Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

Marijuana Gains Wonder Drug Status

By Lester Grinspoon, Boston Globe. Posted March 3, 2007.


A new study reveals that pot relieves pain that narcotics like morphine and OxyContin have hardly any effect on, and could help ease suffering from illnesses such as multiple sclerosis and diabetes.
Advertisement

A new study in the journal Neurology is being hailed as unassailable proof that marijuana is a valuable medicine. It is a sad commentary on the state of modern medicine -- and US drug policy -- that we still need "proof" of something that medicine has known for 5,000 years.

The study, from the University of California at San Francisco, found smoked marijuana to be effective at relieving the extreme pain of a debilitating condition known as peripheral neuropathy. It was a study of HIV patients, but a similar type of pain caused by damage to nerves afflicts people with many other illnesses including diabetes and multiple sclerosis. Neuropathic pain is notoriously resistant to treatment with conventional pain drugs. Even powerful and addictive narcotics like morphine and OxyContin often provide little relief. This study leaves no doubt that marijuana can safely ease this type of pain.

As all marijuana research in the United States must be, the new study was conducted with government-supplied marijuana of notoriously poor quality. So it probably underestimated the potential benefit.

This is all good news, but it should not be news at all. In the 40-odd years I have been studying the medicinal uses of marijuana, I have learned that the recorded history of this medicine goes back to ancient times and that in the 19th century it became a well-established Western medicine whose versatility and safety were unquestioned. From 1840 to 1900, American and European medical journals published over 100 papers on the therapeutic uses of marijuana, also known as cannabis.

Of course, our knowledge has advanced greatly over the years. Scientists have identified over 60 unique constituents in marijuana, called cannabinoids, and we have learned much about how they work. We have also learned that our own bodies produce similar chemicals, called endocannabinoids.

The mountain of accumulated anecdotal evidence that pointed the way to the present and other clinical studies also strongly suggests there are a number of other devastating disorders and symptoms for which marijuana has been used for centuries; they deserve the same kind of careful, methodologically sound research. While few such studies have so far been completed, all have lent weight to what medicine already knew but had largely forgotten or ignored: Marijuana is effective at relieving nausea and vomiting, spasticity, appetite loss, certain types of pain, and other debilitating symptoms. And it is extraordinarily safe -- safer than most medicines prescribed every day. If marijuana were a new discovery rather than a well-known substance carrying cultural and political baggage, it would be hailed as a wonder drug.

The pharmaceutical industry is scrambling to isolate cannabinoids and synthesize analogs, and to package them in non-smokable forms. In time, companies will almost certainly come up with products and delivery systems that are more useful and less expensive than herbal marijuana. However, the analogs they have produced so far are more expensive than herbal marijuana, and none has shown any improvement over the plant nature gave us to take orally or to smoke.

We live in an antismoking environment. But as a method of delivering certain medicinal compounds, smoking marijuana has some real advantages: The effect is almost instantaneous, allowing the patient, who after all is the best judge, to fine-tune his or her dose to get the needed relief without intoxication. Smoked marijuana has never been demonstrated to have serious pulmonary consequences, but in any case the technology to inhale these cannabinoids without smoking marijuana already exists as vaporizers that allow for smoke-free inhalation.

Hopefully the UCSF study will add to the pressure on the US government to rethink its irrational ban on the medicinal use of marijuana -- and its destructive attacks on patients and caregivers in states that have chosen to allow such use. Rather than admit they have been mistaken all these years, federal officials can cite "important new data" and start revamping outdated and destructive policies. The new Congress could go far in establishing its bona fides as both reasonable and compassionate by immediately moving on this issue.

Such legislation would bring much-needed relief to millions of Americans suffering from cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, and other debilitating illnesses.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: marijuana

Lester Grinspoon, an emeritus professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, is the coauthor of "Marijuana, the Forbidden Medicine."



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
the warden
Posted by: warden on Mar 3, 2007 2:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lester, God love you for a long and storied career. What you want in your heart will be a long time-a-coming. The illegality of cannibis, at present, is too useful as a tool for social and political repression to be given up by law enforcement and their directors. Then there is that a-motavational syndrome we often hear about. As if that were a bad thing in an over populated world where it is seen as patriotic to consume and add to the pile of base, valueless trash that is our modern environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PROFIT Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: the warden Posted by: Madam Hatter
Patented Pot?
Posted by: bornxeyed on Mar 3, 2007 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In time, companies will almost certainly come up with products and delivery systems that are more useful and less expensive than herbal marijuana.

Less expensive? The only reason any patentable cannabinoid analog could ever be less expensive than herbal marijuana is if marijuana was illegal to grow. Oh wait, nevermind.

And what is with the new term "herbal" marijuana? It is as if Grinspoon thinks patented medicines are already a fait-accompli, and a good thing, and we must distinguish that nasty "herbal" variety.

Get a grip, Grinspoon. Patenting cannabinoid analogs will be the worst thing that could ever happen to the quest to free marijuana from government and corporate control. It will also lead to the introduction of what Big Pharma does best - production of adverse side effects.

Surely we, the people who have kept marijuana consciouseness alive in this world, deserve better for our "wonder" drug.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Patented Pot? Posted by: UnEasyOne
5000 YEARS of anecdotal evidence...
Posted by: picket on Mar 3, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it OK for Big Pharma Reps to hawk "off label use" of BIG BUCK pharmaceuticals to our physicians ,.....while at the same time over 5000 years of Cannabis use by the suffering masses is not considered scientific evidence because it is ANECDOTAL???

"MJ is the largest cash crop in the US, more valuable than corn and wheat combined. ...conservative value of domestic production is estimated at 35.8 billion." Top 10 states ...Calif,Tenn, Kentucky, Hawaii, Wash, NC, Fla. Ala,West Va, and Ore."....from MJ Production in the US[2006] Jon Gettman http://www.drugscience.org/Archive/bcr2/exec.html

Can't blame THAT on "THE CHILDREN" !!!!!

Taxing and regulating Cannabis would pay for free medical care for all citizens in the US. Free the political prisoners including sick and elderly, languishing in Jail to make room for child molesters, murderers and rapists who get less time than non violent offenders.

In the meantime let humans suffering severe excruciating pain "EAT CAKE !!!" Thank you Uncle Sam.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» HOMEGROWN! Posted by: cami0
Limbaugh!!!
Posted by: vkobaya on Mar 3, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope Rush Limbaugh receives hundreds and thousands of packages of lids of Mary Jane, Maoi Wowie, grass, etc. in his mail. After all, we all love Rush Limbaugh and wish him free of his dependence on the dangerous narcotic Oxi-Contin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT'S WORKS AND IT'S CHEAP
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 3, 2007 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For medical use it should be available. Once someone can find a way to make a huge profit on it we will have a new wonder dry. Aspirin is a good example. If it wasn't already patented, no one could afford it. It saves lives. We can't continue to be prohibited from using and doing things because the 'kids' might get their hands on it. Sorry. The harder drugs are easy to get because it's big business. No one messes with them. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Profit
Posted by: brainvib on Mar 3, 2007 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since there is no profit for the drug companies, ad agencies and pharmacies in an effective anti-pain remedy that any one can grow at home it will never be legalized. ooops!! I forgot the $$$$$$ being made out the super stupid war on drugs.
The big bucks are on the side of criminalization, that is where the $$$$$$ are. Us folks are stuck. God Bless capitalism.
I remember before the criminalization and an artist brother of a good friend would openly bring back a couple duffle bags from Mexico when he returned from his annual winter trip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Profit Posted by: CatDad
Finally - the truth comes out
Posted by: ggmurray on Mar 3, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a relief to see in print what millions have already known. May a thousand flowers bloom - in gardens across America. And may this simple plant give blessed relief to those in need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Hold Your Breath. . .
Posted by: Saitia on Mar 3, 2007 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't hold your breath Lester; the government will be the last bunch of monkeys to understand. Cannabis users may as well live in an alternate reality— the real one, usually— when it comes to explaining the benefits of a "drug" that has been so long tarred with the brush of fear. Those who have no personal experience with it are simply too conditioned by fear to ever come to appreciate what it really does for human beings— on any level.

While those who know may applaud the efforts of advocates like Grinspoon, he is still working on the "tip of the iceberg" so to speak; the higher (no pun intended) benefits of cannabis aren't physical, but mental and spiritual. Artists of every stripe have known this forever. The term "consciousness expanding" is not mere hyperbole when it comes to describing cannabis intoxication.

No, not all users of cannabis appreciate its higher benefits, and some abuse it like they would any other substance, but then that's their choice as users of a plant created by divine mind that can be so beneficial at so many levels. The irony is, we still must function in a society that is completely hypocritical and backward about all such "intoxicants," even as we struggle collectively and individually to find spiritual maturity any way we can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kaneh bosm
Posted by: garry minor on Mar 3, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1936 Sula benet, a Polish Anthropologist discovered that in the original Hebrew of the Old Testament the word "kaneh bosm" was translated as calamus by the Greeks in the 3rd century BC. The correct word is indeed "cannabis". The Hebrew Institute of Jerusalem confirmed her work in 1980.
In Exodus 30:23, God instructs Moses to use 250 shekels of kaneh bosm in the oil used to anoint all Kings, Priests, and Prophets, for all generations, including Jesus! The title "Christ" means literally anointed. Kaneh is also listed as an incense tree in Song of Songs 4:14. The mistake was repeated in Isaiah 43:24, Jeremiah 6:20, and Ezekiel 27:19. There are 141 references to anointing or using the oil of joy, and 145 for burning incense in your Bible.
In 1937, Harry Anslinger, Hearst, Dupont, and more industry with lots to lose were successful in demonizing the most useful plant on Earth. Through propaganda they brainwashed the people. For the first time ever, ever, kaneh was made illegal throughout the world. Kaneh industrialization could have brought us out of the depression. Henry Ford built and fueled a car with it, the seed is the most nutritious thing you can eat, all paper, plastics, and most building products can be made with it, one acre of it equals four of timber and you harvest it every year, canvas is Dutch for kaneh, you have cannabinoid receptors in YOUR body, God put them there! Kaneh can not kill you, it is good for you, in the entire history of mankind not one death can be blamed on ingested Kaneh, alcohol and tobacco kill a million people a year! In 1938 we knew of over 25,000 products that could be made with kaneh. SO WHAT HAPPENED......... LOOK AROUND AT WHAT PETROLEUM, DEFORESTATION, AND LACK OF SPIRIT HAVE DONE TO YOUR WORLD.
The truth shall set you free!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Enlightening Posted by: gellero
Where are the Pharma dupes?
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Mar 3, 2007 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee, where are all the anecdotal "marijuana killed my baby brother" and "Seroquel saved my life!" posts? Usually we get all kinds of drug-horror/drug-miracle posters here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just for medicine anymore
Posted by: donnar on Mar 3, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it impolitic for me to mention that marijuana is also just plain fun to use?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not just for medicine anymore Posted by: liberalibrarian
We're Hurting Our Own Cause
Posted by: gradioc on Mar 3, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A recent article in Rolling Stone documented how the medical pot industry in California is becoming just what our opponents have always said it would be; a wide open pot market for anyone who can get a note from a doctor. Any amorphous ailment from phantom back pains to simple anxiety will do to get you in the door. This isn't helping our cause. The people who live in fear of someone, anyone, having a good time, will use this as proof that any step down the slippery slope will lead to the destruction of Western Society as we know it. We live in a nation dominated by Baby-Boomers obsessed with micro-managing their kids' lives. This not a sympathetic audience for steps toward recreational use. If we really believe (as I do) that the medical and industrial uses of marijuana are important to our society, we cannot afford to give aid to the enemy. Can we please not flaunt our flouting of the law quite so much? (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WOW!!! Thank you AlterNet!!! Finally, an issue we can
Posted by: SamFox on Mar 3, 2007 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
agree on!
To those new to this issue:
http://www.norml.org/
http://christiansforcannabis.com/e107/news.php
http://www.jackherer.com/
http://americansforsafeaccess.org/

Also the DVD "Grass", narrated by Woody Harrelson.

These are just a few of the sites for activists & the history of cannabis & hemp, reasons for prohibition & much more accurate info regarding hemp & cannabis.

For a look at the lost, idiotic, very expensive useless war on drugs:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Brownlow/david12.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Turtel/joel25.htm

Synthetic Rx drugs & big $ pharma hipocracy:
http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/pop/deathreports.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Dean/carolyn24.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Dean/carolyn13.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Ellison/shane20.htm


Legalized theft by the cops:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon78.htm

A bit of humor & a look at the mentality & ignorance of many police agencies:
“Woman’s door broken down in police goof”
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53105

Here’s another: “Police raid house for garden foliage”
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53105

Hold on. There is good news from the Police, some of them anyway:
http://leap.cc/

There is a lot of info out there. I just show the tip of the iceberg. The USA is sinking because Capitol Hill sells us out to big $$ interests of all kinds, not just the syn-pharm industry & has rammed the USA into the "iceberg" of greedy special interest groups, UN Constitutional laws & government fascism.

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Agreement at last
Posted by: babs on Mar 3, 2007 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, this is the first forum I've read on Alternet in which all the posters are in agreement with the argument put forth in a featured article!

Are all the trolls too stoned to type? Or is this one subject that they won't mess with.

The use of the "green" crosses over all economic and sociological lines and its prohibition is fear-based voodoo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Agreement at last Posted by: binkey
psychological effects
Posted by: kelt65 on Mar 3, 2007 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not so sure of marijuana's use in relieving physical pain, but for emotional pain it has no equal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HEMP is NOT marijuana. First, let's legalize INDUSTRIAL HEMP and stop allowing
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 3, 2007 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the anti-marijuana framing to get in our way. The more people shut up and put aside their "pot smoking" stereotyping, the better the chance that America can purge itself of neocons (war zealots) and neolibs ("free" trade sellout zealots) and REPAIR itself !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lobbyists, what lobbyists?
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Mar 3, 2007 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the Fed. Gov't. would only legalize mariuana, tax it the way they currently tax alcohol and cigarettes, they'd have more than enough revenue to provide all of us with single-payer health care. This will not happen, of course, because the pharmaceutical and liquor lobbies would never permit it. Legalized pot would cut into their profits far too much. Which raises the question of why your taxes pay for the government's business to be mostly conducted by the boys from K Street. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lobbyists, what lobbyists? Posted by: cinattra
Wake Up America
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Mar 3, 2007 4:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to legalize marijuana use, write to your Congressman today. Tell him to sponsor a law allowing some drug company to patent it. You'll be able to enjoy it (legally) on spring break.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Patent it? Posted by: Inlander
» RE: Patent it? Posted by: Lincoln fan
unsympothetic prez
Posted by: po cracka on Mar 3, 2007 6:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MJ will always be kept under foot by a coke snortin', alcoholic president. Let's hope our next leader keeps his/ her mind open when fulfilling all the presidential "green" promises.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote Green!
Posted by: Alan8 on Mar 3, 2007 8:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Green Party supports the legalization of marijuana: http://www.gp.org/fec/marijuana.html

I won't vote for any politician that tries to demonize marijuana. Opposition to marijuana is a reliable marker for politicians with pro-corporate pro-fascist tendencies. These people are willing to permit the suffering caused by persecution of pot smokers, to protect the profits of the alcohol, tobacco, pharmaceutical, and textile corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vote Green! Posted by: binkey
Repeal Prohibition now!
Posted by: drblack on Mar 3, 2007 8:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The worst long term policy has been drug prohibition. Weed is like coffe ,except it has more proven benefits.
Anything that is over used can cause problems. The internet and video games or cell phones can cause some problems if used excessively. If it were illegal to use any of these then the results of overuse would increase a hundred fold.
Almost every thing you have been told about illegal drugs is a half-truth or an out right lie.
How many people know that while opioids,like heroin,codeine, are very addictive ,they are also non-toxic.
It blew my mind when I found out that this scientific truth has been around for over 100 years. I even found JAMA articles on the cardio-protective properties of opiates.
Maybe if people could freely study drugs they could solve the problems of overuse.
One thing is for sure . Marijuana is Not harmful and is safer than drinking lots of sugary soda. Marijuana protects against Alzheimers and does NOT cause lung cancer. It actually turns off cancerous cells in the lungs according to recent studies.
Only YOU can stop the madness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I don't think so Posted by: Alan8
» RE: I don't think so Posted by: po cracka
Nice article! Here's some addendum
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 3, 2007 10:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's illustrative to consider the story of the pain medications Vioxx and Celebrex and how the entire story has progressed so far. There are indications that thess drugs can cause heart damage in their users, as Good Pills, Bad Pills: Dr. Sidney Wolfe Condemns FDA Advisors For Backing the Sale of Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra Despite Known Dangers

However, the main players, Pfizer and Merck, have made billions by keeping these patented drugs on the market (and they park the profits in offshore tax havens - that's the pharma mafia for you - and, bonus! It's mostly all legal). A more complete discussion of the risks can be found at medicationsense.com

Now, let's consider the cannabinoids (the active agent in cannabis sativa). There is plenty of evidence that cannabinoids are effective against pain; for example nationalpainfoundation.org. This has been supported by formal studies at places like UCSF (1997).

What patients would like is a standardized preparation of known strength that is safelly and legally available. What's worth noticing, however, is how the DEA and state narcotics enforcement teams (NETs) actively target the most legitimate providers of medical marijuana - they aren't going after the back alley dealers, but rather they are going after the ones who are trying to be open and legal - and the DEA is also still refusing to reconsider the classification of Cannabis Sativa as a 'highly dangerous Schedule I drug'.

Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies and doctors continue to feed amphetamines (Ritalin, Adderall, Desoxyn, etc.) to kids under the guise of 'treating attention deficit disorder' - kids just won't pay attention unless they get their speed, apparently - and who knows how much of that stuff is being used by US soldiers in Iraq, as well. This is all perfectly legal.

It's obvious that the real reasons for treating cannabis in this manner have absolutely nothing to do with the health effects of the plant, and the real reason probably has far more to do with the domestic political ideology of the DEA and the state and local drug police (also, see how much these groups make off of asset forfeiture, and then look into how much of that is cannabis related - as in the case of the pharmaceutical patents, it's all about the money).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Asset forfeiture.... Posted by: Inlander
cashelboylo
Posted by: cashelboylo on Mar 3, 2007 10:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A worrying development is the emerging dominance of hydroponically grown marijuana.
This process introduces petro-chemicals into the cannabinoids, changing their properties and effects.
Much recent government research into cannabis has used hydoponic plants and has come up with "reefer madness" type results.
Of course, the problems found by the researchers are not caused by cannabinoids, but by the petro-chemicals. This is not mentioned in their published material.
Similarly, we are almost never told that the main habit-forming ingredient in heroin is not opium but acetylene (diacetyl-morphine.)
Acetylene is also the habit-former in some painkillers (acetylsalysilic acid.) Petroleum also features in addictions such as cocaine, crack, ice, ecstasy, and, of course, petrol sniffing.
Petroleum is the most addictive chemical on this planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Scientific accuracy does indeed matter Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Great thread!
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Mar 3, 2007 10:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in constant pain and am subject to drug tests so can't smoke the blessed herb - for now. I could legally use enough narcotics to waste an elephant but they scare the hell out of me for two reasons: first - the obvious. Side effects and addiction. Second: what happens when some thugocrat (hey! I think I coined that term!) decides my dosage is too high and puts pressure on my doctor? Or decides I take "too many" pills. Or I change doctors and the new one won't prescribe what I need? Happens all the time. What If I lose my insurance and can't afford it? So I take minimal doses and try to ignore the pain. Weed wouldn't stop it either - but it makes it a helluva lot more bearable. GOD DAMN the evil bastards who keep it from me!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great thread! Posted by: Madam Hatter
Just a thought
Posted by: cinattra on Mar 4, 2007 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if the legalization of mj would decrease the need for docs to hand out prescriptions for the high priced over the counter mood/mind altering drugs?

I'm beginning to see all the connections and why possibly the great ruse continues today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for bringing up Hydro fertilizer dilema
Posted by: YinRising on Mar 4, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, because of economic reasons tied to the prohibition status of cannabis, most growers are opting for hydro to increase yields and therefore profits.

Synthetic hydroponic nutrients can end up stored in the plant if they are not rinsed out at the end of the growing cycle.

Sometimes they can't even be rinsed out, as in the case of Miracle Grow.

Either way, the patient ends up smoking or ingesting fertilizer.

Ever notice how a lit bowl will sometimes sparkle and sizzle?
That's the excess magnesium from the fertilizer that didn't get flushed out.

Clean cannabis will burn to a light grey ash.

If yours burns to a black coal, you might have a problem with over/improper fertilization.

Organic, soil grown is the best, but it even needs to be flushed before harvesting or the buds will have too much carbon content.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

With all due respect to Dr. Grinspoon, not so fast Doc...
Posted by: YinRising on Mar 4, 2007 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I respect the work of the good Dr., I have to take exception with his attitude expressed by his comment,

"Rather than admit they have been mistaken all these years, federal officials can cite "important new data" and start revamping outdated and destructive policies"

Wow, is the Dr. helping out with the reaoning for the war in Iraq too? I can hear him use this sentament to say something like,
"Rather than admit that they have lied about the Weopons of Mass Destruction in order to start an illegal war, federal officials can cite "the need to spread democracy" and start to revamp the War on Terror."

If Dr. Grinspoon honestly believes the government was just "mistaken" all these years, then he is naive and gullible, just like the people who believed we were going to Iraq for WMD's.

The government wasn't "mistaken" when it came to cannabis prohibition. They straight up LIED in order to increase corporate profits at the expense of puplic and planetary health.

What happens to all the people in jail who were denied a medical defence in court, when the Government starts authorizing BigPharma to sell cannabis based meds?

Oops, we were "mistaken" just doesn't seem cover the damage that prohibition has caused.

It's not that I seek revenge for those people, simply JUSTICE!

End Prohibition Now.

Live Fee or Die!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marinol...
Posted by: aebartle on Mar 5, 2007 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a little confused. Hasn't the Pharma industry already come up with a cannabinoid painkiller, called Marinol, that has all the nice painkilling abilities but no THC, so you can't get high off it? What's happening with that? My confusion stems from the fact that no one else has mentioned it in their comments. Am I just making it all up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do yourself a favor
Posted by: LMNOP on Mar 5, 2007 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leave this hell-hole and find yourself a culture that isn't pathological and a government that doesn't consider you its property to be exploited for corporate profit. Oh, and doesn't have 50% of its population that still thought that Bush was a good choice for president in 2004. LOL. You can do better than this almost at random.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mjinterest
Posted by: mjinterest on Mar 5, 2007 5:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an MS patient, I've got to throw in two cents here. Pot is an unbelievable help to me. I can eat food when I take a few tokes (I'm always nauseated), I feel better mentally and emotionally, my fingers work better on the keyboard, and I feel much better about my future.

I live in a state where I can get Marinol, which my neurolgist has prescribed, but it is, frankly, crap. The prescription is for three caps daily. To be honest, it takes 6 to 8 capsules to even feel "high". What a joke. My neurologist strongly rcommends weed in its natve form, but can't legally recommend it or prescribe it.

Every 6 or 8 months I score an eighth or so and am able to carry on, but it's really hard. I'm scared shitless that the cops are going to bust me.

BTW. don't even think of growing weed hydroponically. Go with organic aeroponics. I'm too scared to grow pot at home, but aeroponics is the way to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legalize not only for medical purposes
Posted by: american on Mar 7, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lookit, there is essentially NOTHING wrong with marijuana. It is useful in SO many ways. It is aiming low to petition for legalization for medical purposes only. Hemp is an awesome fiber for paper, fabrics, and textiles. It is helpful in medicine. It has commendible capacities in energy. It is an exremely efficient and practical plant and does not require costly chemical inputs that harm people, animals, and plants to grow it. As a recreational drug it is harmless. It is a fallacy to pair it in comparisons with alcohol, cocaine, heroine or chemicalized cigarettes. It may be habbit forming but it is not addictive. One does not go in to DT's when quttting it. It does not cause a person to lose care for all other things or to kill people on land, sea and air. As a drug, it simply relaxes and heightens the senses (and sensitivities) a little. The illegalization of something with so many benefits and so little detriments plainly highlights the abrogation of reason and embrace of the pathological in one more of many arenas by those who by some rights unkown to me find it fit to appoint themselves arbiters of our destiny. But I think the main reasons it is fought against are that it is not an easily-capitalizable good and that it remains a scapegoat for assigning blame and controlling and imprisoning some of our "lower classes." Exlanation of the former assertion: It grows freely. Alcohol production requires capital, and this private ownership and wealth maintenance capacity, assisted by the ATF of course, yeilds wealth concentration, political payoffs and monopsony. Explanation of the latter assertion: The war on this humble plant costs Americans billions of dollars a year yet is utterly ineffectual and for reasons that have ostensibly never been satisfactorily validated. Why would so many resources be allocated to activities that yield essentially nothing? Why, indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

stop the dutch terrorists
Posted by: richholland on Mar 7, 2007 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Mr Bush should bomb those stupid Dutch government who made the use of marhuana legal.
Especially the fact some ill people get the use of marihuana refunded by the health insurance proves that those europeans are un american, not patriotic.
Besides that the dutch had windmills already in 1650
But seriously Marihuan has also risks if you combine it with alcohol9Cannabis psychose)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wow
Posted by: greggwyck on Mar 7, 2007 8:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i am to stoned to finish this comment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wow Posted by: UnEasyOne