Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Women and the New Economic Revolution

By Avivah Wittenberg-Cox and Alison Maitland, Jossey-Bass/Wiley. Posted June 9, 2008.


Women have entered the workforce in unprecedented numbers over the past 30 years. How is business adapting?
Advertisement

The following is adapted from Why Women Mean Business (Jossey-Bass, 2008).

There has never before been such a confluence of international attention given to the economic importance of women and the need to enable them to fulfill their potential. The position of women - in companies, countries and governments - is seen as a measure of health, maturity and economic viability.

The World Economic Forum, organizer of the influential Davos conference, created a Global Gender Gap Report in 2005, ranking 115 countries on how they score for women's education, health, and participation in the economy and the political process. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has declared that 'gender equality strengthens long-term economic development'. In 2007, it set up a gender website to focus on 'the implications of [gender] inequalities for economic development and what can be done to develop policies for parity'. In a similar vein, the World Bank launched a Gender Action Plan in 2007.

Goldman Sachs, the leading investment bank, is one of those now using the term 'womenomics' to sum up the force that women represent as guarantors of growth. It points to the huge implications that closing the gap between male and female employment rates would have for the global economy, giving a powerful boost to GDP in Europe, the US and Japan ...

Reducing gender inequality further could play a key role in addressing the twin problems of population ageing and pension sustainability. Crucially, Goldman notes, female employment and fertility both tend to be higher in countries where it is relatively easy for women to work and have children.

Governments are looking anxiously for solutions to the persistent undervaluing of women's skills. VladimĂ­r _pidla, the European Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, points out that women have filled 6 million of the 8 million jobs created in the European Union since 2000, and that 59 percent of university graduates are female. 'Women are driving job growth in Europe and helping us reach our economic targets,' he says. 'But they still face too many barriers to realizing their full potential.'...

Why Women Mean Business takes these powerful economic arguments for change to the heart of the corporate world. We analyze the opportunities open to companies that really understand what motivates women in the workplace and the marketplace. We explain the impact of national cultures on women's participation in the labor force and examine why many of the current approaches to gender have not worked and why we need a new perspective: one that sees women not as a problem but as a solution - and that treats them not as a mythical minority but as full partners in leadership. With the new perspective, we offer companies and managers a step-by-step guide on how to integrate women successfully into their growth strategies.

For most of the last century, the issue of women was promoted mostly by women. More generally, women's debate on gender has largely been a conversation among women ... From the lightning rod of Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique or Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex to the more recent "women are better" books like Sally Helgesen's The Female Advantage and Helen Fisher's The First Sex, it has been an important and empowering discussion.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: why women mean business

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
essentialism is NOT progress
Posted by: Zenobia on Jun 9, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Our aim is a new kind of "bilingual" leadership, one that maximizes the abilities and potential of both men and women by recognizing the competitive advantages of our complementary skills and natures."

Pray tell, what are my skills, what is my "nature," as a woman? Let me guess--I am supposed to be good at building social networks? I am not. I am supposed to be more "nurturing" than competitive? Ask the guys I run against. They will laugh. However, ask 3 of my male friends and my father for their definition of "masculinity," and they will say, one who nurtures.

One place where many (not all) women DO need to account for difference is child-bearing. They need a time to HEAL, and some flexibility in scheduling. However, to limit family leave and flex time to a "women's issue" is to again perpetuate the idea that child rearing and care-taking are "women's work." 50-50, baby! At my last job, we had 2 guys out on paternity leave at the same time, and we all thought it was GREAT that they, too, had a chance to bond with their newborns.

Essentialism, binary thinking, duality---all very old-school. Leads right back to the us-them thinking the author criticizes, and a whole lotta 1950s/Victorian stereotyping. Once again, it seems what corporate America really wants is to slot us all into little boxes for target marketing.

Try again, please!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]