Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

9 Ways to Halt the Right Wing Culture Wars and Bring Sanity to Sexual Policy

By David Rosen, CounterPunch. Posted December 3, 2008.


We have a unique opportunity to overturn the perverse agenda of the Religious Right.
Advertisement

 

The recent electoral victory of Barack Obama and the Democratic party presents a unique opportunity to overturn the most perverse policy of the Bush administration and the religious right, the conservative repressive sexual agenda. The following nine proposals can help frame a new sexual agenda to be introduced in the first 100 days.

For the last three decades the religious right fought a take-no-prisoners war over popular morality. Taking power with Bush’s victory in 2000, Christian conservatives were finally in the position to impose their beliefs as public policy. And they did so with a vengeance. At the local, state and federal levels, religious zealots, working through the Republican party, took control of the apparatus of the State and aggressively implemented a diverse set of programs to further their goal of creating a morally upstanding, Christian society. Family life, sexual relations, education, scientific knowledge and popular entertainment became battlegrounds of

the culture wars.

The culture wars played a decisive role in the 2000 and 2004 elections, but were eclipsed in the 2006 Congressional elections, the religious right’s moral fervor spent. While sex issues were all but absent from the 2008 national presidential campaign, they did help rally the conservative faithful at the state level. Efforts to outlaw gay marriage were successful in Arizona (Proposition 102), California (Proposition 8)and Florida (Marriage Protection Amendment) as was Arkansas’ Proposed Initiative Act No. 1 that prohibits co-habiting couples of the same sex, whether gay or straight, from either adopting a child or serving as foster parents.

Nevertheless, efforts in Colorado (Amendment 45) and South Dakota (Initiated Measure 11) to, respectively, establish “fetal personhood” and ban abortion failed. And in Washington, voters approved a proposition permitting physician-assisted suicide similar to one already in force in Oregon. In 2008, it was the collapsing economy, failed Bush policies and culture-war fatigue as well as Obama’s broad popular appeal that turned the tide for the Democrats.

The Democratic landslide provides a unique opportunity for Congress and the President-elect to quickly address at least one of the many profound failings of the Bush administration, its repressive sex policies. The following proposals can help frame the upcoming battle for political reform and, hopefully, finally put an end to the religious right’s culture wars.

* * *

Proposal #1: Safeguard Roe v Wade

President-elect Obama was a co-sponsor of the 2007 Senate version of the Freedom of Choice Act (S. 1173) that would reaffirm Roe as a fundamental right. As he stated: “Throughout my career, I've been a consistent and strong supporter of reproductive justice, and have consistently had a 100% pro-choice rating with Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America.” Congress should pass and Obama should sign the Freedom on Choice Act.

If enacted, the law would effectively overturn many state and federal restrictions imposed over the last eight years on a woman’s ability to choose an abortion. In particular, the Act would lift requirements on health-care providers to provide questionable medical “information” about the risks of having an abortion; lift restrictions limiting abortion providers to only licensed physicians; lift parental-notification and approval requirements for minors seeking an abortion; and overturn the dubiously-named “partial-birth abortions” laws.

One of the critical features of the Roe decision was establishing personhood at the moment of birth. As evident in Colorado voters’ rejection of the “fetal personhood” proposition, the notion of personhood at the moment of conception is a veiled attempt to undercut Roe. Medico-scientific advances are pushing the moment of birth earlier and earlier before full-term is reached, with an increasing number of ever-smaller preemies living healthy lives. This is a remarkable accomplishment and should only strengthen the need to ensure that personhood remains at birth.

Proposal #2: End Abstinence Policies

The Bush administration’s abstinence-only crusade is a failure. Mounting research data indicates an upswing in pregnancy among teen girls, including Sarah Palin’s daughter, Bristol, and that the abstinence-only policy must be replaced. Abstinence-only education contributes to unwanted pregnancies, oftentimes leading to unwanted abortions. According to the ACLU, the federal government has spent more than $700 million since 1997 on abstinence-only programs and, last year, allocated approximately $170 million to such programs.

Obama once insisted: “As President, I will improve access to affordable health care and work to ensure that our teens are getting the information and services they need to stay safe and healthy.” Democrats need to take Obama at his word and quickly move to end funding for existing abstinence-only programs and implement a more humane, sex-positive and age- appropriate educational programs.

In addition, humane sex education is only half the challenge in addressing the needs of teens and young people regarding their sexual health. The monies that have been wasted on abstinence-only programs should be more wisely spent on providing health care screenings and, where appropriate, birth control materials. A young person needs to be supported in terms of both her/his mind and body for an effective sex education program to work.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, religious right, bush era, sexual agenda

David Rosen is the author of the forthcoming, "America's Grand Sex Scandals: From Pochontas to George W. Bush" (Key, 2009), and can be reached at drosen@ix.netcom.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Halting the Culture Wars?
Posted by: armorypk on Dec 3, 2008 12:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I wholeheartedly agree with all your proposals, I fail to see how their implementation would silence or calm the right wing. Indeed, I'd wager that you would be rekindling their militancy and resolve. (Not that that's any reason to refrain from enacting such a progressive (and sane) agenda.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Halting the Culture Wars? Posted by: luzmejor
do we really want to make pornography and prostitution more acceptable?
Posted by: Suzon on Dec 3, 2008 2:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After Chomsky created a stir by allowing Hustler to print an article of his (he didn't know what the magazine was), he stated that pornography degrades women. I'd add that it degrades men as well.

In a world where everyone had a fair share of resources, prostitution would not exist--it is the result of inequality and poverty. I'd much rather see a guaranteed minimum income, not decriminalization.

Sex (especially with someone you know and like) is great. But buying and selling it is sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Really! Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: You said it right here. Posted by: Plexius2
» True enough - you didn't! Posted by: LeeAnnG
» I agree! Posted by: LeeAnnG
» Sexuality is degraded Posted by: samba
You know any sex workers
Posted by: corgyn on Dec 3, 2008 3:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are incapable of understanding this but there are plenty of men and women that enjoy careers as sex workers. I know HDHs [high-dollar hotties, a term used to denote a private expensive career hooker] that have been in the biz since the late 80s - twenty years. They have homes, investments, a certain level of power. College educated and with lives full of possible opportunities they chose sex work for the fulfillment it gives them. It's $10-15K to get this level escort for a weekend, a grand or more for a dinner. Some of these women have clients that have been seeing them a decade or more.

I should note that for several years I did escort websites and provided adult content for porn sites. Most people have no idea how big this business is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sex work: Exploitation Posted by: rickiey
» Corgyn, you should know... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
What is to accomplished with repressive sexual policies?
Posted by: douglashoyt on Dec 3, 2008 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People have the right to engage in any type of sexual behavior with another consenting adult.

However, the real aim of sexual policies is to favor one group over another.

But is not this a good idea?

Shouldn't economic and social policies favor the intelligent over the idiots, the healthy over the sick, the strong over the weak?

And to what degree?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

#10 - Let men wear what they want ?
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 3, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women can wear anything they want and have made inroads into men's fashion. Yet, unless you're some "superhero" or some entertainment crap, you can't do it vice versa unless you wanna be persecuted and called "gay" or the likes.

P.S.: As the weather gets colder, I'm more likely to wear tights under my pants. I sure can feel what hell women go through to make themselves attractive and I haven't even tried wearing skirts or high heels.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do you need a dictionary?
Posted by: AlexaD on Dec 3, 2008 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Equating voluntary sex work to "exploitation" is to defile the damaging experiences of those who are truly exploited. Please grow up and learn to use the word appropriately.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Didn't you know? Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Six problems with that
Posted by: rickiey on Dec 3, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Proposal #1: Safeguard Roe v Wade

No, stupid. RVW was a flawed Supreme Court decision, and as long as it is the guiding abortion law, the right to choose is always in jeopardy. It is time to pass the legislation affirming the right to choose, correctly, and permanently.

Proposal #2: End Abstinence Policies

And end all school sex ed policies. They are counterproductive. Or government, via schools, are neither competent nor has the responsibility to, parent children. And sex ed comes under parenting, not education.


Proposal #4: Accept Civil Unions & Marriage among Same-Sex Couples

A couple spots of trouble here:

1. Civil unions aren't enough.
2. Obama is against gay marriage.
3. Apparrently the populace is against gay marriage, (per the last election anyway).

Perhaps the Supreme Court can handle this one.

Proposal #7: Decriminalize & Regulate Commercial Sex


Just to clarify what you are suggesting, you want to decriminalize prostitution because the government shouldn't be able to tell a woman what she can and can't do with her body, but in the same breath you are suggesting that the government regulate it?

Proposal #8: Develop Better Diagnostic, Treatment & Incarceration Methods for Sex Offenders

Really? How very open-minded and empathetic of you. Call me flawed if you will, but I'm going to have to side with the conservative "kill em all" stance on hat one.

There are some crimes that transcend the concepts of "served his time" or "rehabilitated". Sex crimes affect their victims for the rest of their lives. Forgiveness is not an option.

Proposal #9: Reform, Extend & Strengthen PEPFAR


Have you seen the balance sheet on our country lately? Sure, I would support this idea if we were in a budget surplus. We are NOT. Borrowing money from china to give to Africa, is a nice idea, but frankly, it is stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Six problems with that Posted by: Red State Gal
Legalize prostitution? Allow child porn on the net? Guarantee partial-birth abortion? Okie...
Posted by: Jasonix on Dec 3, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, this is a quite a wish list. This author must really want a re-invigorated Religious Right. Maybe the author fears that the Religious Right will fade away, leaving him with nothing to write about.

The author also misrepresents Obama on abortion. Obama has stated unambiguously that he sees nothing wrong with bans on partial-birth abortion as long as there is a "health of the mother" clause. I also can't see Obama legalizing child porn or prostitution. That'd be political suicide. I'm sure that Obama won't be appointing any anti-contraception veterinarians to women's health commissions, or basing climate change policy on the imminent return of Christ, but I really doubt Obama sees Amsterdam as the template for Change.

Obama needs every bit of political capital he has to deal with more pressing matters. Devoting his first two weeks to horrifying the American public would be a serious mistake to say the least. By 2010, it'll be clear that Obama is the president who has to tell Americans that for the rest of their lives they're going to have to make do with less. Think it'll be easier to do that after coming off the heels of controversial proposals to legalize prostitution? Obama's already going to have convince Americans that there will be no "drill baby drill" solutions to their nose-diving lifestyles and that we're going to have to change the way we live - more local, less travel, less monster homes. The Repubs will be back with a candidate promising to restore the SUVs, the non-stop shopping, the credit binges, etc. Want Obama facing down Palin or Jindal in 2012 after staging a photo-op at a Nevada brothel?

With two Obama terms, access to abortion in the first two trimesters of pregnancy, civil unions for gays, and maybe, just maybe, the decriminalization of pot may be secured. But legalized prostitution and child porn? Don't hold your breath - and why the hell would you want to?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You loose my interest when you label those who oppose your views "perverse."
Posted by: davidhhahn on Dec 3, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me you are playing the same, partisan, divisive game by labeling me, and other reasonable poeple, as "perverse" because we have a different view of morality and sexuality then you.

Many folks have written thoughtfully on both sides of this issues here; but using "perverse" those with whom you disagree does nothing to resolve anything on these political issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Wrong Name, Spammer...
Posted by: Crazy H on Dec 3, 2008 5:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought you were "Jeff" or sometimes "Jess"

Is it true that all spammers have little dicks?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They left off my favorite
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Dec 3, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalize marijuana. Perhaps all other drugs as well.

Imagine if they stopped spending the gagillions that they spend on the WAR ON DRUGS and instead sold pot legally and taxed it.

That would save the economy in a heartbeat!

Granny's crazy videos = Go get a chuckle!

Luv,
Granny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Happy seasons, Grandma Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: Happy seasons, Grandma Posted by: Grandma Crabby
mjlax
Posted by: mjlax on Dec 3, 2008 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, this cultre "war" isn't something that's going to go away sometime soon, or as I believe, at all. It'll be here indefinately, as long as there are people who in essence don't have an satisfying inner (emotional) life and need to control others at all costs.
The last 30 years has seen these people flexing their newfound political muscle, via whatever media available, to the detriment of the country as a whole.
The Texas village idiot that's leaving in January, is just one in a long line of these. If it weren't for the money & power his family had/has, he wouldn't be fit to clean sewers. He's both a dis-ease and symptom of people I described before.
One needs to be ever vigilant for them and anybody remotely like them, so as a nation and culture there might be all inclusive social change for everyone, not just one small group within a country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Um
Posted by: maddy on Dec 3, 2008 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel bad for posting this, but...

Were Alternet's proofreaders on holiday for this one?

I was distracted by all the typos.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Um Posted by: hardwroc
» RE: Um Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: Um Posted by: maddy
» RE: Um Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Um Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Um Posted by: LeeAnnG
Prostitution
Posted by: SjrBoomz on Dec 3, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..is a very complicated issue.

On the one hand, we want to protect women and girls who are thrown into the life of prostitution against their own will.

On the other hand, we want to protect the freedom of adult and consenting women and men to do as they wish with their own bodies.

In my view, "pimping" should be considered a criminal activity. Pimps sell the bodies of other human beings. This is not acceptable.

Prostitution, without pimps, I have no real issue with. I personally find the idea of a woman selling her body repugnant, but it is not my place to tell another woman that she is repugnant if she does this of her own free will. If a woman takes part in the sex trade, of her own free will, and does not feel degraded in doing so, that is her prerogative and no one has any right to tell her she cannot do so. But those women who are forced into the trade, either by violence or poverty, and who do feel degraded by the acts they perform need to be protected. This is why we must eliminate PIMPS, not prostitutes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pandering is illegal Posted by: GuitarBill
» Define "pimping" Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Define "pimping" Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Prostitution Posted by: Red State Gal
Totally agree with the Pot comments above
Posted by: SjrBoomz on Dec 3, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The legalization of marijuana is definitely a pressing issue. Canada (my home and native land) also spends billions of dollars a year on fighting potheads. It's stupid. Over 80% of the people in our prisons are Aboriginal.. the vast majority of the crimes these people are incarcerated for are drug-related, mostly weed. I know just as many white potheads - myself being one of them - as Aboriginals and other ethnic minorities (which make up the majority of the other -20%). Not only is it totally unfair to lock up far more minorities and Aboriginals for the same "crime" that their many white friends and neighbours commit.. but it's ridiculous to lock anyone up for this "crime" in the first place!

Potheads aren't hurting anyone. Alcohol is perfectly legal in both of our countries, despite the fact that the vast majority of violent crimes are committed under the influence of alcohol. Has anyone here even heard of ONE violent crime committed by a person influenced by marijuana that was not also drunk? I haven't.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How it can stop
Posted by: fbear0143 on Dec 3, 2008 1:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really believe that when you begin to raid the treasury, so to speak, the government gets really uncomfortable. Therefore, if state or federal laws are passed that legally define the beginning of personhood as occurring at conception, then in the face of a supreme court hostile to any aoternatives, we must demand that the IRS and state tax agencies immediately grant a tax exemption to every fetus, in the year of conception, whether or not the fetus gets carried to term. That will shut a few people up on this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aggrement with all but one important statistic wrong
Posted by: lunamina on Dec 3, 2008 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree with the items explained in the article: 9 Ways to Halt the Right Wing Culture Wars and Bring Sanity to Sexual Policy, By David Rosen, CounterPunch. Posted December 3, 2008, I disagree with an important statistic, i.e., the one postulated in the following comment:"Medico-scientific advances are pushing the moment of birth earlier and earlier before full-term is reached, with an increasing number of ever-smaller preemies living healthy lives." Let me set some people straight. A very large percentage of the infants saved by these methods, never lead a full life free from medical intervention. Sadly, the majority of these youngsters have to be supported medically THEIR ENTIRE LIVES. This of course costs their families, and mostly society, TRILLIONS of dollars. And, of course, most of the preemies saved in this way have parents who are wealthy or who have 'premium' health insurance. Noteable by the fact that the US has the worst record among first world nations in healthy childbirth statistics. At a time when our population could, very easily, become the final straw that will lead to catastrophic loss of life on this planet. YES, we need all the things outlined in this article. BUt nothing else could do more to improve the standard of living in the world today than reducing birth rates. We also must realize that saving lives is a moral imperative...but where is our moral imperative with saving the species. This is an important part of the discussion that so often is side-stepped by people too afraid to mention it. Yes it is heartbreaking to lose a child...how about an entire civilization! Add to this the other statistics about women's health, i.e, too, too many unnecessary procedures like DNC's, caesarean births, attacking breast cancers when it is unnecessary...I could go on. Just putting a stop to these kinds of things could do also do a lot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who is raising our children?
Posted by: Life of Illusion on Dec 3, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a parent, I would oppose ANY law allowing my child to have a medical procedure done without my knowledge. My child is MY responsibility. By removing parental-notification, you would remove my ability to deal with life's lessons.
And to me, this would lead to children feeling there is no problem with teen-age pregnancy. A pregnant 12 year old IS a problem. Making it so they can have an abortion without their parents even knowing is asking for trouble. What if that child was raped? Who will protect her?

I suppose you feel the school can do a better job of dealing with this than her parents. She sure learned a lot in her sex-ed classes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

skin iz skin, luv is love and fun ixxxxzzzzz fun
Posted by: caru on Dec 3, 2008 5:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let us be free with our bodies ... start with the heart and all else will follow.


love to you lovers of all stripes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mike
Posted by: MichaelODonoghue on Dec 4, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remove the "under God" nonsense from the Flag Pledge — or remove the whole Pledge business from schools. It reeks of fascism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "In God We Trust" Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: "In God We Trust" Posted by: TheNamelessCity
The culture wars are fought with ideas
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 4, 2008 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First comes the conservative idea that if you keep teenagers stoopid about sex, a few of them will goof up and feel super-guilty for the rest of their lives, and the others will learn a hard lesson from the goofups' mistakes.

Maybe torturing our own kids, setting a few up to fail, isn't sane.


Second comes the idea of cutting people off, ostracism, and you're going to hell for good measure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]