Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

DrugReporter

One Mother's Story

By Cheri O'Donoghue, AlterNet. Posted May 6, 2005.


Why were two white boys treated so humanely, while my son, a black boy, was set up, dismissed, and discarded into the prison system?
Advertisement

I was on the Metro North train when I found out, trying to act discreet, trying not to let anyone see me shaking, scared. It was Carmen--my son's girlfriend's mother--who told me. She danced around the words until I pushed her and then she just said it: "Ashley's been arrested." Her words didn't make sense. But soon enough I would discover that when your child, your black child, is arrested and charged with a drug offense, nothing makes sense anymore.

Mother's Day is painful for me now. In the summer of 2003, my son Ashley was 20 years old and living in Manhattan. He was staying in our old apartment in the city--we'd recently moved to the suburbs so that our daughter would have access to better schools. I wanted him to move with us, but he wanted to be independent, near his friends. What could I do? He was grown. And independence is what every parent should want for his or her child.

I don't know how or when it started. I don't know who introduced Ashley to the world of drugs, or how he met two white boys named Peter and Preston who dealt drugs at Hamilton College where they went to school. They would call Ashley, ask him to bring them a small amount of drugs, and they'd resell it on campus to other students; I know this because they were arrested for it. They identified Ashley as the person who supplied them, and the police officers pushed them to call my son and ask him to bring up 70 grams of cocaine to them. Ashley had never done anything like that before. He had gotten one gram or two for them in the past, but such small amounts don't qualify a person for an A-1 felony.

Seventy grams does though. So Peter and Preston asked Ashley for 70 times the amount that he usually brought them. Ashley did as he was asked, and when he stepped off the train to deliver the package, he was arrested. Out of fear of getting a sentence of 15 years to life, and on the advice of his attorney, he pleaded guilty instead of going to trial. My son was given a sentence of seven to 21 years.

Peter--whose father is the executive vice president of the drug rehab center Phoenix House--was given probation. So too was Preston, who was represented by former NYS attorney general Dennis Vacco. When they are off probation, their records will be sealed forever, their debt to society paid. But Ashley will still be in jail. And even after he gets out-- years from now, Ashley will be barred from jobs, barred from getting financial aid to continue his education, barred from voting, some licensing--the list goes on. He will never stop paying. 

I believe my son did something wrong and I believe that people should take responsibility for their actions. But I don't believe a sentence of seven to 21 years is appropriate. If it is for Ashley, then it is for Peter and Preston. My son should have been forced into some kind of program where he could really look at himself and his life. Essentially, that's what Peter and Preston are doing. I love my child as much as their parents love them. Why did they get treated so humanely through this process, while my son was set up, dismissed, discarded in a sense, into the prison system. Was it because he was just another black boy who's nothing, who they think could disappear off the street and no one would notice? Well I notice. I notice everyday. I'm a mother and I want the same thing any mother wants for her child. 

Ashley doesn't come before the parole board until 2009. When people hear that, they ask, how do you stay so strong? How do you keep fighting? I tell them that I'm fighting because I want people to know that this kind of thing happens to normal, everyday good families. I'm fighting because if this happened to my family, it could happen to any family. I'm fighting because it's been 32 years and it's time for a change. But most of all I'm fighting because I'm a mother. I'm Ashley's mother. And they can't have him for seven to 21 years.

Digg!

Cheri O'Donoghue lives in New York. She spoke Friday at a Mother's Day rally at City Hall to reform the Rockefeller Drug Laws.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Whole story
Posted by: Denmark on May 6, 2005 2:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there is definitely racial discrimination and prejudice within American society, certainly affecting police, judges, and attorneys, we need to be clear to distinguish between injustices arising from racism and injustices arising from other causes.

When reading this story, a couple things stood out to me. Peter and Preston were caught first, and got special treatment because they cooperated in the arrest of another criminal. In addition, the higher you are on the food-chain, the bigger your crime. Thus, the person providing drugs for others to sell is more important to stop than those lower down.

If Peter were black and Preston white, and Peter had a heavier sentence, then we'd really be on to some racial prejudice. As it is, it looks to me more like we're dealing with the screwy American justice system and law-enforcement agents hoping to make a big arrest. That is, unless the agents said something about wanting to help Peter and Preston out by getting a black in their place.

I could be wrong. I know nothing more about this case than what is presented in the article. I just want to encourage everyone to point the finger in the right direction when dealing with injustice, or further injustices will be committed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Puh-leeze, indeed!!! Posted by: kww355
it could be any mother's story....
Posted by: mendomama on May 9, 2005 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My heart goes out to this mother. But, the truth is, it could be any mother's story. The ever increasing numbers of people being put in jail for drug related crimes is like any other thing. It can only go so far one way, before inevitably, something has to tip the scales.

Just like a previous poster said, it's the government's way of continually decreasing the numbers of "lower" class citizens. The only thing "lower" about them is the amount of money in their bank accounts. But, if people think that drug use is strictly a lower class past time, then they're delusional.

The truth is, The War on Drugs, isn't any different from alcohol prohibition. The vast majority of people still drank during prohibition times. Did they get out on the streets, announcing that fact, demanding for the unjust law to be overturned? Hell, no! That would be self-incrimination. Just like now, at that time there were users and abusers. That will always be the case. Laws or no. But, just like then, with alcohol, it was the actions of a few that shaped the laws for all.

Do some people have an addiction problem? Yes. Does that make all users, addicts? NO! Just as some people use alcohol recreationally, the same is true with drug use. Our society has proven that laws against drugs do not stop drug use. It simply criminalizes countless "innocent" people.

There is no question in my mind that the drug laws should be lifted. But, think of all the money the government would lose if they were to turn out all those who committed drug related "crimes". I mean, the amount of money they claim it takes to provide for an inmate for a year is more than what most "lower" class citizens get by on. Not to mention all the money and goods confescated from these busts. And for the person who mentioned Bush's use of alcohol and pot, you forgot coke. It's a widely known fact that "little Georgey" was an addict. Just look at some old footage of him on Daddy's campaign trail - he was so hopped up, coffee would've brought him down!

Untill people quit worrying about the social stigma they fear would follow, and stand up against this, nothing will change. Untill people realize that over half the population uses some kind of drug, in some capacity, they'll always feel like "lower" class citizens - thus making it possible for the government to keep socking them (us) away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeb Bush should have to move
Posted by: rkewen on May 9, 2005 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story is so typical, so unfair and tragic. Jeb Bush's daughter got busted for drugs also, and didn't have to pay much of a price, certainly not do any time. Normal people in Florida cannot live in publicly subsidized housing in Florida if someone in their family is a drug offender (or any kind of criminal offender as far as I know - unless perhaps it involves guns). Last time I checked the family of the President's brother still lived in the governor's mansion, the epitome of publicly subsidized housing. I can't say any of this is surprising though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

darkfox
Posted by: darkfox on May 9, 2005 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unmentioned, in the previous posts (that support the fact that not all users become abusers [addicts]), is the notion that one would be prescient upon their first use of an addictive substance. Believing in man's drive towards self-persevation, I am inclined to think that all first time users believe that they will not be "the one" to become an addict. There are some hints (if anyone is inclined to pay attention - an unlikely event for young people who believe themselves indestructible); a family history of addition, certain psychiatric conditions, an addictive "personality", & more. But why take the chance? This is why I for one do not support recreation use.

I espouse this position from both professional & personal experience. I have used recreationally (I grew up in the 60's - 70's & using both marijuana & cocaine). When I went to medical school I just stopped, because my goal did not allow me to continue to use. I believe that it was a desire (to learn) that overcame the desire for these drugs. Had I not gone back to school, I don't know if I would have been so lucky! But... I remain, with one addiction that, at the time, was not condemned as it is today, because it did not impair my ability to study - nicotine. It is one of the most profound regrets I labor under.

At the time it was not known how genetically linked drugs can be. I wish I had known better. Nicotine addiction is in my family. I can imbibe alcohol to my hearts content (& it is easily "contented") because I am not genetically predisposed to becoming addicted, but I would never take the chance of using another recreational again. It's like playing Russian Roulette!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: darkfox Posted by: mendomama
» RE: darkfox Posted by: darkfox
» RE: darkfox Posted by: mendomama
» RE: darkfox Posted by: mendomama
» RE: darkfox Posted by: darkfox
» RE: darkfox Posted by: mendomama
» RE: darkfox Posted by: jwg
» RE: darkfox Posted by: darkfox
» RE: darkfox reply Posted by: Iamnotafruittree
» RE: darkfox reply Posted by: mendomama
It can happen to you
Posted by: karyse on May 9, 2005 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, to the mother of the son in prison, I am an editor for Justice Denied (htttp://justicedenied.org) a not for profit organization -- we publish as many stories as is financially possible about innocent people who have been imprisoned or people who are serving sentences that are out of line with the crime.

To other readers of Alternet: Everyone thinks that it can't happen to them because he or she never breaks the law. It is the natural tendency of rational human beings to look for the "why" something bad happened to someone else to avoid having it happen to us. Newsflash: When it becomes financially profitable to imprison people (see Alternet Article this issue), people in even greater numbers will find themselves imprisoned. Furthermore, imprisonment of basically "good" people, who will be easier to control by dangling the "good behavior" carrot, will increase at a greater ratio than imprisoning "bad" people. Truly "bad" people, are dangerous people, and the last thing a prison guard/work boss wants is a dangerous worker/prisoner.

So, ask yourself, "How and why does the U.S. have a greater percentage of its population incarcerated than nearly any other country in the world?" The answers to this two pronged question are simple: To the "how" portion -- we pass laws wherever we are certan those laws will be ignored -- to the "why" portion -- we like LOW WAGE labor, but we love NO WAGE labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Decreasing the numbers?
Posted by: grace on May 9, 2005 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when has the government had an interest in decreasing the numbers of the working class? On the contrary, they want to keep them breeding like rabbits (no abortion, no contraception or sex ed) so they have an endless supply of cheap, desperate labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Decreasing the numbers? Posted by: Lathor
Misplaced Blame
Posted by: zeeartiste on May 9, 2005 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not strictly about black & white people, and how they're treated, although that's what everyone wants it to be about. It's about drugs. If Peter had been the one coming off the train with 70 grams, he'd be in Ashley's palce right now. If you think there aren't any white people in jail for drugs, or doing unnecessary sentences for drugs, you're sorely mistaken. What about an 18 year old white kid doing 10 years for a dimebag of pot. Or white kids who do 3-5 for a roach in their car. The list goes on and on.

If Ashley's mother wants to make her son's plight a race thing, well, I guess that's her perogative, but she's doing him more harm than good.
If she really wanted to help her son, she would stand up against unfair drug laws, period. She might also like to take some time to understand why her son started selling/doing drugs in the first place, and why she was so clueless about it. It's possible that if she had a better communicative relationship with her son, this may have never happened. She also doesn't understand the severity of her son's actions. She says about delivering 70 grams of coke; "He did what he was told." And we're supposed to feel sorry for him for not thinking clearly?

C'mon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Misplaced Blame Posted by: blupearl
» RE: Misplaced Blame Posted by: zeeartiste
» RE: Misplaced Blame Posted by: blupearl
» RE: Misplaced Blame Posted by: zeeartiste
The world's most successful village idiot
Posted by: Mythsaje on May 9, 2005 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I use Bush as an example for a very good reason. Because he stands at the top of the system that spreads these lies, and tried very diligently to hide his history rather than admit that success (be it undeserved in his case) and drug use aren't mutually exclusive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHITE DISGRACE
Posted by: ssegallmd on May 9, 2005 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a white American, I offer my empathy to the thousands of Americans of color who have been persecuted by white America. I realize that such apologies burn the hell out of the right, the people that really need to apologize, but who cares about such people or their feelings? I am so ashamed of how this country behaves that I cannot express it adequately. This country was not only the last free country to abolish slavery, it had to do so kicking and screaming, a testimony to the character of white America as well as the weakness and hypocricy of the white American church. Now that these heartless, immoral fascists own this country and call all of the shots, it can only get worse as they express the filthy content of their dark hearts and atrophied souls. What about another civil war, but this time, instead of fighting to keep these ignant inbreds within the nation, we kick their illiterate asses out! That goes for the midwest as well as the south.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHITE DISGRACE Posted by: blupearl
darkfox
Posted by: darkfox on May 10, 2005 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not a Fruit Tree,

You may not be a fruit tree but neither are you very well informed. Not all drug addictions have been proven to be linked, but alcoholism certainly has. In fact there has been at least one gene isolated that is responsible for SOME cases of alcoholism. Realize that even disorders that are well known to be genetically linked (e.g. Trisomy 21 - Downs Syndrome) are primarily, but NOT ALWAYS, linked. Again, Down's Syndrome is an examle of this phenomena.

By the way, if you don't care what anyone (including, I assume, experts in the field) have to say, why did you post this? You can be sure that if you don't care about what others have to say, that they will return the favor in kind!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Children, children, fight nice, please
Posted by: Sojourner on May 12, 2005 1:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Born as I was at the end of the Prohibition Era, I take seriously what it should have taught us -- the punishment for regulated substances is often worse than the crime. That's because punishment does not work for health matters, but we vote for politicians, like Bush, who pose as the tough guy.

Take the illicit money out of drugs and the scene instantly changes (except for the hangover from now embedded organized crime). Rather than a political issue, addiction becomes a personal tragedy.

So one important issue is, why can't we learn from our own history? (Yeah, I also grew up on Gene Autry and Roy Rogers, so Texas marshalls like Bush resonate in my bones. To my regret.)

Oh yeah. Did you catch today's story about the FBI arrests in Arizona of military, law enforcement officials on the border taking bribes for letting drugs through? Tell me what's different between such corruption of people wearing "stinkink badges' in 2005 and those in 1931? Same old, same old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

harsh minimum sentences do this.
Posted by: cobrajet on May 13, 2005 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have the Repub congres to thank for this atrocity. They install conservative judges that follow strict minimum sentences without taking into consideration the extent of the crime. Ashley carried 70 grams once, and he was coerced to do it by his friends, they were the ones that conspired to sell the drugs, hell the police were the ones that conspired to the whole thing, if it wasn't for the police tempting him, Ashley would still be walking around today. So are you going to tell me the "War on drugs" is not corrupting police to entrap people ? The horror... the police entice people, then capture them, what a disgrace to society ! Time to end this war on blakcs, on drugs altogether ! Stand up and be counted,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This darkness got to end
Posted by: sterlingwisdom on May 17, 2005 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I came of age in the 60s so smoking pot, using psychedlics and trying cocaine were a part of my youth. At the time I could not believe how ignorant and destructive government policy was. I believed Lenny Bruce was right when he said the laws would change because law students were smoking pot. Lenny was a very funny and very perceptive guy but turns out he was a lousy prophet. Government policy remains completely idiotic and tragically harmful. It also gives racists a stick with which to beat others. I have great sympathy for this woman and her son's plight. Hopefully she will understand when I say I don't care if he is black, green or purple. No one should ever have to go to jail for a drug crime. Drugs should not be a crime. Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crack babies
Posted by: Justice4All on May 20, 2005 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a black adoptive mother a black child born addicted to crack. While her son will get several years in prison for selling cocaine, my 16 year son gets a LIFE SENTENCE of learning, mental and emotional disabilities because one selfish jackass after another sold his pregnant birth mother cocaine, trying to make a buck because they were too lazy to work. I have no sympathy for her son whatsoever.

I also have another adopted child who is doing well enough to go to college, and I would be livid to learn of coke-dealing on campus. This is not a white-black issue: this is about protecting the chains of addiction from our kids and community. If the author's son had been peddling crack to students at one of the black colleges where all parties were black, he'd may have gotten more time. The race thing muddies the issue.

Before anyone feels sorry for a crack dealer in the future, volunteer your tutoring services at a special ed school. You'll see lots of kids who have life sentences of being handicapped from prenatal drug exposure. A woman on crack is far more likely to drink alcohol, even if she's pregnant, making for a very toxic womb. Many of these kids have poor control of their emotions and anger. Math reasoning and/or reading is unusually hard. The cycle of poverty and temptations of the street continue because they are so internally limited, and they too end up addicted and/or incarcerated.

These are the ones to feel sorry for, not a grown man manipulating his mama and dealing the devil's drug of choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Crack babies Posted by: getagripcanada