Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Jonah Goldberg's Gambling Debt: Will Tribune Company Pay It?

By Jeff Cohen, AlterNet. Posted February 7, 2007.


Right-wing pundit Jonah Goldberg made a bet two years ago that by this time Iraqis and Americans would agree the war was worth it. Time to pay up.
Advertisement

There are many shades of right-wing punditry in our country. Among the shadiest is Jonah Goldberg. With arrogance seemingly matched only by his ignorance, Goldberg was just being Goldberg when he offered this wager two years ago:

Let's make a bet. I predict that Iraq won't have a civil war, that it will have a viable constitution, and that a majority of Iraqis and Americans will, in two years time, agree that the war was worth it. I'll bet $1,000 (which I can hardly spare right now).

The two-year period comes due this Thursday. Even Goldberg now realizes his prediction was totally wrong -- with poll after poll showing most Americans do not "agree that the war was worth it." (Not to mention what Iraqis think of the war or Goldberg's boast that "Iraq won't have a civil war.")

So shouldn't Goldberg -- or somebody -- pay off the $1,000?

The bet was offered near the end of an overheated blogo-debate between Goldberg (at National Review Online) and Dr. Juan Cole, the Middle East scholar from University of Michigan. In proposing the wager to Cole, Goldberg goaded: "Money where your mouth is, doc. One caveat: Because I don't think it's right to bet on such serious matters for personal gain, if I win, I'll donate the money to the USO."

Cole reacted to the proposed bet with disgust -- calling it symbolic of "the neo-imperial American Right. They are making their own fortunes with a wager on the fates of others, whom they are treating like ants." Wrote Cole: "Here we have a prominent American media star ... betting on Iraqis as though they are greyhounds in a race."

Just before Goldberg proposed his bet to Cole, the professor had fumed: "Goldberg is just a dime-a-dozen pundit. Cranky rich people hire sharp-tongued and relatively uninformed young people all the time and put them on the mass media to badmouth the poor, spread bigotry, exalt mindless militarism, promote anti-intellectualism, and ensure that right-wing views come to predominate."

"Relatively uninformed" seemed accurate to me, but I wondered about the "mindless militarism" charge -- although I knew Goldberg was one of dozens of pundits who mindlessly cheered on the Iraq invasion (and suffered no consequences). Then I saw a 2003 column in which Goldberg wrote of "bombing Afghanistan forward into the stone age" and relished this anecdote:

In the weeks prior to the war to liberate Afghanistan, a good friend of mine would ask me almost every day, "Why aren't we killing people yet?" And I never had a good answer for him. Because one of the most important and vital things the United States could do after 9/11 was to kill people.

Since Goldberg felt compelled to tell us -- as he gallantly offered the $1,000 bet -- that it was money he "can hardly spare right now," you may wonder about his ability to pay. A look at his bio shows that Goldberg has had a high-flying career in mainstream media -- from CNN contributor to PBS producer to USA Today Board of Contributors. (Full disclosure: In 2000, he and I wrote relatively friendly point/counterpoint columns for Brill's Content.) One would think he could easily afford $1,000, especially for a charity like the USO.

But who knows -- maybe Goldberg has racked up huge gambling debts from ignorant wagers like the one tendered to Cole.

So I have a solution. Let the Tribune media conglomerate pay the $1,000. Not only does Tribune syndicate Goldberg's column, it was Tribune's Los Angeles Times that added the analytically impaired Goldberg to its columnist roster in November 2005 -- at the same time it fired renowned columnist Robert Scheer, whose Iraq analysis had been breathtakingly accurate.

Despite financial upheavals, the highly profitable Tribune Co. has plenty of money, as it lays off journalists en masse and squeezes the life out once proud newspapers like the L.A. Times.

Professor Cole may be right to dismiss Jonah Goldberg as a "dime-a-dozen pundit." But it's time to hold media corporations like Tribune responsible for elevating the Goldbergs and their reckless predictions -- as they strangle newspapers and silence serious journalists like Bob Scheer.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq war, jonah goldberg, juan cole, bet

Jeff Cohen is the founder of FAIR, and author of Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Dust Bin Journalism
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 7, 2007 12:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
History's dustbins are overflowing with the like's of Luciann's half-witted son. Think about it: Westbrook Pegler, Walter Winchell, Fulton Lewis - reationary men who were defined by the reactionary times in which they lived. It appears to me that people like Goldberg have never stopped to contemplate their place in history. Do they even care how their names will be evaluated down through the ages? Or are the so blinded by ideology, they actually believe the tripe they are peddling?

While people like Pegler and the like were realtively few in their time, our period of history has seen a literal glut of ill-qualified "pundits": Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Robert Novak, Michael Wiener Savage, Mark Levin, Charles Krauthammer, Ann Coulter, Michael Reagan, Bill O'Riley, Cal Thomas - not to mention Luciann's half-witted kid - The list seems to go on forever!

Bob Novak has been around for longer than any of these knuckleheads. Tell you what you can do: go back and do a google search of any or all of the columns he used to co-author with the late Roland Evans. Go back thirty or even forty years and historical twenty/twenty hindsight makes it perfectly clear that they were wrong on the issues that mattered at least ninety percent of the time (And I'm being charitable with my estimate). The fact that in 2007, anyone can possibly take that bloviating gasbag seriously has to be one of the mysteries of our age!

Were at a point in our history where we are set for a revolution in our way of thinking. Within two years I believe that most of the people I've mentioned in this piece (Luciann's half-witted kid included) will be gone from view. We can only hope for the best.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let me get this straight...
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 7, 2007 3:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're chasing down one wing-nut for $1000 over some BS comment, and devoting a whole article to it?

That's like going into a NYC subway tunnel and catching one rat...except with the rat, you will have made a bigger difference, and the rat is cleaner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let me get this straight... Posted by: ChicagoPaul
» Or bettor yet, Posted by: leighsure
Loves Labor Lost
Posted by: peridot on Feb 7, 2007 4:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what's the surprise. Jonah's bowel-mouthed credentials are impeccable. His arrogance is perfectly proportionate to his ignorance and that qualifies him most excellently to be a bush league media swell. Why would anyone care how history evaluates this idiot child. He has been put on display for entertainment. The media zoo keepers are delighted when the monkeys throw shit at the crowd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've got a better question
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Feb 7, 2007 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did Newt Gingrich ever repay Bob Dole the $50,000 Dole laid out to cover the fine House Ethics Committee imposed on Gingrich for his not-exactly-illegal not-exactly fundraising publishing venture ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Personally....
Posted by: drmflorida on Feb 7, 2007 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd be happier if he would just shut the hell up now. Perhaps I'm a bit cranky, but if I have to hear one more "Mea Culpa, I've seen the light" from a discredited conservative
"intellectual" I am going to wretch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You've Actually Heard Such Things? Posted by: grumble-bum
Media star? Goldberg?
Posted by: Basenjis on Feb 7, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You could have fooled me. In re his comment on bombing a pathetic, war-torn country back to the stone age, Goldberg and his readers might profit greatly by being propelled forward into the Age of Enlightenment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's right...
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Feb 7, 2007 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in a twisted way. Some Iraqis who are into fundamentalist power think the war was worth it because America has played right into their hands and is about to lose. Many Americans have profited immensely by the war, and think the war was worth it. The smart gamblers always win, like the house who owns the casino.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Waste of Space...
Posted by: CatDad on Feb 7, 2007 1:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's pointless giving media whores like Ann Coulter, Drudge or the mom/son Goldbergs the time of day. Lucian in particular is an atrocious case...Jonah is only a "journalist" for the same reason that G.W. Bush is president...people sadly give the offspring of famous people the benefit of the doubt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There was no bet
Posted by: kst on Feb 7, 2007 6:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to point out that Jonah Goldberg didn't actually make a bet; he merely offered a bet. Juan Cole never accepted it (for good reasons).

If reality had gone the other way, I don't think there'd be any serious call for Juan Cole to pay for a bet he never accepted. Neither Jonah Goldberg nor anyone else is under any obligation to pay off this bet that was never actually made.

Having said that, Jonah Goldberg should be subject to at least $1000 worth of embarrassment over the fact that he was so spectactularly wrong, wrong, wrong. (Did I mention he was wrong)?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These jerks aren't paid to be accurate
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Feb 7, 2007 10:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're propagandists - paid to obscure, obfuscate, bloviate and push an agenda. nothing will shut them up. I'd recommend tar and feathers - but that's a helluve lot of tar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jonah Golcberg = Andrew Sullivan
Posted by: EggyDrudge on Feb 8, 2007 4:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The mentality/congnitive dissonant ego syndrome of those on the Right seems to be very predictable. Andrew Sullivan has gone through the same convolutions of logic as Goldberg. Time after time when he was proven 100% wrong about the war, he shifted and morphed his viewpoint to avoid taking responsibilty. Also, neither of these geniuses has ever EVER apologized for demonizing those who opposed them and were prove 100% correct in their forsight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]