Lust and Desire: to Honor or Ignore?

By Jennifer Liss, WireTap. Posted February 24, 2006.

In the signature homewrecking story of the 20th century, an intern in a humble blue dress seduced a dashing, smooth-spoken president. When Dan Rather asked Bill Clinton why he did it, the ex-president responded, "Just because I could."

The theories to why people betray their love are as numerous as the ways in which people do it. Perhaps some, like Clinton, cheat because they can and are greedy. Perhaps others feel overpowered by a merciless lust. In seriousness, a friend said her theory is that cheating is a "chemical imbalance," an illness that causes deviant behavior.

Almost everyone I know has either been the homewrecked or the homewrecker. And most of them did feel sick. Sick that they deceived the one who loved them truly. Or sick to have been bamboozled by the one they truly loved. Years ago, I peeked at an ex's Friendster webpage to find that one of his new "friends" listed homewrecking as one of her hobbies. Sick.

But unlike a flu patient, the homewrecker gets no sympathy. Nobody likes a homewrecker. And why should we? A lesson learned for Brangelina when, according to a recent AP story, a Jennifer Anniston fan on a justice crusade broke up their romantic dinner screaming, "Where is that homewrecking Angelina?"

Daphne Gottlieb, a former homewrecker and San Franciscan performance poet, is out to set the cheater's story straight with "Homewrecker: An Adultery Reader," a collection of essays, fiction and poetry that explore why and how people cheat, get caught, suffer and recover.

Her introductory essay, "Let's Just Get This Out in the Open," implies that Gottlieb has retired her homewrecking ways and learned a few things like, "the shittiest thing you can do in the world is lie to someone you love; also that there are certain times you have no other choice -- not honoring this fascination, this car crash of desire, is also a lie."

No other choice? Could ignoring your yearnings be a greater crime than wronging your partner? Love will prevail in the end, right?

Brace yourself for bad news. According to Gottlieb, "Love -- at least pair-bonded, prescribed love -- does not conquer all. It does not conquer desire."

Uh-oh.

And so Gottlieb's mission intrigues. Since cheating doesn't seem to discriminate -- the former president did it, celebrities do it, your ex might have done it, heck, you might be guilty of it -- it is one of those subjects, like cancer, that on some level speaks to everyone. Everyone can say they've nursed a cheated heart, whether it was their own, a sister's or even a lover's.

Gottlieb wants to make sure that we know there's a potential cheater in all of us, so she includes a rainbow of perspectives. She's out to show how the complexities of betrayal change from straight married high school sweethearts to committed gay and lesbian couples navigating communities where no one is a stranger. She wants to show that homewrecking has no demographic limitations, and that lust and pain are emotions shared by all.

One of the strongest pieces in "Homewrecking," is also one of the most unconventional. In "Beating Around the Burning Bush" Matthue Roth tells the story of an orthodox Jew who is cheating on his girlfriend with God, and consequently, two-timing God with his girlfriend. The girlfriend doesn't know about the intensity of his devotion, and he feels like he is emotionally betraying her. While God most likely knows about his relationship with his girlfriend, the narrator is sure He isn't pleased.

Jennifer Liss is a contributing writer to WireTap living in San Francisco.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »