurray for no new news! Posted by: grinch
» RE: Hurray for no new news! Posted by: willymack
» Research is news Posted by: dhardisty
Don't Decriminalize- Legalize
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 19, 2006 12:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see a joint as being any different than someone drinking a beer- the only difference is the stigma of decades of government misinformation. The war against Marijuana is a farce and should be put away.

No, I don't do the stuff, but the day it becomes legal I'll be the first in line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't Decriminalize- Legalize Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: Don't Decriminalize- Legalize Posted by: maxwell.bridges@maxbridges.us
» RE: Don't Decriminalize- Legalize Posted by: maxwell.bridges@maxbridges.us
» RE: Don't Decriminalize- Legalize Posted by: maxwell.bridges@maxbridges.us
» RE: Don't Decriminalize- Legalize Posted by: grammasanity
Plan, Plant, Planet
Posted by: equidave on Dec 19, 2006 1:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Our present global crisis is more profound than any previous historical crises; hence our solutions must be equally drastic. I propose that we should adopt the plant as the organizational model for life in the twenty-first century, just as the computer seems to be the dominant mental/social model of the late twentieth century, and the steam engine was the guiding image of the nineteenth century.

This means reaching back in time to models that were successful fifteen thousand to twenty thousand years ago. When this is done it becomes possible to see plants as food, shelter, clothing, and sources of education and religion.

The process begins by declaring legitimate what we have denied for so long. Let us declare nature to be legitimate. All plants should be declared legal, and all animals for that matter. The notion of illegal plants and animals is obnoxious and ridiculous."

terence mckenna
from: http://deoxy.org/t_ppp.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ok but Posted by: jwg
» RE: Ok but Posted by: equidave
believe
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 19, 2006 2:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the Bushies don't believe in science, these worthwhile studies will have no effect as long as the Bushies remain in power. Out, you Brazen Bushie Bums.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: believe Posted by: timebomb734
» I'm losing money here... Posted by: Scientz
» RE: believe Posted by: rsaxto
Colonel Pepper's Solution
Posted by: treyhaltom on Dec 19, 2006 4:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only does it not make you a junkie, it tends to increase your IQ and enhances your understanding of subtler dimensions and circumstances.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DEFENDING POTHEADS??! Posted by: Argh the Defender
» RE: Colonel Pepper's Solution Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Colonel Pepper's Solution Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Colonel Pepper's Solution Posted by: bornxeyed
Less of a gateway if legal.
Posted by: colinmeister on Dec 19, 2006 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only logical reason I can see why smokers of marijuana might move to other illegal drugs is because they have to come into contact with dealers in illegal drugs to obtain their supplies. If a customer is buying marijuana, and the dealer asks if the customer has tried/would like to try cocaine, there is a chance that the customer might buy two drugs from the dealer instead of one.

Make marijuana legal, and this aspect goes away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What I mean to say is... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Withdrawals? Nah Posted by: harpy
» Maybe we just like to get high Posted by: aaronfetty
» RE: Maybe we just like to get high Posted by: Madam Hatter
Don't bogart that point, my friend
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Dec 19, 2006 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pass the mic on to me...

I heard John Walters on NPR about 3 years ago with two other common myths: the increasing number of marijuana addicts and the vastly more potent marijuana of today.

First, we don't recognize marijuana addiction when it comes to disabilities and secondly, don't blame me if someone sold you ditchweed back in the day.

As for the first, I voluntarily stay away from it for extended periods whenever I want, and as for the second, it depended on who you knew or where you got it. Still does, to a degree,

I remember some 'Ganja' from '74 that left stains in the bag from the high resin content. One little skinny would take care of a roomful. I only wish someone else would bring more of that to town! Granted, there was a lot of mean green, but the redbud, Hawaiian, Thai stick, etc, was available too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not true at all Posted by: harpy
» RE: Not true at all Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Not true at all Posted by: Madam Hatter
» NPR is 90% Propaganda Posted by: rwa
Pot
Posted by: crusty on Dec 19, 2006 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They dont call it dope for nothing. Most people use it to justify self medication instead of dealing with lifes problems head on. Its a big waste of time money and perfectly good brain cells... Give me Belgian beer any day. Or Italian wine. OR how bout this try living without a buzz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pot Posted by: timebomb734
» RE: Pot Posted by: JCR
» Absolutely! Posted by: Aim
» RE: Pot Posted by: sausage
» RE: Pot Posted by: crusty
» RE: Pot Posted by: JCR
» RE: What the heck? Posted by: Techubus
» RE: Pot Posted by: grolan
» RE: Pot Posted by: crusty
» RE: Pot Posted by: purplelotus13
» RE: Pot Posted by: crusty
» So what's the difference? Posted by: harpy
» RE: So what's the difference? Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Pot :only dopes call it dope Posted by: sasquuatch55
Well duh.
Posted by: pball on Dec 19, 2006 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Post hoc ergo propter hoc...

Of course "hard" drug users are likely to have started with pot, not because pot causes hard drug use but because hard drug users passed it along the way to coke or crack or heroin or whatever.

It's like saying "Speeding is a gateway crime to MURDER! 100% of murderers committed speeding BEFORE they ever killed!" May be factually correct but that don't make it true (see link).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only a gateway because...
Posted by: inanaturallight on Dec 19, 2006 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...because, as I did, once kids get ahold of some and try it they realize that the adults were filling them full of s**t about it, and thus about all drugs, so why not find out for yourself? I don't know what nutty propaganda and scare stories they use about it to our youth in modern times, in my day it was called physically addictive and was supposed to turn you into an instant Charles Manson, it was considered infinitely worse than alcohol at the time.
Some also seem to want to see it as a cure for the world's ills and that to me is a misperception as dire as that of the 'gateway proponets', but people are going to try to find escape, and the "legal" alternatives, tobacco and alcohol, seem to be more dangerous in myriad ways.
I suspect if we as a society were more truthful with our children about this and other things fewer of them would be trying to find escape in drugs. The society we live in drives our youth to escape at exactly the same time their sense of right and wrong and responsibility is developing, and if we as a society could find ways to delay this experimentation until "adulthood" I think we as a society would end up better off. Incarceration serves no one but the people running the incarceration business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent points Posted by: WhuThe?!?
You could say welcome to the bleeding obvious....
Posted by: cordas on Dec 19, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However whilst its so obvious to many, there are some people who are entrenched in a bizarre world of denial and make belief, where everything is tied together in very simple explanations that adsolve themselves and the state from any responsibility.

The ONLY way that hash is a gateway drug is that it introduces users to criminals who want to make money out of them, and these criminals want to get them onto "hard" addictive drugs.

Yes I know that ignores the influence of peer pressure, experimentation and those people who seeking the oblivion that hard drugs give, but if you remove the criminal link between hash and the hard drugs then the peer pressure will lessen as the peers will be less likely to take these drugs in the 1st place, after all they have to do the drugs for the 1st time just like "precious timmy who was led astray". Kids will always experiment and will always push the boundaries thats part of growing up, but removing this link will help to cut that down as well.

The last step to having a working drug policy would be for the state to give away hard drugs like crack and heroin free, to registered users, this could be done in a regulated and controled manner, but this could not be too tight or you would drive the users back to the black market.

Legalise the drugs, control those you don't want in society and you will drive the criminals out of the business (or turn them legitimate which would be my prefered option) and you will have less problems with drugs.

Just to drive the point home, how much of a problem is alcohol in the early 21st century compared to the early 20th when prohibition was in place and the mob ruled the trade?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dave's not here man
Posted by: mat38 on Dec 19, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, pot is a gateway drug. So are chemically treated tobacco and booze. In fact, more kids today are getting high from slamming Robitussen PH (something I did back inthe seventies once - not fun).
Mind altering drugs are just that - mind altering. No matter how you spin, being high all of th time, well, it's not the best way to go through life.
Now, I believe we shold legalize it and give people the choice to have really good, clean, untreated and unadulterated weed. If we do that we can tax it, make hemp products much more usefull, especially as alternative fuel sources, and we can put an end to that disaster called the Drug War.
It's time for change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dave's not here man Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Dave left man Posted by: jwg
» RE: Dave's not here man Posted by: Techubus
» RE: Dave's not here man Posted by: mat38
» RE: Dave's not here man Posted by: bornxeyed
Again, missing the real point
Posted by: P. Hermes on Dec 19, 2006 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana is banned because it runs counter to the prevailing American, narrow and unempathetic worldview. Pot's unlocking of empathy and deep thought is a danger to this adolescent and shallow society's valueless and aggressive way of thinking, expressing and living. No wonder smoking pot in America has become an increasingly "downer" experience. It's the society and its values that make any enjoyable substance a gateway drug.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Again, missing the real point Posted by: Argh the Defender
» Well, no... you are wrong. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Well, no... you are wrong. Posted by: aonghus36
Marijuana is safer than alcohol in every way!
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Dec 19, 2006 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana is safer than alcohol in every way!
Legalize pot!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If I were any of you, I'd join the fight with the libertarians to ABOLISH THE DEA !!!
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 19, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the only way we can get rid of the motherfucking poisons marketed thanks to a RIGGED market for Big Pharma and market real solutions. Marijuana causes no death compared to alcohol and tobacco and yet the motherfucking DEA made marijuana illegal 70 years ago and gave us the Middle East crisis in the process (hint: hemp would have eliminated the need to beg the mideast for crude oil).

P.S.: I met a few DEA members who confessed that the vast majority of the DEA are HEAVY alcoholics and smoke at least two packs of cigarettes a day and I'm not joking!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As if
Posted by: LMNOP on Dec 19, 2006 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Two recent studies should be the final nails in the coffin of the lie that has propelled some of this nation's most misguided policies: the claim that smoking marijuana somehow causes people to use hard drugs, often called the "gateway theory."

Oh yeah. The final nails. As soon as Curious George and his goons see and analyze this data, they'll be forced to stop calling marijuana a gateway drug because they are so open-minded, honest and dedicated to science and truth.

The people that promulgated that crap never believed it in the first place, and no data will affect their cant.

By the way, did you now that education is a gateway "drug" to a life of crime? It's a fact. Almost every person in prison started out in school years earlier.

Also, orange juice causes cancer. Virtually every cancer patient reports having consumed some in the twenty years preceeding the diagnosis of cancer.

This is the same quality of evidence offered for marijuana - most heroine abusers started out with pot. Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

You've got to be certifiable to believe anything coming from the American government is honest or sincere.

You cannot expect honest discourse with liars, and that is who dictates drug policy. They are not convinced of anything by scientific studies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Me too!
Posted by: symcokid on Dec 19, 2006 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If taking a few 'hits' is good enough for the Bush daughters, it's good enough for me too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Puff Puff, Pass Pass!
Posted by: tiptopshape on Dec 19, 2006 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been smoking marijuana since 1965, and the way I got started was by drinking 3.2 beer in high school and college, and smoking tobacco. The gateway drugs are these two, and not the other way around. Oh, by the way, I haven't gotten into other, harder drugs, I just stick with my pot. I'm 58 years old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Puff Puff, Pass Pass! Posted by: outlander55
Marijuana used to be legal...
Posted by: outlander55 on Dec 19, 2006 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
until the alcohol and tobacco lobby urged the government to make it illegal. Most people who smoke pot don't drink liquer or smoke tobacco. It is all about economics.
Mother nature produces pot, man makes liquer. Who do you trust?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

believe nothing
Posted by: pg on Dec 19, 2006 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you are a pea brain if you believe bush is the pot problem...

Think DuPont... they would hate to see people using hemp instead of Nylon or other synthetic fibres...

Think big Pharma Companies... they would hate to see people growing medicinal products in their back yards...

Think Oil companies... they would hate to see people using natural lubricants and they would hate to lose DuPonts business making syntheic fibre which mostly are made from oil.

Think big agra biz....and the list goes on...

The prohibition against pot is corporate and it is bigger and older than any one president

Then again, if Clinton admited he really did inhale now that he is not President...maybe we could make some progress...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: believe nothing Posted by: Shey
» RE: believe nothing Posted by: denverd
Out from the shadows
Posted by: JCR on Dec 19, 2006 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To anyone who believes marijuana is a dangerous drug, I can only say this: try it first. Used chronically, marijuana can become problematic, but here are some words to live by - aurea mediocritas.

To be completely honest, it is more carcinogenic than cigarettes but one should never consider (nor would they be capable of) smoking marijuana with the same frequency. Smoking marijuana even a couple of times a day is a very low risk activity when compared to the negative effects resulting from cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and harder drug use. It appears that most readers are well aware that alcohol is responsible for far more deaths due to overdose and drunk driving, and most seem to understand that smoking dope does NOT kill brain cells the way alcohol obviously does. I don't think we need to go into the correlation between violent crime and alcohol do we?

Many have offered explanations why marijuana may or may not be a "gateway drug" but in the end it depends heavily on the person. Let's face it - some people may actually look for the next best high after tiring of marijuana (the vast majority do not however) while some may only end up using harder drugs as a result of their exposure to dealers and assorted "harder" users. Take marijuana out of scary basement apartments and into drug stores and remove that threat. Pot smokers usually come into contact with a few hardened rock star type party freaks who often use grass to bring them down from a long, coke-fueled night of partying. They may buy from those types who sell it to pay for meth. It's a bad situation for anyone to be in just to cop a bag.

It's complicated but what is apparent to me is that it has less to do with physical predisposition and more to do with the environment in which pot smokers find themselves. Take pot out of sketchy environments and put it where it belongs - out in the light of day where it can be examined and dealt with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]