Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Civil War in Iraq Has Begun

By Cenk Uygur, Huffington Post. Posted July 15, 2006.


Reading a New York Times article on Iraq listing the casualties from one day, there's only one conclusion to draw -- this country is well into the middle of a civil war.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Cenk Uygur

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse in Iraq, Nic Robertson of CNN reports the most grotesque story I have ever heard in my life: "One international official told me of reports among his staff that a 15-year-old girl had been beheaded and a dog's head sewn on her body in its place; and of a young child who had had his hands drilled and bolted together before being killed."

My God, what have we done? What have we unleashed?

The answer, unfortunately, is all out civil war. There is no way we, or anybody else, is going to get this genie back in the bottle. Through our arrogance, carelessness and even malice, we started a sectarian battle between the different ethnicities of Iraq. And that battle has now blossomed into an absolute war.

If you're conservative or a Republican or just hopeful, you might think and wish I am wrong. But you can wish until your blue in the face and it isn't going to change facts on the ground. The bloodletting is in full effect and the results are horrific.

My God, will we please try to get on the right course instead of running into this brick wall over and over? Iraq is done. It's finished. We have to stop the bleeding. We have to separate these people into their respective corners; otherwise it's only going to get worse.

Our best hope is a semi-civil partition of the country into three areas. The later we start this process, the more violence and bloodshed we are going to see. Iraq has already turned into a house of horrors. And we're doing absolutely no good sitting there completely clueless.

If the idea that a civil war in Iraq has already begun, look no further than this New York Times article covering just one day's carnage in Iraq:

The sudden surge in violence began Sunday morning when a group of Shiite gunmen appeared on the streets of a predominantly Sunni neighborhood in western Baghdad and began executing people. This vigilantism appeared to come as retribution for the bombing of a Shiite mosque the day before.

It was closely followed on Sunday by what seemed to be retributive car bomb attacks against another Shiite mosque.

Estimates of the number of killings in Baghdad on Sunday ranged from at least 30 to more than double that number. And at least 30 died in violence on Monday, officials said.

In Tuesday's most deadly attack, two pedestrians wearing vests made of explosives blew themselves up near a restaurant outside the walls of the Green Zone, within a few hundred yards of three busy entrances, Iraqi and American officials said. Soon after the initial blasts, a hidden bomb was detonated nearby, adding to the carnage, the American military said. Some Iraqi authorities said the third explosion was caused by a car bomb.

At least 15 Iraqi civilians and an Iraqi police officer were killed in the explosions, and 4 people were wounded, according to the American military command.

In an Internet posting, two prominent insurgent groups claimed responsibility for the attacks.

The Mujahedeen Shura Council in Iraq said it was behind the two suicide bombings, according to SITE Institute, which monitors jihadist postings on the Internet. The Islamic Army in Iraq claimed in a separate posting that it was responsible for the third explosion, which it said was a car bomb, according to a translation provided by SITE.

The claims raise the possibility of a coordinated strike by the two groups, though they do not have a history of working together and, moreover, are thought to be rivals.

The Islamic Army said it had struck in revenge for the rape and slaying of an Iraqi girl and the killing of three other family members in Mahmudiya. Five American soldiers, and a recently discharged soldier, have been implicated the case.

In a predominantly Sunni area of Dawra, a district in southern Baghdad, gunmen ambushed a bus carrying Shiite mourners from the holy city of Najaf, where they had buried a relative, government officials and family members said. The gunmen pulled 10 people from the bus and executed them, the Interior Ministry official said.

An hour earlier, in Taji, north of Baghdad, gunmen ambushed another bus, killing one person and wounding five, the official said.

Two mortar grenades hit a Shiite mosque in Dawra, killing 9 and wounding 11 civilians, the Interior Ministry official said.

In other violence, a family of five -- a father, mother, grown daughter and two teenage sons -- were found beheaded in a predominantly Sunni sector of Dawra, according to an official at Yarmouk Hospital, the main medical facility in western Baghdad. ...

The account of the killings just keeps going. That's all from just one day. If that's not a civil war, then what the hell is?

Digg!

Cenk Uygur is co-host of The Young Turks, the first liberal radio show to air nationwide.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We unleashed the 'religion of peace'
Posted by: prod on Jul 15, 2006 12:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
""One international official told me of reports among his staff that a 15-year-old girl had been beheaded and a dog's head sewn on her body in its place; and of a young child who had had his hands drilled and bolted together before being killed."

My God, what have we done? What have we unleashed?"

What we did is unleashed the 'religion of peace'. But stuff like this is nothing new for Islam. This is the religion that invented the honor killing, the religion that still buries women up to their shoulders and stones them to death for being raped because they brought dishonor to their family. The religion that believes if you kill anyone who isn’t of your religion because they are not of your religion and happen to die in the process that God will reward you with 72 virgins.

We may have gone into Iraq for complete and total lies and BS reasons but we are there now. There are a lof of good Muslims in Iraq, but they would be overtaken by the terrorist thugs if we depart.

Should we leave and hand the country over to these animals, animals that have said they want to spread their sick version of religion throughout the world?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fundies are fundies Posted by: ginmar
» RE: Fundies are fundies Posted by: prod
» RE: Fundies are fundies Posted by: prod
» RE: Fundies are fundies Posted by: morticia_addams7
» do you have compassion? Posted by: nbrown
There was a civil war brewing long before...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jul 15, 2006 1:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the latest U.S. invasion.

Didn't the Kurds align with the U.S. in '91?

Didn't Saddam gas/murder those folks?

The U.S. has "liberated" these agressions, along with fighting the bombers who strap their payloads to children...

Why are we still there? We have captured Saddam, we have determined there there is (was) no threat from large-scale CBR (WMD) attacks, they have established a temporary govenment, that oversaw the ratification of an Iraqi constitution, which led to the first democratically elected permanent governement, we have even killed the leader of the major insurgent group (Al Zarqawi)...

What the hell are we still there for? To teach these people to value human life? As Master Chief used to say, "Eff the effing eff outta that sheeite"--That lesson ain't worth our people. No better time to bring our folks than the recent turning over (following the pre-parliament, following the Constitution, follwoing the permanent gov't) of an Iraqi province to Iraqi's.

Let them figure out how to govern themselves. Let us protect ourselves, and defend ourselves, and be ready to strike should the need be absolutely necessary.

No better time than now. We have accomplished our goals in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yes
Posted by: rsaxto on Jul 15, 2006 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, it does seem that a civil war is happening in Iraq. And the creators of this civil war are the election stealing, war criminal Bushies. Impeach the ghastly creators of this ghastly occupation and of this ghastly civil war. End the ghastly barbarism by impeaching its creators and help end the civil war by withdrawing all of the ghastly occupiers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wrong Posted by: vitor1969
» RE: Wrong Posted by: Pickles78
sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jul 15, 2006 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prod asks "Why are we there?" OIL. World domination by a power-mad would-be dictator. Undreamed of wealth for the greedheads in the government

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jul 15, 2006 3:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the powers that be have discovered there is a civil war going on! There has been from the get-go. The Kurds have been in rebellion since Iraq was formed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sickofsleaze Posted by: brunowe
NY Times = rag!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jul 15, 2006 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do believe a civil war is raging there..you dont need the NYT to tell you that.. and an exit strategy is getting more diffilcult for sure.. our soldiers are caught in this and quite frankly, we should leave and leave them to themselves. They're terrorists and hate the US long before we were there. The liberals surely don't care what happens to them.

But as far as this article, it's the NY Times... you cant trust or believe anything they say.., the paper is a rag with not much credibility left.. you can do better for info by surfing the net!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NY Times = rag! Posted by: annonymous77
» RE: NY Times = rag! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: NY Times = rag! Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: NY Times = rag! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: NY Times = rag! Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: NY Times = rag! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: NY Times = rag! Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: NY Times = rag! Posted by: Conservasaurus
PERFECT CLUE
Posted by: Perfectclue on Jul 15, 2006 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"My God, what have we done? What have we unleashed?" (THIS IS WHAT BUSH, CONGRESS, THE CORPORATE MEDIA CALLED "DEMOCRACY" AND CHEERED ON THIS AGGRESSION, OCCUPATION, PHONY ELECTIONS, PHONY CIA REGIMES, FALSE STRATEGIES AND SUPPORTED THIS FASCISM, SECTARIAN, COMMUNAL WARFARE CREATED BY A SCHISM OVER WHO SHOULD BE A WHORE, GROUP FOR AMERIKAN NAZIS THAT ULTIMATELY ENDS UP WITH MASSIVE IGNORANCE, MASSIVE DESPOTISM, BRUTAL FASCIST FOREIGN POLICIES AND CIVIL WAR.... COMPLIMENTS OF WESTERN CLASS OLIGARCHIES AND THEIR PROTO FASCIST WARS OF AGGRESSION!! THE U.S. IS JUST AS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS COMMUNAL, SECTARIAN WAR, CIVIL WAR AS IT WAS ITS AGGRESSION, AND THE CORPORATE MEDIA WHORES COMPLETELY DEVOID OF ANY LOGIC, MORALITY, REASONING, BLAMING THIS MONSTROSITY ON THE VICTIMS, NOT ITS FASCIST CLASS ELITES!!!! SIEG HEIL!!!!)----PERFECT CLUE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The New York Times is reporting this???? Hmmmmm!
Posted by: Pepper on Jul 15, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, if I am a bit suspicious. It makes me wonder several things. First of all the NY Times is a supporter and always has been of this war. In fact, we now know their key reporters collaborated in manipulating the American public to get us into that war. In addition, they only publish what this administration wants to be public.

Second, if the above is true, then why would the administration want this news out to us. Don't forget these reporters are embedded in Iraq and not reporting the true atrocities that even the US trooops are doing, so why are they reporting this???? What is the agenda?

Well, elections are coming up, right??? It appears that the party that wants us out of Iraq (THAT VOTED WITH THE NEOCONS TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ WHEN WARNED OF THIS VERY THING POSSIBLY HAPPENING), may actually win the majority. If the neocons do not want out of there, then what is the best way to keep us in there??? Say there is a civil war. Many are now saying we have created death squads for those who resist like we did in El Salvador.

Could this part of the plan??? Are we using our own allies for such actions??? Remember all the british troops who were arrested in Iraqi clothing with bomb material to be used in car bombs??? Remember the US blaming an attack and massacre on shias worshipping in a mosque? when in fact civilians around the Mosque reported the US soldiers had come to their homes and told them to not leave and stay where they were if they hear any shooting???

That was just shortly before the massacre and then it was blamed on the sunni's??? Putting all of this together makes me wonder if this isn't a way to keep everyone in chaos in order to justify not withdrawing as promised (Bush is building his palace there, remember that too, along with 14 permanent bases).

The only way he could justify never leaving is to say they need to stay to keep these factions separated. I think its Salvador all over again, just my humble opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Very keen questions Posted by: Citizendeane
» Overdone Posted by: brunowe
» Let me restate that Posted by: Conservasaurus
Enemy at the Gates
Posted by: Captainmagic on Jul 15, 2006 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been mentioned previously and i wrote of it recently. Has it been lost to you? Have you taken too lightly the knowledge that Iraqi staffers wanted to know what was going to happen to them when it was time to evacuate? Was the significance of this little gem not seared onto anyones forehead. They can see the writing on the wall....it's on the green wall and their onclave is looking a tad small. Iraq is a wounded dog....have you ever tried to pick up a dog in a lot of pain.....that's whats a commin folks...do you think that the iraqi's/ iranians/syrians/ arabs have got the USA's number yet......not long now me thinks.

Captain OUT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All is going as planned. Get real, progressives
Posted by: Sojourner on Jul 15, 2006 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had the US insisted on a "civilized" partion in the beginning of the occupation--despite the recent precedent of Yugoslavia (which has gone through the very same experience: a dictator holding people who hate each other together as a nation; the dictator's death; civil war)--even though everyone except journalists who need to sell words knew what was most likely, the US would have been in costant uproar.

Now that Bush can claim (despite its gross falacies) that we gave them every opportunity for a united democracy, we can 'reluctantly' help them reestablish workable boundaries (again, just like Yugoslavia) and we can maintain our presence there by playing them off against each other.

That probably was the plan from the beginning, but it could not be talked about because it is too Real Politik for American consumption.

No one in the UN will seriously object. No one in the Congress will seriously object. No one who knows anything will seriously object. Only journalists who pander to a special interest group who buys their words will object--because that way, we will still be "nice," or "politically correct" or whatever you wish to call the BS.

Get real, progressives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Condemn Iraqis for their atrocities
Posted by: coldeye on Jul 15, 2006 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans didn't sew a dog onto a person's head. some fanatic did it. So stop the guilt trip.

Regardless of why the US did or didn't go into Iraq, it is a civil war and there is no point in US combat operations in that environment. The military should develop an evacuation plan to get US forces out safely and to ascertain, with the help of other Arab and Muslim(including Iran) nations what the Iraq government needs to do in the absence of US troops to settle this conflict. Perhaps the conflict can't be settled and a horrid civil bloodbath, partition and chaos will result. but the US can't help by having armed patrols and convoys roaming around in the middle of a civil war.

but there is no value in smearing US troops with atrocities committed by Iraqis. to the extent US Troops commit artrocities, they should be harshly prosectuted. But self-flagellation is unnecessary. American soldiers should not pay or be ridiculed for the viciousness of the miltias on both sides of the Iraq civil war, or for the atrocities that the Islamist groups commit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How do you know that? Posted by: Citizendeane
» RE: How do you know that? Posted by: brunowe
» Racist to the core Posted by: Citizendeane
» RE: acist to the core Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Condemn Iraqis for their atrocities Posted by: morticia_addams7
The Middle East Flare-up: Bring Back Colin Powell—NOW!
Posted by: HughEScott on Jul 15, 2006 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When General Powell left the State Department after warning Bush, “You break Iraq and you own it,” George W. began a new era of U.S. foreign policy best described in Mad comic books as,”What, me worry?”

Shrub’s response to the Israeli bombing of Lebanon was a radio-transmitted phone call to Middle East leaders from Air Force One with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice whispering in his ear. Yeah, that impressed the world—just like after Hurricane Katrina hammered the Gulf Coast.

While fellow Americans were drowning in New Orleans, Bush flew from his Crawford ranch to Southern California for partying and GOP fund raising.

And where was Condi? On vacation in the Big Apple, shopping on Park Avenue for fancy shoes. Later that night, as more men, women and children in New Orleans slipped underwater, she attended a Broadway play and got booed by the audience for being in Manhattan instead of D.C.

So tell me, Miss Tweedle Dee and Commander-in-Chief Dumb, how many innocent civilians in Lebanon must die before Israel gets back its TWO (2) kidnapped soldiers?

One hundred, 500, a thousand...?

Just what I figured. No response.

With that kind of leadership, no wonder the Middle East is blowing up. MAY DAY to General Powell, America needs you NOW

For the truth about King George W. Bush & the treasonous neocons, visit www.FreedomCentralUSA.com

Hugh E. Scott, author, investigative journalist, Vietnam veteran, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, Goldwater conservative, Ronald Reagan fan and RABID neocon-hater with a family history of honorable military service going back to 1776.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another rousing "stay the course" success for "The Decider"
Posted by: xbj on Jul 15, 2006 6:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congratulations! Oil prices nearing $100 a barrel... Iraquis killing more of each other than American troops... yet even more trillions raped from American taxpayers headed for Iraq to disappear (with a huge chunk making it back into the GOP warchest).

No, Democracy in Iraq is a rousing success. Congratulations, George. Congratulations Dick, Donald. Congratulations, Condi! We're staying the course, we're not cutting and running, the insurgency is in its death throes; why, Democracy is just around the corner!!

Now, let's all raise our steins and sing a rousing chorus of "Uber Allies" followed by a couple of "Zieg Heils" thrown in for der Fuhrer for good measure.

For Hitler's in his Springtime, and all's right with the world. Today we have Iraq; Tomorrow, the world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nazi Left and Brown Shirts.. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Nazi Left and Brown Shirts.. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Nazi Left and Brown Shirts.. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Nazi Left and Brown Shirts.. Posted by: Conservasaurus
Remember the USUK/PNAC arms/oil cartel plan
Posted by: verite on Jul 15, 2006 9:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is to keep the Iraqi oil in the ground.. at least allow about only 6% out.
A civil war without end is a good way to do this plus at the same time increase arms profits, and plus continue the DU genocide of the natives.
All is going according to plan. Bush may be dumb, but the puppet masters know what they are doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeeze
Posted by: Dewa on Jul 15, 2006 9:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off, the article is horrible horrible horrible. If half of what it says is true, then, well, America kinda fucked up this whole charade (if you hadn't already figured that out). I don't really get conservatives (to use a broad sweeping term to define those who suppoprt the war, even in these stages) can defend what's going on. The biggest argument I've seen so far has gone from "Well, we're not as bad as Saddam," so "Well, we're not much worse then Saddam." When Mr. Hussein (I apologise if I spell his name wrong but I really couldn't care less) is your measuring stick of morality, things may be a wee bit off.

Secondly, you guys are waaaaay too defensive. Seriously, I know this is a horiffic topic, but stop bashing each other. Argue, debate and persuade, but do you really need to insinuate everyone you vaguelly disagree with is a neo-nazi gasbag? The level of vitirol in these comments borders on obscene at times. It seems a lot of people are very, very quick to take offence. I noticed a few times just in this topic that people who have agreed with each other (in my inadequate eyes, at least) but violently attacked one another in the fear (if I may use the term) of them other having a differring opinion. Quite a few of the comments here are civil, educated and intelligent, but it seems the majority are being drowned out by trolls, partisan attack drones, and those who seem to assume that everyone a) disagrees with them, b) are racist, monocultural fascists and c) uneducated bigots.

Anyway, debate and argue, but please please stop the pointless attacks and feuds. It really lowers the quality of your usually well reasoned arguments and makes you seem like a moron to the rest of us.

Especially on the internet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Reason To Be Unreasonable Posted by: Joe Ox
Revalations
Posted by: BuckFush on Jul 16, 2006 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee, what a scoop. What a revalation! Iraq in civil war.

Next thing you know, you'll be telling us there are no WMDs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The " Civil War" here in Mosul, Iraq No war here!
Posted by: vitor1969 on Jul 16, 2006 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For being in the middle of a civil war, it sure is real calm here in Mosul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Civil war? I dont see it, even though I am Iraq, are you?
Posted by: vitor1969 on Jul 16, 2006 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, are you actually reporting from Iraq? The Kurds, Shitties and Arabs ( and even the Christians ) seem have missed your report of "Civil war" I will be sure to let the Iraq police and Iraqi Army of the lastest reports on our next patrol with them. Maybe they did'nt get the memo. I doubt your sources. However sad, these attacks on each other are, it is not civil war. I have seen civil war in Yugoslavia, yes, I was there when it was bad..I have seen Mosques blown up and little children killed because of hate. Your are sensationalizing events to make it seem worse than it really is. Here in Mosul, a city of over one million Iraqis, it is life as usual. It is a struggle yes, but not a civil war. Are you actually at the sites of the fighting or are you just spinning it into what you want it to be?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ah, the classic "blind eye" Posted by: brunowe
» Civil War By Definition Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Civil War By Definition Posted by: brunowe
Ain't Democracy Grand?
Posted by: EQdi on Jul 16, 2006 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Moron:
I talked about my desire to promote institutional change in parts of the world like Iraq where there's a free press and free religion, and I told him that a lot of people in our country would hope that Russia would do the same thing.

Vladimir:
We certainly would not want to have the same kind of democracy as they have in Iraq, I will tell you quite honestly. (laughter)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ain't Democracy Grand? Posted by: peridot
» Totally agree. Posted by: ABetterFuture
Hydrogen Bombs
Posted by: oprev on Jul 17, 2006 3:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer is clear. They are animals, or, less than. We have to make an example of them. We have to use nuclear weapons on Iran and Syria. The terrorists/extremists are a disease to mankind. Hydrogen bombs should be used on multiple cities in both of those countries. If the Shiites are working with us in Iraq as it seems, and, the Sunni's against us, then, the Sunni's should be eliminated completely. We don't need these types in our world. And we have the ability to decide who can stay, and, who cannot. Those who behead or support that type of torture should not be here. Melt them. Show them what hell is like... on earth.

Nukes Work,
Use them

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hydrogen Bombs Posted by: xbj
» RE: Hydrogen Bombs Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Hydrogen Bombs Posted by: xbj
» RE: Hydrogen Bombs Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Hydrogen Bombs Posted by: xbj
sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jul 15, 2006 3:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the powers that be have discovered there is a civil war going on! There has been from the get-go. The Kurds have been in rebellion since Iraq was formed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jul 17, 2006 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When a Repugnantican says "reform" they mean Gut as in Social Security, Medicare etc

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sickofsleaze Posted by: Pickles78
Misperceptions of Islam and Iraq
Posted by: dkm on Jul 17, 2006 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too many people take seriously this stupidity about the 24, 48 or 72 virgins (number depends on the writer) waiting in Paradise as part of Islam. It is no more true than the bit about Catholics sacrificing nonCatholic children on their altars. (Or Jews sacrificing nonJewish children on their altars.) Once again the particular slander depends on the author.

As for Hussein's gassing of the Kurds, remember that he was an American ally at the time, that the Reaganites (Cheney and Rumsfeld) knew perfectly well about it and had no problems with it, and that the toxic materials and delivery systems were supplied by Hussein's western allies, the US and the UK. At the time the Kurds were most definitely NOT allied with the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Virgins or not Posted by: Joe Ox
Big picture....
Posted by: Reader11722 on Jul 17, 2006 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel attacking her neighbors is a distraction as the US erodes our rights at home. As Israel launches missles, the US detains peaceful protestors in cages, pressure book outlets to drop the book "America Deceived" by E.A. Blayre III, wire-taps all phones without a warrant and exposes CIA agents. Soon the US gov't will jump in the fray and open a third front in Iran. That will throw the whole region into chaos. Toss in a false-flag attack on the US (like 9/11) and the public will line-up for One World Gov't.
Last link (before Google Books caves in):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/
book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

6
Posted by: mananahoyt on Nov 8, 2006 12:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
6
Posted by: mananahoyt on Nov 8, 2006 12:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
5
Posted by: mananahoyt on Nov 8, 2006 12:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]