Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

World Bank Bankrolls Global Air Pollution

By Matthew Wheeland, AlterNet. Posted September 26, 2002.


A new report details how the World Bank funds deadly incinerator projects worldwide, while World Bank officials oppose them in their own backyards.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Matthew Wheeland

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

This weekend marks the annual meeting of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank group in Washington, D.C. While protesters are gathering by the thousands, two environmental groups have released a report documenting the hypocrisy of World Bank policies toward funding incinerator-based waste-management projects.

The report, entitled "Bankrolling Polluting Technology: The World Bank and Incineration," was released on Sept. 25 by Essential Action and the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives/Global Anti-Incinerator Alliance (GAIA). It details the extent to which the World Bank approves funding for incinerator-based projects, even while it promotes the U.N. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs).

The Stockholm Convention, ratified in 2001, is a U.N. treaty that requires nations to minimize POPs with a goal toward their eventual elimination. Among the 12 POPs named in the treaty are dioxins and furans, chemical byproducts that are released in large quantities during waste incineration.

Incineration has been used for decades as the magic-bullet solution to disposing of otherwise persistent waste materials. However, as scientific studies on burning waste have shown, burning toxic wastes serves only to concentrate and distribute POPs in the long run, making them all the more deadly even while they are presumed to be removed.

"The World Bank doesn't have any clear reason to fund incinerators, and they need to get with the times: incinerators are a bad investment, a failed technology, and they create massive pollution." So says Stacy Malkan of Health Care Without Harm, an international environment and health organization.

Dioxins, for example, are widely recognized as the most toxic substance on the earth. Not only do they cause cancer, immune system damage, and many other reproductive and developmental problems, dioxins are known to accumulate in the fatty tissues of organisms and are not digested over time, meaning they end up in much of the food we eat, and then remain in our bodies. As a byproduct of manufacturing products containing chlorine, dioxin is an unnecessary and preventable toxic waste, and is the focus of considerable international attention. Poly-vinyl chloride, or PVC, is targeted as a primary producer of dioxin.

It has been estimated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other groups that incinerators are responsible for 69 percent of worldwide dioxin release. In the U.S., the EPA in 1993 labeled incinerators as the nation's leading source of dioxin pollution and urged the promotion of other ways to dispose of toxic wastes.

The international community is not ignorant of the dangers of incinerating toxic waste. In 1999, the Philippines passed the first national ban on incineration, and incinerators are banned in parts of Chile.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

With Obama Faltering, Do We Need Al Gore?
Election 2008: Just as George Bush needed Dick Cheney in 2000 to elevate his stature and status, Obama badly needs Gore.
By Stewart Lawrence, AlterNet. August 21, 2008.
Who Will Crash the Democratic and Republican Conventions?
Democracy and Elections: As a new generation of activists gears up to take to the streets in Denver and the Twin Cities, can they create democracy from outside?
By Michael Gould-Wartofsky, The Nation. August 21, 2008.
Russia and Georgia: All About Oil
ForeignPolicy: This struggle started when the former Soviet republics began seeking Western customers for their oil and natural gas.
By Michael T. Klare, Foreign Policy in Focus. August 21, 2008.

Advertisement