Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Two Girls Bleed, Only One Leads

By Tamera Gugelmeyer, Women's Media Center. Posted August 31, 2006.


We all remember Jon Benet and Elizabeth Smart. But what happens to the memory of a murdered girl like Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi? 

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Tamera Gugelmeyer

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Two young girls lost. The name of one, Jon Benet Ramsey, is etched in the collective U.S. consciousness. The other, Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi, barely registers--if it registers at all.

Spurred by the recent arrest of John Mark Karr, the man who claimed to be Jon Benet's rapist and murderer, the media has devoted hundreds of primetime hours to the Ramsey case during the past two weeks, consuming the attention of national pundits and local newscasters alike. While this degree of media interest is rare for any case in today's attention-deficit-disorder--and infotainment--afflicted news world (and especially unusual for what is a 10-year old, cold case file), media coverage of the Ramsey case is even more disturbing when juxtaposed with the al-Janabi case.

"If it bleeds, it leads" goes the old newsroom adage. Is the brutal stalking, gang-rape, massacre, and torching of Abeer--and the murder and burning of her family--less newsworthy because it occurred during wartime? Because it happened in Iraq? Because these crimes were allegedly committed by six U.S. soldiers? Because Abeer was not white, wealthy, or a child beauty pageant winner posed in kiddie porn-like displays for the camera?

Why are media hours and resources lavished on researching and reporting the background of one man--even after DNA evidence has proven him not to be the Ramsey rapist/murderer--but not one five-minute segment, and hardly any newsprint, devoted to the backgrounds of the six U.S. GIs who allegedly committed the Iraq atrocity--not even Spc. James P. Barker, the one who has confessed to it? (Others accused are Sgt. Paul Cortez, Pfc. Jesse Spielman, and Pfc. Bryan Howard; a fifth, Sgt. Anthony Yribe, is charged with failing to report the attack but not with having participated. Pfc. Steven Green, also accused, has been discharged but faces charges.)

In the summer of 2002, the U.S. public faced similar questions when Elizabeth Smart, a blonde teen from an affluent Salt Lake City suburb, was abducted from her bedroom one June night. The case garnered hundreds of hours of local, regional, and national news coverage. Meanwhile, in Milwaukee, the abduction of Alexis Patterson, an African American girl, went virtually unnoticed by the press. That same summer, Erica Pratt was named a Time Person of the Week in July 2002. Erica was a then 7-year-old African American girl who literally chewed her way free from her captors. Only by her extraordinary feat did she warrant the media's attention.

Jon Benet Ramsey, Elizabeth Smart, Chandra Levy, and Natalee Holloway--these names we know. But Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi, Alexis Patterson, and Laura Berenice Monarrez, one of the more than 400 girls and women abducted, raped, and murdered in the Mexican border town of Ciudad Juarez, are not only gone, they've been disappeared by the media. 

Jon Benet, as almost everyone now knows, was a 6-year-old with blonde, bouncy curls from a white, wealthy family in affluent Boulder, Colorado. Her rape and murder is certainly no less vile than the rape and murder of Abeer, an Arab Muslim girl from a country shredded by war. But the implications in the coverage are alarming. The lack of in-depth coverage of Abeer's murder is, in effect and whatever the final outcome, a pre-pardoning for the six U.S. soldiers whose crimes are deemed unavoidable, if not acceptable, because they occurred during the U.S. occupation of a foreign country, against a dark-skinned child. 

Rape and murder against Jon Benet, on the other hand, are reported as a heinous anomaly--bad things like that aren't supposed to happen to little white girls who are safely tucked in their beds. 

Ironically, wrong in both cases. Someone is sexually assaulted every two and a half minutes in the U.S. One in six women has been raped (attempted or completed). Of rape victims, 44% are under the age of 18, and 80% are under the age of 30. (For statistics and additional information, see RAINN, the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network.) 

Clearly, it needs to be the right kind of bleeding to lead the news. The skin, if not the blood, needs to be the right color. Can there be much doubt about the differences that race, ethnicity, class, and nationality/geography make to media coverage in the U.S. today?

To get to Abeer, her family was murdered. They can no longer ask, "What about Abeer?" So we must.

Digg!

Tamera Gugelmeyer is a writer and non-profit consultant.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And with insistence
Posted by: talkville on Aug 31, 2006 12:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whenever I hear (especially around Superbowl Sunday) about the price of time on television, I experience a nausea as described by Sartre. The price of the sound-byte is high indeed. And there's ample evidence of the preferences shown by the MSM. The air-waves are no longer ours, despite the FCC. All those 'demographic studies' are seeming more and more ominous by the minute. Hopefully, we'll begin to challenge our assumptions as strongly as we observe the outcomes of our 'outcome-focused' 'leaders'. Great article, may it travel well and be noticed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And with insistence Posted by: ankhet
» RE: And with insistence Posted by: talkville
thanks for this article
Posted by: Michelle on Aug 31, 2006 1:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an important topic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US major media
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 31, 2006 2:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US major media have been deeply led astray by numerous politicians and numerous media giants. The greedy control freaks of politics/media serve the money instead of the people. If we had a real democracy the people would be the #1 priority and the money would be well spent instead of being wasted on mass murder and numerous other crimes against the peoples of the world. Justice delayed is justice denied.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Exactly Is The Media
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nicely written, but it's been done before.

It's no surprise to mainstream America that the mainstream media uses hype to attract readers/listeners. But are all of these readers/listeners so gullible? I think not. What is a surprise is that the media feels they are.

Karr's picture may have been the largest, but the story of this Iraqi family and the abuse they suffered allegedly at the hands of American military has also been front and center.

Please don't underestimate the readers/listeners, and please don't use the name of raped/tortured/murder children and women to gain readers of your own. You got me here to read this story, but only because I found it in my inbox, labeled "Natalee Holloway". Using any of these murdered children is just as bad as using an 5"x7" pic of John Mark Karr to lead with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

At least the Russians knew their media was propaganda and lies
Posted by: mat38 on Aug 31, 2006 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most Americans have know idea they are being lied to, or don't care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MSM - hyped by small-time
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most Americans ONLY assumed they're being lied to. And many care. Don't you? Insulting the intelligence of readers/listeners of news is not the way to win friends/influence people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about Lori?
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 31, 2006 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it amusing that the author made no mention of Lori Klausutis. Intriguing isn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fox...and Friends?
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
well, well, well...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fox...and Friends? Posted by: RobertVermeers
hmmm
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh wait, is she white? Because if she is, we should just ignore it - since it's not fair to the other non-white victims of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hmmm Posted by: browngoddess
» RE: hmmm Posted by: radical_blonde
» RE: hmmm Posted by: jillclaire
» RE: hmmm Posted by: jillclaire
» RE: hmmm Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» thanks Posted by: dissidentpoet
» RE: hmmm Posted by: browngoddess
Rita
Posted by: Lauren on Aug 31, 2006 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you watch lots of cable 'news' you know Rita, the breathy blonde who chases court news items. The other day she described a look Karr gave her, very creepy.

Myself at two, "I dont like menz, they look at me."

Creeps are everywhere. They target the vulnerable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ita Posted by: ankhet
You are not like us, so you do not matter mentality - a common trait among whites
Posted by: werewolf on Aug 31, 2006 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Bush epitomised the mentality of the whites by his nefarious statement "If you are not with us, you are against us". The same reason why the 'civilized' western journalists do not equate white victims to non-white victims. They don't have a bond with the non-whites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Broader. Posted by: ABetterFuture
You are not like us, so you do not matter mentality - a common trait among whites
Posted by: werewolf on Aug 31, 2006 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Bush epitomised the mentality of the whites by his nefarious statement "If you are not with us, you are against us". The same reason why the 'civilized' western journalists do not equate white victims to non-white victims. They don't have a bond with the non-whites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You are not like us, so you do not matter mentality - a common trait among whites
Posted by: werewolf on Aug 31, 2006 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Bush epitomised the mentality of the whites by his nefarious statement "If you are not with us, you are against us". The same reason why the 'civilized' western journalists do not equate white victims to non-white victims. They don't have a bond with the non-whites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow!!
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You got all that, from his comment? And here I thought he was talking about terrorists vs. non-terrorists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ignore the MSM
Posted by: nonwhiteperson on Aug 31, 2006 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fascination with the sexuality of distressed white girls takes the place of more important news. I was frustrated with the constant coverage of Holloway during Katrina and its aftermath. She was only one person not hundreds of thousands affected by Katrina. The prurient interest in JonBenet occured immediately after Lamont's win and during the war with Lebanon. CNN has been focused on Warren Jeffs for months and it is not a coincidence Jeff's is "captured" on the first anniversary of Katrina. They could have caught him at any time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ignore the MSM Posted by: AndreaN
» RE: Ignore the MSM Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: Ignore the MSM Posted by: jillclaire
» RE: Ignore the MSM Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: Ignore the MSM Posted by: jillclaire
» RE: Ignore jillclaire Posted by: fenix
Distressed white girls
Posted by: nonwhiteperson on Aug 31, 2006 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jeffs had 40 wives and 60 children in his Utah church. Many of his wives were white girls. He set up old men in his church with young white girls. It is an abomination that the children who are raped and murdered in Iraq are ignored.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Propaganda
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your comment explains exactly why Jeffs is in the forefront of the MSM these last days, altho your numbers are wrong - make that possibly 80 wives, and up to 250 children. Yes, his children are white. Does that not mean they don't deserve safety as well? What if, say, half of those children are girls - 125. Possibly 125 girls who will be sexually abused.

I have no problem giving my heart, soul and resources to help ALL children, but how dare anyone exploit "murdered white girls" OR ANY GIRLS for that matter - in order to bash the right wingers.

After doing some research on the Women's Media Center, and noticing that Jane Fonda is on the board, the author's motives are much more clear. How ugly is it that she needs to use the tragedies of murdered to try to make this point, which could've been made in a number of different ways.

btw - Natalee Holloway had been gone for over a year before Katrina hit - and she certainly didn't steal any headlines from that terrible disaster.

Oh, I'm not white, either. Just human.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

my mistake
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Natalee Holloway had only been gone a few months. But certainly Katrina made the headlines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: my mistake Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: my mistake Posted by: jillclaire
» RE: my mistake Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: my mistake Posted by: jillclaire
» RE: my mistake Posted by: nonwhiteperson
In closing...
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...on behalf of the families of the murdered children in this article, a big old "thank you" for the additional media coverage - The parents especially are thrilled that this author took the time to highlight their tragedies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sometimes it doesn't take much for White folks to get defensive
Posted by: dissidentpoet on Aug 31, 2006 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no one is saying that because someone is White they are worth less or any crap like that.

what the article and comments are saying is that White folks are continuously presented as what matters, and folks of color (not non-white people, i could just as easily define White folks as non-melanin people, but i won't) are left unmentioned. in america, being "just human" is assumed to be white. as a Black man, i don't have the luxury of being "just human." when i walk down the street, whether it is white folks locking their car doors as i pass, cops slowing down and staring, or white men expecting me to step aside, there is no question of my race - there is always a question of my being human.

This is because american society - not just the mainstream media but in american society - is at its root racist. period.

now, i am not speaking about any one individual or about the contents of someone's heart or anything, just that the nation and its society lean one way, and its institutions, culture, myths, and aims are racist. the concensus view of the world, and of america itself, is seen through white eyes, and is designed for white eyes. therefore, more often than not the assumption is that america=white, which really is, when you think about it, pretty ridiculous. but that's where we are.

and pointing this out is not racist, it is simply telling the truth.

i would love for the world to be one where we can all decide if we want to be "just human" or anything else. but this isn't that world.

and the quickest way to see that is the way that some tragedies are tragedies, and some are forgotten, or somehow justified. some pains matter, some are not even believed to exist. i'll always remember a cover to Time magaizne with a picture of a young White mother who had contracted HIV through a blood transfusion (this is before there was a real understanding of how HIV/AIDS was transmitted and before different regulations and chekcs were out in place). the headline said something like the "AIDS case that shouldn't have happened." (something like that, i was thrown by it but was so angry i didn't remember the exact phrasing) the implication in the article was that this was such a terrible thing, and shouldn't have happened, and this case was the tragedy. in a very brief part it mentioned the numbers of people in africa or in the queer community who also have HIV/AIDS. altogether, they recieved less attention than this one white woman. that, to me, is how america sees the world.

the second quickest way to see that america (even the "left") is racist?

try pointing racism out to white folks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Defensive white folks Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Defensive white folks Posted by: jillclaire
» RE: Defensive white folks Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: Defensive white folks Posted by: jillclaire
» wow Posted by: dissidentpoet
» Ha! (RE: wow) Posted by: Michelle
» RE: Defensive white folks Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: Defensive white folks Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Defensive white folks Posted by: Kelly
» yeah Posted by: dissidentpoet
» RE: yeah Posted by: nonwhiteperson
Maybe you're not listening to the right media
Posted by: Katlong on Aug 31, 2006 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I listen daily to NPR. The horrible death of Abeer and her family WAS painstakingly presented there. I don't watch television news for the very reasons stated above, i.e. the purient interest always seems to win out. But, television gives people what they want. Perhaps if the masses stopped blindly accepting/wanting the purient, the news media would stop pursuing it.

On another note, the comment above that Warren Jeffs could have been caught at any time is, if not patentely false, at least misguided. I live in Southern Utah. There were police/people looking everywhere for him. There were many days when the police barricaded neighborhoods because of possible sightings of Jeffs. He stayed well hidden.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The author of this piece does not understand why the story was buried
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 31, 2006 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why try and switch the discussion of the rape and murder of a 14-year old girl, Abeer, by US soldiers in Iraq, to one of black-white racism? This has nothing to do with racism; the US military wants to keep this story from being widely discussed, because it will than lead to a discussion of a great many more atrocities in Iraq - an expected result of any occupation, especially one managed by Rumsfeld and Cheney.

The JonBenet case is lurid because of the 'child beauty star' angle and that's why it was pushed - just like all the other sensational gossip stories that are meant to distract the population from the real criminals (the ones who run the government, that is). When the wealthy are victims of crimes, it is sensational; when the poor are victims of crimes it is ignored. Since there is a higher % of poor blacks, those crimes are often ignored. It's more the money than the skin color that determines coverage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My thoughts exactly...
Posted by: melissa999 on Aug 31, 2006 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have not forgotten this tragedy, no matter how much our military tries to cover it up. It brought to mine a very similar case 10 years ago, which also has stayed with me in Okinawa, Japan in which three servicemen again planned out the abduction and rape of a 12-year-old girl. They were sentenced to only 7 years in prison, which means they're probably hanging out right now, checking out girls at a bar nearby.

In that tragedy, the three perpetrators were African-American and the victim was Japanese. Did the military cover up that case because of their respective races? Nope. Rather, at the time, U.S. Defense Secretary William Perry just stressed that American troops have an important role to play in Okinawa. And I believe "Boys will be boys" was also implied. As in, we're paid to kill, maim, strategically plan to abduct and rape little girls, kill them and their families or anyone else who stands in our way 'cuz that's how we do...Also, let's not forget the vast majority of the women who report sexual harrassment and rape from their fellow soldiers in the US military and also, that tidbit from the Alternet story that mentioned how violent porn is being used to motivate our soldiers. Good times.

So JonBenet may sell a lot of papers, but I certainly haven't forgotten the many, many others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RIP...hang the Senator
Posted by: Elmowilcox on Aug 31, 2006 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While on the topic of unsolved mysteries, anyone ever hear what happened to Chandra Leavy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IP...hang the Senator Posted by: AFWXMAN
White/brown skin; US-citizen or not; unknown killer/brave soldier killers = real MSM-differences
Posted by: Ullern on Aug 31, 2006 3:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Is the brutal stalking, gang-rape, massacre, and torching of Abeer--and the murder and burning of her family--less newsworthy because it occurred during wartime? Because it happened in Iraq? Because these crimes were allegedly committed by six U.S. soldiers? Because Abeer was not white, wealthy, or a child beauty pageant winner posed in kiddie porn-like displays for the camera?"

Sorry: yes. To all of those questions.

"Equality of attention before the law of the lens" is not a principle that has passed a democratic legislative assembly yet.

About time it did. Fairly uphill struggle, is my humble guess.

Just the thought, that every human on earth merits and deserves the same amount of attention in the mainstream media (not to mention the problem of how to define that very MSM) according to some - any - rational order of priorities, seems pretty far off. But it's a good thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US Policy: Teaching Them A Lesson/Strategic Objectives
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 31, 2006 6:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abeer's murder had less to do with racism then US policy in Iraq. The war has shifted into punishing those even perceived to support the insurgency. Hence, the murders are semi state-sanctioned, if technically illegal. Innocents may die, but they are always an example. Iraq has become similiar to Vietnam, as the war sinks further down the drain, desperation leads to wholesale destruction of even the civilian population for its failure to support US goals and objectives. As for the murders in Mexico, for the USA, they are essentially murders of PONA's (people of no account). Simply put, sources of cheap labor (NAFTA), and hence perhaps even their murders serve as an example of how easily they may all be punished if they step out of line.
Again, murders which are not a big US concern and even have some value to US policy makers, and hence not a media concern, and in Iraq, just part of overall US policy and defining of military strategic objectives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» thanks for the reply Posted by: Michelle
good post
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 6:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
sofla -

what you just wrote, sounds like the story this author should have written. Sounds like she was outraged over this child's (and her family's) torture and murder, but her anger came out at the media's inequality when reporting stories.

Maybe she should've written two stories - one on how the media doesn't report evenly, and one on the horrors that this family experienced and the role the United States has played.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: good post Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: good post Posted by: sofla100
military propaganda people?
Posted by: jillclaire on Aug 31, 2006 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
would that be the MPP? I heard that they aren't working on this one anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Um, you're a journalist so you should get it?
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Aug 31, 2006 8:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, it 'bleeds it leads' but in order to have any interest to the audience you need to make it seem like the threat can happen to them. This is why journalists such as yourself love to point out all the crime, rape, etc. Also, its important to the ratings to try to bring out any racism, fear, prejudice, sexism, sexual fetishism, or perversion in your audience. This helps ratings. This is why those little girl murder/rapes are so good for your news business. You got families thinking "my God what if that happened to our child" and you got your perverts thinking "wow what fun". If you're luckily you can get a "copycat" and then your ad revenues really go up. Journalism is almost as bad as the war making. At least those neo-cons are honest in what they do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A better article
Posted by: jillclaire on Sep 1, 2006 4:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about the atrocity of the torture and death of Abeer and her family, the reasoning behind rape as a weapon and the coverup by the American military, can be found here:

http://snipurl.com/vrys

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A better article Posted by: AFWXMAN
Return to Vietnam
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 1, 2006 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lies and disinformation of the Vietnam-era US military are happening all over again. Take the recent massacre in Haditha by US troops - their sergeant was given a medal for that, after the story was put out about an "IED ambush" that killed "15 Iraqi citizens" - when the facts are that the soldiers broke into people's homes and exceuted everyone they could find in a mini-My Lai massacre.

The propaganda shills who try and cover up and justify these atrocities are just as guilty as the original perpetrators - included in this class are all those who try and justify Israel's war crimes in Lebanon (cluster bombs, deliberate attacks on civilian populations and infrastructure, massive environmental pollution from an Exxon Valdez-sized oil spill, and the continuing air/sea blockade). Self-defense? It's no better than the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.

So troll away - you only provide more evidence of your own culpability in these atrocities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racism/Bigotry in America
Posted by: AFWXMAN on Sep 1, 2006 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was born English, and I'm a naturalized American. I grew up in England, the USA and Chile. Needless to say, I'm a WASP; my family's history in England goes back over 400 years. That's my racial, ethnic, and societal background, in case anyone insists on knowing.

That having been said, here's my view on bigotry in America from the point of view of someone who is both an insider and an outsider: most Americans, regardless of race, are bigots. This is the most divided country I've ever seen. Nobody identifies themselves as Americans. Nope, everyone is Irish-American or African-American or Native American or Scotch-Irish or whatever. America is a huge tub full of "others", and you know how suspicious everyone is of the dangerous "other". American's refusal to coalesce into some sort of common culture is the reason it's so easy for politicians to ignore the needs of the people. Why don't we have universal health care and a country like Finland does? Because in Finland politicians are serving Finns, a group that is just like them, a group towards whom they feel a sense of responsibility!! In America politicians feel like they serve the "others", and why should they care about those people? Until all Americans see themselves as Americans, and stop f@@king around with sacred cows like their color, race, or "heritage" before all else, the needy will stay that way and we will remain a violent country.

By the way, in Chile the races have all blended; 90% of Chileans consider themselves mestizo. More important Chileans consider themselves Chileans, not Lebanese-Chilean or Anglo-Chileans or Yugo-Chilean, even though they may have names like Leigh, Llewellyn, Daud, Daire, or Almenabar. Granted, discrimination based on color does happen but not nearly on the scale it's happened in American history. Chilean society is much less violent than ours, and I believe that part of the reason is that there are so few "others" to fear.

I know my post may seem cynical, but I'm sick of everyone seeing the differences between us and blaming all those "others" around all of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: acism/Bigotry in America Posted by: dissidentpoet
» oh sure Posted by: Michelle
» RE: acism/Bigotry in America Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: acism/Bigotry in America Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» RE: acism/Bigotry in America Posted by: AFWXMAN
» RE: acism isn't only in America Posted by: nonwhiteperson
» acting like humans Posted by: Michelle
» RE: acism isn't only in America Posted by: nonwhiteperson
British soldiers released after only 10 years for brutal rape and murder of Danish girl
Posted by: mo1912 on Sep 3, 2006 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/8-18-2006-105930.asp
The early release of these monsters has been kept quiet in the British press .
10 years for battering a young girl to death with an army spade allowed to quietly slip back to the U.K. Their evil faces should be on the front page of every paper !
Instead they have had £750,000 army legal aid, £20 a week "incidentals allowance" while in custody and pension rights retained .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Women Bleed Daily Under Islam. Does the World Care? Do You?
Posted by: bullwhip7 on Sep 3, 2006 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, there are daily "honor" killings under Shari'a law. Women who dare to live even in the framework of Islamic dictates. This does not necessarily mean sex, either. If a woman is raped - it is her fault, just being seen with a man, is enough to "dishonor" a family under this middle ages' system of law.

You talk about the blood of a girl and her family? Why don't you bring up the blood of hundreds and even thousands of women suffering ignominious death every year under Islam?

What a sham!!! A complete and total sham!! Yet here we have ignorant people who embrace "the cause" and blame our own civil servants and soldiers. Shame on those of you who espouse these causes without doing real research.

It's time to bring Islam OUT of the Middle Ages. Help protect the rights of the women of Islam, and of other's living under Islam's yoke of racism and intolerance.

Honor Killings in Jordan...

Beheading Nations: The Islamization of Europe

Fighting 'Honor Killings' Mitigated

Honour Killing: Crime & Abetment

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]