Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Press Is Only Too Happy to Burnish McCain's Reputation

By Eric Boehlert, Media Matters for America. Posted May 14, 2008.


There literally would be no McCain brand if the press hadn't methodically built it and then enthusiastically promoted it.
Advertisement

Campaign aides for Sen. John McCain want very much to sell the American public on the "McCain brand" and to pitch the Republican candidate as a sort of stand-alone, untarnished political entity, according to a recent Washington Post article.

The marketing ploy, if successful, would not only create distance between the candidate and the rest of the Republican Party, which currently suffers from widespread voter disapproval, it would also effectively elevate McCain and make him a larger-than-life figure, the spokesman for his own maverick brand that's built on political independence.

"The campaign's general-election strategy is to sell the McCain brand to show voters that he is distinct from President Bush and other Republicans," the Post reported.

So guess what members of the press, including those at MSNBC, CNN, NBC, The Washington Post, Newsweek, the Politico, and The Boston Globe, have been doing incessantly in recent weeks. They've been making glowing references to the durability and appeal of the "McCain brand." I mean, how lucky can the Republicans get? The press is echoing precisely the message that the candidate's advisers want repeated again and again. What are the odds?

I assume the sarcasm is coming through loud and clear here.

We all know McCain is supposed to be a maverick. That phony meme has been drummed into voters' heads for nearly a decade now. Yet as Media Matters for America has shown, the media use the label "maverick" despite the many times McCain has fallen in line with the Bush administration or the Republican Party establishment, a lifetime rating of 83 by the American Conservative Union, and his recent rightward shift on high-profile issues such as immigration and taxes. (For the longer, in-depth dissections of that McCain's media free ride, go here.)

Now, in a sort of Phase Two, McCain's all-around maverick-ness is being elevated into an iconic brand status, right alongside Ford and Nike.

The media, which admire the corporatization of campaigns, are hugely impressed by the development. Successful branding represents a kind of marketing nirvana in which you're able, via a collection of images and idea, to differentiate yourself -- or your product -- from others that appear to be identical. (High-profile political journalists understand the career significance of branding and work feverishly during the campaign season to create their own media brand.)

Indeed, the term "brand" conjures up an impenetrable, irrevocable image, an entrenched vision that cannot be altered. In the business world, it often takes a catastrophic event to change people's perception of a well-established and respected brand. As the Post article noted, "The selling of McCain is rooted in

one of the oldest theories of product marketing: that a successful brand identity, once established in the American psyche, is virtually impossible to blunt or damage."

So in a way, this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy for the press. By discussing McCain in terms of a formal brand, they're suggesting that McCain's reputation as a maverick has become so embedded, so ingrained, that it has transcended into a formal trademark. And since it's a brand, who are journalists to question it or to alter it?

Of course, when reporters and pundits fawn over the mighty McCain brand, almost none of them acknowledges the central role they played in building it. In fact, the press is almost entirely responsible for the marketing of McCain. So when admiring the McCain brand, journalists are really just admiring their own handiwork.

Branding, and brand management, is certainly nothing new in politics, nor is there anything inherently wrong with it. Campaigns today are often less about the candidates running as themselves and more about them running as an extension of who voters perceive them to be. As Fast Company magazine recently noted, "Politics, after all, is about marketing -- about projecting and selling an image, stoking aspirations, moving people to identify, evangelize, and consume."

In fact, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has won widespread acclaim for the innovative steps it has taken, from social networking and graphic design, to successfully launch the Obama brand. "Barack Obama is three things you want in a brand," Keith Reinhard, chairman emeritus of the advertising giant DDB Worldwide, told Fast Company. "New, different, and attractive. That's as good as it gets."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, john mccain

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
U.S. Major Media: Merely the Ruling Class PR Department
Posted by: lorenbliss on May 14, 2008 6:07 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No critique of Big Business mass media's alleged coverage of the 2008 presidential campaign is complete without noting the extent to which its propaganda writers perpetuate what is by far the biggest and most maliciously deceptive of Hillary Clinton’s many Big Lies: her claim she supports "universal" health care.

The damning truth, of course, is quite different; excluding the 1994 fiasco by which she (deliberately?) enabled the Harry and Louise campaign to destroy forever any hope this nation will adopt single-payer health insurance -- Hillary has never proposed genuinely "universal" health care. Nor does she now propose any meaningful health-care reform. What she proposes instead is simply MANDATORY payments to the health insurance monopoly.

In other words -- like the closet Republican she is -- she intends to guarantee the survival of the insurance companies by forcing all of us to finance their obscene profits and pornocratic executive salaries. What’s more -- again typical of her Republican values -- she would savagely retaliate against those of us who are too poor to participate in this colossal swindle, imposing on us an impossibly ruinous choice of penalties: either a pay-or-go-to-prison succession of fines and tax-surcharges, or acceptance of stipends in return for total submission to the unspeakable tyranny of the welfare bureaucracy -- the result a terror-stricken state of degradation and abject powerlessness scarcely different from the lot of a prisoner, and in any case unimaginable to those who have not experienced it firsthand.

All of which -- just as Hillary and her financiers intend -- would not only lock the present system in place forever but effectively prohibit any future efforts at healthcare reform. It would also legalize our eternal enslavement to ever-skyrocketing insurance costs and thus to the ever-more-omnipotent insurance lords themselves, much as all of the United States outside the New York metropolitan area is already hopelessly enslaved by Big Oil and Big Automotive. Thus by analogy the true purpose of all such mandatory insurance schemes becomes obvious: not liberation from disease and insecurity, but its diametrical opposite -- yet another step in the methodical reduction of the American people to inescapable serfdom.

Speaking of the BBMM and its ever-more-brazen Voelkischer Beobachter function of propagandizing the U.S. electorate, note that The New York Times online has thus far refused to publish the original version of the above comment, which I filed last night as a response to Katharine Q. Seelye's "Clinton's Universal Bargaining Chip," an opinion piece that falsely portrays Clinton's quest for the presidency as, at its core, a quest for "universal" healthcare. My original version was essentially the same as the text above, though it ended as follows, answering one of the questions posed by Seelye:

As to the identity of Hillary’s suitable running-mate, the only possible choice is John McCain -- for whom, with her vicious agitation of racism, she is already actively campaigning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You should be writing for Alternet Posted by: countingdaisies
what big corp wants...
Posted by: cwilsondrum on May 14, 2008 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will try anything to get. think GE,Westinghouse,Rupert Murdoch,monsanto,etc. want Obama for president???? prepare to see big media run a magnificant campaign for McWar. Too bad the sheeple are too stupid to quit buying their products,listening to their trash media,and pretty much asleep at the wheel to realize the end of their lifestyles. gas prices,food prices,civil liberties,,,think those are going to go back to 1990. doubt it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Be prepared when the shit hits the fan Posted by: countingdaisies
McCains Health Care Plan
Posted by: JSquercia on May 15, 2008 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain's health care plan would be a disaster for this country but a boon to the Health Insurance INDUSTRY . He would eliminate the deduction Corporations get for providing Health Insurance . The claim is that the corporations would in turn raise the workers salaries . Yes and if you believe THAT please stop by to buy a wonderful Bridge in Brooklyn . So now you have to purchase Insurance for yourself and your family . You will of course NOT be able to get the same price as your employer was able since you are an individual . Estimate is a policy for your Family would probably cost in the pricey neighborhood of $12,000 but NOT to worry Johnny generously will give a $5,000 tax Credit leaving you with only $7,000 to pay from your pocket . This of course assumes you do NOT have a pre-existing condition as Senator McCain or Elizabeth Edwards do .
Here is my SUGGESTION to the Dems run a NEW Harry and Louise Ad in which Harry discovers that he can't afford HIS Health Insurance and learns that Louise can NOT get ANY coverage due to a pre-existing condition

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

article is good but how can we fight media bias for Mccain
Posted by: whealeydj on May 17, 2008 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
other than by poining out that brand name means PR which means propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain's "brand" is FAKE and must be exposed
Posted by: MavTX on May 22, 2008 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is going to have to be a grassroots effort to fight media bias for McCain. This means blogs, YouTube, emails, publishing the truth about the plasticity of the McCain brand.

McCain has established a disturbing pattern of misusing his role as a lawmaker by creating laws and loopholes that benefits lobbyist, his friends (only the rich and powerful), his family, and indirectly benefit him.

McCain has consistently demonstrated throughout his political career that he is guilty of double-speak. He consistently he attempts to appease whatever audience he's standing in front of at the time.

In a string, spanning decades, of McCain engineered land swaps benefitting "his friends", Rob Smith, director of the Sierra Club's Arizona affiliate states, "When the public trust intersects with private interests, basically, he (McCain) has favored land development . . . in every case,"

Rob's statement can be applied to all of McCain's grandstanding. McCain is an accomplished "Pretender", and all these land swaps, the flip-flops, the McCain-Fieingold bill that birthed the 527’s, the loophole laws demonstrate that upon closer scrutiny of his political life, McCain's brand is just plain scary.

McCain graduated 3rd from the bottom at Naval Academy, not ready for prime time in 2000 and past his prime in 2008 - - clueless on the economy, foreign policy, flip-flops, double-speaks, extremist and flawed spiritual advisors, close ties and friends with unscupulous lobbyist - - at best he’s an enigma and at worse he’s the 16 personalities of Sybil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]