Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Taking Media Progress Even Further

By Rick Gell, AlterNet. Posted April 18, 2006.


Until progressives are on TV -- especially cable TV -- the right wing will continue to dominate the airwaves.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rick Gell

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Any sports fan knows that a retooled team may win a few more games, but if the competition has also ramped up, the end result is the same. In 2004, in the weeks leading up to the November election, liberals and Democrats were patting themselves on the back for their major increases in voter registration and field organizing -- only to be shocked at the even stronger turnout produced by the better-organized Republican effort.

You know the result. Did it feel like progress? Hardly. But people forget. Air America was on the air for six months, Daily Kos was raising lots of money for candidates, MoveOn.org was a force, Michael Moore was smashing box-office records, Al Franken was at the top of the bestseller list along with other Bush-bashing tomes. And the result: Kerry was  "Swift Boated," and an  AWOL president was portrayed as a strong Commander-in-Chief. Progress?

Yes, with Air America, we have entered the talk radio ballpark. On the web,  we seem to have a small edge in the blogosphere similar to the edge held in circulation of left-of center magazines and books. I'm bullish on web TV, but each new medium has always predicted the demise of the previous one -- movies were going to kill radio, as TV was going to kill the movies, etc.

And market penetration is always slower than we think. Thirty years later, and the top ten cable shows average between two and four million viewers; those numbers would translate to instant cancellation on ABC, CBS and NBC. 

It's the mainstream media, stupid. Mostly it's TV. Swift Boating was a TV phenomenon, accomplished primarily on broadcast and cable news programs. We are being lulled into a false sense of accomplishment because mainstream news media has supposedly "awakened" to Iraq and Katrina -- as if they could ignore dead bodies floating past the camera in an American city. But Katrina was apolitical, and didn't require a stand on any issue other than incompetence. Bush and company have so thoroughly fouled up Iraq, not to mention their falsified claims to start the war, that it is easy to think that things have turned around.

But rest assured, the same defeatism that feeds our media strategy will have us firmly in our role as "Linus" -- having the football pulled out from under us, once again -- in '08. We will be shocked when the mainstream media fawns all over "straight-talkin'" McCain and his tough as nails, 9/11 superhero VP Rudy Giuliani.  In my opinion, Hillary will be eaten alive with under-the-radar attacks on personal vulnerabilities, as well as the  basic misogyny embedded in corporate media and its advertisers. Just watch.

Unless progressives wake up and face hard truths about media — and the money, strategy and tactics it will take — we will continue to win battles and lose the war. Progressives have essentially given up on center stage -- broadcast and cable news  -- and stayed in the comfortable terrain of  alternative media, given up on leveraging our "buying power" and mostly come to believe that the non-profit road is the only road to editorial integrity.

This allows corporations to have their cake and eat it too; as if progressives are still the back-to-the-country, anti-automation, communal-living hippies of the sixties and not the Starbucks-drinking, iPod carrying, SUV-driving people many of us really are.

So we run off to the alternative media hills preparing to wait the ten years till web-video reaches parity with broadcast. We live in the rarified world of non-profit funding, and leave billions of ad dollars and venture capital money on the table. We run "media reform" conferences steeped in policy, but void of creativity and  absent of people who could greenlight any media projects.

Progressive investors, hardest to criticize because they do so much, are loath to change directions and fund media -- even though they know that GE, Viacom and News Corp. are crushing the things they believe in and spend tens of millions on.   There is plenty of dough among wealthy liberals  -- billions -- and yet we prefer to blame Rupert.  Much of the political funding for media spending  takes place in back rooms and in secret because the same progressive press that should be shining a light, is begging for cash.

How long are liberals going to let Maytag advertise on right wing Michael Savage's radio show, and shun Air America -- without doing anything? We wash our clothes too.

In the cause of full disclosure, for the past year I have been pitching a weekly progressive newsmagazine show for cable with a former cable-news president on board as Executive Producer. In a country evenly split between red and blue, with 168 hours of very profitable Fox News programming on cable each week, this should be a no-brainer. But I can't get to first base.

In his article "New Success for Progressive Media," also up today on AlterNet, Don Hazen frames a mostly positive view of the emerging media battles won, and what we need to move forward. In a rather different tone, I've laid out what I think has to change for big victories. Together, I hope they make a lot of sense.

Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We Must Change
Posted by: thinkverybig on Apr 18, 2006 1:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am really not a fan of Fox News and will never watch a network that condones an idiot President like BUSH. Fox is a biased Right wing station that should be boycotted. I tend not to watch a lot of news anyway because they are all controlled by corporations and are used as forms of control and to spread the government's propaganda. They are also negative and inflates stories more than what they should be. It's time for a change in this country and world.... It's time for a REVOLUTION.

I am in the process of creating a website by the name of "WeMustChange.org" and I'm looking for volunteers who might be interested in coming aboard and helping me get this concept off of the ground. I need a website designer, and some talented and creative people who are willing to put forth an effort to make a difference in this world. I am presently pondering websites formats etc. Please email ideas to david@thinkverybig.com

One thing I do want to address is oppression world wide. I need more ideas and view points. Let's make "WeMustChange.org" a household name. I need some good people on my team.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We Must Change Posted by: 2flingpoo
» RE: We Must Change Posted by: 2flingpoo
» RE: We Must Change Posted by: 2flingpoo
Finally, Liberal Media!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 18, 2006 1:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you want to check out a great documentary? Go out and buy "Left of the Dial: The Rise and Fall and Ressurection of Air America". I don't have the DVD at arms length at the moment so I can't tell you the name of the filmmaker who put it together but trust me on this one, folks, it's well worth the twenty bucks.

Al Franken is the closest thing our generation will ever have to a Will Rogers. And unlike his "collegues" on the far right, Al doesn't have to spew lies in order to make his point. It's the truth that will eventually set this miserable country free: The total, unvarnished, uncomfortable yet beautiful truth. We've become a nation of hannitized dittoheads. I try to devote and hour a day to Sean and Rush (the last half hour of Limbaugh followed by the first half hour of Hannity). To be able to comment intelligently on these fools requires one to keep track, on a daily basis, with the lies they are spreading. It's a dirty job but, dag nap it, someone's got to do it. As horrible as the two hosts in question are, the REALLY frightening thing about eavesdropping on the vast right wing conspiracy are the people who call in to these programs. If you don't think that America is capable of going down the road of total violence and repression similar to what happened to Germany in the thirties, listen to the typical caller on Rush and Sean's programs. There are a hell of alot of half-witted,angry white males out there, kids. They've been led to believe that they are getting the shaft with respect to the American dream and the people feeding them this garbage are the SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE DOING THE SHAFTING!!! I mean, how stupid is that??? Oh and it gets better: Not only are they angry as hell, alot of them are armed and dangerous!

I've said this before but it needs to be repeated: The first job of the democrats when they take back control of the House and Senate in January of 2008 will be to totally re-regulate the FCC. They got rid of the fairness doctrine (which gauranteed that both sides of an issue would be heard) in 1981 and look at where it's gotten us. Twenty five years later we're creeping towards facism. You don't believe me? Consider the words of the father of the facist state, Benito Mussolini, in 1927:

"Facism should more properly be called 'corporatism' because it is the total merging of corporate and state power".

Umm....in case you haven't noticed, we're there.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Demobot Propaganda
Posted by: AlanSmithee on Apr 18, 2006 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Faux-liberal donkey propaganda makes nervous democrats feels good - and it changes absolutely nothing. Even on TV.

Oh, and btw, it's Charlie Brown who gets the football pulled away as he's trying to kick it. Pwogwessives are more like Marcie to the DLC's Peppermint Patty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Demobot Propaganda Posted by: Suburban Dad
The media is only one component.
Posted by: wli on Apr 18, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One would be well advised to examine Antio Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony.

A media apparatus cannot exist in isolation and later build up political momentum around it. Segments of the financial, political, cultural, and other spheres of influence must mutually support the media, along with a constituency that vigorously defends it. This is no particular secret. There has been a left-wing press before in the US during the 1930's, and it was systematically eradicated despite its broad popularity. The eradication campaign was successful in no small part due to the lack of defense in the political and financial arenas.

This is no small task. You can't just wish yourself into a billionaire so you can prop up left-wing media endeavors or wish yourself into high office to repeal laws and policies made to crush left-wing media. The "bootstrapping problem" is enormous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE ARE ON CABLE TV!!!
Posted by: palm44 on Apr 18, 2006 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Link TV, a totally non-corporate, non-profit progressive television network available in 27 million homes through an infrastructure worth $100 million is now seen on Washington DC cable, and will very soon be seen on the AT&T system in New York. Link is also negotiating for cable carriage in a number of other systems and is also available thorugh Gooble Video.

The majority of its carriage is on satellite, which most progressive don't have (but many suburban and rural conservatives do, so they get their daily dose of Democracy Now from LinkTV), but 4 -5 million people watch it ...that is a significant audience for a progressive network

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WE ARE ON CABLE TV!!! Posted by: Rick Gell
» RE: WE ARE ON CABLE TV!!! Posted by: SGinNYC
Independent World Television
Posted by: Ian B. on Apr 18, 2006 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we want to get news and views from other than corporate controlled media, we need to fund our own. IWT is a worth while project in development that needs financial support from Progressives and Liberals. Put your money where your mouth is, check out the site, contribute and pass it along. The folks behind this are Progressive and media professionals and activists who know what they're doing.

http://www.iwtnews.com

http://www.iwtnews.com

linked text

umm...one of those links should work, I think. Ah yes, click on linked text.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Understanding Media History
Posted by: StuartH on Apr 18, 2006 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conservatives are now trying to get control of universities. if you look at book and magazine publishing, as well as the music industry, you can see a homogenization that follows the interests of the banking and investment community. It may be that the internet can escape this trajectory. Or it may require determined progressives who gain power in Washington before not too much more time passes.

If you saw the final scenes in "Good Night and Good Luck," you saw a history lesson. Edward R Murrow fought a very edgy battle for journalistic integrity and won, only to be shuffled upstairs and muffled. That may be the moment when network TV came under the domination of corporate interests.

All the trends that make the mainstream media what it is are not trivial and superficial. Bush and Rove are perfect expressions of this Matrix reality we live in.

Yes, there need to be more aggressive, smarter and more well funded progressive media efforts.

But progressives are smarter than conservatives. Therefore, the policies and directions for America and the world of the 21st century that ought to be leading us forward ought to be at the center of all this.

For conservatives, projecting a coherent package of policies and visions is easy: What makes money makes right and God ordained it.

Changing this rather feudal paradigm in favor of one that creates a sustainable future for 22nd century humans and the rest of creation will be a bit more complicated. One of the problems is that progressives seem to be suffering from a collective lack of self esteem and are not able to dare to put forward a sustainable planet big picture that is persuasive.

We also don't seem to sense the ruthlessness of the oil and extractive interests in its true light. These are dying empires. They cannot be sustained in gentlemanly debate, but must go for all possible means. If they have to shut off the Republic and go to unending martial law, they just might do it. They are capable of anything. We have seen their experiments with social control in Central America, if you read carefully.

Progressives have to deal with the need to come to the battle with some sense of desiring to win. This isn't the time for a live and let live kind of niceness. Progressives who are well off need to start thinking in terms of engagement rather than vacationing in cool places. People who prefer to blog or to talk back to their TV sets needs to start engaging with some other people and organizing something. Anything. At any level.

Waiting for a media paradigm that has been taking shape since the early fifties to change will lead to becoming more and more comfortable with explanations about why the US can never elect progressive leaders. This is a progressive country! America is founded on progressive thinking! Why the hell are the descendants of Cotton Mather and the witch burners of the 1600s getting the better of us?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

seniorlefty
Posted by: wernersi on Apr 18, 2006 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rick's very realistic overview really touches all the right bases. But how can the devasting insights and truths espoused by a fearless patriot like William Blum, Noam Chomsky, or Gore Vidal inundate the "mainstream media"??? By creating a new broadcast tv channel underwritten by the wealthiest liberal true believers and small folk that are pissed off enough to swear to outfox FOX, etc. in an allout truth attack by the decent Left on the hate-diffused Right. Air America is a tenuous, commercially very noisy "start" on radio; much more is needed!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

True
Posted by: Moonbat on Apr 18, 2006 3:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But progressives are smarter than conservatives."

True, now it's time to grow a male apendage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another distribution alternative: LPTV
Posted by: TexasTom on Apr 18, 2006 7:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The battle to get distributed over cable television is largely a hopeless cause right now -- ask Mark Cuban about the problems that he's been having convincing cable powerhouse Comcast to offer his HDNET channels to their subscribers. And I think it is fair to note that Mr. Cuban has greater resources than any start up progressive cable network is likely to have. The blunt truth is that the cable environment is extremely hostile to any independently owned start-up networks. Instead, the space is going to the large media companies that are able to leverage their existing networks to gain carriage for new networks.

But there is another way past the cable operators: low powered television (LPTV). Most major markets have several of these little broadcast stations, which typically offer shopping programs, infomercials, ethnic programming, or religion. LPTV is a secondary service that isn't often carried by cable operators...but the stations sell for a fraction of the cost of full powered stations.

It's a way to bypass the cable monopoly and reach at least some viewers. It's also a way to test out progressive programming concepts to see what works and what doesn't. And in many markets, it is a way to reach large numbers of viewers who don't subscribe to cable -- while major northeastern markets have extremely high cable penetration rates, in the rest of the country there are a number of markets where large numbers of viewers rely primarily on off-air TV reception. This includes large markets like Dallas, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and Salt Lake City...

It's an alternative that is worth thinking about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

check out real independent TV
Posted by: Kspencer on Apr 19, 2006 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There ARE alternatives: both national satellite channels Link TV and FreeSpeechTV are having a considerable impact. Even if you are not in one of the 27 million US homes which have switched from cable to the superior satellite offerings, you can watch these channels on the web:
www.linktv.org
www.fstv.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]