Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Famed NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen tells the depressing story of government censorship of years of impeccable research.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

What the Government Doesn't Want You To Know About Global Warming

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted March 24, 2008.


Famed NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen tells the depressing story of government censorship of years of impeccable research.
Advertisement

JUAN GONZALEZ: Dr. James Hansen is widely regarded as the leading climate change scientist in the country. It was his testimony to a Senate committee in 1988 that first brought the threat of global warming to the world's attention. For the past quarter of a century he has headed the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NASA's premiere climate research center.

Just over a year ago, Dr. Hansen went public with a charge that made headlines around the world, that the Bush administration had been trying to silence his warnings about the urgent need to address climate change.

AMY GOODMAN: You may have heard Dr. James Hansen mentioned before on Democracy Now! His name has been cited by many guests on the show.

JOHN PASSACANTANDO: This government, at the behest of its oil company contributors, has been told not to put out information about global warming, not to allow the scientists to talk about their expertise with the press, about the connection between global warming and hurricanes. That happened at NOAA. There's been pressure on Dr. James Hansen at NASA.

PAUL EHRLICH: I think it's true that attitudes have changed slightly in the White House, because they now see a political issue, but they have worked very, very hard to suppress the science on global warming. For instance, they sent some junior jerk to try and keep Jim Hansen, who's one of our very top climate scientists, from saying what he thought.

CHRIS MOONEY: Apparently, a NASA aide was instructed to interfere with Hansen's ability to do press interviews. Actually, this completely backfired, because Hansen is not someone to be told to be quiet. And so, he just went to the media anyway, and it ended up exploding.

TIM FLANNERY: Can you imagine what it would be like for one of the world's leading scientists, who is revered by everyone, to have this pipsqueak who lied about his credentials controlling what he tells the public? Just appalling. And, you know, the countries around the world would -- I don't know what they'd pay to have the advice of a Jim Hansen. It's the sort of stuff we all desperately need. And here, in a country that actually pays him a salary and allows him to do his work, he is silenced. I mean, I honestly cannot see the sense of that. I can't see who benefits.

AMY GOODMAN: That last speaker was acclaimed Australian scientist and writer Tim Flannery. Well, today, Dr. James Hansen himself joins us in our firehouse studio. His story of how the Bush administration tried to silence his warnings on climate change is detailed in a new book. It's called Censoring Science: Inside the Political Attack on Dr. James Hansen and the Truth of Global Warming. It's written by author Mark Bowen. He joins us from a studio in Watertown, Massachusetts.

We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Dr. Hansen, 1988, talk about the significance of that time.

DR. JAMES HANSEN: Well, I think it had become clear that the climate was changing and that human-made greenhouse gases were a reason for the long-term trend in the climate. And I just wanted to draw that to the attention of the public, because we really need to do something before the climate change becomes large, just because of the inertia of the system. If we wait until the climate change is large, then it's too late to stop it from happening.

AMY GOODMAN: So, what did you do twenty years ago?

DR. JAMES HANSEN: Well, I just reported that the world at that time was getting warmer, and I expected 1988 to be the warmest year in the period of instrumental record, which it did turn out to be, and that humans were primarily the reason for this long-term warming trend.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And, of course, that was twenty years ago, and while the Bush administration has gotten a lot of attention for its failure to heed any kinds of warnings, there was another administration before that, the Clinton administration, as well. And I think Bowen talks in the book about some problems that you had with Al Gore and -- could you talk about how the Clinton administration reacted to some of the warnings you raised?

DR. JAMES HANSEN: Well, my concern is general with both Republican and Democratic administrations. They both feel that they can control what scientists say to the public. So their offices of public affairs in the science agencies are headed, in general, by political appointees, and they review the press releases before they go out. So, it doesn't really make sense in a democracy. The public should be honestly informed. And then, of course, the publications are allowed to make the decisions, and they don't have to follow exactly what the science says. There are other considerations that they have. But they shouldn't influence what is presented, the scientific evidence. And I object to that, regardless of which administration is in power.

AMY GOODMAN: So, before we go on to the Bush administration, where you did have the most trouble, can you talk about what happened during the Clinton years and how you were able to express or not your research?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bush, bush administration, global warming, climate change, james hansen

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
let em eat smoke
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Mar 24, 2008 4:05 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can only hope that the first people who choke on all the pollution that has been and will be allowed by these criminals,are the children of the people who voted for these bastards. ask yourself what kind of person votes for somebody like george bush and dick cheney? people just like them. stupid,arrogant,criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: let em eat smoke Posted by: opalescentscales
» RE: let em eat smoke Posted by: donl51
US President blocks NASA climate satellite from launching
Posted by: GreyFlcn on Mar 24, 2008 6:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever wonder why Bush was all big on this "Mission to Mars" thing for a while?

Here's why.

"Associate Administrator for Earth Science Ghassem Asrar reveals that DSCOVR was nixed by NASA due to directions from the Whitehouse:

“It is widely recognized that the science offered by DSCOVR would help make possible an integrated self-consistent global database for studying the extent of regional and global climate change. Due to Space Shuttle manifesting constraints recently directed by the President, the DSCOVR mission is currently without a launch opportunity.”

Dr. Asrar was likely referring to George Bush’s outrageous interference in the NASA science program, directing them in January 2004 to commit between $229 billion and $1 trillion to send astronauts to Mars for an interplanetary photo op. However, one does wonder what is exactly is meant by “constraints recently directed by the President”."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 24, 2008 7:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global warming doesn't have to happen.

Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» BUT IT IS! Posted by: donl51
I have read 2 books by Chris Mooney.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Mar 25, 2008 12:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reference: "The Republican War on Science" by Chris
Mooney, 2005, Basic Books. It has the following URLs:
http://www.waronscience.com/home.php
http://www.chriscmooney.com/
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05268/576883.stm

See also:
"Undermining Science, suppression and distortion in the
Bush Administration" by Seth Shulman, 2006

"The Republican War on Science" by Chris Mooney says:

"Because Trofim Lysenko convinced Josef Stalin that
genetics is wrong, 12 million people died of starvation.
The coal companies convinced President George W. Bush
[and Senator Inohe] that global warming hasn't happened
and 12 hundred people died in hurricanes in 2005. For the
same reason, people died in the wildfires in Oklahoma."
12 hundred is less than 12 million, but GWB is still
comparable to Stalin. Both adopted anti-science policies
for ideological reasons and thereby murdered large numbers
of their own citizens.
George W. Bush favors a form of "democracy" called
Theocracy.
There is something that needs to be made explicit: Truth
is not determined by a vote of scientists. Scientists are not
authorities. Nature is the Only authority. There is only
one vote that counts, and Nature casts it. It isn't just "not
nice" to fool Mother Nature, it is impossible. Scientists
understand and believe this so innately that they never say
it, but other people may think that scientists wield power or
authority.
Reference: book: "Science and Immortality" by Charles B.
Paul 1980 University of California Press
The Eloges of the Paris Academy of Sciences (1699-1791)
page 99: "Science is not so much a natural as a moral
philosophy".
page 106: Nature isn't just the final authority, Nature is the
Only authority. When you try to disobey Nature [In
older language: "When you try to tell God how to run the
Universe".], the result is less subtle than a train wreck: The
rocket explodes on the launch pad. Oklahomans die in
wild fires when it should be winter. The Gulf coast suffers
the worst hurricane season ever. Tornado season extends
into January.
Book: "The Long Summer, How Climate Changed
Civilization" by Brian Fagan 2004 Basic Books
Summary: Small climate changes caused the fall of many
civilizations.

The Religious Right is also giving a war on Science, trying
to convince people that Evolution is wrong and trying to
prevent the teaching of Science in school. As we all know,
religion is caused by mental illness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have read 2 books by Chris Mooney. Posted by: opalescentscales
» RE: I have read 2 books by Chris Mooney. Posted by: opalescentscales
» RE: no comparison Posted by: donl51
"Thin Ice" by Mark Bowen
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Mar 25, 2008 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A very good book. A page turner. Epic tale of equatorial
glacier research.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is surprising that Dr. Hansen got as far as he did.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Mar 25, 2008 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The norm in the government is to promote only yes-
persons to supervisory positions. Congratulations
to Dr. Hansen on that coup as well. Promoting only
yes-persons is how we got Iran-Contra and all of those
other unchecked and unbalanced actions by CIA, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CLIMATE CHANGE... GOOD NEWS
Posted by: PacificGatePost on Mar 26, 2008 12:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's good news on the global warming front... it's not.

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CLIMATE CHANGE... GOOD NEWS Posted by: Cooltruth
» RE: CLIMATE CHANGE... GOOD NEWS Posted by: Richard House
» You Believe This? Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
Lebrons' just warmin' up
Posted by: tennant on Mar 26, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
some skeptical gw climotologists from cleveland have forwarded a theory that as LeBron heats up so does the worlds mean temperature. since he's entered the league the overall world temperature has increased 2 degrees. as for the ice shelf bustin' loose in the antartic. well, LeBron let loose a thundifferous, in yo face, high flyin', whozz yo momma, 360, tomahawk jam & boom there goes the ice shelf. file this one under levity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barbarians inside the Gates?
Posted by: writerman on Mar 27, 2008 2:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really feel like a gang of greedy, corrupt, murderous barbarians have taken over the country and are dragging us towards disaster.

If we get through this terrible era I believe we'll look back with incredulity and shock that such a crazed gang of loonies were ever allowed anywhere near the reins of power. They remind me of a cult like the Nazi leadership, dangerous fanatics with an insane ideology leading nowhere but to Hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» your feelings are correct Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: your feelings are correct Posted by: jeffreytaos
» RE: Barbarians inside the Gates? Posted by: HillbillyBob
Gubbmint doesn't want you to know that 71 years ago,
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 27, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the ban on Cannibas brought about by Big Oil, Chemical, Coal, etc ... to RIG the "market" is what is responsible for global warming. REMOVE the ban on Cannibas and allow its 25000+ industrial uses into the market and Big Oil, Chemical, Coal, etc ... will be DEFEATED. Oh, and uh, conserve and all that stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global warming - made up by liberals
Posted by: War-Lover on Mar 27, 2008 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no global warming. It is just a dumb lie made up by liberals who want to undermine this great nation. There is not one iota of evidence that supports the theory of global warming. If it were real George Bush would have stopped it by now because George Bush is an angel sent from God to save the world.

Any one who thinks global warming is real has been brainwashed by the terrorits. Bin Laden is laughing his ass off because his plan is working. He wants us to think global warming is real so we stop using our cars and refridgerators. Then our economy will fail and the terrorists will attack us and take over our country. I am not gonna let that happen. We should all buy big SUV's and use as much gasoline as possible. That's the only way we're gonna beat these terrorists and the Russians and the Chinese and Venezula.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ass Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» Satire? Posted by: Robba29
» RE: Satire? Posted by: Shey
» [Ignore this user] Posted by: TruthBeKnown
Oil barons at the top.
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 27, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's be sure to elect some more oil barons to pres and vice pres. They will run the nation the way they ran their oil corps--destroy all competition, lie, cheat, and steal.

The GOP will be happy to nominate more such for us every four years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS IS ALL ABOUT
Posted by: fearn on Mar 27, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GREED. Tragically America has evolved into the greediest nation on earth. For decades it has been official American policy to ensure that America had a disproportionate share of this planets resources. Now hundreds of millions of Americans piss away resources without a thought. Every day tens of thousands die because they don't have the very basics. Ironically Americans are not as happy as they were 50 years ago when they used much less. American denial about all this is going to come back and bite you. Read more -
www.amoralamerica.info

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rich. stoopid. people.
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 27, 2008 9:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what your nation looks like run by the owning-investor class.

Watch your back, rich boys. Blackwater want be able to protect you from the mob of homeless and poor people you've shat upon when they come to git some back...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bolzhidar balkas
Posted by: bozhidar on Mar 27, 2008 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we'v been denaturing the nature for long time. and nature may kick us to oblivion or thereabouts. nature can make sm'thing butiful out of sm'thing bad but nat'l. it transforms feces into nourishment for roots of trees, ect. but it can't handle some 140000 man-made chemicals that is destroyng life.
the way out may be progress but w.o. regress. and regress is enormous: obesity, divorce, asthma, diabetes, hypertension, madness, rage r just a few of the ill effects of the insatiable appetite for more and more of things that cause such regression; some of which we even don't need. thank u

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» we 'need' little Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Some good points but many suppressed scientists present evidence that it ain't our fault
Posted by: batfink on Mar 27, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True that the Bush gang may have wanted to suppress global warming, but "human caused global warming" just isn't the answer and too many other excellent scientists are saying so and are being suppressed by the "human caused global warming" gang.

see: http://tinyurl.com/359p3z

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's REAL, folks
Posted by: willymack on Mar 27, 2008 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global warming isn't a chicken little, hysterical, false alarm; it's a tangible, observable phenomenon, agreed upon by a vast majority of genuine, reputable scientists with no monetary gain at stake. While it may be part of a natural cyclic trend, the role of humanity through the release of vast amounts of carbon dioxide into our atmoshpere has been proven beyond the doubt of anyone willing to examine the evidence and employ a little THOUGHT. It's unfortunate that greedy bastards in the "energy" industry turn a deaf ear to anyone who may criticise the pollution of our air,and who may adversly affect their obscene profits. It's even more unfortunate that there are so many of us who'd rather parrot corporate propaganda than use their heads. By the way, a giantic piece of the Antarctic ice shelf has broken off and fallen into the sea. It was in the news yesterday. Anyone wanna bet this is a result of our world getting COLDER?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RN
Posted by: mnatra on Mar 27, 2008 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work in a hospital.When my patients come in for surgery, they put their lives in to the medics hands and by and large, they have good outcomes.These patients are both Republican and Democrats,they trust science.All the science is positive for most medical interventions.
Thus when all the scientific evidence points to causes of Global warming,how can a rational person
deny it? Why would these very same people deny the evidence? It is not like there is not enough evidence out there on carbon build up.
It is called denial. the most lethal kind of denial is to be inside a burning building and to not take action.What does this denial serve if you are choking/?This is a very good interview.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DENIAL Posted by: Cathyc
The Religion of Global Warming
Posted by: dayahka on Mar 27, 2008 4:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything that was said about science and censorship in the article may be true. However, the big problem is that many people hold a belief in global warming (or peak oil, or the second coming, or whatever) not on the basis of an hypothesis subject to confirmation or refutation, but as a matter of faith. There is no conceivable fact that would dissuade a Peak Oil depletionist from his views, and many global warming people are the same. There are legitimate dissenters from anthropogenic global warming and instead of considering the evidence, these people are dismissed with ad hominem attacks. Just today Mr global warming scam himself, Al Bore, calls dissenters flat earthers. This is irresponsible and unscientific. Let Al show me his scientific credentials; all he is is a hack. Goddard Space Center also includes hacks among its members. Climate change is a fact, a perennial fact. Anthropogenic climate change is not a fact and is subject to dissention--legitimate dissention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pseudo intellectual spew Posted by: skoog5600
» The simplest of questions ... Posted by: skoog5600
» RE: The simplest of questions ... Posted by: Beached Whale
Typical 'progressive' rubbish
Posted by: Beached Whale on Mar 29, 2008 3:48 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For someone who constantly bleats about how everyone is trying to silence him, James Hansen never shuts up. However, his cherry-picked nonsense has been discredited on various occasions and only the forces of global warming opportunism (e.g., Gore, 'carbon traders', the alternative energy industry looking for a government handout) and the self-obsessed misanthropes of so-called environmental and anti-globalization movements conspire to keep it alive.

Disclaimer: I'm not affiliated with any government, oil or energy concern, NGOs or any organization benefitting from or promoting global warming hysteria. I AM a developmental economist who is capable of discerning who the real victims of this nonsense are and who will pay the global warming piper with their own lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Typical 'progressive' rubbish Posted by: Beached Whale
» Too bad economics isn't a science Posted by: AsteroidMiner
» Some good URLs Posted by: AsteroidMiner
» RE: Typical 'progressive' rubbish Posted by: Beached Whale
» the poor in jeopardy Posted by: rdog
The economics of Extinction
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Mar 31, 2008 8:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George W. Bush and the republicans and the Wall Street Journal are denying
global warming because they want to keep selling coal. Coal is a $100 Billion per
year business in the US alone. The problem is that burning coal causes global
warming alias climate change. Global warming because of supervolcanoes has
caused mass extinctions in the past. The republican war against science is putting
civilization in danger of collapse and it is putting Homo Sapiens on the endangered
species list.

The economic cost of the extinction of Homo Sapiens is infinite, and the cost of
the fall of civilization is very nearly infinite and way beyond any possible benefit
of any kind to anybody. Calculating a cost of global warming in money is
therefore the ultimate in foolishness. Money does not exist without people, but
people can exist without money. ANY such calculation is way beyond morally
wrong. Project 1 is avoiding extinction at any cost.

Nature's eventual wrath and retaliation includes:
1. The impending EXTINCTION of human life in maybe 1 or 2 centuries.

2. The downfall of civilization a lot sooner than our extinction. Maybe
civilization will fall within 30 years.

1. The Existential Risk that is virtually certain to happen if we don't mend our coal
burning ways is the same as the End Permian mass extinction: Hydrogen Sulfide
[H2S]. It is possible to avoid it, but the power of wealth must be overcome. 5
groups of paleontologists have come to the same conclusion independently. That
is sufficient evidence to take drastic action regardless.

Reference Book: "Six Degrees" by Mark Lynas. See a summary at:
http://www.marklynas.org/2007/4/23/
six-steps-to-hell-summary-of-six-degrees
-as-published-in-the-guardian

2. Reference Book: "The Long Summer, How Climate Changed Civilization" by
Brian Fagan, 2004 Basic Books, ISBN 0-465-02281-2
Summary: Smaller climate changes than we have caused already, caused the fall
of many civilizations.
Reference Book: "Collapse, How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed" by Jared
Diamond. 99.99% of all people in the collapsing civilization die, including the
richest. Hunting the neighbors as food happens. We really really don't want to
go there.
See:
http://environmentaldefenseblogs.org/
climate411/2008/01/14/global_winds/
The drought in Georgia, California, Australia, Greece, Turkey, the Sahel, China
and other places is part of the desertification that will soon cause agriculture to fail
and civilization collapses when agriculture fails. The rich have the privilege of
being the last to die of starvation, but their deaths will happen quite soon after the
deaths from starvation of everybody else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]