Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Getting His War On

By Dean Kuipers, LA CityBeat. Posted February 18, 2006.


David Rees never wanted to be a political cartoonist, but then 9/11 revealed the ambivalent relationship to violence at the heart of American culture.
Advertisement

David Rees never wanted to make political statements. He didn't even want to be a political cartoonist. In the days directly following September 11, when he was living in New York City, he just needed to hear an honest rendition of his country's internal dialogue about fear and war. As the media doggedly delivered a highly formalized and polarized debate about revenge, Rees listened to another line of discourse playing out in the white-collar offices where he worked as a temp, in the streets, in the music, and mostly in his own head. There he found horror, misunderstanding, hip-hop slang, and yes, jokes. There he found "Get Your War On."

Laughing at real-life horror like cluster-bombing Afghani children or floating bodies in New Orleans is bound to offend, and Get Your War On spares no one. The strip excoriates the Bush administration, the military, religious extremists of all stripes -- it has the audacity to laugh at death itself -- and exposes the apathy, fatigue, and bafflement experienced by almost every American. It has also become immensely popular, appearing exclusively in every issue of Rolling Stone and getting 25 million hits a year online.

Standing outside a lecture hall on the University of Southern California campus, where he's making an appearance for the Annenberg School for Communications, 33-year-old Rees looks like another junior professor -- grey tweed coat, the first touch of gray at the temples, a clutch of files in one hand. Since the strip spawned a series of three well-received books, Rees has done a lot of this. He knows the students are going to ask him about the global uproar over the Mohammed comics, and he's been thinking about that quite a bit himself.

"Since I became an atheist, I think any kind of restriction on picturing or making fun of or commenting on deities or prophets just rubs me the wrong way," says Rees, talking quickly, and seeming to figure out what he's going to say as he says it. Which, by the way, is one of the reasons he created his comic: to figure out how he felt about things.

He has decided that American newspapers should print the cartoons.

"I don't see why not," he says. "Seeing the cartoons kind of removes a level of mystery. It kinda deflates the issue, at least it did for me. 'Oh, these are just crappy cartoons, like mediocre cartoons.' I don't think you should necessarily publish photographs of victims of Janjawid rape in Sudan, or something. But I do think that to eliminate a layer of uncertainty and anxiety is useful in some way."

He also believes it is a test of our Constitutional civility. His own comic depends on it: Offensive speech is still protected speech in the United States.

"If they publish them in the United States, and you are an American Muslim, and you look at the cartoon and it drives you fucking bananas, you do just have to reconcile yourself: Are you comfortable living in a society where -- it's not like a tactful thing to do, or necessarily a sophisticated political critique -- but this is a country where you are allowed to do things like that."


Digg!

Dean Kuipers is editor of LA CityBeat.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
it is also cathartic to reflect and write
Posted by: eileenflmng on Feb 18, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
excerpted from
Chapter 6 FREELY available at
http://www.wearewideawake.org


THAT DAY

Jack had been restless for three days. Julianne was in New York City at her sisters and wasn’t due back for three more. His knees began throbbing more the moment she drove out of sight the morning of September 8, 2001.

After returning home on Monday night from The BLAC: Brother Lawrence Addictions Center, Jack mindlessly ate two Lean Cuisines, then spent the rest of the evening trying to read. He fell asleep just before dawn and dreamt he was on the blacktop running track at the middle school where Julianne taught 7th grade English; and where they both rollerbladed in the early mornings before the kids came to campus.


Jack spent a ten hour day at The BLAC, as its Founder and Administrator, and the mornings on the track were when the couple had their best conversations. He inhaled the aroma of tar as he wondered what was keeping Julianne from him. He bladed for what seemed like hours when a silver spandex clad apparition with a golden helmet flew by, sharply turned and with a backward stroke, called out, "Hi Jack, don't look down, don't look back, look out straight Jack, look out straight!"

"Yeah, I can, I can do that." Jack bellowed back to the apparition that had already vaporized into the distance. Then Jack rolled onto an exquisite grace; knees freed from bone on bone grinding and not an ache within his fifty-three year old body that had been abused by two motor vehicle accidents and hours of over use syndrome. Jack glided upon the blacktop effortlessly for what seemed like hours, when suddenly, a roar of thunder assaulted his senses and his eyes were magnetized upward, to view two fireballs thrown down from on high, miles from where he stood. He saw them hit the ground, one traveled east, the other west, and then they circled back around, burning a path straight towards him. Just before they collide, Jack woke up not believing he had only been dreaming........


read the rest chapter 6 on WAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best treatise on the Cartoon Jihad that I've read thus far.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 18, 2006 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In response to "Piss Christ" "[former North Carolina Senator] Jesse Helms didn't go out and smash embassies and shit, you know what I'm saying?"

This entire article was excellent, and I think the above statement exactly embodies the difference between most of Western civilization and those societies whose leaders inflame a willing populace to acts of rioting, burning, and pillaging.

I hope Mr. Rees keeps drawing his cartoons, and I wholeheartedly agree with him: the Jihad Cartoons should be published by any who value liberty over political oppression based on superstition. The drawing of these types of cartoons and their publication should be done in spite--perhaps to spite--those who would use violence to enforce their will, their beliefs, and their law upon others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great cartoons
Posted by: chaoslegs on Feb 18, 2006 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think in the run up to the Iraq War, or maybe just after it started a friend of mine turned me on to these. I didn't keep up with them, but now have book marked the web page.

Does anyone at alternet monitor these posts? Could the two previous posters be on TOPIC? Like related to the article some how? I have seen their posts on 2 or 3 articles today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Cartoons and Double Standards
Posted by: Ras3hilton on Feb 20, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if Joseph Wilson or his wife would agree that taking a stand against "Bushitler" was completely safe? I'd bet they suffered just a little bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]