Between Fact and Fiction

By Mitra Ebadolahi, AlterNet. Posted April 4, 2005.

I have a guilty secret. I love J.J. Abrams' hit ABC show, Alias.

I am not alone in my adoration of Agents Bristow and Vaughn. Alias is one of primetime television's most-watched shows, consistently pulling in high ratings and earning rave reviews from entertainment pundits. The scripts are intelligently written, with plenty of intriguing plot twists and exasperating cliff-hangers. Yet I feel ashamed when I tell friends about my Alias addiction, mainly because the show unabashedly glorifies a shameful American institution--the Central Intelligence Agency.

Since its inception in 1947, the CIA has undermined democratically-elected governments in countries like Iran and Chile, meddled with free elections in scores of countries, including France and Italy, distributed massive quantities of propaganda in violation of international sovereignty laws, and funded and/or trained mercenaries who have terrorized countless civilians all over the world. And, since the CIA takes great pains to operate as secretly as possible, this list is just the tip of the iceberg--an abbreviated indication of the true range and scope of the Agency's activities over the past 60 years.

Yet, if we depended on Alias alone for information about the CIA, we would never know about this institution's dark history. The ways in which Alias writers and producers have subtly reinforced the image of the CIA as a righteous organization are fascinating. While the show's Chinese, Russian, Cuban, Irish and Egyptian villains routinely torture and murder their innocent victims, the CIA agents themselves rarely use real guns in confrontations, opting instead to use stun guns or tranquilizer darts most of the time. On the rare occasions when Sydney Bristow or another CIA agent does use gunfire, it is invariably in self-defense. The message is simple: CIA agents do not randomly kill or routinely sanction extreme violence.

History belies this message, however. To cite but one example, the CIA published two tactical manuals designed to train counterinsurgents to overthrow Nicaragua's democratically-elected government during the clandestine contra war in the 1980s. In "Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare," the CIA promoted acts of terrorism "against the civilian population, including assassination of government employees and sympathizers." One entire section of this manual was dedicated to "Selective Use of Violence for Propagandistic Effects"; here, the CIA affirmed that "it is possible to neutralize carefully selected and planned targets, such as court judges, [municipal] judges, police and State Security officials, etc."

Alias is misleading when it comes to CIA protocol for torture, too. Most of the time, torturers on the show are foreign terrorists or criminals. When Agent Vaughn takes an enemy into custody, the prisoner is accommodated in a spacious and well-lit jail cell or comfortable CIA safe house--never tortured in a filthy, cramped cage. In the rare instances when an American officer does resort to torture or illegal detention, it is usually someone affiliated with the FBI, National Security Council, or National Security Agency--or a rogue White House operative, like Robert Lindsey in season three. Sure, there have been times when Jack Bristow or Marcus Dixon roughed up a detainee--but it is always made clear that the Agency does not officially sanction such behavior. As Lauren Reed remarked last season, "The United States is not in the business of torturing witnesses for information."

This rosy picture of CIA protocol is ludicrous, particularly in light of the present controversy over the Agency's involvement in the prison abuse atrocities at Abu Ghraib. Alias writers have conveniently avoided plot lines that mention hot spots like Iraq and Afghanistan, where CIA operators are currently accused of torture and other human rights violations. Human Rights Watch has reported that CIA tactics in Iraq have included the use of muzzled dogs to threaten prisoners, sleep deprivation, near drowning (or "water boarding"), and exposure to extreme temperatures. On March 3, Washington Post journalist Dana Priest reported that a CIA officer who had killed an Afghan detainee by leaving him naked overnight in a freezing cell had been promoted within the Agency, while the CIA inspector general was supposedly investigating the case. Priest points out that the classification of CIA records, sanctioned by the Bush administration, has prevented American citizens from learning about all the Agency's criminal transgressions since the start of the "War on Terror."

In 2003, Mitra Ebadolahi published a historical analysis of the CIA's terrorist activities in Sandinista Nicaragua in UCLA's Westwind undergraduate journal. She can be reached at mightymousemitra@yahoo.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »