Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Talk Radio and the Conspiracy to Kill

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted August 1, 2008.


Would Jim Adkisson have killed without prompting from extreme right-wing talkers?
Advertisement

Now I know how the others feel.

Having written extensively about talk radio's right wing shock jocks and the hate speech they regularly use to tar opponents -- equating liberals with terrorists, homosexuals with child rapists and the Mafia, and political and media figures with the Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan (even calling on air for assassinations, as Michael Reagan, son of the late president, did last month) -- it was only a matter of time until the smear merchants took aim at me.

Still, it was a little surprising to hear that "O'Connor's mentor in spirit, Josef Goebbels, must be laughing in his grave." And it was more than just disconcerting that the charge of Nazism was made as part of an attack on the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the award-winning tolerance group named for the late 'Nazi Hunter,' after the Center's New York office offered to host a launch party for my book "Shock Jocks: Hate Speech & Talk Radio."

The allegation that Goebbels is my mentor came in an email forwarding a post by former Boston Herald writer Don Feder, which originally appeared on GrasstopsUSA.com ("Give Your Values A Voice".) Feder, the email said, "believes that the Wiesenthal Center supports deceptive fools like O'Connor to appease its wealthy leftist supporters. If that is true (and of course no offical [sic] at the Center would own up to it), it is shameful."

What's really shameful, of course, is trotting out the ad hominem "You're a Nazi" meme when confronted with ideas that differ from your own. Feder's "exclusive commentary" was headlined "Obama and the Conspiracy to Kill Talk Radio," another false meme being consistently bruited about by the right. Its opening made Feder's thesis clear: "Looking ahead, liberals are determined to derail potential opposition to their plans to accelerate the deconstruction of America. Consequently, they have targeted talk radio. Bringing back the Fairness Doctrine is just one facet of their scheme to eviscerate the only part of the media controlled by conservatives."

According to Feder & Company, "The jihad against talk radio" (I thought I was a Nazi, not an Islamofascist!) is this:

"The left will do anything to gag its opponents. From the college campus to the halls of Congress (think campus speech codes, think hate crimes legislation, think speech-suppression zones surrounding abortion clinics), liberals are the chief proponents of censorship in America.

On July 23, the Simon Wiesenthal Center's New York Tolerance Center will host the launch of Shock Jocks: Hate Speech & Talk Radio by Rory O'Connor, a book which indicts talk radio as "highly politicized, overly partisan and often factually challenged" -- unlike, say, The New York Times, AKA, Mainstream Media Hacks for Obama.

But that's not all. According to its cover, this penetrating analysis (endorsed by Walter Cronkite, the dean of liberal media manipulators) exposes the "dirty secret" of radio talk shows -- how "they use the guise of 'not being politically correct' to ratchet up their anti-gay, anti-woman and overtly racist language." In other words, they're against same-sex "marriage," reject feminist mythology and oppose racial quotas. Oh, the venom! Oh, the malice!

The left uses allegations of hate speech to set the stage for censorship. In its invitation, the Wiesenthal Center hyperventilates: 'Hate speech can lead to hate crimes. And hate speech has no role on the public airwaves.' Apparently, the First Amendment doesn't apply to anything the left deems "hate speech."

FYI, a friend of mine -- a Jewish conservative -- noted the exquisite irony here: Conservative talk-show hosts tend to be the most outspoken defenders of Israel anywhere in the U.S. media, while their counterparts in the mainstream media are overwhelmingly anti-Israel. Like the Anti-Defamation League, the Wiesenthal Center carries water for the left in the guise of fighting anti-Semitism.

Shock Jocks is just the latest manifestation of the left's obsession with talk radio."

Feder's unoriginal jeremiad -- which he further promulgated on WABC's Sunday morning "Religion on the Line" program with Rabbi Joe Patasnick -- went to repeat what other right-wing media organs such as NewsMax and WorldNetDaily have already attempted to inject into the mainstream -- the ridiculous idea that there is a conspiracy afoot to "Hush Rush" and knock conservatives off the airwaves by requiring "fairness" and "balance" in our public discourse.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sean hannity, michael savage, media, shock jocks

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor is the author of "Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio" (AlterNet Books, 2008). O'Connor also writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Price of Freedom - crazy activist!
Posted by: carbon-based on Aug 1, 2008 5:24 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this article assumptions are a bit of a stretch.. Hannity for instance has never even suggested anyone hate liberals... Rush and Savage is a moron so I cannot comment on him as I've never really listened to them.

That said...instead of suggesting that these radio shows swayed the attacker to kill, I'd suggest that he already had a hatred beyond normal political divides and bought books that fit with his political views, not his sickness that drove him to kill others.

""Having written extensively about talk radio's right wing shock jocks and the hate speech they regularly use to tar opponents -- equating liberals with terrorists, homosexuals with child rapists and the Mafia, and political and media figures with the Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan (even calling on air for assassinations, as Michael Reagan, son of the late president, did last month)"" - I listen to Fox pretty often, as well as CNN and MCNBC. I've never heard on any of those station where liberals were equated as mentioned in the above passage. As far as te 9/11 activist sending anti American hate mail to our troops, he should be arrersted and tried as a traitor, like Hanoi Jane should have been.. but because we live in such an open free society messages such as those, designed to cause our military to revolt, seems to be allowed.

Amazing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Price of Freedom - carbonbased Posted by: carbon-based
» Ann Coulter & Co. Posted by: weathered
» RE: Hey carbon... Posted by: Quannah
Life imitating art already disproven
Posted by: elidude420 on Aug 1, 2008 5:28 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US Judicial System has roundly and repeatedly rejected such claims that certain media exposure induces murderous rampages. (And rightly so.) Even the metal band Judas Priest was found innocent in court against accusations that their music caused suicides. As much as I dislike right-wing radio, I will not apply a double-standard.

The way to get these "shock jocks" off the air is by demanding local, public control of our local, public airwaves. These guys are syndicated nationally because our broadcasting standards equate success with monopoly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think... Posted by: robbie.seal
4change
Posted by: 4changenow on Aug 1, 2008 6:08 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No the devil did not make this man shoot those people. ---The hate people just give these nut cases a place to feel like they belong and pretend they are like others.
The shooter changed nothing (except to great great grief for several local folks.) People will continue to move forward. So to all you nut cases: You ain't nothing. I mean you are nothing, you can't even generate fear. Loser.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 4change Posted by: Lauren
» RE: 4change Posted by: Turiye
» RE: 4change Posted by: Lauren
Deconstructing America a righty project
Posted by: alchidester on Aug 1, 2008 7:38 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America at its best is a fine tasting cultural soup. America at its best is a place where all the world meets to contribute to knowledge and understanding in the free exchange of ideas. America at its best is diverse and tolerant. Diversity and tolerance are the basis of our Freedom. We are a great nation because we are able to criticize ourselves, our government and each other freely, by law, enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights. This I learned in the 6th and 7th grades in the Montgomery County Maryland public schools 1959-1960 - it was called Civics.

I still believe in these things. Nowadays I am regarded as a Liberal (to be pronounced with a disdainful sneer by the right and with pride by me and my circle of friends).

If you value your freedom, you will be tolerant of how other free persons choose to express their freedom. If I dislike how some of my fellow citizens express their freedom, advocate that their freedom be curtailed by legislation, and I succeed in that advocacy, I have just diminished my own freedom, for in an atmosphere of intolerance freedom cannot survive – it won’t be long before my own freedom is limited by the legislated intolerance of others.

Advocating the denial or suppression of the rights of others is the first step in losing your own rights. Advocating Constitutional Amendments to allow the denial and suppression of the rights of others is ultimately self-defeating and subversive of American ideals.

Tolerating the intolerant is a conundrum for sure. Attacking intolerance, especially when it manifests from some form of religious fervor that wants to set the world right by fixing what is wrong with everyone else, seems only to strengthen the resolve of the intolerant, giving them the false assurance that they must be correct since they are being persecuted for their religious beliefs.

Supporting positive values you believe in and manifesting those in your own conduct continuously, without criticizing and attacking others may be the best path. I try the walk there.

Al Chidester

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We the sheeple of the United States, in order to form better grazing lands...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 2, 2008 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...need protections from hate mongers who prey on the gullible and easily influenced members of the herd, just in order for these wolves to to have their dastardly plans done for them with the least amount of effort!

Anti-Hate legislation NOW


Comprehending hatred in this country...

... theres always been someone somewhere to hate!

the largest human bloodbath of the 19th century was fought over it...
the largest human death toll in known times happened in the 20th century because of it!
and there is still people with enough hate in them to see it last a few more times
before we finally get it!

call it what you want...
racism, nationalism, communism ...republicanism...
they all seem to end in a "ISM" are politically motivated and is about the "hatred" of something,
its the glue thats become the Raison d'être!

time to recognize it for what it is... hate!
and long past time to legislate an end to it... hate!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» American Doesn't Ban Speech Posted by: edgar1
» RE: War and Money Posted by: bloominblacksheep
» RE: War and Money (2) Posted by: bloominblacksheep
note to Mr O'Connor
Posted by: vintovka on Aug 2, 2008 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the Feder article that offended you so. I did not see the quote about Goebbels as your 'mentor' that you placed at the head of your article. Did Feder write that in a separate piece, or did you simply make it up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» reread the paragraph Posted by: mclemens
Heirarchy
Posted by: bobtr900 on Aug 2, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a kind of hierarchy to all of this. Adksson was really given the green light to kill by the religious right. They are the dupes of the Repug party who in turn are the dupes of the wealthy, the ultimate scum at the bottom of all of this. However the RR are also part of the wealthy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: edgar1... Posted by: Quannah
» Irrelevant Example Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Irrelevant Example Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Freedom of Opinion Must Be Preserved Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Freedom of Opinion Must Be Preserved Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Heirarchy Posted by: Lauren
The infectious disease of liberalism
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 2, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2004, while writing George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, I addressed the issue of liberalism, an infectious "disease" Republican shock jocks consider worse than AIDS.

Here is an example:

My book also reveals George Junior for what he is: a conniving rightwing ideologue who hijacked the GOP I once loved and turned it into a sanctuary for the dregs of American society-―rich bigots, racist rednecks, gun nuts, homophobes, hypocrites, fascists, control freaks, Confederate flag wavers-—the Trent Lotts, Tom Delays, Jerry Falwells, Ralph Reeds, Bill Bennetts, Charlton Hestons, Ann Coulters, Rush Limbaughs, G. Gordon Liddys, Sean Hannities...the list goes on and on.

Those assorted groups and individuals have one thing in common. They hate liberals with a passion, which I don’t understand.

According to my dictionary, liberal means being a “free-man, not restricted,” someone who “favors political reform.” My fourth great grandfather, John Scott, fits that description perfectly.

He, too, wanted unrestricted freedom and political reform. So in 1776, John grabbed his musket, left his rural Vermont farm and fought the British Redcoats. I write about his valiant military service in Chapter 15.

In my mind, John Scott and millions of Americans like him today, modern liberals, are the true patriots, not rightwing Republicans. Liberals cherish individual freedom and will defend it to their deaths, if necessary. I think that’s admirable. Rightwing Republicans feel just the opposite. Listen to Talk Radio or watch Fox News, substitute “Jews” for “liberals” and you will get a taste of what Nazi Germany was like before WWII.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exaggeration? Posted by: edgar1
» RE: xaggeration? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: xaggeration? Posted by: edgar1
» Maybe so, Lauren. Posted by: HughScott
» RE: Maybe so, Lauren. Posted by: Lauren
right wing wackos not so tough
Posted by: johnthetreehugger on Aug 2, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
while the incident in Knoxville is certainly a tragedy, there is a certain cruel irony in that people oft derided as the "latte drinking elite" tackled the right wing lone wolf warrior and beat his cowardly ass and prevented him from killing more of their own. Where else have the intended victims been so quick in their response and success in thwarting a massacre?

Guess its a quite a shock to the propagators of the myth of the superiority of conservative white man that liberal man physically kicked his ass and had him begging for mercy.

Let those right wing morons ramble on the air... they are a bunch of cowards and whiners anyway. Notice how they almost never have real debates? Its cause they are bullies, plain and simple.

We just have to stand up to and challenge the bullying. Folks in Knoxville proved that it works.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're an idiot Posted by: robbie.seal
» RE: You're an idiot Posted by: johnthetreehugger
Talk Radio and Nazis
Posted by: n8rwtchr@verizon.net on Aug 2, 2008 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Correction. The item I just sent in should read like this:

Don't these guys (and the entire Republican cadre) know that it is the Bush family that is [in]famous for its Nazi connection during WWII??? Prescott Bush (George W's grandfather) was a financial backer of Hitler's regime. (Google this. See particularly the Guardian item from '04) Actually I suppose it's really convenient for them to forget this fact. Seems like they're doing a number that could really explode back in their faces if the reality of this truth really got into the public awareness.

(Newbie. I clicked send when I meant to click edit and delete the "not".)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Talk Radio and Nazis Posted by: Jack Canuck
» RE: Talk Radio and Nazis Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Talk Radio and Nazis Posted by: Lauren
Words
Posted by: mpreb658@earthlink.net on Aug 2, 2008 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a portion of a small treatise I recently wrote.

There are plenty of decent ways to express ideas, and when one sets them out there in front of the world for all to see or hear, one better be certain he means what he says. Words are powerful; they paint pictures; they create ideas; they persuade. They also are ever lasting. They can drag down and they can lift up. They can heal. They can kill. So let us all be careful in the choosing of our words. I know I intend to be more watchful from now on, in what I speak and what I allow to be heard.

I might add that no one is immune to being influenced by public or private discourse. If one uses killing words, then mayhem is being promoted. If one uses healing words, one means to inspire. If one uses rational, reasoned words, one is attempting civil discourse. So what is the goal of the hard-talking right wingers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Words Posted by: BCcovers
Words
Posted by: mpreb658@earthlink.net on Aug 2, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a portion of a small treatise I recently wrote.

There are plenty of decent ways to express ideas, and when one sets them out there in front of the world for all to see or hear, one better be certain he means what he says. Words are powerful; they paint pictures; they create ideas; they persuade. They also are ever lasting. They can drag down and they can lift up. They can heal. They can kill. So let us all be careful in the choosing of our words. I know I intend to be more watchful from now on, in what I speak and what I allow to be heard.

I might add that no one is immune to being influenced by public or private discourse. If one uses killing words, then mayhem is being promoted. If one uses healing words, one means to inspire. If one uses rational, reasoned words, one is attempting civil discourse. So what is the goal of the hard-talking right wingers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The same as... Posted by: robbie.seal
Charlie Manson syndrome
Posted by: Grousefeather on Aug 2, 2008 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Charlie Manson has been in prison since goading his cadre of followers into committing murder in the 1970's. Mind you, Charlie didn't actually kill anyone, but he did provide the motivation, and for that he was convicted of murder. The motivation for the Manson inspired murders by the way was political, he wanted to start a race war.

Since Shawn Hannity doesn't play a guitar it's probably not completely accurate to compare him to Manson, but there are other obvious similarities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sean Hannity is a punk Posted by: marie.vorrath
» RE: Sean Hannity is a punk Posted by: Lauren
» Actually... Posted by: robbie.seal
The Accused
Posted by: weslen1 on Aug 2, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The movie, The Accused, told the true story of a girl who was raped in a bar in New Bedford, Massachusetts, while the whole room full of patrons stood by and watched and cheered the rapists on. All the onlookers were sued and found guilty of inciting a crime. Some went to jail. It was found that inciting a crime was itself a crime.
When someone such as Hannity, O'Riley, Rush, Savage etc. constantly spouts hate, that is inciting hatred in others. One of those hate jocks, during the Elian thing, the little Cuban boy who was returned to his father, even gave explicit instructions over the air as to how to shoot federal agents to make sure they died.
Helping ordinary people over Corporate CEOs is NOT a bad thing. And those ordinary people are the ones who are listening. This guy is a crazy and this kind of incitement is all it took to drive him over the edge. And when these things happen, it's always the innocents who pay the ultimate price. The people in that church never hurt this guy, but the hate mongers made them his enemy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Accused Posted by: 6399
» RE: The Accused Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The Accused Posted by: oldurn
» RE: The Accused Posted by: 6399
» Let me use your shread of logic... Posted by: robbie.seal
Of course hijacking this atrocity to push his book doesn't make O'Connor a "Nazi".
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Aug 2, 2008 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It just makes him a shrewd opportunist looking to further his publishing credentials and increase his effective volume, no different from his peers in the right wing media. Of course, he walks all over the graves of the victims to do it, but you can't be successful in the business of political propaganda and pointed pontification without kicking over a few corpses, eh? I mean jeebers, it's not like dead people can vote*.

O'Connor redefines "hate speech" as speech he hates to hear. No thanks. I'll take my dissent from my government's poor--lethally so--behavior without hitching my wagon to the tactics of folks I can just as easily switch off. Dragging these victims through the rhetorical street to push his agenda and his latest "good reasons to use the force of government to shut people up" manifesto is an ugly thing to do at best, something right out of the Savage Rush playbook. Whatever sells, huh?

*Chicago notwithstanding

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FAUX Greedia Prostitutes Spew Hate and Propaganda!
Posted by: williameon on Aug 2, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reptilian Terrorist Propagandists get away with murder.
Lies, Terror and Treason!
They are Wrong!
How wrong are they?
George W. Bush WRONG!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obviously it was talk show hosts . . .
Posted by: 6399 on Aug 2, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clearly no one goes on a homicidal rampage without the goading of talk show hosts first. Spree killers are, without question, the product of spiteful, vindictive talk show hosts in most cases! I mean, is there even a shadow of a doubt?

In fact, I'm still not sure how we coined the term "going postal". Isn't going "shock jock" more appropriate? When someone reaches the tipping point, there are usually no cues from a degenerate society like ours that killing is the solution, other than from shock jocks of course.

Honestly, shit like this really does strip the left of credibility. Yes, the hateful rhetoric of people like Rush et al occasionally spurs some on, but free speech is free speech and it must apply evenly to everyone. Furthermore, if these sick fucks weren't already seriously predisposed to violence, they wouldn't march out and start indiscriminately shooting people just cuz Sean Hannity said so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Slander Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Slander Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Slander Posted by: Lauren
» RE: and racist Posted by: Lauren
Bearzerker et al
Posted by: ArtemInox on Aug 2, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice to see this article called out for the towering pile of bullshit that it is. I've listened to all of those smoke screen clowns on the radio for years, the scariest thing is that I can hear people echo these sorry fucks in their every day attitudes and sayings. Who needs to think or form their own opinions, just turn on the radio and soak it all in....

Nothing to say about it that hasn't already been well said. Hehe have to admit Savage is often kind of funny in his presentation without meaning to be, and in spite of being a megalomaniacal jackass, he makes some very good points about some basic things. He at least is willing to step up and say what he thinks, and take the hits for doing so.

Listen to these guys so you can spot their bullshit a mile away, and call out the braindead chumps that get all their thinking done for them by the pundits, it isn't hard to do when you know the methods used every day...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Agreed, let's target the sponsors
Posted by: southerndem on Aug 2, 2008 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author states that we need to "pressure the corporations who are using the public airwaves but not serving the public interest." I absolutely agree: 1) I would not want to support anyone who allows this garbage on the air, and 2) shock jocks are about making money, so if boycotts lead to sponsors terminating their support of this evil, they go off the air. The question is, where is the website that tells us who sponsors Savage, Limbaugh and the like? I can't tolerate listening to them (plus I work when they are on the air), so I don't know who thinks their audience is a good target market. If I knew that, I would absolutely 1) not support their stores and 2) let them know I would not support them as long as they gave money to such horrible people.

Anyone know of such a resource?

(P.S. I live in Knoxville, so this shooting hit particularly close to home for me. The shooter is obviously responsible, but I still have no doubt that the kind of hate going out in the media is detrimental to our society in innumerable ways)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Start with this list Posted by: ebishirl
» RE: Start with this list Posted by: Lauren
If It's Not Connected, Why is Fox Blacking Out the Story?
Posted by: Bartleby1701 on Aug 2, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, I don't know the answer to the large question here - what do do about talk radio - and I know there is a legitimate debate about whether this guy was really inspired by just being nuts or by talk radio or both. But the fact that a search for "tennessee church shooting" at Fox News' website yields not one hit, I think, is telling. Every other news website yielded multiple hits - from the original report to all of the follow ups. Fox...zero. Nothing. Why do you think that is?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Allen
Posted by: pursah on Aug 2, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We do not need legislation to rid the nation of hate speech. We have the Patriot Act. This act says a terrorist is anybody the President says is a terrorist. The next liberal president can shut down the entire right wing hate machine--print, broadcast and internet-- by executive order declaring them all as the terrorist they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That would suck Posted by: robbie.seal
Making money: the ONLY motivation of Talk Radio shock jocks
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 2, 2008 10:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew a guy in college who would go into a bar, tell two other guys at different tables that each one had called the other an "asshole," then stand back while the idiots beat the crap out of each other.

I think that summarizes what Talk Radio shock jocks are doing -- on the right and left -- laughing all the way to the bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» All Those Left-Wing Shock Jocks! Posted by: BobKincaid
health care the real issue
Posted by: logic on Aug 2, 2008 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More people need better access to the mental care they need.People with mental illnesses respond to other peoples words from an imbalanced sense of logic. When I hear these hate monsters, I simply turn them off. It's scary that there is such a large audience for these types of hatred.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the real issue Posted by: Quannah