Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

If our government and large food and energy interests don't change direction, the food riots in distant lands will soon be coming to their doors.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Worst Food Crisis in 45 Years

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted May 1, 2008.


If our government and large food and energy interests don't change direction, the food riots in distant lands will soon be coming to their doors.
Advertisement

Food riots are erupting around the world. Protests have occurred in Egypt, Cameroon, the Philippines, Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, Mauritania and Senegal. Sarata Guisse, a Senegalese demonstrator, told Reuters: "We are holding this demonstration because we are hungry. We need to eat, we need to work, we are hungry. That's all. We are hungry." United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has convened a task force to confront the problem, which threatens, he said, "the specter of widespread hunger, malnutrition and social unrest on an unprecedented scale." The World Food Program has called the food crisis the worst in 45 years, dubbing it a "silent tsunami" that will plunge 100 million more people into hunger.

Behind the hunger, behind the riots, are so-called free-trade agreements, and the brutal emergency-loan agreements imposed on poor countries by financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund. Food riots in Haiti have killed six, injured hundreds and led to the ousting of Prime Minister Jacques-Edouard Alexis. The Rev. Jesse Jackson just returned from Haiti and writes that "hunger is on the march here. Garbage is carefully sifted for whatever food might be left. Young babies wail in frustration, seeking milk from a mother too anemic to produce it." Jackson is calling for debt relief so that Haiti can direct the $70 million per year it spends on interest to the World Bank and other loans into schools, infrastructure and agriculture.

The rise in food prices is generally attributed to a perfect storm caused by increased food demand from India and China, diminished food supplies caused by drought and other climate-change-related problems, increased fuel costs to grow and transport the food, and the increased demand for biofuels, which has diverted food supplies like corn into ethanol production.

This week, the United Nations' special rapporteur on the right to food, Jean Ziegler, called for the suspension of biofuels production: "Burning food today so as to serve the mobility of the rich countries is a crime against humanity." He's asked the U.N. to impose a five-year ban on food-based biofuels production. The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, a group of 8,000 scientists globally, is also speaking out against biofuels. The scientists are pushing for a plant called switchgrass to be used as the source for biofuels, reserving corn and other food plants to be used solely as food.

In a news conference this week, President Bush defended food-based ethanol production: "The truth of the matter is it's in our national interests that our farmers grow energy, as opposed to us purchasing energy from parts of the world that are unstable or may not like us." One part of the world that does like Bush and his policies are the multinational food corporations. International nonprofit group GRAIN has just published a report called "Making a killing from hunger." In it, GRAIN points out that major multinational corporations are realizing vast, increasing profits amid the rising misery of world hunger. Profits are up for agribusiness giants Cargill (86 percent) and Bunge (77 percent), and Archer Daniels Midland (which dubs itself "the supermarket to the world") enjoyed a 67 percent increase in profits.

GRAIN writes: "Is this a price blip? No. A food shortage? Not that either. We are in a structural meltdown, the direct result of three decades of neoliberal globalization. ... We have allowed food to be transformed from something that nourishes people and provides them with secure livelihoods into a commodity for speculation and bargaining." The report states: "The amount of speculative money in commodities futures ... was less than $5 billion in 2000. Last year, it ballooned to roughly $175 billion."

There was a global food crisis in 1946. Then, as now, the U.N. convened a working group to deal with it. At its meeting, the head of the U.N. Relief and Rehabilitation Administration, former New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia, said, "Ticker tape ain't spaghetti." In other words, the stock market doesn't feed the hungry. His words remain true today. We in the U.S. aren't immune to the crisis. Wal-Mart, Sam's Club and Costco have placed limits on bulk rice purchases. Record numbers of people are on food stamps, and food pantries are seeing an increase in needy people.

Current technology exists to feed the planet in an organic, locally based, sustainable manner. The large corporate food and energy interests, and the U.S. government, need to recognize this and change direction, or the food riots in distant lands will soon be coming to their doors.

Dennis Moynihan contributed research for this column.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: food corporations, ethanol, imf, biofuels, hunger, food riots

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No story here? Try the Corporate Crime Reporter on Monsanto for the inside scoop.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 1, 2008 7:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate Crimer Reporter: Farm Broadcaster Ousted after Ripping Monsanto’s Goon Squads

"Monsanto is the dominant player in the global seed industry and has a reputation for playing rough.

On air, Brownfield quoted from a newly published Vanity Fair article titled “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” by Donald Barlett and James Steele.

“Monsanto relies on a shadowy army of private investigators and agents in the American heartland to strike fear into farm country,” Barlett and Steele write. “They fan out into fields and farm towns, where they secretly videotape and photograph farmers, store owners, and co-ops, infiltrate community meetings, and gather information from informants about farming activities. Farmers say that some Monsanto agents pretend to be surveyors. Others confront farmers on their land and try to pressure them to sign papers giving Monsanto access to their private records. Farmers call them the ‘seed police’ and use words such as ‘Gestapo’ and ‘Mafia’ to describe their tactics.”

After reading from the Vanity Fair article, Brownfield then begins to riff on the Mafia theme.

“Multinational corporations are doing everything possible to change agriculture – and not for the better,” Brownfield says on the show. “I know a little bit about this – not a lot, just a little bit – but Monsanto literally they have Mafia goons out, do they not? They show up on farmers’ property, they try and harass them, they say if you don’t sign this, we are going to take you to court. They have literally tried to destroy agriculture as we know it. They have a goon squad. Maybe that’s not what they like to be called. But if it was the Mafia, we would call them the goon squad.”

Calling Monsanto’s patent enforcers goons was apparently the straw that broke this camel’s back.

Brownfield’s stint at Dearfield was about to end.. . .


22 Corporate Crime Reporter 18, April 30, 2008

Monsanto's real interest in genetically modified crops has zero to do with "feeding the world", but rather is about creating patented crop strains that they can use to force open markets and gain monopolies via extortion and the use of intellectual property laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where's the column?
Posted by: racetoinfinity on May 2, 2008 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish Alternet would post the column.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where's the column? Posted by: racetoinfinity
No column for the second day running
Posted by: akai ringo on May 2, 2008 3:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the second day running that Alternet has just printed the story heading. May I suggest that you look into this before you begin to lose credibility and readers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What the...?
Posted by: makeadifference on May 2, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHY NO STORY? FORCED REMOVAL?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hippies right-peace, brown rice, and zero population growth
Posted by: plantland on May 2, 2008 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1.It is frightening how many articles about food and energy shrotages, climate change, joblessness, educational parity,and immigrants rights ignore the ramifications of family size.

2.Polished white rice has far fewer calories and good oils than brown rice. Markets and aid groups need to consider shipping, storing, and introducing brown rice.
Soaking and sprouting grains increases the protein and viatamins. The water necessary for cooking can be used instead for cooking, decreasing the need for energy to cook.

3. Cultural sensitivity and not wanting to criticize fundamental religious groups who desire either multiple wives or as many children as possible has trumped common sense, and brought us to the edge of global catastrophe. Aid should include family planning assistance. Tolerance of immigration, needs to be based on an expectation of planning fewer children. Immigrants to America need to be told that Americans frequently use family planning and limit the number of children they have. US tax policy and social policies seem to reward large families, at least for people to whom the subsidies seem like a lot.
Of course we need to share and allocate better with the immediacy demanded by the situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grow Pot..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 2, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grow Hemp we can grow it like Brazil grows sugar cane and we can sue the Hemp itself and also the stalks for cellulose fuel..

This would launch thousands of new farms as well..!

Simple as that..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hemp Ethanol Posted by: dadux
» RE: Hemp Ethanol Posted by: TJ-stars4peace
» Hemp Ethanol Posted by: dadux
» RE: Hemp Ethanol Posted by: TJ-stars4peace
» Hemp Ethanol Posted by: dadux
» RE: Hemp Ethanol Posted by: TJ-stars4peace
It can't happen . . .where?
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 2, 2008 12:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to globalization by our rapacious corporations, aided by the Bush and Clinton admins., the entire economic world is being converted to Fundamental Fascism (the incestuous wedding of corporations, governments and wealthy investors). If this "greed is good" trend is not stopped, we are all, quite literally, doomed, along with much of the planet. The stakes could not be any higher.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This "analysis" is just as bad as Paul Krugman's at the New York Times. . .
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 2, 2008 3:59 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . and it actually comes to the same conclusion that Paul Krugman does.

It starts of by toeing the normal line:
"Behind the hunger, behind the riots, are so-called free-trade agreements, and the brutal emergency-loan agreements imposed on poor countries by financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund.

Then, Amy Goodman lists off the supposed causes for the food crisis:

The rise in food prices is generally attributed to a perfect storm caused by:

- increased food demand from India and China,
- diminished food supplies caused by drought and other climate-change-related problems,
- increased fuel costs to grow and transport the food, and
-the increased demand for biofuels, which has diverted food supplies like corn into ethanol production.


This is NOT the reason food prices are spiking right now - that is due to the fact that the subprime speculators, after making a killing in the credit markets, dumped all their ill-gotten gains into commodities, driving prices through the roof.

This is indeed part of a larger global trend towards resource scarcity, but let's be honest: a major reason for resource scarcity is the ridiculously wasteful behavior of over-consumption-based Western economies.

Odd that Amy Goodman, who must know about this, doesn't even mention it, isn't it? Instead, she runs with ExxonMob's favorite PR line: "ethanol is the evil demon seed that is the sole cause of food price spikes."

In a news conference this week, President Bush defended food-based ethanol production. . . One part of the world that does like Bush and his policies are the multinational food corporations. International nonprofit group GRAIN has just published a report called "Making a killing from hunger." In it, GRAIN points out that major multinational corporations are realizing vast, increasing profits amid the rising misery of world hunger.

First, notice how that paragraph neatly ties GW Bush to international agriculture corporations to ethanol production to "making a killing from hunger"... but I wonder what GRAIN actually says?

Here is the actual report
http://www.grain.org/articles/?id=39

A few key quotes:
"Nothing that the policy makers say should obscure the fact that today’s food crisis is the outcome of both an incessant push towards a “Green Revolution” agricultural model since the 1950s and the trade liberalisation and structural adjustment policies imposed on poor countries by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund since the 1970s."

That's what the GRAIN report is really all about. From that perspective it doesn't matter if the corn was made into ethanol or cows or tortillas - it is a colonial system that has far more in common with 17th century slavery than "race & gender" liberal s like Amy Goodman are willing to admit.

Do you really think that if no ethanol was being produced, that the multinationals would relax their grip on international markets?

Let's return to the actual GRAIN report:
"For years the World Bank and the IMF have told countries that a liberalised market would provide the most efficient system for producing and distributing food, yet today the world’s poorest countries are forced into an intense bidding war against speculators and traders, who are having a field day. Hedge funds and other sources of hot money are pouring billions of dollars into commodities to escape sliding stock markets and the credit crunch, putting food stocks further out of poor people’s reach".

Thus, Amy Goodman's article is a seriously dishonest distortion of the facts. Sorry to offend, but there's no denying it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Dishonest distortion" - Not Posted by: KeepsonTickn
Two models for organic agriculture, two models for biofuels.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 2, 2008 4:28 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first model for large-scale organic agriculture in the New World by European colonists was called the slave-based plantation.

In this model, widespread in the Caribbean, Brazil, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and so on, slaves were captured or bought in Africa, shipped across the country, and set to work like cattle on large plantations.

Yes, they were 100% organic. There were no petrochemical fertilizers in those days.

There are a few similar models in the 20th century - the Soviet collective farm was quite similar to an Old South slave plantation, and the tomato pickers in Florida keep saying that they are forced to work under slave like conditions for Taco Bell growers.

Another good example is Mexico - currently, organic production is booming - 98% OF IT FOR EXPORT TO THE UNITED STATES! and you can be sure that Mexican labor standards are strictly enforced - which is easy, because there are no standards! Is it that Mexicans don't like organic food? Or is it that the prices are artificially jacked up for the American latte liberal market?

We could round up millions of displaced refugees, ship them to the Caribbean and open up new slave plantations dedicated to biofuel production - and would you be surprised to learn that the slave plantations are already in operation, biofuel or no? They are there right now.

So, that is model #1 for organic farming and biofuel production.

The other model is that of independently owned farms, sized a few hundred acres in size. 100 acres might produce from 10,000 to 20,000 bushels of corn grain for export abroad (about 300 tons, say), or it can produce ten different crops to satisfy the local market.

What if our small farmer grows more corn or potatoes than the market wants? There you are, a small farmer, stuck with tons of corn - can you turn it into ethanol and make a little money that way, or do you have to let it rot?

. . .Combined with refining improvements and the use of corn stover (averaging 4 tons per acre), an acre would yield about 1,300 gallons of ethanol (900 from the corn grain and 400 from the stover).

However, even when this goal is reached, energy crops will remain the more productive alternative. By the time we reach 300bu/acre for corn, energy crop yields will also have improved substantially – we believe up to 20 tons per acre. At the same conversion ratio of 100 gallons per ton, a 20-ton per acre energy crop will yield 2,000 gallons.


Personally, I don't eat grain-fed meat of any kind, nor do I eat a lot of high-fructose corn syrup, so ethanol is fine with me. I'm just sick of all the corporate propaganda put out by oil corporations on this issue - and I'm even sicker of the corporate press echo chamber.

Yes, Amy Goodman IS the corporate press - she's writing for Hearst Communications (owner of King Features Syndicate), who also plays a big role in Murdoch's AP. She also has repeatedly refused to allow the public to post comments on her Democracy Now web site - what kind of "voice of the people" doesn't allow public input? Seriously - why not? I've gotten no clear reason from their public office as to why they wouldn't allow the public to post comments - you try asking them.

Right now, the low-hanging fruit in the global food crisis is the speculators - with a few stokes of the pen, government regulatory bodies can put them out of business. All they have to do is tighten up capital liquidity rules, so that currencies can't easily be converted without serious penalty - yes, it is that easy - but it is not an allowed topic of discussion in the liberal corporate press.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to fire up the tiller, and buy a cheap freezer.
Posted by: yale on May 2, 2008 8:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Homegrown is the best food in the world. You can put a good portion of all the veggies you grow right in your $50 yard sale freezer. Another good provider fruit and almost carefree is blackberries. 10 of these plants will soon turn into hundreds and is the easiest way to help fill that freezer with good tasting stuff, just pick, bag and freeze. We grow eveything, including our own homegrown, well hidden of course. Although 20 years ago most folks around here had it right in their gardens. Times have changed, the pot spotters do a lot of flyovers in the fall around here because of all the backwoods folks and hippie farmers who grow their own meds. The war on drugs eats up lots of tax dollars, those helicopters arent cheap to fly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The World's Growing Food-Price Crisis – A Crime Against Humanity.
Posted by: Wilfred on May 6, 2008 1:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are seeing a new demonic face of hunger in which people are being priced out of the food market. Sharp food price hikes are hurting the poor and sparking violent protest all over the world. This is happening against a global campaign against the production of Biofuels with the United Nations having declared it a Crime Against Humanity.
This is devastating for the two billion poor people worldwide who live on less than R14.40 a day.
The re-balancing of food prices in relation to the price of energy is likely to cause severe social distress.
Climate change is also playing a role and appears to be increasingly destructive as massive droughts and storms, such as a cyclone last year, destroyed R4 320 million worth of rice in Bangladesh.
The rising cost of oil is the major contributor to the food crisis, affecting the cost of production, transport and fertilisers. This is driving the switch to biofuel production as an alternative to hydrocarbons and the race among western countries to produce Biofuels is responsible, in significant part, for the escalating food costs. The logic is simple: When countries put corn aside for energy, the amount available for food is in greater demand, and prices rise. If demand is already high, the effect is amplified.
Generous government subsidies for ethanol in the U.S. have lured thousands of farmers away from growing crops for food. Nearly a third of the corn output in the U.S this year will be used to make an estimated 9.3 billion gallons of ethanol.
There is enough food in the world for everyone but it is the pursuit of profit that stops people from having enough to eat. Capitalist governments and the imperialist powers who are complete servants of multinationals will not raise an eyebrow if not pushed by mass protest. These giant corporations are prospering and profiteering at an alarming rate in an environment of neo-liberal policies.
There is no long-term solution under capitalism, because the overriding interest of food manufacturers and distributors is profit.
Corruption, governments’ collusion with profit-hungry traders, food manufactures and multinationals coupled with drought & bad weather, high oil prices stocking transport costs, spiking bio-fuel demand and low reserves are the contributors to this malaise.
There is no guarantee that governments will positively respond, but public attention can often illuminate otherwise ignored problems.
The South African populace needs to be vigilant as our cabinet has approved the development of an Industrial Biofuels Strategy in late 2005 and released its draft strategy in late 2006.
The demand must be made for governments to swiftly implement policy measures that include (1) price controls on most staple food items, (2) the establishment a State-owned Commodity Marketing Board that must be the sole buyer of particular commodities and/or operate a guaranteed price/purchase scheme for others, (3) the sale and transfer agricultural inputs & technologies to farmers, at subsidized prices, that lower input cost but contributes to higher yields and increased productivity and (4) a state entity for the production of some basic commodities.
These policies and programmes must allow for (1) market interventions to alter the food prices directly, (2) support to improve competitiveness of the agricultural sector and above all safety net interventions in support of poor households.
Governments around the world must come under pressure from protest movements to fix food prices and even nationalise some food production. The organs of state, including parastatals, must implement and prioritise programmes to alleviate the plight of the poor and improve the quality of life of the people. Let us all join hands and fight against this crime against humanity.

Wilfred Alcock Pretoria-South Africa www.live.blat.co.za

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

According to the World Bank, Global Food Prices have reached an all time High.
Posted by: yellow on May 7, 2008 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
World Bank estimates of 25% increases in the average food import costs of third world countries has caused a real hunger crisis in that part of the world. In the last three years, global food prices have increased by 83% according to a recent WB Report. Rice, corn and wheat, all staple crops in third world diets, have gone up markedly. Much of this has to do with ethanol production in the US and EU. Both heavily subsidize local ethanol distillery production while they levy a significant tariff against imported ethanol. This virtually eliminates the possibility of third world countries gaining a market share in ethanol production to earn foreign exchange needed to pay for rising food and fuel prices. The resulting poverty is causing suffering and political instability.

Once again, selfish western consumption habits are causing problems in the third world. Conservation programs are needed. We need to explore building up urban mass transit and renewable energy technologies. The US consumes over one quarter of the 86 million barrels/day global consumption of crude oil. A mere 3 million barrel/day reduction in US energy usage would drastically bring down the global price of crude oil. We need to alter our excessive consumption habits and policies for ourselves and the rest of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]