Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Soldiers Wage Battle Against War

By Dean Kuipers, LA CityBeat. Posted July 14, 2006.


The director of the new film 'Sir, No Sir!' speaks up about GI resistance to war -- and why it's absolutely essential now.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Dean Kuipers

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

David Zeiger's new documentary film, Sir, No Sir!, captures one particular day in 1970 that the U.S. military establishment desperately wants you to forget. It was Armed Forces Day, and across the country, years of rising resistance to the war in Vietnam culminated in a nationwide anti-war protest by active military personnel that shut down planned celebrations at 28 U.S. bases. In fact, tens of thousands of GIs were involved in resistance to the Vietnam War, printing over 100 underground antiwar newspapers and coordinating their actions in a string of activist coffeehouses that sprung up near bases all across the country.

Today, however, that memory has been all but erased. And when Zeiger, an L.A.-based filmmaker, realized that soldiers speaking out about the Iraq War were being largely ignored because of military control of the war message, he felt he had to act. A former activist in the antiwar coffeehouse circuit, Zeiger found loads of footage about what was a big news story in the 1960s and '70s, showing that thousands of soldiers thought it their duty to speak out against war back then. He hopes to empower those who need to do so today.

Dean Kuipers: Was the GI movement against the Vietnam War not well known?

David Zeiger: Today, almost no one knows about it, but at the time, in fact, a lot of people did know about it. The demonstrations of GIs at Fort Hood for example - there were two demonstrations on Armed Forces Day, demonstrations in 1970 and 1971, that involved thousands of GIs -- those were covered by all the local media in Texas. Walter Cronkite did a two-part series on the GI underground press. But in the years since, what has happened is literally people's memories have been reshaped by the Reagan administration, which has been obviously carried over with the Bush administrations.

The politics were that the Vietnam War was a noble war fought bravely by soldiers who came home only to be spat on and vilified by selfish middle class hippies who condemned them for the war and who betrayed them. So the memory of what actually happened has been buried.

Kuipers: Was there an active campaign on the part of the DOD to try to scrub this out of memory?

Zeiger: The political agenda of erasing the GI movement from the memory of Vietnam was set by Reagan himself. He declared in that speech, "I will never send American troops again to a war that their government's not willing to win." And then, in the early '80s, was a campaign largely orchestrated by the Reagan administration to "honor the vet." This was around the time that the Vietnam memorial was built. This was very much the project of General Westmoreland, who had been the commander in Vietnam up until the Tet Offensive, and who was roundly hated by the troops, very similar to the role [U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald] Rumsfeld has today. The undercover political message was that they fought a good war. And if you say the war was not good then you're not honoring the vets.

Kuipers: But people who were against the war surely remember?

Zeiger: There's a lot of willingness -- even on the part of very progressive people -- to buy into that. The Presidio Mutiny was one of the biggest events of the San Francisco antiwar movement during that era -- there was actually one really bad Hollywood movie made about it. But books about Vietnam never mention it. Even the Vietnam history that was on PBS in the late '70s, early '80s doesn't say anything about it. These events have been literally, willfully written out. I got an e-mail from someone who said, "For years, I told people about this stuff and they thought I was crazy."

Kuipers: And soldiers used to publish underground newspapers?

Zeiger: They were coming out of bases, largely. A lot of people had access to mimeograph machines -- company clerks and whatever. When I worked at the Oleo Strut coffee house in Killeen, Texas, which was off Fort Hood, the civilians helped get the printer [to put out a paper called The Fatigue Press]. But all the articles were written by guys in the military and it was all laid out by them. Some of them had some staying power because they had a support base outside of the military. But others might come out with three or four issues and suddenly they got transferred or kicked out or jailed -- which also happened.


Digg!

Dean Kuipers is editor of LA CityBeat.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
US military totally broke down in Vietnam
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 14, 2006 2:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The film is excellent and a great piece of history. I found the footage fascinating and in some ways it all seemed very modern and yesterday.

I think it is very easy to erase the memory of this from the minds of young recruits. Each generation lives in its own times, and buys into the tropes of that time. Today's generation is the MTV/internet generation. They have been raised on violent video games, the idea that war is bang, bang quick and as easy as popping characters on a video screen. They are also the career generation. Everything these days is about getting the right credentials, the right piece of paper. In order to do this, everyone must follow the path laid out by the system. Obedience to the system - if not to society (since many of these young people are also the source of all the bad behavior we are familiar with) is key.

At first, this makes it very easy for the military to maintain a surface discipline and control. People don't trust each other because they are in competition with each other, thus it is difficult to build resistance movements. But all of this does eventually break down when, as they said in Apocolypse Now, 'the bullshit was piled so high you needed wings to stay above it'. And never forget, most of that bullshit was Democrat bullshit, since they are the ones who started the Vietnam war and used the same freedom rhetoric we hear from Tony Blair and Bush now to prosecute the war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It never ends.
Posted by: notrab68 on Jul 14, 2006 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many "progressives" still view the world through a Vietnam lens. It became such a defining time of their lives they've never been able to let it go and it has colored every facet of their existence. It's sad, really.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It never ends. Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: It never ends. Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
Soldier's Comment
Posted by: S2_369 on Jul 14, 2006 10:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the most part, I am more than definetly aware of these antiwar movements going on around the country, and around the world. I save 'movements' because that is what I see: several seperate movements running around cutting each other off from the ankles with their infighting. This is because some movements have chosen to ally themselves with political parties that simply want to use them for a voting bloc, while other movements are truly independent and have taken up efforts to petition both of the mainstream parties, as well as the other ones.

In short, each antiwar movement, and pro-war movement, too, for that matter, is counter-productive to one another, as they are generally pretending that they are THE sole movement for their cause.

With that in mind, it is clear why there is no clear Soldier-borne antiwar movement, apart from IVAW, that is getting the message out clearly to everyone in the services. However, this is only a matter of time as, I suspect, others are beginning to come to this conclusion as well, and will be taking measures to alleviate this anomaly.

PV2 Marc T
Intelligence Analyst

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]