Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

The War on Drugs Is Really a War on Minorities

By Arianna Huffington, Los Angeles Times. Posted March 27, 2007.


Democratic presidential candidates crave the Latino and black vote, but ignore the Drug War's unfair toll on people of color.
03272007story
03272007story
Advertisement

There is a subject being forgotten in the 2008 Democratic race for the White House.

While all the major candidates are vying for the black and Latino vote, they are completely ignoring one of the most pressing issues affecting those constituencies: the failed "war on drugs" -- a war that has morphed into a war on people of color.

Consider this: According to a 2006 report by the American Civil Liberties Union, African Americans make up an estimated 15% of drug users, but they account for 37% of those arrested on drug charges, 59% of those convicted and 74% of all drug offenders sentenced to prison. Or consider this: The U.S. has 260,000 people in state prisons on nonviolent drug charges; 183,200 (more than 70%) of them are black or Latino.

Such facts have been bandied about for years. But our politicians have consistently failed to take action on what has become yet another third rail of American politics, a subject to be avoided at all costs by elected officials who fear being incinerated on contact for being soft on crime.

Perhaps you hoped this would change during a spirited Democratic presidential primary? Unfortunately, a quick search of the top Democratic hopefuls' websites reveals that not one of them -- not Hillary Clinton, not Barack Obama, not John Edwards, not Joe Biden, not Chris Dodd, not Bill Richardson -- even mentions the drug war, let alone offers any solutions.

The silence coming from Clinton and Obama is particularly deafening.

Obama has written eloquently about his own struggle with drugs but has not addressed the tragic effect the war on drugs is having on African American communities.

As for Clinton, she flew into Selma, Ala., to reinforce her image as the wife of the black community's most beloved politician and has made much of her plan to attract female voters, but she has ignored the suffering of poor, black women right in her own backyard.

Located down the road from her Chappaqua, N.Y., home are two prisons housing female inmates, Taconic and Bedford. Forty-eight percent of the women in Taconic are there for nonviolent drug offenses; 78% of those in the prison are African American or Latino.

And Bedford, the state's only maximum-security prison for women, is home to some of the worst victims of New York's draconian Rockefeller-era drug laws -- mothers and grandmothers whose first brush with the law resulted in their being locked away for 15 years or more on nonviolent drug charges.

Yet even though these prisons are so nearby, Clinton has turned a blind eye to the plight of the women locked away there, notably refusing to speak out on their behalf.

Avoidance of this issue comes at a very stiff price (and not just the more than $50 billion a year we're spending on the failed drug war). The toll is paid in shattered families, devastated inner cities and wasted lives (with no apologies for using that term).

During the 10 years I've been writing about the injustice of the drug war, I've repeatedly watched as politicians paid lip service to the problem but then ducked as the sickening status quo claimed more victims. In California, of the 171,000 inmates jamming the state's wildly overcrowded prisons, 36,000 are nonviolent drug offenders.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: race, election08, war on drugs

Find more Arianna at the Huffington Post.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's RACISM!
Posted by: Temporary on Mar 27, 2007 12:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pure and simple! White people drink alcohol, blacks and coloreds smoke weed! Both are equally as harmful, yet alcohol and even tobacco are not banned. WHY???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's Prohibition Posted by: edith
» RE: It's Prohibition Posted by: pingoo
» RE: It's RACISM! Posted by: Poe
» RE: It's RACISM! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» 15% of the population Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: 15% of the population Posted by: pingoo
» My apologies Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: My apologies Posted by: Lauren
» RE: My apologies Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: My apologies Posted by: Chris420
» RE: My apologies Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: My apologies Posted by: Chris420
» The gateway Posted by: slydad
» RE: The gateway Posted by: ALANHESTER
» Thank You Posted by: slydad
» Oh like you do. . . Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Oh like you do. . . Posted by: slydad
» fear Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: It's RACISM! Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RACISM! Hmmm! Posted by: derfb1
» RE: RACISM! Hmmm! Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: I'm white, I don't drink. I smoke weed. Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: It's RACISM! Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: You're ignorant Posted by: ateo
» RE: It's RACISM! Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Good points Posted by: ateo
» RE: It's RACISM! Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: It's RACISM! Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Get off the phone, you idiot!! Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: Marijuana harmful? Posted by: Topaz
You people are crazy
Posted by: Colton on Mar 27, 2007 12:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't you all know what the unemployment % would be if all those worthless people were not in jail? How the heck are we supposed to give people faith in our imaginary economy if you start casting shadows of doubt? All this money isn't going to levitate on it's bootstraps by itself !

/sarcasm off

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You people are crazy Posted by: pingoo
» 75% unemployment rate... Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon
» RE: 75% unemployment rate... Posted by: cardboardurinal
» RE: You people are crazy Posted by: pingoo
» RE: You people are crazy Posted by: Colton
» RE: You people are crazy Posted by: hms2004
» RE: You people are crazy Posted by: Colton
RACISM in America continues
Posted by: thinkverybig on Mar 27, 2007 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's plain and simple. White America still controls everything and is envy and jealous of the Black Man or anyone with pigmention. Throughout history white folks have raped, killed, conquered, destroyed, enslaved, hung, murdered, you name it and they've done it. Why should we believe that racism has stopped. But.... it won't last for long. The time is coming where you start to reap what you have sown.... and I can feel it in the air.

Our judicial system is RACIST.... Our political System is RACIST and so on.... This country won't be all it can be until white folks are OUT OF POWER................. Plain and Simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Uncle Tom Stawman Posted by: edith
» What's wrong with you man? Posted by: slydad
» RE: What's wrong with you man? Posted by: ALANHESTER
» Idiotic response Posted by: ISlamIslam
» Not really Posted by: ISlamIslam
» Absolutely Posted by: ISlamIslam
» RE: Absolutely Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: ACISM in America continues Posted by: thinkverybig
» RE: ACISM in America continues Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: ACISM in America continues Posted by: peacefullaim
» RACISM in America continues Posted by: derfb1
» RE: YOU are the racist Posted by: ateo
» RE: Jealous of what? Posted by: ateo
» I am only jealous of one thing Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE:Let the self flaggelation begin Posted by: OhioPatriot
Nixon's War on Blacks and Hippies
Posted by: lessbread on Mar 27, 2007 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Smoke and Mirrors: The War on Drugs and the Politics of Failure

The White House lived by the principles of the southern strategy, and Dent's office had its own lingo. There were issues that mattered to "our" people, and those that mattered to "their" people. "Their" people were what the White House called "the young, the poor, and the black." The phrase rolled off the tongue like one word: theyoungthepoorandtheblack. The young were the longhaired student antiwar types for whom the president had open and legendary contempt; the poor and the black were leftover concerns from the Great Society.

Brownell daily read a dozen newspapers from around the country and clipped stories that played on those themes. He looked for stories about badly managed social programs, watched for currents of localized resentment, combed the columns for colorful quotes and juicy anecdotes the presidential speechwriters might use. He particularly kept an eye out for drug stories. Drugs were one thing the young, the poor, and the black all seemed to have in common.

Despite Nixon's assertion to the preelection Disneyland crowd that drugs were "decimating a generation of Americans," drugs were so tiny a public health problem that they were statistically insignificant: far more Americans choked to death on food or died falling down stairs as died from illegal drugs.

So Brownell was delighted that the media were inflating the story by melding the tiny "hard drug" herein threat with the widespread "soft drug".marijuana craze. Marijuana, Brownell knew, was a perfect focus for the anger against the antiwar counterculture that Nixon shared with "his people." Brownell dug out a-recent clip from Newsweek: "Whether picketing on campus or parading barefoot in hippie regalia, the younger generation seems to be telling [the middle-class American] that his way of life is corrupt, his goals worthless and his treasured institutions doomed. Logically enough, a good many middle-class-citizens tend to-resent the message."in an article Brownell might have penned himself, Newsweek identified the targets of that middle-class resentment this way: "The incendiary black militant and the welfare mother, the hedonistic hippie and the campus revolutionary." The young, the poor, and the black. Nixon couldn't make it illegal to be young, poor, or black, but he could crack down hard on the illegal drug identified with the counterculture.


Tobacco and alcohol 'are more dangerous than LSD'
Alcohol worse than ecstasy on shock new drug list
Scientists want new drug rankings

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't forget Reagan... Posted by: Sushi
» RE: Don't forget Reagan... Posted by: lessbread
RACE RACE RACE RACE RACE RACE 24-7 24-7 24-7!!!
Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties on Mar 27, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GOTTA KEEP THE PSEUDO-LEFT FOCUS ON RACE!
GOTTA KEEP THE PSEUDO-LEFT FOCUS ON RACE!
GOTTA KEEP THE PSEUDO-LEFT FOCUS ON RACE!

Now that the pseudoLeft has created a generation white-hating political warriors like the type who are democratic activists, alternet posters, etc, and now that the pseudoLeft has poisoned the well of Leftism as far as lower middle class whites are concerned, now the rich people can just kick back and let their pseudoLeft snowball momentum do the work.

As long as the rich folks can tie every worthwhile political idea (like ending the drug war) to RACE or Gender or Identity Politics (or any other identifiable pseudoLeft idea), then they have nothing to worry about, because that worthwhile political idea will go NOWHERE with white lower middle class america! Why? Because the pseudoLeft has already poisoned the well of leftism as far as the largest voting segment of americans are concerned. ANYTHING the PseudoLeft is associated with becomes ANATHEMA to a huge portion of lower middle class whites. Why? Because the Pseudoleft (such as alternet and its posters) have already demonized and attacked whites and in particular white males for so long that by now ANYTHING the pseudoLeft promotes is automatically rejected by most lower middle class whites -- just because the PseudoLeft switched the villain from the rich person to the white male, and in particular the lower middle class white male, i.e., the "redneck".

So do you pseudolefties really wanna end the drug war? OK, then STOP talking about ending it. Do not have anything to do with ending the drug war. Stop the anti-drug war propaganda. Because anything you touch will not find favor with lower middle class whites. Do not talk about ending the the drug war. Do not talk about the need for single payer healthcare. Do not talk about raising taxes on the upper class. Do not talk about the need for an indexed minimum wage starting at 10 dollars. Do not talk about minimum 5 weeks annual vacation.

Because america desperately needs all those things. And because of that, YOU pseudoLefties should stay far away from these ideas, because your touch is the touch of death for any good idea. Because you have already poisoned the well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» to further the analogy Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
» RE: to further the analogy Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Counter productive Posted by: ateo
» RE: Counter productive Posted by: hms2004
DON'T BLAME THE CANDIDATES
Posted by: gellero on Mar 27, 2007 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't blame them.,,the candidates have to pander to the majority and mass media. BLAME THE SO CALLED 'BLACK CAUCUS' and 'HISPANIC CAUCUS' for not taking a stand. And since when was Pres. Clinton so 'beloved' by the black community??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "Drug War" has failed...
Posted by: RON_KING on Mar 27, 2007 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... not only because prohibition never works, but because it has diverted crucial resources from solving the problems we CAN solve. Even in Law Enforcement, diversion of resources into the Drug War has left communities with fewer officers available for other crucial tasks.

It is time to end this prohibition and stop funding the smugglers and the DEA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A True National Disgrace
Posted by: drricklippin on Mar 27, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Arianna;

Add this to the willful (I believe criminal) "pushing" of licit psychotropic drugs by the drug companies onto the middle and upper classes including the rich and it compounds the immorality of this story.

(AnnnaNicole had NINE drugs in her body as per autopsy)

The presidential candidates should answer your good questions soon

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm white. I don't drink but I smoke weed.
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 27, 2007 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm white. I don't drink but I smoke weed. And I'm a 45 year old professional homeowner, taxpayer, yadda ya. NOBODY is gonna throw me in jail for smoking pot. But poor folks on public assistance.... straight to the slammer. So, it may be more "economic racism" than actually racism. Rich black folks aren't going to prison for smoking pot either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep thinking that Posted by: ateo
» Flightless Eagle Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Flightless Eagle Posted by: EagleMB
Urban Rebellions in 1968-early 1970s, roots of drug war in RACIST U.S.
Posted by: volscho on Mar 27, 2007 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is also what helped trigger this new organization of society. After MLK was assassinated, riots broke out in various cities, like Detroit. The rioters were poor African-Americans, economically and racially oppressed. Rebelling after being told to "wait their turn" and the slow pace of civil rights reforms, the white power structure told them to wait, but when you are suffering it is very difficult to wait (white power structure does not suffer and does not get it).

Irony. Civil Rights movement legally desegregated American society and guaranteed right to vote for African-Americans. The irony is that the massive incarceration of African-American men strips away the voting rights and other civil and human rights of a large fraction of this population. It is racial oppression.

Other dimensions: Militarization of domestic police force, cross-pollination of ideas, people, strategies, tactics, even weapons between U.S. armed forces and domestic police officers. The term "peace officer" seems quite foreign. Before the late 1960s, SWAT teams were unheard of. Community policing of ethnic groups in their own neighborhoods very common. (White glove officer, sometimes without a firearm) Impoverished neighborhoods (ghetto, slums, barrios) are now patrolled in military-like fashion by police commando units to "keep order" (all the while "white" kids in the suburbs use cocaine).

Other dimensions of social control: Sterilization of poor African-American, Latino, and Native American women (tubal litigation, norplant, depo provera injections) without woman's approval or making the women sign paperwork to "consent" while in labor. This is a form of Race Population Control.

These are some of the dimensions of how racism operates in the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alright Arianna.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Mar 27, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's one of the best articles I have read of yours in a while.

There are a few things you did not question though. The drug war is as much class warfare as it is racist. And another thing you failed to mention is that alot of latinos refuse to feed the system like whites by paying fines. It's a form of civil disobediance I find admirable. I spent some time in jail with a couple of mexican immigrants that would rather spend 60 or 90 days than pay a $100-200 fine for open container violations. Those guys did not know anything about Thoreau but acted with his zeal.

It's also funny that Sessions would make such a rational statement. Maybe there is some real hope for alabama.

Someone posted a link about the war on drugs recently that had a very important aspect about it all. The war on drugs leads to a disdain for the law thus making people more likely to break other laws. That hurts everybody more than the ill effects of drugs on some people. The war on drugs just brings more misery for everybody but a few cruel and heartless people.

If the american public had not accepted the unconstitutionality of the war on drugs, do you think they ever would have accepted the war on terror? It's terribly sad too many of us don't care or don't even understand the ideals in the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. To me the war on drugs seems so unamerican, but that's because I believe in the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence.

For over twenty years I've thought about how much nazi germany would have loved amerikas drug laws. Inform on your friend, your neighbor, your family. Distrust and fear will rule. Look at our modern day gestapo, who are they? They are the heavily armed stormtroopers called drug enforcement units. Is this freedom or is it oppression?

"“One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”

Martin Luther King Jr.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
» and the winner is..... Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: and the winner is..... Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
» And you just make sh*t Posted by: lessbread
» RE: And you just make sh*t Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: And you just make sh*t Posted by: lessbread
» RE: And you just make sh*t Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
» Well Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Well Posted by: EagleMB
» Well, just a little more Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: doneman2000
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: doneman2000
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: doneman2000
» RE: Alright Arianna. Posted by: EagleMB
LEAP........Law Enforcement Against Prohibition.....
Posted by: picket on Mar 27, 2007 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
members have seen first hand the DISASTER that prohibition has cost our citizens in lost lives alone. USA Drug Policy is severely flawed.

I read a couple months ago that Congress was expected to revisit sentencing laws. The disparity unfairly singles out largely the poor. 5 grams of crack =5 years....and 400grams of cocaine=5years.

I hate myself for watching COPS TV show but .......amazing to see the huge undercover pony-tailed detective crawl into a sewer to retrieve a small white pebble of a substance and act like he has saved the world.

2004 election everybody said Kerry understood .....JUST WAIT until he is elected...don't ask..DO NOT put him on the spot. Well this time ASK ALL CANDIDATES and soon. Do not waste my time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hey Obama, here's a chance to show you have a spine...
Posted by: schnoggi on Mar 27, 2007 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
oh never mind, keep shovelling platitudes to churchies, you'll make a fine VP to that hack Hillary. You have a real chance, but if you play it safe and inane like just about every other Dem pretty much ever, well, you won't be missed either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War on Drugs Funds Corrections Industry and Secret Police State
Posted by: mrtshw on Mar 27, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the war on drugs victimizes the young, the poor and the minority! That " secret " has been belabored for fifty years at least and has been obvious to everybody not on life support since 'pot' was demonized and valium wasn't. The real story of the War on Drugs is not the victim but those who benefit so handsomely from our idiotic drug policies.
As a psychotherapist and social activist for the past 40 years, my perspective has been defined by my work with countless 'crack heads', 'pot heads', and even more prescription drug addicts; especially those addicted to pschoactive drugs.
The reason the illicit addicts are subject to criminalization is because that's where the money is..... the money that pays for our grotesquely corrupt corrections industry; that pays the " unreported/untaxed " income ' supplements' of our grotesquely corrupt criminal justice system and that pads the 'cash flow' of our grotesquely corrupt political system from neighborhood ward captains to the " pillars " of our Corporatocracy.
The War on Drugs has also proved very helpful as an ' underground ' funding resource for the US 'closet' government's CIA murders, genocides, Carlyle Group arms trades, House of Saud oil scams, Henry Kissinger secret alliances, APAIC-Sponsored/ Lieberman-Zionist maneuvers to murder innocent Palestians, Egyptians, Iranians. Lebonese,Syrians,Jordanians,etc., South American coups.
Finally, the GOP elephant in the room not often mentioned is the vital role the War on Drugs has played in distracting us
" American Idols " idolaters from the currently approved addictions: alcohol, tobacco, Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Oxycontin, Demoral, Sugary/Transfat laden Junk Food,Heterosexual Kinkiness if a Democrat, Gay Porno Sex if a homophobic Republican, Missionary Sex with the lights off if a straight Republican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

leagalize it and tax it
Posted by: eosrk on Mar 27, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that would free up all that mess from law enforcement so that they can focus on the real crooks, espically those in government!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: leagalize it and tax it Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Why stop there? Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: leagalize it and tax it Posted by: peacefullaim
wrong tact
Posted by: lamar on Mar 27, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an issue of personal liberty. Making it about race or immigration cannot possibly help convince law-and-order conservatives that the drug war is a failed policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wrong tact Posted by: Topaz
» RE: wrong tact Posted by: efficacy
To quote the late Bill Hicks...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 27, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its not a war on drugs, its a war on personal freedom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A question of anedotal evidence
Posted by: DJFedder on Mar 27, 2007 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I do not disagree with Ms Huffington's statistical information about whom is arrested, and jailed for drug use I do believe it misses a point brought forward by other commentators.
Is it poor folks or colored folks who are arrested. I am reminded of a statistical study I read just last week that inferred that given like circumstance color in a non-defining characteristic in judging who may or who has committed crime. (except for murder, which actually can fit into the paradigm if you remove Crack related murders).
I for one would really like to see a statistical study done that used economic benchmarks, instead of skin color benchmarks, to determine which drug users go to jail and which ones do not.
Call me a socialist, and let me paraphrase, Its about capatalism stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A question of anedotal evidence Posted by: Revolutionary
» Anecdotes Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Anecdotes Posted by: EagleMB
Jim Crow
Posted by: Revolutionary on Mar 27, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are wrong. The 21st century manifestation of Jim Crow is the spate of antigay "marriage protection amendments" to state constitutions and this Jim Crow is backed mostly by the same people as the old Jim Crow; the controlling majority of southerners who are inbred morons, willfully ignorant crackers, and meanspirited religious fanatics

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's quite simple really
Posted by: cletus on Mar 27, 2007 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a responsible drug user who has getting into many of unspeakable things for 20 plus years now the difference between users is wealth not skin color(as if one has nothing to do with the other right,but forget that for a moment)a white middle class kid gets prescribed drugs which are for the most part dealt from the pharm. companys.Now people such as myself we buy from personal dealers but as a kid I bought many drugs of the streets,running the risk of getting caught or for lack of a better term "getting caught up in the game" and being snitched on o remember prescribed drugs ok-illegal drugs BAD!Transltion its ok to do drugs as long as big pharm gets theirs,one reason you'll never see marijuana legalized because with it who needs A.D.D. drugs or anti-depressants.junkies buy heroin people with problems get oxy-contin,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1