Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Celebs Fail, An Urban Paradise Is Plowed Under

By Dean Kuipers, LA CityBeat. Posted June 16, 2006.


Despite help from Hollywood's progressive celebrities, L.A.'s biggest community garden is raided and bulldozed away.
Advertisement

This is their justice, eh?" said Tezozomoc, elected representative of the community gardeners called the South Central Farmers. "This is their dialogue."

All around him his world was exploding, a world he'd tried to hold together with an army of pro-bono lawyers, celebrity friends, and over 350 fiercely devoted low-income Mesoamerican immigrant families. It was a coalition force that held onto a 14-acre chunk of South Los Angeles, smack on the heavily industrialized Alameda Corridor, for over 14 years, two of them under eviction notice - maintaining 24-hour vigil over their padlocked garden plots, mobbing weekly City Council meetings, and generating a mountain of court documents as they made their simple appeal to the citizens of L.A.: Save the city's biggest community garden.

But they were living on borrowed time and, on Tuesday, June 13, time ran out. The scene on the ground was messy, though never violent, as L.A. County Sheriffs, Fire Department, and LAPD moved in with helmeted troops and bulldozers to make the world safe for warehousing. The scene was snarled with scores of emergency vehicles and a half-dozen helicopters and honking semi-tractor trailers trying to get through the heavily industrialized streets. As Tezozomoc talked at around 11 a.m., he pointed out the ladder truck moving into position to remove the last two people left in the gardens, Kill Bill actress Daryl Hannah and environmental activist John Quigley, chained to lockboxes up in the property's iconic walnut trees. By noon, they were down and it was over. The bulldozers moved in on the gardens.

Tezozomoc stood in the intersection of Long Beach Avenue and 41st Street, among a clot of about 250 furious protestors, some of them with faces covered by bandanas and many of them banging relentlessly on a metal gate, and said, referring to the owner of the gardens property, developer Ralph Horowitz: "Just yesterday, we thought we had saved this farm. But Horowitz and [Councilwoman Jan] Perry wanted the eviction - no matter how much money was on the table."

For almost a year, the farmers had tried to arrange for the city to buy the property from Horowitz, who publicly stated he was amenable to the idea as long as he could get his asking price of $16 million. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa had tried to negotiate that sale on Monday morning, but said Horowitz refused the offer.

"Today's events are unfortunate, disheartening, and unnecessary," said Villaraigosa in a statement Tuesday.

Zack de la Rocha, former lead singer for the activist rock band Rage Against the Machine, and an ardent supporter of the farm, swept Tezozomoc into a tight and long hug.

"How are you, brother?" he said quietly, as the two men wept. "We know you tried so fucking hard."

"This is a betrayal," De la Rocha told me. "Horowitz's children will never have to worry about a bite of food. But for these people, this is how they feed themselves."

He looked at the line of deputies sealing off the MTA train line that ran alongside Long Beach Avenue between the black-and-green-clad demonstrators and the farm, tears in his eyes.

"Isn't this farm the kind of civic interaction that the city and its politicians are trying to stir?" he asked. "But when it crosses capital and development plans, they get hit over the head with clubs."

In fact, there was little club-swinging when the eviction came. Sheriffs in helmets and wielding batons arrived at 5 a.m. and cut through the locks securing the large metal chain link gates, where eviction notices had been posted and reposted for years during the tumultuous legal battle. Of the 17 or so people who were arrested inside the garden, most were "walkers," who agreed to walk out under their own power. Another half-dozen fixed themselves to lockboxes made from 55-gallon drums filled with cement. Hannah and Quigley went up the tree. But all were removed without significant incident. A total of 40 were arrested, including demonstrators arrested blocking streets and sidewalks outside.


Digg!

Dean Kuipers is editor of LA CityBeat.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So, wait until he builds the warehouse...
Posted by: Mutternich on Jun 16, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...then give it a green roof.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Peaches come from a can Posted by: axolotl_helix
got reason?
Posted by: jonestown kool-aid on Jun 16, 2006 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tree-sitting, or chaining yourself to something, although well-intentioned, are just two actions that get scoffed at by "non-activists". Humans become desensitized VERY quickly and bold acts of protest often fall prey to callous TV audiences.

All too often it just becomes fodder for corny jokes, the lone exception (in fairly recent times) is the case of Julia hill, but she had the stuff mass-media audiences can digest (i.e. she was attractive, pleasant, and marketable) if she had hairy armpits, and was loud and angry things would have been different. Even though she was laughed at by many, it worked to some degree-- She did manage to get an Oprah appearance, but she, like so many others, have been forgotten by the general public who don't have the time or energy to "pay attention". Those who care remember, but we are few, and they are many.

Getting back to the L.A. community garden- it is not easy for the American public to sympathize with a group of hispanic squatters (essentially what they were in this case) no matter how well-intentioned or legitimate their efforts were.

The landlord, or property owner, Horowitz, may seem like a greedy scumbag, but he's a businessman who is not going to "do the right thing" because it's bad business. This is the sad truth-- He can't afford to piss off his business cronies by selling the land to a group of latinos who want affordable food for their families!!! In their minds these are the same people who looted and stole from their businesses in the '92 riots. To Horowitz and his ilk these people are not neighbors, they're a nuisance.

Even though he made more money on ONE land sale than TEN of us working class stiffs will make in a LIFETIME, to him it's just another transaction. It's the disparity of wealth that is the real issue here as we progess into the 21st century. 16 million fucking dollars- that's about 1.1 million per acre AND that's "South Central" industrial- zoned real estate, not exactly "prime".
How much does an acre in Beverly Hills cost??!!??

Many Americans, like myself, are part of the "working-poor" class---- College-educated 20 and 30-somethings who have full-time jobs (with or without benefits) but still have a hard time paying the bills and staying out of debt. (no, not because our money is poorly managed!) Actually BUYING real-estate is out of reach because 1/3 (more or less) of our salaries goes to pay rent. We are essentially modern day serfs working for nobels like Horowitz and others. In order to get ahead in America you MUST own real estate, there really is no other way to "get ahead". The money you make from your first land sale enables you to move up the food chain--sometimes. People like Horowitz not only understand this, they excel at it. I don't aspire to be any sort of landlord, I just want what my hispanic brothers (no, I'm not a communist, thank you) in L.A. want-- a little space on earth to provide for myself and my family. In this modern day feudal system it is difficult, but not impossible.

I just wish the greedy, self-absorbed scum fucks who buy up this land of ours-- just to flip it and go buy some more-- could have the fore-sight to avert a potential revolution (yes, one day it will happen again,as it did in 1776), but history has shown this to be impossible (rulers having foward thinking capabilities). Land for agriculture should not be viewed as a commodity, but a commons. Most, if not all of suburbia was once farmland. Q:WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE BUILD ON MORE AND MORE ARABLE LANDS??!!??!!?? A: higher food prices, and eventually complete dependance on agribusiness-- neither option good.

Essentially, debate be damned, those people in L.A. were fighting for independance and the freedom to provide for themselves. Unfortunately, it was on land owned by someone else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: got reason? Posted by: Gerard
» RE: got reason? Posted by: jonestown kool-aid
» RE: got reason? Posted by: feller
» RE: got reason? Posted by: ethanay
» RE: got reason? Posted by: jonestown kool-aid
» RE: got reason? Posted by: bttl
» RE: got reason? Posted by: ethanay
» RE: got reason? Posted by: feller
» RE: got reason? Posted by: ethanay
» Show Me the Contract Posted by: feller
» RE: Show Me the Contract Posted by: ethanay
where was o.j.?
Posted by: wleming on Jun 16, 2006 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Celebrity compassion doesn't change the fact that public spaces are being undermined and then bulldozed by real estate developers and the greed heads who support them all over the country.
Real estate taxes and the people who pay them.. developers et. al.- fund the major urban political machines from new york, to chicago, to l.a.
Don't get in the way folks.. money talks: you walk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Is your kettle black? Posted by: feller
» RE: Is your kettle black? Posted by: ethanay
» RE: Is your kettle black? Posted by: Elmowilcox
» RE: Is your kettle black? Posted by: feller
» RE: Is your kettle black? Posted by: ethanay
I sympathize with the farmers...
Posted by: InfinityDog on Jun 16, 2006 8:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but I am not impressed by the "celebrity support" for their cause. Many of the celebrities named in the article -- in particular DiCaprio and Martin Sheen -- are mega-millionaires. If they were so sympathetic to the farmers' cause, why didn't they put their money where there mouths were?

This is another problem on the Left that the Right doesn't share. When well-capitalized ideologues on the Right want something badly enough, they finance it. They buy up radio stations, TV stations, newspapers, think tanks, banks, anything that they want to warp or control. But when the Left finds a cause celèbre, what do we do? We sit in trees and chain ourselves to barrels full of concrete.

Something tells me that's not a winning strategy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the Celebs and their Cash?!!!
Posted by: kbartoy on Jun 16, 2006 11:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It really strikes me as odd that all of the celebrities who get tons of mileage out of doing charitable acts couldn't have stepped up to the table for these folks. I mean, Brad and Angelina shell out a bunch of cash to Namibia for allowing them to suspend Freedom of Press so as to have a nice birth. But, where are these celebs when the shit hits the fan in their own goddamn backyard.

Are you telling me that they couldn't have come up with the $6 million or so to save the farm?

I don't want to hear one more fuckin' celeb from Hollywood trying to act the part of a "good liberal." I figured that they were all full of it. And, now, they are really shown their true colors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I protested to save the farm.
Posted by: neogaia on Jun 16, 2006 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live a few blocks away from this farm. A developer bought it and wants to build a warehouse. This farm has 350 families with small plots on it and it is in an industrial area so it soaks up a lot of CO2 and other pollutants but if they tear it down all that stuff is going to go into the air. That will contribute to global wariming and the air pollutants are going to go into my lungs and my family's lungs and my neighbors' lungs and our health will suffer. I went to protest there but I left once the police started getting their riot gear on. The local news and most of the journalists have put a spin on it justifying Horowitz actions. This whole thing is just making it clear then when it comes down to it money and power are the only things that win. How can I a poor Mexican-American female from South Central possibly help take down a white(actually Jewish but still white) rich man? Most people have lost their compassion. Everyone who hears this story knows what the right thing to do is but they don't want to help do the right thing because most people only care about themselves. Individualism is great but we need to change our society so that in the future(if there is any due to global warming there might not be one) people will help each other out and do the right thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Grapes of Wrath Posted by: feller
» RE: Grapes of Wrath Posted by: Mutternich
» Pedro, It's Not Your Land! Posted by: feller
» Wow, like Cool. Posted by: feller
» United States of Weirdos Posted by: feller
» RE: You're an idiot, feller Posted by: ethanay
Mr
Posted by: Peace on Jun 16, 2006 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess that all money which could have been used to purchase the garden was spent on more prisons and roads for SUVs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rent A Crip Posted by: feller
OK ... you are right on the refusal of offer ... but ...
Posted by: kbartoy on Jun 16, 2006 5:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it still doesn't change the fact that it was a non-profit foundation and not celebrities who dug into their pockets for the purchase price.

And, why doesn't the City claim eminent domain again? I don't know the whole story but they already did this once before selling it back to the fella.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing new under the sun
Posted by: cold2touch on Jun 19, 2006 1:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mesoamericans are just doing their duty by getting stomped on by greedy realtors. It happened in '50s, where an urban community (pueblo) called Chavez Ravine was razed through unilateral, un-debated fiat by the city council to make way for a gentrified development as well as the Dodgers stadium.
Back then, if you didn't agree with developers, you were a commie. Now, after 50+ years of enlightenment, if you don't agree with with developers, you are a commie.
Progress, huh?
Listen to Ry Cooder's Chavez Ravine album, the music is as great as the lyrics are heartbreaking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]