It is time the Democrats reframe the debate over funding for the Iraq war.
|
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Ending the War: Time for the Dems to Play Hardball
Share and save this post:
Also in Top Stories
Only in America Could a Two-Faced Creature Like McCain Attain Such Media Status
Rory O'Connor, AlterNet
As Vets Take to the Streets to Protest the War, McCain Snubs IVAW at the RNC
Liliana Segura, AlterNet
McCain's Palin Gambit: Are Americans Weary of the Culture Wars?
Sanho Tree, AlterNet
Obama's Biden Pick Signals 'More of the Same' Stupid Drug Policies
Paul Armentano, AlterNet
Exposing Five Dangerous Lies in McCain's Big Speech
AlterNet
Breeding Envy: Do You Need to be a Millionaire to Have Kids?
Vanessa Richmond, The Tyee
Hospitals' Lessons From Hurricane Gustav
Sheri Fink, ProPublica
Taking a page from America's retailers, President Bush is getting a jump on the coming battle over Iraq war funding. On Monday, he added an additional $45.9 billion in supplemental war funding to the $150.5 billion he'd already requested, and then turned up the heat on Congress to sign off on the $196.4 billion before heading home for the holidays. Only 60 more browbeating days until Christmas!
And you have to give Bush credit. Despite record-low approval ratings, he's unabashedly playing -- and winning -- the PR game on the war. By incrementally adding to his funding request, he made his ongoing plundering of our treasury to pursue his disastrous Iraq policy seem relatively modest. The headlines all focused on the $46 billion he's just added to the tab -- not the $196 billion he's really after.
And while his language about "supporting the troops," and "providing our troops with the help and support they need to get the job done" is well past its sell-by date, the Democrats have yet to reframe the funding debate. So Bush replays his patriotic greatest hits while the blood of our soldiers continues to flow -- in the process making our country not more, but less, safe.
The president was feeling so cocky he even pulled out the "s" word -- "succeed" -- that had been in cold storage for a while. "Our men and women on the front lines should not be caught in the middle of partisan disagreements in Washington, D.C.," he said. "[Congress] ought to make sure our troops have what it takes to succeed." Whatever that means in Iraq these days.
The Democrats meanwhile remain divided and confounded on how to stand up to the president on Iraq. House invertebrates like Steny Hoyer, who foolishly think ducking for cover is a winning '08 strategy, are urging a cautious approach, suggesting that any hardball stop-the-war efforts will leave red state Dems vulnerable to attacks for undermining the troops.
Senate leaders, including Carl Levin, are also treading lightly. Levin's latest gambit: put Bush on the installment plan, giving him only part of the money and forcing him to come asking for more in June, after the next Congressionally mandated report from Gen. Petraeus (September redux?). Levin's plan would also aim for a complete withdrawal from Iraq within nine months -- but this would only be a goal, not a date certain requirement.
Hey, why accomplish today what you can put off until tomorrow -- or June?
See more stories tagged with: iraq war, bush, democrats
Find more Arianna at the Huffington Post.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
EMAIL
PRINT
33 COMMENTS
