Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

The Strange Death of Republican America

By Sidney Blumenthal, Huffington Post. Posted August 6, 2008.


Today no one can even envision when the Republicans will control the presidency and both houses of the Congress as they did just two years ago.
Advertisement

On July 29, President George W. Bush appeared at the Lincoln Electric Company in Euclid, Ohio, where he spoke about energy and then asked the audience for questions. The opportunity for people in a small town in the Midwest to pose a question directly to the president of the United States is a rare one, possibly a once in a lifetime experience. "And now I'd like to answer some questions, if you have any," said Bush. But his request was returned with silence. Bush filled the air with an awkward joke: "After seven-and-a-half years, if I can't figure out how to dodge them, I shouldn't..." The audience tittered nervously. Bush continued, "If you don't have any questions, I can tell you a lot of interesting stories." The crowd laughed again, but no one raised a hand. "Okay," said Bush, "I'll tell you a story."

Despite the daily tracking polls and the back-and-forth of the candidates, the underlying story of the 2008 presidential campaign remains the Bush presidency and how it brought about the end of the long era of Republican political dominance that began in 1968 with the election of Richard Nixon. That story is the subject of my new book, "The Strange Death of Republican America: Chronicles of a Collapsing Party."

Bush has the lowest sustained popularity among modern presidents. The Republican Party has fallen farther behind the Democratic Party in party identification and favorable ratings than it has in decades. Democrats are poised to make dramatic gains in their numbers in the House of Representatives and the Senate. The previously little-known Senator Barack Obama could have vaulted to become the presumptive Democratic nominee only as a response to Bush. Senator John McCain's emergence at the presumptive Republican nominee is also one of Bush's consequences. Without the crackup of the conservative movement and the fragmentation of the Republican primary field, McCain would not have had his opening. His candidacy is as much a manifestation of the shattering of the Republican phalanx as Obama's. Whatever the outcome of their contest, the party as it was is over. Today no one can even envision when the Republicans will control the presidency and both houses of the Congress as they did just two years ago.

Bush's decline is an end to more than family dynasty; it is an end of political empire. Bush, "The Decider," was the implementer of complementary radical plans for an imperial presidency and a one-party government to be ruled for generations by Republicans.

Dick Cheney, whose Secret Service code name when he was President Gerald Ford's chief of staff, "Backseat," suggested his invisible influence, was the originator of the imperial presidency. It was a overarching idea he took from the Nixon White House, when he was then counselor Donald Rumsfeld's deputy, and elaborated as vice president into a doctrine of an unaccountable and unfettered "unitary executive" that had the right unto itself even to order torture.

Bush's chief political strategist, Karl Rove, whom he has called "The Architect" and "Turdblossom," was the designer of the grand realignment that would lock in Republican control for time immemorial.

But Bush's fiascos, from Gulf to shining Gulf, from the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq to FEMA in New Orleans, were the culmination of Republican ideology and have unraveled Republican strengths built up over 40 years. I explain the scope of Bush's damage to his party in a talk on July 31 at the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C., which can be viewed here.

Though the Republican era is drawing to an end, a new Democratic one is not inevitable. Its dawning would require not only winning the White House and the Congress but also governing together successfully, which has not been possible since Lyndon Johnson was president.

In the meantime, the growing intensity of the day-to-day campaign has turned the focus away from the Bush presidency. Bush has achieved the weird effect of being the incumbent, still responsible, and increasingly ignored as somehow irrelevant. The silence that greeted Bush in Euclid, Ohio is symptomatic of his fading while still being present. Dominating politics just a short time ago, his elusiveness can only work to the advantage of the Republicans. If the Democratic campaign allows him to escape from being in the picture it will have forgotten a cardinal law of politics that voters can be led into the future only by making the election a referendum on the past.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: strange death of republic, gop, election 2008

Sidney Blumenthal, author of "The Clinton Wars," writes a column for Salon and the London Guardian.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Since when is integrity
Posted by: weathered on Aug 6, 2008 2:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
political party dependent, look at LIEberman and cringe.

Something very good can from this if we confront it, but as long MSM continues to pretend the totality of crimes that 9/11 wrought require dark denial the prognosis is poor.

Im just a 3rd. gen. Republican absolutely ashamed of the affilation w/the only comfort that Im not alone.

Obama/Gore/Kucinich/Reich/Warren Buffett/Murtha

this is the team I'd like to serve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Since when is integrity Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
» RE: Since when is integrity Posted by: weathered
Resurrection
Posted by: hquain on Aug 6, 2008 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's worth remembering that Bush's presidency went swiftly downhill after inauguration. After the original hoo-haa about 'adults taking over', there was essentially nothing, except the embarrassing cave to China on the surveillance plane forced down. By September 2001, his administration was in deep doldrums, presaging freefall. Only Osama saved him, and Cheney will be remembered forever for definitively seizing the government apparatus almost instantly after the attacks.

Thus Bush began fading almost immediately and would be all but unremembered now, were it not that the rightist elements he brought with him got the opportunity of the century, and grabbed it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: esurrection Posted by: weathered
Because of dirty GOP campaign tricks, Obama will lose in November unless he...
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 6, 2008 2:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
picks Senator Clinton for his running mate.

Once in office, Barrack should put Hillary in charge of getting Americans the health care system they deserve. What about Bill, you might wonder? That's easy. Make him our ambassador to the United Nations.

Since that fantasy won't happen and my vote doesn't REALLY count, I'm trying to prepare myself for another four years of White House corruption -- under the "leadership" of President McCain.

For reasons why bitter Hillary supporters should NOT vote for the grumpy old senator, visit my new nonprofit Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com.

One of the Web site arguments summarizes my investigation of "Songbird" McCain's behavior as a POW in North Vietnam. The facts-check shows how he distorted his so-called "heroic" war record and exploited it for political gain. Part of the information is based on my recent communications with a former POW.

If, after visiting UnfitMcCain.com, you agree with my findings, please tell your family and friends about the Web site.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, lifelong registered Republican and former McCain supporter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for supporting UnfitMcCain.com
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 6, 2008 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seven days ago, I started tracking hits on my new nonprofit Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com.

On the home page, I request visitors to recommend the site to family and friends with five emails that ask each recipient to do the same.

Amazingly, after 202 hits on Day One, the total jumped yesterday to 105,211!

Thanks again and please keep the Anti-McCain Straight Talk Express rolling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shameless self promotion Posted by: progressive-life
» Hugh... Posted by: edgar1
» Stop apologizing, Hugh... Posted by: ranchero42
It's All Cyclical
Posted by: drricklippin on Aug 6, 2008 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is nothing strange or new about the recent decline of the Reublican party.It's all cyclical.

The Reagan/Gingrich "free market solves all revolution" has run its course and is over. (President Bill Clinton did not really help much with reversing it)

Now it is time for the return of Democratic ideas/ideals and it should be quite interesting under President Obama

I will say that the religious right component of the modern republican party has been almost completely discredited by hypocritical and truly bizarre revelations among its leaders.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampoton,Pa
ralippin@aol.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's All Cyclical Posted by: bobtr900
» RE: It's All Cyclical Posted by: kelt65
Envision?
Posted by: BlackbirdHighway on Aug 6, 2008 3:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, I can envision McCain winning in November.

Considering that the Republicans stole the election 2000 and got away with it, then stole the election in 2004 and got away with it, what exactly do you expect them to do in 2008?

Why do you think we keep hearing that the polls are predicting a close election? If Obama was up 20% in the polls and McCain somehow won, then people wouldn't believe it. But if Obama is only up a few percent, and McCain comes out the winner, then it's "oh well, the polls weren't accurate enough".

Between now and November, 100's of thousands of mostly black Democratic voters are going to be purged from the registered voters lists in key states. Other tricks will be used as well. Possibly millions of votes will either not be counted or will be miscounted.

Obama can still win, but they are not going to make this a fair election, you can count on that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spineless Democrats: Impeach the Criminals Bush & Cheney
Posted by: left_libertarian on Aug 6, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are all talk and no action.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hugh Posted by: bobtr900
Why Ask Questions?
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Aug 6, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush continued, "If you don't have any questions,... ."

Why would someone in the audience ask a question? If we have learned anything in the last seven years is should be that you can't trust anything this administration says.

I happen to be old enough to recall the public reaction to Eisenhower's denial of the U2 overflight of the Soviet Union. The public was supportive, or at least mixed concerning the actual flights, but there was nearly universal horror that a president would actually lie to the American people. How far we have come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why Ask Questions? Posted by: progressive-life
» Lies and Damned Lies Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
Not Wise To Count Chickens Before They're Hatched
Posted by: thebeerdoctor on Aug 6, 2008 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sydney's hubris is disturbing but understandable, since he operates in that special cloud called inside politics. There are so many things that could still defeat the democrats. A staged terrorist attack for one. A sudden outbreak of war with Iran is another. And it would be wise to remember that there is still plenty of proprietary software (Diebold) out there that could steal the election electronically. The DLC democrats can sneer at McCain all they want, for being too old and too silly. A backlash sympathy vote could vault him to the white house. Only a truly united Democratic party will be able to pull off a victory.
Without full participation from the Clinton faction, this campaign is doomed.
http://www.streetalker.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now is the Time
Posted by: Nicnic on Aug 6, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Now is the time to go after them. The veil of 911 is wearing off. The obfuscation is becoming transparent. The lies are being seen and the criminals can non longer hide. "Let's Roll!" Begin with the impeachment of George W. Bush and everything will unravel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh Yea! Wait till they STEAL the 2008 SELECTION!
Posted by: williameon on Aug 6, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They stole the 2000 Selection!
They stole the 2002 Selection!
They stole the 2006 Selection!
And
They're stealing the 2008 Election

Sounds like a winning formula to me!

Caging lists
Intimidation
Missing Ballots
Touch Screens
No machines or
Broken voting machines
Black Box Vote counting Machines which allows them change the vote.


The icing on the cake is:
The Endless Propaganda
A Faux Media System that covers up all of it with more Propaganda!
What do you think Rove is working on right now?
Voter Disenfranchisement
Red Herrings and
Voter Initiatives to get out the Reptilian Vote
Disinformation and Terrorism!

He has a direct link to every Propaganda Spewing Parrot on T.V.
He speaks and their lips move.
You have a part to play in their Illusion.
They get to ride on a 300 foot yacht while you drown in real life as
The Victim.
Katrina anyone?

The Sixty Four Thousand Dollar question is?
Are you going to let them get away with it and
How do we stop them?
First thing is to out the vote!
Stop the intimidation at the polls by hired thugs
Make sure paper ballots are available.
Ask your representatives for voting machines with a verifiable paper trail.
Do exit poles.
Turn off
The Faux News.
If everything they have said for fifty+ years is BU__! SH__!
Why would they stop now?
They’re trying to cover up their crimes with more lies.
What is more important?
The color of Britney’s under ware?
Or
That Crooks are ruining our Government and running the Media?
Stop it now!
or
Forever, Forgo your Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Counting chickens before they're hatched?
Posted by: SufiLizard on Aug 6, 2008 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to realize there's a very real chance this election will leave us utterly shocked.

Republican election fraud has gotten progressively bigger and bolder so the will of the people is no longer very relevant in our elections.

The Supreme Court and lower federal courts have been stacked with political operatives with no regard for upholding the law, nor the Constitution.

The Justice Department has become just an arm of the Republican party.

AND... no matter who wins this election they will come into office to face a huge economic melt-down that is the result of 30 years of Reaganomics.

Even if Obama does win in November (which is a good possibility even with all the above factors working against him) he could very well be a Jimmy Carter type who gets blamed for the economic calamity of his predecessors. And we could go right back to Republican rule again in 2012.

And never discount the impact of McCain's latest ad comparing Obama to the Anti-christ as portrayed in the Left Behind series of novels. "The One" is a very clear appeal to the millions of "Christians" who have read those books.

Make no mistake, we are the underdogs and we need to fight and scrap like underdogs.

Overconfidence will lead to ruin. For the Democratic party, but more importantly for the country and the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Commondreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Aug 6, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we can dethrone the extremist right wing ideology we have lived under, then this 8 years of debauchery and sophistry and destruction just might have been worth it.

Certainly in the last 4 years, the implosion I was expecting from bad policy and corruption and a pyramid-scheme economy has finally happened and not a moment too soon - to show the American people the light - that extremist pro-market policies do not work (except for the imperial heads at the top)...that religious terrorism does not work (if you are a good citizen agnostic or atheist - heaven forbid)...that exclusiveness (as in GLBT issues and in economic issues)...does not work, and lastly, that you can vote against your wallets because of fear mongering only for so long..that is, until you're flat broke - and then it's time for an acceptance that extremism of any kind is not a good thing.

Right now, my agnostic self thanks God for GWB and his merry frat house henchmen, without whom the implosion for the middle and under-paid classes would probably not have happened. We can only hope this routs out the extremists for a long time and that we can have a reasonable government that blends the best of non-terrorist conservatism with the best of progressivism (preferably much more on the progressive side, investing in Main Street instead of in Wall Street).

Our last hope is that the anger and broken wallets of Americans will persuade them to look past the current political ads that are doing the Swiftboat dance...and get down to looking at the truth - that good progressivism works and we need to save ourselves before it's too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More Debauchery Please Posted by: edgar1
» RE: More Debauchery Please Posted by: CommonDreamer
It doesn't matter---they got what they wanted
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 6, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if the long nightmare of conservative control of the country may finally be changing, they had their way long enough to accomplish much of their goals.

Ever since Reagan got elected in 1980, a huge concentration of wealth has occurred. The obscene millionaires and billionaires have gotten what they wanted. For 25 years they have pretty much had their own way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dead today, born again tomorrow
Posted by: QCao009 on Aug 6, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sydney:

Declaring the elephant dead is mighty premature !!! It will just be reincarnated and born again in a different form. When it comes to power, Dems are not so far behind in terms of corruptibility and inflexibility. When power continues to corrupt, we have to change our way of doing business as usual. Then and only then, will we change them ... after we change us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Death? It's alive and well
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 6, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just yesterday I read another right wing hack who, when Bugliosi mentioned the redacted white paper, just denied that the white paper exists! They actually deny it exists! Just like they deny the "white house memo" exists. And then they move on to talking about how there is no evidence...

The case against the Bush administration is solid, yet the democrats do not act. That is why, in every way that matters, the two parties are equal. The democrats do not have a problem with robbing America blind and giving the money to the top 1%. Remember, most of the dems are in the top 1% too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Death of the Republic
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 6, 2008 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is unfortunate, that Republic leaders are notorious for helping big business and are thought as Pro-War today. In my opinion with the Republicans now gone and the democrats in charge, they will push for more nationalized everything. Which means more debt and less freedom because of the debt. The nation is going to lose its Republic and become a more socialized base enslaved to a few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Death of the Republic Posted by: ranchero42
What's strange about it?
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 6, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is strange is that it has taken this long for Republican Americans to get a clue and realize that they have been lied to, divided by issues that really shouldn't concern them, bamboozled because they refuse to see that the left and right hands are not working together! What is strange is that they continue to have hope for McCain - he's different, straight talk express, my eye!

Over the last 30 years more social services have been cut, more jobs have off-shored, more people are working more hours for less money! More has been put onto the back of the taxpayers - health-care, retirement savings, financing the S&L debacles, bailing out the airlines, the Enron fiasco, more and more welfare for the rich and corporate. All the while that this shell game has been going on the "Religious Right" has been loudly proclaiming their agenda!

This bunch of thugs need to be IMPEACHED and jailed, and made to repay the money that they have siphoned to their buddies!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's strange about it? Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Bush is a spendaholilc Posted by: edgar1
THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 6, 2008 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's looking good for the Dems right now but I'm not jumping to any conclusions. Obama is bashed on a daily basis by the media. McCain on the other hand is always shown blabbing about how Obama "gets it all wrong". He's never specific. For people with even slim doubts, this steady drip of baseless criticism sinks in. In time the doubters vote with no idea why they vote for or against either candidate. The media votes for them. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain is straw man
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on Aug 6, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Rebublicans know they haven't got a chance in hell, so it makes no sense for any potentially useful Repub (are there any left?) to run in this election. Might as well burn a throw-away spare like McCain whose advanced age, borderline senility and imminent dementia disqualify him as a "world leader" right off the bat. The USA doesn't need a gerontocracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McCain is straw man Posted by: maxfactor
Bush Isn't a Conservative
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 6, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
clearly democrats/liberals haven't been george w fans since 2000. but a large number of republicans and conservative leaning independents despise bush as well. aside from his ineptitude as a CEO, his dishonesty in his Iraq policy and his utter inability to defend a policy in English, Bush simply isn't a conservative. Take your model: Goldwater or Reagan, Buckley or Taft. Buchanan. His big govt, interventionist policies abroad and at home exceed anything his GOP predecessors or conservative philosophers prior to the victory of the neocons under Cheney would justify. I would agree Reagan's aggressive foreign policy up to about 1987 might parallel Bush's policies abroad, but even Reagan cut a deal with the Soviet Union in his second term, perhaps the one thing that will preserve his prestige.

There well may be no further "Republican" presidents; the question is whether conservatives will form a new party based on limited govt or not,leaving the Rumsfeld and Wall St types to form yet another party or try to worm their way into the Democratic Party in alliance with the Rubins and Clintons.

Likewise, the Democratic Party is not guaranteed eternal life either, especially if the standard of living and energy sources plunge and foreign wars rage on during an Obama corporate - Democrat regime.

In 1860 the parties realigned and merged in various ways. Maybe it's that time again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush Isn't a Conservative Posted by: ranchero42
Yes, I can...
Posted by: Sanford on Aug 6, 2008 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Today no one can even envision when the Republicans will control the presidency and both houses of the Congress as they did just two years ago.”

Oh, yes, I can. After all, we’ve had George W. for 8 years. It will no good to have Democratic control of Congress unless some (many) of the Democratic time servers are voted out as well. "Off the Table" Pelosi ought to be one of the first to go. I don’t think that Obama, if he should win, will go after the Bush administration criminals either. But you and I can. Here’s a movement that seems to have legs, but only if enough people – you and I - support it:

- The Justice Robert Jackson Conference for Planning the Prosecution of
High Level American War Criminals -

The event will be held September 13 & 14, 2008 in Andover, MA

We've lined nearly 20 great speakers - law professors, lawyers,
prosecutors, journalists, authors and activists.

We need your help to get the word out about the event! Please forward
this email to any interested parties. The conference website is
linked text

AGENDA FOR THE "JUSTICE ROBERT H. JACKSON CONFERENCE":

PLANNING FOR THE PROSECUTION OF HIGH LEVEL AMERICAN WAR CRIMINALS

September 13 - 14, 2008

Andover, Massachusetts

Registration details available at linked text

Saturday - - 9:00 a.m. Opening Remarks

Brief introductory remarks stressing that crimes and misconduct have now
occurred twice in forty years - - in Viet Nam and then again in Iraq - - and
the high level perpetrators need to be punished (as occurred at Nuremberg
and Tokyo in 1945 and 1946) in order to insure that people will not do these
things again (as the Germans and Japanese have not committed their crimes
again).

9:30 a.m. Panel Discussion And Subsequent Audience Participation On:
The

Crimes Of Torture And Degrading And Abusive Conduct, And Perpetrators and
Punishments."

10:45 a.m. Break

11:00 a.m. Panel Discussion And Subsequent Audience Participation On:
"Crimes Against the Peace - - Preemptive War And Aggressive War."

12:15 noon Luncheon

1:00 p.m. Panel Discussion And Subsequent Audience Participation On:
"Murder and Other Crimes Under State Laws."

2:15 p.m. Break

2:30 p.m. Panel Discussion And Subsequent Audience Participation On:
"The Torture Team: The Actions of Bush Administration Lawyers, Their
Criminal Liabilities, And Potential Disbarment."

3:45 p.m. Break

4:00 p.m. Panel Discussion And Subsequent Audience Participation On:
"Existing And Potential Domestic, Foreign and International Court Cases On
Torture, Rendition, and War."

Sunday -- 9:00 a.m. Morning Forum I

Topic for Panel and Audience:

What must be done to make the question of prosecutions an issue in the fall
political campaign and to have the question become a significant subject in
the media and on the internet.

10:30 a.m. Break

10:45 a.m. Morning Forum II



Topics for Panel and Audience:

A. Creating an umbrella coordinating committee with representatives
from various organizations, including those that are already involved in
cases.


B. Creating a Center to keep track of and organize relevant briefs,
articles, books, opinions, facts, etc.

C. The possibility of having a Chief Prosecutor's office a la
Nuremberg.


12:00 noon Final Review and Event Summary

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The undead
Posted by: sirios on Aug 6, 2008 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impending death of the Repubs? Wishful thinking. these guys are zombies, and you know what happens when you are convinced they are dead, they suddenly rise up from the grave and wreak more havoc than ever before. Maybe the writer is using bushes tactic of, if you repeat yourself often enough people will accept it as true. Anyway ,pray ,meditate, demonstrate or whatever, because the runaway train that the american society is riding on, is about to run out of track and hurl head long into the abyss.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Somebody forgot to tell me the Republicans were dead
Posted by: mercianomad on Aug 6, 2008 12:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as I can see, they are not dead and will wheedle their way into the limelight again and again as long as the current system stays in place.

Don't expect the "democrat revolution" to bring you much of anything. Certainly don't expect any permanence, and don't expect American culture to start showing any signs of enlightenment any time soon. It is now openly anti-intellectual and seems on course to remain that way indefinitely because everything is pretty well institutionalized now.

Just watch Obama get treated like Jimmy Carter did if he wins. If he gets more than one term before the next neocon swoops in I will be massively surprised.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ba
Posted by: mnstra on Aug 6, 2008 1:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wishful and naive thinking/writing.There is a large voting block out there for McCain and company.
Even without the cheating it is poised to be a close race.A lot of people ;SUV drivers and execs. like the Republicans. Obama is clearly a vacuous candidate who may win by default,He is
a hollow candidate who does not have the courage of his convictions.Ge ready for 4 more years of hell no matter who wins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ba Posted by: JERSEYDAN
Wishful Thinking
Posted by: John Carey on Aug 6, 2008 6:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd love to believe this, but I too think it is wishful thinking. Time and time again I have heard the political pundits say "Bush is irrelevant." Then the administration comes up with a law so insane it will curl your hair, and it passes 549 - 2. Again and again.

I don't see the republicans showing any signs of nervousness. I agree that in a real world election, the Republicans are finished, but you can bet there will be an October Surprise coming. I don't think we have seen the last of these guys. There really isn't a democratic party to vote for anyway. So if you have a one party system (as we do) what party do you think will be elected?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blumenthal ran a similar piece in Oct.2004
Posted by: JERSEYDAN on Aug 6, 2008 6:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In it he explained why Bush was going down for the count. We all know how that worked out: all the negatives Bush had in that election showed him losing. He was unpopular. He was below 50%. Younger voters were going for Kerry. Lots of new Democratic voters. A genuine war hero in Kerry up against a feeble minded,AWOL, college drunk who couldn't put a coherent sentence together even with the help of a remote earpiece to feed him answers during the debates. Racism will ultimately undo Obama, as well as old fashioned polling place shenanigans; voter ID laws, provisional ballots ( which won't be counted ) and "spoilage." Not to mention electronic machines. We can write the headlines and analysis right now:" In the end, not enough voters trusted Obama. He lost the white worker vote. He lost on national security. On experience. etc." The media is already telling us how they will spin his loss. Only the folks at liberal blogsites are in denial over this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Wishful Thinking
Posted by: John Carey on Aug 6, 2008 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm amazed at how many people who should know better project their wishful thinking onto Obama. People assume that since he is (half) black, he is liberal. He's no more liberal than George Bush is conservative. These labels have long since ceased to have any meaning.

Out of wishful thinking, people assume that Obama is against war. WRONG! He's every bit as pro-war as McCain. He wants war with Pakistan instead of Iran. Pakistan has nuclear weapons (courtesy of the US) and next door is Russia, which will kick us from here to China. That's great, because then we can go to war with them too! Ain't war grand? Check out his speech to AIPAC, where he (along with all the other candidates) pledged undying loyalty to Israel now and forever, and promised the US would go to war anytime anywhere if it pleased Israel (which it does).

Heaven help us. One of these people will be our next president and he/she will be a totalitarian Stalinesque dictator from the day they are sworn into office. All war all the time is a safe forecast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Put up
Posted by: Sherirux on Aug 7, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are all fed up. We are all worried. We need to stand together and DO SOMETHING!
We just opened our Democratic HQ in our very red district. We need many volunteers to keep this forward motion going. Have any of you volunteered at your local Democratic office? If not, why not? This cannot be the time for everyone to sit back and wait for others to volunteer in your stead! We need you! Your country needs you! Fold a flyer, answer the phone, GET OUT THE VOTE! You can BE a part of changing things for the better! Please! Volunteer today!..... Or regret you didn't help come Jan. 20, 2009.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Put up Posted by: mercianomad
REPUBLICANS
Posted by: rideyourbike11 on Aug 8, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If everyone were true to their parties edict:

Republicans would be people who want to keep what they have earned.

Democrats would be people who want to share what they have earned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neoconservatism has roots in European Fascism not in any US political tradition.
Posted by: yellow on Aug 8, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neoconservatism is often mistakenly attributed to the disaffection of former, mostly Jewish, leftists with the excesses of Stalin and Stalinist regimes. It is often encapsulated in an old joke made by conservative humorist P.J.O'Rourke about Irving Howe in which he says of Howe's "leftism," "He supports all revolutions except those that have really happened and opposes all wars except those against Arabs." However, US neoconservatism, Jewish or not, has roots in European fascism not US political traditions and historic experience. And it is a response to the crisis of late capitalist stagnation and the use of imperialism to restore declining US hegemony.

An excellent film, The Power of Nightmares, exposes the link between US neoconse