Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WTO Dispatches from Hong Kong

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted December 13, 2005.


The latest: Ending on the wrong note -- From Deborah James ... The police unleash tear gas -- for what? ... What's the strategy?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Joshua Holland

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

AlterNet staff writer Joshua Holland is reporting live from Hong Kong on the World Trade Organization Sixth Ministerial Conference. His dispatches of events from the protests and trade negotiations will be updated throughout the week.

*************************
Ending on the Wrong Note -- from Deborah James
Updated -- December 18, 9:24 am PST

Note: Deborah James, who is the Global Economy Director of Global Exchange, sent this dispatch in from Hong Kong on the conclusion of the trade talks.

Tonight, the hope of millions of farmers around the world for a better life for their children were dashed when talks at the World Trade Organization came to a conclusion.

The great economic powers of the world were successfully able to pressure the developing countries into agreeing to a text that is vastly against their interests.

Negotiators have been attempting to portray the deal as a step forward for developing countries. In reality, the deal is a setback for developing nations and for democracy and sovereignty of all countries.

A couple of the salient points:

Agriculture:

The US and EU agreed to allow the imports of goods from the world’s poorest countries, free of tariffs of quotas. However, they agreed to do it for only 97% of the goods, which actually allows them to leave out key products of interest to the same least developed countries.

Several West African countries have made a elimination of rich nation subsidies for cotton a key issue, because it is estimated that these subsidies cost poor African farmers billions in lost revenue. Rich nations agreed to eliminate cotton export subsidies, but failed to set a final date for all subsidies, as the West African countries had demanded.

Development:

The US, EU, and Japan agreed to provide several billion dollars a year in so-called development aid. However, most of this aid is actually already promised; is actually loans, not grants; or will actually be used to for these countries to restructure their economies for integrate the WTO rules, rather than for development. This was often referred to as the “empty development package” because the package will likely not be fulfilled.

Services:

The horrifying text that had been forwarded on services, which would have made service privatization for the vast majority of developing countries mandatory, was somewhat rolled back. However, the fight will now be taken to Geneva to define the future of the privatization of energy, banking, health, water, education, transportation, etc.

The highlight of the evening was the Venezuelan delegation. Venezuela and Cuba had claimed certain reservations in the second to last private meeting, which stated that they disagreed with the text on services and industrial tariffs. During the final public plenary, the chair introduced the final declaration for approval. After hearing applause, he pounded the gavel. At that point, the Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mari Pili Hernandez, jumped up on the stage, and insisted that she and the Cuban delegation be given the right to make their reservations public in the meeting. The Chair, after some resistance, finally had to allow them to speak. The Cubans stated that they agreed with consensus, but had certain reservations. The Venezuelans then stated that they made reservations on industrial tariffs and services that they wanted to be put in the final report.

This was a courageous stand, the first time a country has registered reserves, and opens up opportunities for the fight in Geneva.

We will continue.

*************************
The Police Unleash Tear Gas -- for What?
Updated -- December 17, 7:26 pm PST

After a week of noteworthy restraint by the Hong Kong security forces things turned ugly tonight when police responded to a small group of protesters rushing their lines by firing multiple rounds of tear gas at crowds of peaceful demonstrators and onlookers who had gathered outside the Convention Center.

The scene in the street was surreal as I left the "locked down" venue through a little-used entrance on the side opposite the large group of protesters. The streets were filled with riot police. Many were in jeans and t-shirts -- all were helmeted -- after apparently being called to duty from their homes.

On the street in front of the Convention Center, a group of Korean farmers were entertaining the crowds with a large drum circle. In addition to chanting "down, down WTO," they chanted "Citizens of Hong Kong" about thirty times and then: "nice to meet you!" At a later point, on another street, they sat and chanted: "We love Hong Kong," to which some onlookers yelled, "We love Korea!" One person then yelled: "South Korea, that is."

Police seemed flustered by the demos. I stood in front of the Convention Center for perhaps an hour witnessing a bizarre series of moves. At a signal, the riot police would extend their collapsible metal batons and yell something in unison. Then they'd rapidly advance in a line for a hundred feet or so. Then retreat.


Digg!

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Benzene
Posted by: benzene on Dec 13, 2005 9:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hasn't anyone stopped to think that maybe, just perhaps, that all of our current economic systems are doomed to failure? Forgive me if my facts are fuzzy here, but from what I've been able to surmise through observations, it seems as though all of the world's economies are based upon the assumption of infinite resources when, in fact, the world they are tied to is anything but infinite.
Can anyone please explain to me how this makes sense?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Benzene Posted by: werely
» RE: Benzene Posted by: philame
» RE: Benzene Posted by: memerot
» RE: Benzene Posted by: qrswave
lightining - haha
Posted by: werely on Dec 14, 2005 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I told him I couldn't rule out his being hit by lightning in the next few moments, but he didn't seem amused."

-- you rock Josh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the nexus between neo-liberalism and militarism
Posted by: philame on Dec 14, 2005 1:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't wait to read about it.

and Josh does rock - he's over there working for his money (and in the right way, for us)!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks, and don't forget I'm working for you.
Posted by: JoshuaHolland on Dec 14, 2005 2:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't forget that your donations sent me here. If you want to know about a specific policy or position, put it in the comments and I'll get it for you if I can. Everyone who has any expertise is here, and many of them are accesible to the media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Feminist NGOs + cross-border solidarities
Posted by: philame on Dec 14, 2005 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to hear more about the feminist NGOs represented there and their issues.

Some info on cross-border solidarities between NGOs in richer and poorer countries - for example between ag NGOs from EU and Asia/Africa - would be great. Alliances between feminist org's across regions would also be interesting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A new media model? Posted by: JoshuaHolland
I would like to know about the intellectual property issues
Posted by: chaoslegs on Dec 14, 2005 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Particularly the drug patents, and those awful genetic ag patents mentioned in that other Alternet article today, "The Gene Rush."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great Point! Posted by: qrswave
Informative and much needed reporting...
Posted by: qrswave on Dec 15, 2005 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thanks!

especially liked the interview with the small farmer. just as I suspected negotiations are aimed at putting more power in big-agri hands.

They control the money supply and now they aim to control the food supply.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hooray for G110, hooray for Alternet!
Posted by: philame on Dec 16, 2005 1:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What great news! Wonder how this will get covered in the MSM?

I've said it before, but I'll say it again - sending Josh Holland was such a great idea on Alternet's part. Hope it happens again at other important global conferences. In fact, send someone to the next CEDAW meetings in New York!

Wish an Alternet journalist covered the BIG Beijing + 10 meetings in New York at the UN in Feb 2005. The Beijing Platform for Action meetings are the big int'l negotiations and benchmarking on progress on women's human rights. They happen every 5 years. The meetings last Feb also got hijacked, but by the US rep. Ellen Sauerbrey who stalled and threatened to shut down the whole process. The US attack on women's human rights needs more coverage and is very much linked to int'l trade. Think trafficking in women (as sex slaves, domestic slaves and so on), low-paid unmarried girl factory workers and sex tourism in general. The connections don't stop there.

The UN system is a zoo to naviagte, but the Committee on the Status of Women meets every year in New York to take stock and set new goals around the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). CEDAW and the Beijing meetings are closely related (both concern int'l women's rights), but slightly different in goals/actions. The next CEDAW meeting is January 16th-Feb 3rd 2006 in New York. Check it out.

If Alternet sends a journalist to cover what is happening now around protecting and furthering women's rights globally, then I'll forgive you for that horrendous stay-at-home feminists piece :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What happens to the people of developing nations...
Posted by: qrswave on Dec 17, 2005 6:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if this all falls apart?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eyewitness: My observations exactly
Posted by: julz2005 on Dec 18, 2005 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was as close to the HK convention centre as I could get last night. Stayed there for a couple of hours but couldn't get anywhere - the area was totally locked-down by hundreds of riot police.

These reports capture my experience here too: the media-exaggeration (especially the over-the-top local coverage: feels like the news angle was pre-written months ago), the weird police actions and preparations, and the whole feeling of the event.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]