Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

HGH: Clemens Denies Taking It to Get Buff, Stallone Loves It -- Will It Go Mainstream?

By Scott Thill, AlterNet. Posted March 3, 2008.


Despite the Clemens saga in Congress, money, not morality will determine whether human growth hormone becomes an every day drug.
Advertisement

Roger Clemens is a terrible liar.

When he threw a shattered bat at Mike Piazza during the infamous Mets-Yankees Subway Series in 2000, he tried to tell me, the sole journalist given post-game access to him because I was also managing his personal website, that he figured the shattered stick was the actual baseball. Rather than trying again to hit the same player he had nailed between the eyes with a reportedly errant fastball earlier in the year, the Rocket argued, he was simply trying to get a confused if routine out at first. And he didn't understand or appreciate the implications opposing theories were putting him or his family through.

Two Bush terms later, and he's foisting the same dogged, determined line on Congress, but this time about something much less dangerous: human growth hormone, commonly known as HGH. And before you disagree with that admittedly unpopular position, ask yourself this: Would you want Roger Clemens throwing broken bats at your head, or would you rather he kindly inject you with HGH and help you pick up World Series wins, Cy Young awards and million-dollar endorsements along the way? It's not an easy question to answer, especially now that Congress has decided that Clemens' recent testimony in a hearing on HGH was mere theater wrapped in perjury and possibly demands a Department of Justice investigation.

But before you answer it, maybe you should consider what Rocky and Rambo icon Sylvester Stallone said after his 61-year-old body outweighed its former Rambo by an additional 40 pounds of muscle: "HGH is nothing ... Mark my words. In 10 years it will be over the counter."

Given the nexus between sports and pharma, it's hard to argue with him. It's the same logic that dictates the lucrative relationship between the erectile dysfunction market of Viagra or Cialis and the National Football League, for example. Created originally to treat hypertension and angina, which didn't work out so well, Viagra feasted on male insecurity over impotence and went supernova, which has worked out very nicely indeed ever since. Meanwhile, HGH has been used for years to treat growth deficiencies and other conditions, although in earlier days the hormones were taken from the pituitary glands of cadavers. When synthetic hormone production kicked in during the 80s and 90s, the drug crossed over with a quickness, breaking out of its conventional usage in pediatric endocrinology and going viral at pharmacological multinationals across the world. And it wasn't long until, like Viagra before it, HGH soon became known more for its ability to postpone Father Time, although for the entire body rather than just its crotch. So Stallone is probably right: It won't be long before you see HGH commercials during the Super Bowl.

Plus, the arguments against HGH are the usual ones: It's dangerous, it can kill you, it doesn't work and so on. And while these are certainly valid medical and physical arguments against its proliferating popularity, the same thing can be said about substances already legal and vigorously defended, from alcohol to caffeine to trans-fats and all the way to carbon dioxide. In the end, what you're left with in the fight over HGH is a cultural standoff over ethics regarding freedom, regulation, health and permissive social attitudes. And we know how those standoffs tend to end.

Stallone admittedly used HGH to turn back the clock, if only to create a couple more Rambo and Rocky flops. "Testosterone to me is so important for a sense of well-being when you get older," he told Time. "Everyone over 40 years old would be wise to investigate it because it increases the quality of your life."

And even though Clemens has unequivocally dismissed usage, no one can dismiss the stunning late-career stats he put up while allegedly on the juice. His agent Randy Hendricks gave it the old college try, releasing an analysis of the Rocket's questionable numbers that found nothing to fret about. Just Roger being Roger, the extensive report basically argued. But he was met with a rejoinder from professors from University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, who analyzed the same data and found that "unusual factors may have been at play in producing his excellent late-career statistics." While other pitchers of the same age were faltering or shredding tendons, Clemens was increasing his efficiency and commanding crazy salaries for it. That was a statistical abnormality; whether or not it was because of drugs is beside the point.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: clemens, human growth hormone, stallone

Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm.com. His writing has appeared on Salon, XLR8R, All Music Guide, Wired and others.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Congress is wasting our time...
Posted by: Obijuan on Mar 3, 2008 1:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...with this nonsense. Pretending to care about justice by pursuing a baseball player who lied about being on the juice. Pathetic.

Wake up America. George HW Bush is a criminal, and always has been. George W Bush is a criminal who used cocaine and who went AWOL on your tax dollars. Cheney is a criminal in too many ways to count. Karl Rove is a criminal and the worst kind of liar. They all need to be brought under oath and investigated for war crimes. Or even worse, they should be waterboarded into admitting all they have done on live television.

America is constantly at war in pursuit of peace. This is an oxymoron. Realize this. Your beloved homeland is gone. Remove this administration by whatever means is necessary, and put most of them (in the 100s) behind bars where they belong.

obi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well...
Posted by: talkville on Mar 3, 2008 2:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As in "The Economy" (or in "The Ecology?) 'Growth' is Good, in and of itself? One Human plus One dosage of HGH equals a BETTER Human? Perhaps a Super Human? A Human with bulging muscles is BETTER than a natural human without these? By ingesting HGH will Stallone's genetic makeup perhaps immediately transform so he can father a 'new and improved' 'race' of humans?

By all means, let Stallone and anyone else 'grow the economy' by spending time and money and ingesting HGH to their hearts content (or demise, who knows?); each individual will seek their own mode of existence. Or maybe the metaphysical twin of HGH can be injected into "The Economy" and we could experience vigorous, rapid and oh such excellent Growth in these times of capitalist cycle-change. What better 'stimulus' than that?

It's not the substance itself or people's use of HGH so much. What I have a problem with is the Promise. Cancer is also Growth. Federalism is also Growth. Growth describes a process of development, in this world it includes the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

Perhaps it will be the 'next big thing' (!), but we're still rocking and reeling from a host of previous 'big things' and not altogether positively I might add. One wonders if Mr Stallone's investment portfolio might include certain investments? What particular 'arrangements' are held by the manufacturers of this substance and what kind of 'compromises' have the scientist-workers and technocrats arrived at in developing it?

Alas! I'm left with too many questions before I myself rush out and spend my money (desperately needed elsewhere!) on HGH; I'll do without muscles and sexualized admirations myself. This inexact and imperfect natural life I'm living is plenty fine for me, despite its many perturbations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Healing hormone
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Mar 3, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Growth hormone [GH] is needed for healing as well as for
growing. GH enabled the movie star and the baseball player to
continue working when otherwise they would have had to retire.
The GH enabled them to heal the insults of aging so that they
could work longer. The choice is: would you rather live 100
years and be forced to retire because of your physical condition at
60 or would you rather live 99 years but be able to continue
working until you are 80? I suspect that most of us would choose
the second alternative. If we re-named it Healing Hormone [HH]
would Congress be less prejudiced against it? GH or HH is used
as medicine to heal persistent/unhealing wounds. Eleven year
olds have survived wounds that would kill a person of any other
age. GH is also the injury survival hormone. You have more of
it at age 11 than at any other age.

Congress may be influenced by health insurance companies who
don't want to pay for GH/HH. That is another reason to go for a
single payer government health insurance like the Canadians have.

I would prefer a secretagogue if possible because use of an actual
hormone may over time reduce the size of the gland that makes
the hormone. Taking an artificial hormone may make you need
to continue taking it. That is OK if you can afford it. GH must
be injected, another reason to prefer a secretagogue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Secretagogues Posted by: 2dogarage
What Congress won't investigate: the corporate takeover of sports.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 3, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, sports players in the corporate world are nothing more than prize bulls who provide prime space for taking up a few ads.

Ever hear of bovine growth hormone? Very similar to human growth hormone. It's injected into the breasts (udders) of cows to make them produce more milk. They get infections as a result, and that means lots of antibiotics and bacterial pus and ooze in the milk, but hey! it's pasteurized, so drink up.

HGH messes with basic biological systems, as one cautionary site puts it:
"HGH for anti-aging or "plastic surgery in a bottle" use leads to more long-term complications such as high blood pressure, more serious fluid retention, chronic joint pain and swelling, and some facial bone growth. Long-term abuse, as seen in athletic use, can lead to more pronounced, and sometimes deadly, side effects such as irregular heart rhythms, increased risk of diabetes, joint and facial deformities, and a shut down of the pituitary glands."

However, just think of how much more a ballplayer is worth than a prize cow. But wait... why is that? Why should some schmuck who happens to be able to hit a little white ball consistently be pulling down millions every year while broke fans are asked to fork over ever-higher amounts for tickets?

Maybe if we were to start asking about that, we might also start wondering why some schmucks in a Wall Street office should be pulling down millions in year-end bonuses while people are going bankrupt and losing their homes?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The question is... Posted by: 2dogarage
no time to investigate criminals but enough for sports figures:
Posted by: jwpa13 on Mar 3, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Rep. Pelosi took impeachment "off the table" it was allegedly to allow congress the time to work on more important matters. LIKE WHAT, Rodger Clemens? Get off baseball and get on with holding our politicians accountable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Play ball - who cares!
Posted by: carbon-based on Mar 3, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Concerning Clemens use of HGH - who cares - why is our congress spending a dime on investigating this.. If Clemens wants to kill himself- be my guest. We are embroiled in Iraq, the mideast is coming apart, healthcare is a bust in this country and the news was filled with Roger denying what is obvious!

Is this the best our democratic congress can do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is the most important issue of our time
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 3, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, possible steroid use, and probable cheating by sports figures is exactly what we need Congress investigating! (Yes, I'm talking about YOU Arlen Specter!!).

Did Clemens use HGH? I don't know, and I'm past caring.
Did the Patriots cheat when they beat the Steelers in two AFC championships en route to the Super Bowls? As a diehard Steeler fan (and I am), I STILL DONT CARE!!

We don't have health care for 45 million americans, our government is going broke, we are at war in TWO countries, we haven't built an environment-friendly nuclear power plant in decades, only one of the three possible next presidents can open his or her mouth without a lie issuing (and maybe Obama lies too and is just better at it?).

Forgive me if my diehard sports fandom doesn't extend to congressional investigations to ensure fairness of competition.

Perhaps my judgement is clouded by the fact that that I consider congress my employees, and they are ones that are NOT DOING THEIR JOB!

They are wasting their time. And their time, is MY money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Want to know why?
Posted by: Longdream on Mar 3, 2008 2:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're all sports fans, that's why.

Don't bother them with a housing crisis, a recession, the war. IMPEACHMENT? Yeah, yeah...maybe tomorrow.

Right now? PRO BALLPLAYERS are in the house! HOOOO-WEE!

Bunch of fools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There should be full-on drug pumped sports league !!!!!
Posted by: common intelligence on Mar 3, 2008 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's kind of ironic that there is this hipocratic approach to what is acceptable and what is not in "pro" sports, at least.

You know there are all kinds of tech knowlege restrictions imposed on sports. Yet the objective of all sports is to always be the most, the fastest, strongest, hit the ball the farthest etc. But the ball must conform to limitations, the bat, the glove etc. Yet the shoes, keep getting so specialized, sport specific.

Then too, they never limit the size of a person that can compete against the other like in High hurdles or basket ball (except in boxing). And nobody pays any attention to the minor leagues.

They can make golf balls the fly straighter and further, and even clubs with gyroscopic balance, but women don't play against men in the "masters" tournements.

So I guess the Hormones, (no pun intended) are really about not luring in young up coming kids that want to be competative at all cost, because their piers or family have pushed their ego on the kids.

SO my question is why not let it rip in the pros.? Let's just see how far we can push the human bioMachine. What's the problem, really.
Let's use the technology we have learned. Let the sports freaks knock themselves out. The pharmacutical Co.s use us all for guinea pigs as it is. People OD all the time by their own choice.

What is the big problem. HGH is highly beneficial to maintain figor and vitality and strength as the human body gets older. It can ward off many diseases of aging like deterioation of joints and cartlidge, bone density lose. Muscle mass. I don't mean you have to start pumping Iron for a Hercules body, but at least stay physically toned and agile.

Yah, I know abuse of HGH can have complications. But have you read the disclaimers for ALL the new miracle drugs they push on the TV infomercials ? You can kill your kidneys from taking too much, Tylenol or Ibuprofin for pain relief too. SO why is one appoved any the other is taboo?

"You can't stay young that's for sure. Why does everone try?
But you can get as old as you possibly can! "
- James Garner

So, I say if you don't have to become a decrepid old man or woman, why would you want to?
(It seems this whole HGH scare and bias legal crap is politically driven.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And we should care about this for what reasons?
Posted by: ArtemInox on Mar 4, 2008 10:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These guys are professional ATHLETES. They develop their body and their game as best they can for as long as they can. That's what they do. And can any of these dopes in congress really understand just how these chemicals work, how much of the science are they capable of getting? Bah. This is so ridiculous I can't even think of anything relevant to say about it.

http://www.addictedtoaggravation.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]