Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

Could Cheating Save a Relationship?

By Greta Christina, The Blowfish Blog. Posted July 17, 2008.


Cheating should never be the go-to solution. But what about as a last resort?
Advertisement

My column from last week, Is Cheating Ever Okay? -- the one suggesting that cheating in a sexless relationship might be morally defensible -- generated more comments than any other column I've written for this blog. By a considerable margin.

And based on the content of the comments, it seems as if I need to do some clarifying, and go into this in a little more detail. This is a complicated question -- that's the main point I'm trying to make, actually -- one that I'm still figuring out myself, and it's going to take more than a couple of blog posts to resolve it, even in my own mind. But I want to take a little time to explain what the heck I'm talking about, and address some of the main themes that came up in the replies.

First of all: Lots of people said, "Why don't you just talk about it with your partner? Don't go cheating. If you're not happy with your sex life, try to work it out."

Yes. Of course. I totally agree. It is no fair reneging on monogamy in a sexless marriage if you haven't told your partner there's a problem. I even said so in my original post (she said, trying to keep the peevish tone out of her voice). But apparently I didn't say it clearly enough, or at great enough length, or close enough to the top of the page, and it somehow got overlooked. So I'll say it again: If you're in a relationship where your partner has unilaterally turned off the sex, and you're considering cheating, you have some responsibilities. And one of those responsibilities is to make a scrupulous, good-faith effort to fix the sexual problems with your partner, and try to find a solution that works for both of you, before you go a-wandering.

What's more, you have to try hard, and you have to try more than once. If you tell your partner, "What's with the lack of sex?" and they say, "Yeah, well, I don't think I want to have sex anymore," you can't then shrug your shoulders and go running to the nearest singles bar or online hookup site. You have to make it very clear that this is a real problem for you, one that's making you unhappy. I'm not sure you should necessarily give them an "If you won't ever have sex with me again, I'll find someone who will" ultimatum -- in my experience, most people don't respond well to ultimatums -- but you have to make your feelings clear, and you have to keep trying. Cheating isn't a go-to solution. It's a last resort.

But what if you tell your partner there's a problem, and they aren't willing to talk about it? Or they don't see it as a problem, and aren't willing to do anything about it?

What would you do then?

Several other people pointed out that sometimes people's libidos go through temporary dry patches, due to childbirth or depression or other stressful situations. They argued that part of a longterm monogamous commitment is being willing to accept that, and to accept celibacy until things get better. And again, I quite agree. I even said so in my original post. (She said, again trying to keep the petulant, "Could you please at least read what I write before chiding me about it?" tone out of her voice. And failing, probably. Sorry about that.)

I'm not talking about that. I'm not talking about long but temporary dry spells. I'm talking about one partner unilaterally turning off the sex in a relationship -- permanently. Or at least, with no willingness to discuss it or deal with it, and no end in sight.

What would you do then?

And lots of people said things like, "Why cheat? Isn't open non-monogamy a better option?"

Yes. Of course it is.

But it's not always an available option.

Not everyone is willing to be non-monogamous. Or even to consider it. Some people apparently do think that, because they've given up on sex, their partner should, too. In the letters to the sex advice columnists on this topic, one of the themes that comes up a lot is that the partner who's turning off the tap thinks sex is something you do when you're younger, early on in the relationship; that the drying up of sexual desire is normal; and that it's unreasonable to expect or indeed want sex past a certain point.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: monogamy, relationships, cheating

Read more of Greta Christina at her blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Amen!
Posted by: jimtoevs on Jul 19, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my opinion, many good relationships are sacrificed on the alter of monogamy.

I can't speak for women, but as a Gay man I can tell you that in my experience, monogamy works in the early stages of a relationship, but at some point, monogamy gets in the way of an otherwise wonderful relationship between two people who really love each other.

If the relationship is strictly based on sex, then non-monogamy is a threat to the relationship. However, if the relationship is based on love, caring, mutual compatibility, and other things of which sex is a part, then why sacrifice the relationship simply because sex is no longer a part of it?

After three years into a ten year relationship, my partner and I both got sober. My libido was enhanced by sobriety, and his took a complete nosedive.

Fortunately, we were able to talk, and when I told him I was willing to relieve him of total responsibility of fulfilling my sexual needs, he was tremendously relieved, and we stayed together for another seven, relatively good years. At that point, he was unable to maintain his sobriety and went back to drinking, which ended the relationship.

I think it is important for us to look at the history of human monogamy. It appears to me to be a relatively new concept which is observed by almost no one, and is used by religion to create guilt and shame as a method of control over the religion's adherents.

Jim Toevs

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Amen! Posted by: Russ Wellen
Really helpful series
Posted by: PressurePoint on Jul 19, 2008 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to thank Greta for expanding this dialog. In our age where the Christian right has attempted to silence all sexual discussion and force their mores on America (ie, FDAs footdragging on HPV vaccines) thoughtful discussion is more important than ever. Like sex, cheating is going to happen. Those who have crossed the line or are thinking about it need as many viewpoints as possible so they're better able to make an informed decision. Sticking one's head in the sand may be a way of life for some of us, but I prefer to know whats really going on in the world and how thoughtful people handle a tough and touchy moral issue like this one. Thanks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another view
Posted by: ppp1 on Jul 19, 2008 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know this is going to make people go through the roof, but here it goes: I don't think what's know as "cheating" in a relationship is inherently wrong, period--in fact, I think the very use of the word itself reflects a bias.

It should be noted that the word "cheating," as it is used in relationships, means something different that it means in most other contexts. Cheating usually means depriving somebody of something that's rightfully theirs, or gaining an unfair advantage over somebody in some way. Examples would be a corrupt union giving its members less money than they're entitled to, or an athlete taking steroids to give him/herself an advantage over other players.

In the case of relationships, "cheating" means something different. It means breaking a promise. Well, it's not necessarily wrong to break a promise. It depends on what the promise is. I think that the right to have consensual sexual relationships with others is a fundamental human freedom, like freedom of speech or religion. In law, an agreement to do an illegal act is not binding to begin with. I don't think a promise to give up a personal freedom (in this case, to have sex with other people) is binding to begin with either. I do, however, think that if someone is going to do such a thing, they have an obligation to take steps to protect their partner against venereal diseases.

It's interesting that the word "cheating" is almost never used to describe breaking a promise, even one concerning marriage, that doesn't involve sex. What if a married couple agreed, as part of their marriage "contract," that they would never get divorced? Does that mean that if one of them later wants a divorce, they can't do it because of the promise? Is one partner "cheating" on the other by divorcing them? What if they agree to never stay out past midnight? If one deliberately doesn't come home until 2 am, are they "cheating," and is doing so immoral?

Your article and position about this reminds me of when states would allow divorce, but only under certain conditions, like adultery or desertion. That's better than not allowing divorce at all, but I think people have the right to divorce just because they want to. Likewise, I think your article raised valid points, but it didn't go far enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have you seen the number of swingers' groups online now?
Posted by: Fog on Jul 19, 2008 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheating isn't new and swinging isn't new, but every person has to start this whole moral debate with themselves from scratch, coming to terms with their own libido, self esteem and moral position on the scale between celibacy and swinging, much of which is dictated by their parents' religious background.

Since I have no religious guilt, the only concerns with full on open everything I have are STD's and broken personal promises. Between consenting and aware adults there's absolutely no moral hinderances to sleeping with whomever and how many you care to. Monogamy is an artifact of jealousy and control.

There is no such thing as a relationship where both people are perfectly matched libido-wise all the time. Sexual release is a fundamental aspect of our being a reproductive being and sexual frustration is a major player in bringing down relationships. Sexual variety is a fundamental genetic drive as well.

Being shy is a temporary state of mind, and a handicap in living life. Drop your hang ups and join your local swingers' club and have FUN while you are living, for their ain't no orgies in heaven and you'll have missed out on all the fun!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Open Dialogue, Open Minds
Posted by: leener on Jul 19, 2008 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This discussion has come at an interesting time in my 15 year marriage. My husband and I have decided to start dating other people outside the marriage. We're not splitting up, we actually love each other very much and we have great sex. But we're also both very vibrant, exuberant, involved people who just enjoy meeting new people. Becoming close with others and sharing a certain level of intimacy is such an amazing experience. I liken it to people who have like 8 or 10 or 12 kids; they always say that they love them all equally, just differently. I can believe that because that's how we both feel about the people we are intimate with.
Learning to integrate and balance this new portion of our lives can be challenging sometimes, but we have become so close, so much closer than I ever imagined, because we are so honest with each other about who we really are inside. It's not just about sex. I have a friend whose husband forbids her to even have coffee alone with male colleagues from work! From my perspective, it's about trust and freedom from the control of another person. We went through that already and I won't subjugate myself to another ever again. No one should ever have that power.
I think straight couples can learn alot from the gay community as open, non-monogamous relationships are far more acceptable within gay society. Marriage especially has been laden with so much crap from religion and social ideology, and complicated by Disney princess syndrome,it's surprising the divorce rate isn't 100%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Open Dialogue, Open Minds Posted by: GoddessLissa
You're batting for the wrong team
Posted by: Love Me, I'm a Liberal on Jul 21, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When misogynists really like your posts, you're doing something wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marriage was invented...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Jul 25, 2008 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To unite royalty, and thereby sovereign nations. For a long time, it was not really important that the general population participated in what was not much more than ceremony and symbolism. For some, marriage represents commitment, for others, subjugation. From my perspective, the primary cause of divorce IS marriage. If you've always wanted children, maybe it's best that you get married so as to avoid stigmatizing the kids. But isn't this idea pretty well outdated? Y'all need to recover and do whatever is necessary to live well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Human relationships are not sacred
Posted by: nfamous on Jul 28, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with relationships in this country is that most people are raised by religion. Religion teaches us that marriage is sacrosanct. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Man made it up just like all of religion. Humans are just intelligent mammals. That's all. We are part of this Earth whether we want to be or not. It's almost as if we think we are too good to have come from the other creatures that inhabit this planet. We aren't. We spend all of our lives fighting our own instincts only to realize too late that human instinct is what got us this far. If you want to spend the rest of your life with one person that's fine. The vast majority of people, male and female, are not programmed that way by nature. We've made so much technological progress in such a short time that we've mistakenly assumed that we also made an equivalent amount of evolutionary progress. Wrong. Evolution is slow. We are what we are and that's all that we are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not getting it at home
Posted by: rerses on Jul 28, 2008 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When there is no sex at home, the deprived spouse is justified in finding some love and affection outside the marriage;however, there is always the risk that one will form an emotional/romantic bond with the outside person which would dom the marriage. For years my wife "had a headache." Now that I am getting ready to leave her because I am in love with another woman she has rediscovered her interest in sex,but the lack of sex wasn't our only problem. I am leaving to be with the woman I love.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not getting it at home Posted by: GoddessLissa