Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

Burning Tires for Power: Green Energy or Health Hazard?

By Kari Lydersen, AlterNet. Posted July 10, 2008.


The idea of burning waste tires for energy is catching on, and one city is hoping to build the biggest facility yet. But some residents are concerned.
Advertisement

Green is not the color most people would associate with burning tires.

But that's how developers of a proposed tire-fueled power plant in hardscrabble Erie, Pa., describe their project. They say the plant, which would turn 900 tons of tires each day into a 90-megawatt power supply, would be an ecologically beneficial investment since it would keep tires out of landfills or illegal dumps and generate electricity with one-tenth the emissions of traditional coal-fired power plants.

If it receives needed state approval, Erie Renewable Energy's project would be the largest power plant in the world burning "tire-derived fuel," or TDF.

Such plants are relatively common in Asia, Europe and the United States, but they usually operate on a much smaller scale -- they are often built in a modified existing facility to fuel one local industry like a paper mill or cement kiln. The ERE plant, if it is built, would be the world's largest tire-burning power plant and one of relatively few constructed solely for that purpose. It would consume 72,000 tires a day and produce enough electricity for about 75,000 homes.

Opponents concerned about health and environmental effects say power generation is just a way to disguise what is really a giant tire incinerator.

"I think there's some definite green-washing going on here," said Dr. Neil Carman, clean air program director for the Texas Sierra Club, who has testified against such plants.

ERE's Web site says the tires would be shredded into 2-inch pieces and burned suspended in sand in two boilers, in a completely closed environment, with top-notch emissions control and fire prevention technology.

The company's Web site also says opponents like to "conjure an image of uncontrolled tire fires with clouds of black smoke billowing into the air. ... Nothing could be farther from the truth." The Web site promises local residents would not find their cars and homes coated in black soot or ash, as often happened when an International Paper mill operated on the same site.

But residents who have formed the group KEEP (Keep Erie's Environment Protected) aren't buying it.

"They are calling this a completely green, renewable thing; well, burning tires isn't considered renewable by anybody," said KEEP member Dennis Stratton, an electrical engineer. "They talk about gasification and liquefaction. You're going to be throwing tire chunks into an oven at 1,600 degrees; I don't care what you call it, it's still going to be burning."

ERE notes that there are 275 million waste tires in the United States, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with one generated per person per year. The Web site (ERE founder Greg Rubino declined to speak for this story) says that since scrap tires are breeding grounds for mosquitoes, they are a source of West Nile virus. The company presents the power plant as a direct solution to Pennsylvania's supposed scrap tire problem.

Environmentalists point out there are other proven uses for old tires that don't involve burning, including recycling them into rubber mats or into material used to pave highways.

In 2005 strident local opposition torpedoed plans for a tire-burning power plant near the Twin Cities that would have generated 20 megawatts -- much less than the proposed Erie plant.

ERE's Web site says its emissions would be well within all legal standards and up to 10 times lower than those of coal-burning plants. But environmentalists and some residents argue that federal clean air standards are too lenient and don't regulate many dangerous metals, organic compounds and tiny particles. When synthetic rubber tires are burned, the byproducts would include highly toxic beryllium, lead, cadmium, selenium, silver, manganese and chromium 6 (of Erin Brockovich fame), according to Carman.

He said the waste gases of sulfur dioxide and other compounds in the emissions would also stick together in the air to form tiny toxic particles. Separately, unburned carbon would bond together to form highly carcinogenic benzene rings, or PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), which form as gases cool, "like skydivers separating and then forming big rings and circles."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: renewable energy, green energy, tires

Kari Lydersen, a regular contributor to AlterNet, also writes for the Washington Post and is an instructor for the Urban Youth International Journalism Program in Chicago.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The worst,
Posted by: Last Chance on Jul 10, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
most choking smoke comes from burning tires. That's why protesters like to burn them in the streets, because everybody runs away from it. Instead, many folks are using them to build their single story ranch style homes, which is SO much better than the fire-trap plywood and 2-by-4s thrown up today and sold for 20 times their their value to ad-driven idiots who see them as their mansions in the forest -- now going up in smoke wherever trees and brush will ignite from lightning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tires are made of petroleum no doubt.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 10, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So of course, burning those tires for electricity is the worst idea. A better idea for those tires would be to re-manufacture them. That would cut down on oil demands for one and cut down on the emissions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» re-manufacture? Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: re-manufacture? Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: re-manufacture? Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: re-manufacture? Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» re-manufactured into new tires Posted by: Last Chance
» reman tires Posted by: pfeifer999
» RE: re-manufacture? Posted by: kahuna_2bears
Failed Years ago in Columbus
Posted by: blynn on Jul 10, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'd think the failure of a similiar plant in Columbus Ohio in the last decade would be enough to deter anyone from trying this again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» do you have sources? Posted by: pfeifer999
Hot Damn!
Posted by: nirile on Jul 10, 2008 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shit. Everytime I hear of my hometown's newest hairbrained idea, all I can think of is the monorail episode from the Simpsons. I believe the Springfield Tire Fire made an appearance in that one.

This story is so sad for so many reasons, I hardly even know where to start. Yes, its true, Erie has been hit hard by NAFTA and our shifting global economics, but come on! REALLY?? A FREAKING TIRE BURNING ENERGY PLANT? How bout this, City of Erie, give me the money you would give to freakin Greg Rubino, and I'll get a butt load of CFLs and start a free replacement program/weatherizing program and you won't need some much damn energy.

Then I take that beautiful toxic site and freakin clean it up and turn it into a wonderland of bioremediation/phytotechnology.

For those of you not from Erie, the site that they're taking about is a beautiful site right on the cliffs of Lake Erie with an awesome view. All sorts of nasty things are hiding in the soil (because of its past use as a paper mill) and even more across the street in the old paper mill's secret dumping grounds. When the mill went under and the city wanted to buy the property, the didn't even want to do an environmental assessment on area of the dumping ground, figuring that if they knew what was there, they would just have to clean it up. URG.

Plus, don't even get me started about the shady land deals that were going down with the then Mayor Rick Filipi.

All this on top of the fact that finally, after the hi-larity of the SNL "Lake Erie Sludge Drink" sketch was wearing off and the city was actually starting to loose a bit of its ever present haze; the "brains" of the city want to start polluting it again?

I can't even understand Erie sometimes! Its these kinds of stories that simultaneously make me want to run screaming from there (which I did) and run screaming back to there...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

remanufacture
Posted by: RobNLA on Jul 10, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched a TV show where they showed how old tires are converted into mats. They are shredded and then broken down into very small pieces, magnets pull most of the metal. The left over material is further broken down into dust and then used to create floor mats.

I suspect this dust could be used to make new tires with further processing, but likely this doesn't happen because it is cheaper to create tires from new material. However, at some point the rising cost of oil will alter this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly. That is what I meant. Posted by: maxpayne
» It may be only my opinion . . . Posted by: dustdevil
Persistence of vision
Posted by: willymack on Jul 10, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Light bulbs seem to glow with a steady light, but are actually blinking on and off sixty times a second, which is too fast for our eyes to detect, therefore the expression "persistence of vision". Bad ideas have a similar property in that they seem to persevere, regardless of compelling reasons for discarding them. Burning ANYTHING is not the answer to our current energy and enviornmental dilemas. Combustion of this or that is an idea so deeply ingrained in people's minds that it will take a major effort at educating the public, coupled with real, concerted efforts to develop new and safe generation of power. Reduction of waste and population control will also have to take place, whether we like it or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's a good sign . . . Posted by: dustdevil
rafarumba
Posted by: rafarumba on Jul 10, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They just opened up a power plant that burns tires in Puerto Rico last month. Though they claim it's non-polluting technology, the neighbors weren't convinced and sued. No EIS had been required of the developer, so the Court shut them down until an EIS is completed. A small victory for an island where developers and their political allies run rampant over people's rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old History
Posted by: Gaubladt on Jul 10, 2008 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our area does tire burning at the concrete plant near Midlothian Texas. A few years ago, there was an aricle in the local Green Sheet about the opposition to that facility.
People who lived nearby noticed that their animals had a lot more still-births than normal. One woman who raised dobermans said that about 40 percent of each of her dog's litters were still-born. And, she was dying of cancer. Her husband had died of cancer.
Burning tires generates chemicals of the dioxin group. Members of that group are mutagenic.
Referece the speeches of former presidential candidate Barry Commoner. An early PBS documentary references a test on Rhesus Monkies that put the danger concentration level inside an organism at parts per trillion!
The bush administration relaxed the regulatioon of these chemicals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Buning tires another pollution generating boondoggle.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Jul 10, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why not burn peat? Bogs have been known to burn for decades under the ground.

No hydrocarbon combustion please. It isn't a solution just a continuation of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

its called gasification...not oxidation!!!
Posted by: tbone on Jul 10, 2008 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, first off, let me say that I would not want this in my backyard either, but let me be clear, this technology is in fact clean.

go to www.gocpc.com to learn more about gasification and power production.

Gasification is a high temperature process that cracks long chained hydrocarbons into smaller organic molecules, like H2, CH4, and CO. This process takes place in a REDUCTION atmosphere, that is, NO OXYGEN, it is not simply BURNING. The process must be "started" but once operating can be easily controlled. The high temperatures can create more NOx than typical power production processes, but can also be easily dealt with using catalytic converter technology, similar to your car.

I am not convinced the technology exists to EFFICIENTLY utilize this process fueled by used tires. The energy required to shred the tires will be significant and when taken into account removes most of the energy gains. However, the key here is the waste stream...what else are you going to do with all those tires? Recycling is ok, but to be clear, you cannot use old tires to make new ones, doesnt work, when rubber is vulcanized it is a one way reaction, you cant go back. Now, reusing them is feasible, there are plenty of playgrounds out there using rubber chips instead of wood, etc. I can see a home constructed of old tires being robust, safe, and cost effective, but shipping all those tires around to building sites is wasteful and reduces the overall savings of using the materials.

Again, I would not want this in my neighborhood, but it may in fact be a feasible solution to a highly visible problem. And with appropriate oversight I am sure this project could be clean and safe for everyone involved. Do your research, gasification is a useful green tech, but only if you have a waste stream that is under-utilized. Also, cost-of-scale issues are huge here, a large megawatt facility is much more cost effective than small home use units. I used to work for the company I listed above, they are still struggling, but that shouldnt restrict the research into the technology, and in case you're wondering, most of their projects were funded by you and I, the taxpaying public.

Trevor

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tire Burning not Clean
Posted by: KEEP on Jul 10, 2008 4:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trevor claims that this is a clean process. Why then is there a 300 foot smoke stack? In the companies own air application, it states there will be 8000 pounds a day of toxic particulate emissions a day, or 2 million, 900 thousand pounds a year. There are 5 schools within a mile of this, and it is within 500 yards of Lake Erie. Expect a majority of the emissions to end up in the Lake. The PA DEP does not look at PAHs which are a known to cause cancer. In studies it has been found that burning Tires instead of Coal releases 2 to 3 times the amout of PAHs. The University of Buffalo just released a study in 2005 about PAHs causing breast cancer. The Tire Incinerator is trying to claim it is Renewable, Clean Energy. It is neither. If this were so great wouldn't every city be trying have it?
Ask Questions
Dennis

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Alternative Use for Tires
Posted by: Michael7843853 on Jul 11, 2008 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems to me that a few years ago I read how ground up tires can be used to make a phenomenally durable and safe form of asphalt. Too durable, no doubt, for the companies involved to want to use it. Once again, the public good is being fisted by the invisible hand of the so-called free market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Necklacing or Salvation
Posted by: john2007 on Jul 12, 2008 7:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am totally skeptical of the claims of developers in cases such as this and know beyond a doubt that they always prefer profits to public safety. On the other hand, what if they are correct about this technology? What if we could generate energy, save landfills, and not cause cancer or mutations?

I wouldn't wish beta site status on any community but it would be nice to see how it works in a long-term trial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is nuts -- good for Carman
Posted by: davescott on Jul 14, 2008 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neil Carman has been a Sierra Club toxics specialist and activist for a long time -- glad to see he's on top of this. I'm amazed that anyone still thinks burning tires is a solution in 2008. Burning pollutants doesnt get rid of them, it just moves them -- to our air and water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mercury tires?
Posted by: SolarnLinuxRules on Jul 26, 2008 10:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Exactly what part of the tire has mercury in it? If that is the case that it does contain mercury then we have been spreading mercury across America over every road we use from tire wear, and it would be leaching into the ground where there are acres and acres of spent American tires from years and years of build-up. And in any product and road made with these spent American tires.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]