Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Adrift in Scarborough Country

By Robert Jensen, AlterNet. Posted May 20, 2005.


After a confrontation with Brent Bozell, the author is invited back to present evidence on a shout-TV program -- or so he thought.
Advertisement

Joe Scarborough welcomes viewers to his MSNBC talk show with the promise of "no passport required and only common sense allowed."

Unfortunately, it seems evidence is not always allowed in Scarborough Country -- at least evidence that might contradict the conservative "common sense" or make for "boring" television.

My experience as a guest on Scarborough's show two nights this past week is a reminder of how little space there is on U.S. television for serious discussion of public policy. I tell this story not because I feel personally aggrieved but because it's an indication of how degraded our political and media cultures are these days.

I've been a guest on the former Republican congressman's show a dozen times since 9/11, providing a left analysis of war, media and a variety of social issues. Although the format is highly constraining (not much time, up against a conservative host and one or more conservative guests, issues presented with a right-wing framing that would take more time than is available to challenge), I've always found Scarborough Country to be the conservative TV talk show in which I get the fairest treatment (certain FOX News shows, for example, can be much worse). It's far from an ideal format, but when they call, I don't hesitate to go on.

On May 16, I appeared with Brent Bozell from the Media Research Center, a right-wing media watchdog group, to discuss the controversy over Newsweek's Quran-flushed-down-a-toilet story. In the course of that discussion, I made what I thought were some obvious points: That there were other sources for Quran-desecration stories beyond the Newsweek article, and that such stories are not difficult to believe given a documented pattern of abuse in U.S. military prisons that includes sexual humiliation, beatings and murder.

At that point, Bozell demanded that I provide evidence of the assertion that U.S. soldiers had murdered prisoners. I mentioned that the military's own reports acknowledged this, but Bozell found that inadequate and demanded, "No, don't give me reports -- you give me the evidence."

Although I pride myself on keeping a level head on these shows, I must confess I was a bit confused at this point. No reports, just evidence? Aren't investigative reports a kind of evidence? Did he want me to produce a dead body for the camera?

Because I had not expected to discuss these details on the show, I hadn't prepped on those reports and couldn't cite specific documents on the spot. But I promised I would send them along once I got back to my office. Scarborough closed the segment with an invitation to me to come back the next night to bring the evidence that Bozell had harangued me about. I agreed and rearranged my schedule to make room for a follow-up appearance.

The next morning I assembled a variety of documents, including the unclassified portion of the report that Vice Adm. Albert T. Church had presented to Congress in March 2005, at which time Church cited six prisoner deaths caused by abuse. I assumed that material -- combined with stories about the military's own trials of soldiers on criminal homicide charges, New York Times stories about prison homicides that were based on military investigations, and an Associated Press report that compiled the most extensive list of prisoner deaths publicly available -- made my point adequately.

I sent those files to Scarborough's producer, who thanked me for my effort, and Bozell, who didn't return my call (although his assistant did confirm receiving the material). That evening I dutifully trudged over to the studio in Austin to present the evidence that I had been badgered about the previous evening. But instead of revisiting the question, as Scarborough had promised, I found myself electronically sandwiched between Pat Buchanan and U.S. News & World Report publisher Morton Zuckerman for another gabfest on the Quran story (transcript at ). The producer talking into my earpiece told me to remember that the show would concentrate on that day's developments in the Newsweek story and that I shouldn't spend too much time on the previous night's questions.


Digg!

Robert Jensen is a journalism professor at the University of Texas at Austin and author of Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity (City Lights, 2004).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
puppet
Posted by: Iamnotafruittree on May 20, 2005 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joe Scarborough is just a puppet to his own pay check. But, I must admit that I do enjoy laughing at him from time to time! I can't believe that there are people who actually take him seriously! The joke is on all of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

blabborough
Posted by: Michiganman on May 20, 2005 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose if a true liberal doesn't step up to be minced on these type shows the producers will just make one up! Takes some real guts to draw that target on your forhead. My compliments!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please Stop waiting for them to "FEED" you an opening?
Posted by: owlbear1 on May 23, 2005 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're giving away ALL of your power when you do that...

Of course, I imagine that if you didn't keep giving them control you wouldn't be asked back would you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking for the left side
Posted by: charlie54 on May 24, 2005 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I commend your efforts. Unpopular views should have knowledgeable and capable persons to balance the discussion. However, I am concerned that your experience does not have you well prepared to be a representative of the left side opinions. Be focused, is it opinion the right side is after or do they actually want facts? It is obvious, they have made their bread and butter on opinion and continue to influence those who turn their heads to facts. Thank you for your efforts, we need to expand the base, so that we can effect those programs that invite you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]