Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Changing the Country, One Book at a Time

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted January 26, 2006.


In part one of our two-part roundtable discussion, four leaders of the progressive publishing industry discuss their successes and failures since 9/11.
012606_story
progressive books
Listen

Download

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Don Hazen

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

[Editor's Note: This is the first of two parts of our Roundtable Discussion on Progressive Publishing. You can download the audio of this talk from AlterNet in two parts: Part One, Part Two. The second half of the discussion was published on Friday.]

Introduction

In our world of fast-changing technologies, information overload, instant pundits and a relentless global 24/7 news cycle, books are, perhaps surprisingly, still vitally important. Yes, in the era of the Internet and media convergence on the web, Gutenberg's invention is still holding its ground, even though there is some decline in the number of books being sold, in a business sector that has its ups and downs.

There are many reasons why books remain a central part of many of our lives. One heartening reason is books represent deeper thinking than what we get in our day-to-day news scanning, and, happily, many people still want to dig and know more to make sense of our crazy and disconcerting world. And in some cases, book authors get enough respect and attention to jumpstart a national conversation.

Nevertheless, the trends in book publishing reflect media consolidation in other areas -- there are the big conglomerates and the little guys. As much as 80 percent of trade publishing is controlled by large publishing houses. Still, book sales are big business: Barnes and Noble, Borders and Amazon are all battling for market share. The Internet is helping to make many more books available than the brick and mortar stores can contain -- the so-called "long tail" that is supposed to strengthen small, independent publishers.

One might think that the smaller independent progressive book publishers would be thriving, especially in the face of the Bush administration's rampant unpopularity. But, surprisingly, political publishing is in the doldrums. The publishing boom of post-9/11 and the earlier Bush years have faded, along with the effectiveness of progressive activism. Is there a connection with books and the state of political engagement?

AlterNet invited four stalwarts of the progressive publishing universe to Mo Pitkin's in New York City to chat about the state of all things book publishing on January 11, 2006. Anthony Arnove is an author and editor at Haymarket Books as well as the literary agent for progressive heavies Arundhati Roy and Noam Chomsky. Dan Simon is the founder and publisher of Seven Stories Press, who has had some notable publishing successes -- currently with Kurt Vonnegut's "/alternet.bookswelike.net/isbn/158322713X">A Man Without A Country." (Seven Stories, in partnership with Akashic Books, published AlterNet's "The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq" by Christopher Scheer, Robert Scheer and Lakshmi Chaudhry.)

Sarah Bershtel is the longtime associate publisher of Metropolitan Books, an imprint of Henry Holt and Co., where she has been the force behind notable political publishing including Barbara Ehrenreich's "Nickel and Dimed" and her newest "Bait and Switch"; also on Metropolitan's roster is Thomas Frank's "What's the Matter With Kansas?" and many others.

The fourth participant was Colin Robinson, a dynamic Brit, who had major success at Verso Books before moving over to the New York City-based nonprofit New Press in 2001. New Press is considered the heavyweight of independent political publishing, given the number of books it publishes, and its creative titles and fundraising prowess. Robinson, as chief editorial operative, was seen as a compelling fit by many at the New Press. But, much to the shock of some of his fellow publishers, Robinson left at the end of the year do to editorial differences. In Editor and Publisher, Diane Wachtell, executive director of the New Press, acknowledged the differences over running the non-profit publishing houses. "The New Press is an interesting hybrid and there's nothing written down on just how you go about making it work. We all care about it, but we don't all have the same vision on how to make it work," Wachtell said.

Robinson went into more detail. He cited differences on the nature of the New Press list -- "I want to do more radical, edgy books on politics and culture." Wachtell, Robinson said, is more interested in "progressive books. Books on public interest and on education." And he questioned the New Press's dependence on grants and foundation money. "Foundation support can affect the books. You can end up trying to please foundations and their support is unreliable." Many are looking to see where Robinson lands, as well as hoping that the New Press continues to play a powerful role in progressive and edgy publishing.


Digg!

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
America is slowly (very slowly) waking up.
Posted by: Spyder on Jan 26, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point made about the small number of publishers that not only control the books that get published and promoted, but also pay to get shelf space in the store chains, is the most poignant element of this discussion. Americans should have figured this out thirty years ago, but we the public have let this situation progress much too far. The success of Nickel and Dimed is great, but Bait & Switch is not doing as well. We should see how the second book has become the reality for the white collar middle class already, just as we should have seen the points made in What's the Matter with Kansas at least a decade earlier. Books on these new progressive subjects have blossomed in recent years, but what we need is an explosion. Wake up to what our corporate culture has done to us, America!

http://www.e-tabitha.com/WakeUp.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Books fuel mounting anger with Bush, Democrats
Posted by: sausage on Jan 26, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was talking with a friend who works for Barns and Noble, when he noticed my copy of New York Times national security beat reporter James Risen's State Of War.

He said books of its nature were selling very well right now, while the pro-Bush titles....well, B and N can bearly give the stuff away. It wasn't that way five short years ago.

While dissatisfaction with Bush is growing, frustration with the Democratic Party and Democratic political leaders is increasing apace. We talk, e-mail, yell but they do not listen.

My friend said he's given up on the Democratic Party. I will hang with it until the votes are counted at the conclusion of my state's gubernatorial primary in June. Then the Dems are on their own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressives on the www
Posted by: eileenflmng on Jan 26, 2006 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before 9/11, I never gave much thought for another beyond my rural community. I was apolitical, thought the world had already gone mad and there was nothing anyone could do or say to change it. I lived a simple contended life in the rural South and have always been grateful to be an American.

After 9/11 I got really restless, began asking a lot of questions, and have never been satisfied with easy answers. I began the research to discover why a small group of people hated American’s so much, that they would do something as evil as targeting and cold bloodedly murdering innocent people. That research led me to write KEEP HOPE ALIVE, available at http://www.olivetreesfoundation.org


WAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org
was born when I returned from TIKKUN's [Hebrew for mend, repair and transform the world] first annual Conference for Spiritual Progressives in Berkeley which I attended three weeks after experiencing 16 days in Israel Palestine. Because the media in America ignores the truth about Israel Palestine and did not bother to cover the fact that over 1,300 interfaith spiritual progressives gathered in Berkeley in July, I am compelled to report what I witnessed.

I speak out as a Christian of The Beatitudes first and then as much a citizen of the world as a grateful American.

I am social justice radical writer of fiction, memoirs and the WAWA BLOG which is a PROBONO public service discouse confronting government and media shields and the neo-con neo-christian zionists who want Armageddon.

http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inclusive?
Posted by: Ginfo on Jan 26, 2006 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet's roundtable may have been edgy in NY's alphabet city but it was not inclusive. In fact, three of its four featured publishers went on record at a recent panel to acknowledge the spectacular growth of book buying among African-Americans - yet cynically none of them put their advertising dollars in the Black press. Without support from advertisers, the Black press is doomed to an endless struggle for survival - and progressives should be concerned about this.

For those interested in reading a publication that acknowledges this major sector, they can look at Black Issues Book Review - and the January-February issue in particular with its cover story "The Powers Behind Black Books."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Advocates In Action
Posted by: Allan Shore on Jan 26, 2006 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem to me, a nonprofit professional and wannabe fiction writer, is that the history we have in the social justice movement of effective, real, earth-shattering change never finds its way into our writings. It is as if publishers believe that the great unwashed masses won't buy books or sit in theatres to watch political adventures with heroes and heroines whose super strengths come from advocacy tools and tactics, so they refuse to publish them. Tom Clancy et al. even directly attack the nonprofit advocacy sector (I'm thinking of Rainbow Six here) and we fail to fight back with our own Jane ... Jane Bond. Even popular progressive writers like Jonathan Kellerman demonize counselors and therapists, casting aspersions on people in the helping sector (i.e., Therapy). But no one counters with script-ready adventures using alternative means to justice and peace. Just ask any woman who excapes the evil of domestic violence with the help of networks of safe houses, re-created identities, people who cover her (and her kids' tracks), etc. The emergency of Wi-Fi gaming technology is generating exciting networks of young people playing in teams of excitment in Asian countries, and we see no acknowledgement of this in our literature.

I hate to give away my idea, but I'm writing a book called Balance of Empowerment, which is a progressive reversal of Tom Clancy's Balance of Power book, using a president who gets fed up with being forced to use military antics and turns his power over to grassroots activities to give a new voice to democracy, liberty and justice.

So please stop sending me nice hand-written rejections. Invest in progressive entertainment and it might well make your fall into capitalism a bit more pleasing to us all.

I for one would have no problem eating heart- and earth-friendly popcorn in a theatre that had an adventurous spirit of its own.

Nice discussion, otherwise. But a bit insider-oriented, I think.

Allan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is Something Missing in This Discussion...
Posted by: Armafied on Jan 26, 2006 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The library!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I thought "What's the Matter with Kansas?" was the best
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 26, 2006 1:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides, even customers from stark red states like Idaho and Mississippi gave the book a real praise unlike most progressive/liberal books out there. And of course "Don't Think of an Elephant!" was just as good though obviously not as popular as "What's the Matter with Kansas?" I'm not sure the other books ever really had a chance to resonate unlike these two to begin with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This and That
Posted by: anothername on Jan 26, 2006 4:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Progressive books? Books that incite change? I think of The Jungle and the meat packers. I do not think of Leviathan.

I read Cookie Roberts' "The Founding Mothers" and disliked the gossipy references to The West Wing and a recent presidential election. They were not relevant to the book. I also recently started Christine Todd Whitman's "It's My Party Too." That one I did not want to go past the first few pages because it was a policy article that belonged in a periodical instead of a book.

I still read parts of "The Case Against College" that was written in the 1970s/1980s. There are also other books I have read that are valid even though their particular circumstances have changed.

Nevertheless, the books that have truly inspired me to change are those that are fiction. I will write both fiction and non-fiction, but just as my speeches for rallies are very different from my op-ed pieces, I stress different items depending on what I am writing. We need the policy tomes that help explain how to implement change. However, we also need the emotional motivation of fiction to inspire people to act for change.

As for the comment about women writers, I have noticed that when I present an article idea and note that it applies to women, as well as to men, I immediately am placed in a category of women issues. Considering that I write about foreign affairs, economic structures, and other large policy issues, I find it rather degrading that I am considered only to be writing about these issues as they impact women, instead of how they impact individuals, corporations, and government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Activism
Posted by: Chuck0 on Jan 26, 2006 11:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Colin:
"But my own personal opinion was that it all became very activist-orientated. It was question of "getting out there" and demonstrating; the state was so ferocious in countering demonstrations that young people going on those demonstrations really had to get into their heads: "How do we avoid getting the living daylights beaten out of us, and how do we stop ourselves from getting arrested?" There seemed to be less discussion about what was the movement that was actually being built by these demonstrations. And I think that made it a problem to get an ongoing organization within the anti-globalization movement."

I think Colin is really off base with this assessment of what happened to the anti-globalization movement which is, in fact, still very active. To say that the movement was getting too "activist-oriented" is pretty strange given that we are talking about a period of three years and only a handful of large national protests. Up until 9/11, the movement was growing after each summit protest. People were itching to get involved. Contrary to what some people think, violent protests like Quebec City only got more people interested, including many radicalized liberal activists.

Let's remember that the 9/11 attacks happened just two WEEKS before huge protests were anticipated in Washington, DC. The police and others were expecting 100,000 protesters--if 9/11 hadn't happened the September protests would likely have been Seattle II. The 9/11 attacks were disruptive of many things including the planned protests. The liberal groups and organized labor got spooked and called off their events. 9/11 was the kind of event that few protest movements have had to deal with, so it's not surprising that many activists were shocked into inaction. Other activists opted to do more activism against the new wars. Anti-globalization protests continued after 9/11, including the February 2002 anti-WEF protests in New York City.

Lastly, activists didn't cut back on activism because of police violence. The amount of police violence at protests wasn't that much different in 2001-2002 than it had been in 1999. Among the younger direct action activists police violence is just a non-issue. You'd be amazed at the cavalier, risky attitudes that most of these young people have about protests. They have few reservations about mixing it up with the cops.

Chuck Munson
Infoshop News

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pissing in the Pool
Posted by: madmac10 on Jan 27, 2006 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One often overlooked factor impacting allternative, progressive or independent publishing was the Swift Boaters Against Kerry book published in 2004. Despite the impact it had on the election, which was undeniably pivotal, it was even more influential in the publishing world. It tainted the waters.

Revulsion overwhelmed curiousity. Very few of us want to wade into the muck in order to find out how to preserve our civil liberties, stop the war or empower women. We seriously do not want the controversy that surrounds such publications, we aren't curious enough to put up with the stench. Especially in view of the fact that, despite the hysterical screeching from MSM pundits, we already know the truth.

I don't know what it will take to clean it up, either. I suppose something will come along sooner or later to ignite the nation's attention. I do believe, however, if publishers of the caliber who attended this roundtable are hard at work finding it, the pollution should clear up eventually.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Framing means concepts, not language
Posted by: woblyv on Jan 30, 2006 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry to have to point this out on Alternet of all places, but framing has everything to do with concepts, and the most important concepts at that-- the unconscious and automatic ways we make sense of our lives. Democrats who dismiss framing seem to mostly do so by equating it with wording or something along those lines. As Don Hazen managed to point out, there is much more to framing. Framing is about applying the results of empirical analysis of political reasoning, a sophisticated process that yields simple, powerful, and compelling knowledge. We need to bring those simple, powerful truths into the world of political organizing. --Rob in Boston

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

timeless
Posted by: timeless on Feb 8, 2006 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am ready to put into this arena a 33 page play book that if read enough could change the way the world sees it self. Contact me at godfreeentirety@yahoo.com, if u can assist. aho timeless The name is Flesym discouver what is hidden in plain sight. hint

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

timeless
Posted by: timeless on Feb 10, 2006 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
attempt to communicate without pronouns, nots of any kind, be am is, just a start humans are very programmed and words are things aloha

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asdasd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 7, 2006 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]