Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Doctor No Way
Also in DrugReporter
CNN's Lou Dobbs Is Clueless When It Comes to the Drug War
Tony Newman
Drug Czar's Latest B.S. Claim: Pot Makes Teens Crazy and Suicidal
Paul Armentano
How Pot Became Demonized: the Fine Line Between Good Medicine and 'Dangerous Drugs'
Wendy Chapkis, Richard J. Webb
NYC's Staggering Arrest Rate for Pot Achieved By Police Deception and Scams
Steven Wishnia
Psst... Government-Supplied Marijuana Program Turns 30
Bruce Mirken
North Dakota Man Facing Years in Prison After Buying Salvia Divinorum on eBay
Phillip S. Smith
Stuart Hoffman does not believe in the medical use of marijuana – at least, not the kind you grow in your backyard or buy off the street. And he'd feel that way, he says, even if he wasn't the chief medical review officer for the drug testing services at ChoicePoint, with clients ranging from the U.S. government to large national retail chains. Born and educated in Minnesota, he was a private oncologist with a thriving practice in Downey, Calif., for 35 years, and had plenty of patients who used pot to relieve symptoms. And while he agrees marijuana does relieve symptoms – dulling chronic pain, reducing seizures, stimulating the appetite, controlling nausea – he's seen it surpassed by better drugs.
And that, he says, is where the pro-medical marijuana people go wrong. It's not that the feds don't want to relieve suffering of people like Angel Raich, the 38-year-old with a plethora of chronic conditions who has taken her case to the U.S. Supreme Court. It's that the medical establishment has studied pot and found it lacking. "Angel Raich is being used by a group of people, in my opinion, who are struggling to make marijuana legal across the board," says Hoffman, "and they use all sorts of arguments that are sort of half-truths." He spoke not in his capacity as an officer of ChoicePoint – he cannot speak officially for the company – but as a doctor who couldn't let those "half-truths" lie.
At ChoicePoint, do you test people who use medical marijuana?
Dr. Stuart Hoffman: Constantly. We do about four million drug tests a year here. Approximately five percent are positive for all sorts of things, and marijuana is probably 75-80 percent of those. A few people have prescriptions for Marinol, pure marijuana: perfectly legitimate, recognized by the federal government. People who are on medical marijuana present a very different problem for us because there are only about 10 or 11 states that currently accept medical marijuana. And it is the employer's individual policy which determines whether we make it a positive or negative.
So a Wal-Mart store in California will fire someone for using medical marijuana?
A Wal-Mart store anywhere in the world will not recognize medical marijuana, even though some states say that it's legal. It's their decision. It's title 49, part 40, U.S. Department of Transportation. [Hoffman pulls out thick printed book of regulations.] That's the bible for the federally regulated tests, and it's been challenged in court many times. Nobody's ever beaten this thing.
As an oncologist, you treated people who used marijuana. Have your attitudes about it changed?
No, my attitudes about it have always been the same. I treated many people with chemotherapy who became very nauseated, who were dying of cancer, losing weight and couldn't eat. Before it was legal, many of my patients would go out and get street marijuana. At the time, there were drugs called Compazine and Thorazine, which were also tranquilizers but had a fair anti-nausea effect. These drugs were on a par with marijuana, and none of them was very good, but they were better than nothing. About seven or eight years ago, a whole new class of drugs came in including things like Ondansetron and two-to-three others, which were anti-nausea medicines that just revolutionized chemotherapy. These were superb. There was no question, it was better. There were still a few people who would request marijuana because it was the mystique of the forbidden fruit.
Yes, but Ondansetron is expensive, and homegrown pot is free.
Sure. It's not cheap. But Ondansetron is given intravenously at the time of the chemotherapy, so insurance covers it 100 percent. Uninsured people don't get chemotherapy, because they can't afford it – so cost isn't really a factor.
What about appetite stimulation?
It's been known for years that marijuana will stimulate your appetite a little bit. But they've found that massive doses of progesterone, one of the female hormones – the substance is marketed under a trade name of Megestrol – is a superb appetite stimulant. Far better than marijuana.
Dean Kuipers is editor of LA CityBeat.
| More Interviews: | ||
|
Vandana Shiva: Why We Face Both Food and Water Crises Water: The world renown activist reminds people that corporation-friendly economic schemes got us into this mess in the first place. By Maria Armoudian, Ankine Aghassian, AlterNet. May 15, 2008. |
Arianna Huffington Storms NYC With New Book, Skewering McCain as a 'Pandering Pawn of the Right' War on Iraq: Huffington blasts corporate media and lampoons McCain. She tells all in an interview with Grit TV's Laura Flanders and AlterNet's Don Hazen. By Don Hazen, AlterNet. May 15, 2008. |
The Cards Are Stacked Against Mothers in America -- Here's How We Can Fix It Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: Joan Blades, founder of MomsRising.org, discusses bias against mothers in the workplace and the "mommy wars." (with video) By Don Hazen, AlterNet. May 10, 2008. |