Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Karl Rove may be on his way out the door, but his destructive legacy will be with us for years to come.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Connect the Dots: Karl Rove's Politics Uber Alles Strategy and the Utah Mine Disaster

By Arianna Huffington, Huffington Post. Posted August 21, 2007.


Karl Rove may be on his way out the door, but his destructive legacy will be with us for years to come.
Advertisement

What makes Karl Rove's politics über alles strategy chilling is connecting the dots between it and the Utah mining disaster.

Rove's unprecedented use of federal assets for political gain, laid out in yesterday's Washington Post, meant that every tool at his disposal was employed to help foster his goal of a permanent Republican majority. "It was all politics, all the time," Rep. Henry Waxman told WaPo.

"It was total commitment," marveled Rep. Thomas Davis III, who worked closely with Rove in 2002 on the GOP's House reelection campaign. "We knew history was against us, and [Rove] helped coordinate all of the accoutrements of the executive branch to help with the campaign."

These accouterments included, in the words of the Post, "enlisting political appointees at every level of government in a permanent campaign that was an integral part of [Rove's] strategy to establish electoral dominance." But Rove's plan involved much more than having Cabinet officials make election year visits bearing federal goodies to the districts of embattled Republicans; it also meant using the government's regulatory mechanisms to reward major GOP contributors. Major contributors such as Big Coal.

Coal mining interests have donated more than $12 million to federal candidates since the Bush-era began with the 2000 election cycle, with 88% of that money -- $10.6 million -- going to Republicans.

And what did that largess buy the coal mining industry? Mine safety regulators far more interested in looking out for the financial well-being of mine owners than for the physical well-being of miners.

Exhibit A is Bush's "mine safety" czar, Richard Stickler, whose agency both approved the controversial mining technique used at the Crandall Canyon Mine before the collapse, and oversaw the rescue operation.

Stickler is a former coal company manager with such a lousy safety record at the companies he'd run that his nomination as head of the Mine Safety and Health Administration was twice rejected by Senators from both parties, forcing Bush to sneak him in the back door with a recess appointment.

In other words, the guy the White House tapped to protect miners is precisely the kind of executive the head of the Mine Safety and Health Administration is supposed to protect miners from. And now Stickler is the one who will lead the "investigation" into what happened in Utah -- unless there is enough public outcry to force a truly independent investigation.

Of course, industry-friendly regulators like Stickler have been the rule under Bush, not the exception. Indeed, Bush's first mine safety czar was Dave Lauriski, a former mining executive who had earned a reputation for aggressively defending the interests of mine owners. For chapter and verse on Lauriski, read this terrific article by Ken Ward, Jr. in the Washington Monthly, but here is the nub of the matter: Lauriski took office promising mine owners that he would "collaborate more with stakeholders on regulatory initiatives" and become "less confrontational" with mine operators.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: karl rove, utah mine disaster

Find more Arianna at the Huffington Post.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where do we begin, to get clean again.
Posted by: 24&somuchmore on Aug 21, 2007 11:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No surprise at this point at anything the members of the Bush administration have done. Truly they are some of the least patriotic and cowardly leaders in American history, and will be vilified for the next century by historians. Perhaps at some point in the not too distant future, Americans will wake up to realize these folks have hijacked the Republican party and taken it and the nation down the path to corruption and fascism. Pandering to and manipulating the public with regard to their emphasis on faith. That the USA under GWB has been damaged almost to the point of no return. On this last point, I hope that I am wrong, but I fear that I am not.

Like the lyrics of God of Wine by Third Eye Blind:
Where do we begin, to get clean again.

As an American, I am ashamed of this administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» As an American, Posted by: Ellie1
Republicans have politicized virtually every regulatory branch of the federal government.
Posted by: boblecht on Aug 22, 2007 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this process started with Newt Gingrich's "Contract ON America." Regulatory functions that were in place to protect citizens from abuse by corporations were attacked and "defanged" through legislation. The federal agencies charged with enforcing regulations were systematically defunded to the point their function in safeguarding the citizens against corporate malfeasance was neutralized.
The commonwealth of this nation has suffered greatly from these processes. Almost every corporate scandal in the past decade is the result of these two very successful Republican strategies.
Government of the people by the corporations for the corporations is not Democracy--it is Fascism. You could look it up in your dictionary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mine disaster media coverage
Posted by: Mogio on Aug 22, 2007 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This entire episode is emblematic of the decline of US media and journalism in so many ways, perhaps most important is the total lack of any discussion of mine safety in the general media. And who do we see on TV news? The mine owner and his MSHA cohort. Back in the day, when a mine disaster happened other miners and even United Mine Workers' officials would also get to give voice to their concerns--on the evening news yet. It's as though all the reporters have been told not to mention the word 'union' at all. What happened to the concept of worker protection? Yesterday, finally, Ray Suarez asked the local Utah TV reporter (of all people!) who was in fact in charge of the rescue; apparently the mine owner is, with input from the toothless feds! This is shocking info, and Suarez didn't follow up at all on this--just treated it as matter of fact. Leher's News Hour's coverage of this sad affair has been most appalling--interviews with industry lackeys and local TV reporters, never anyone critical of mine safety practices, or the current lack of effective mine oversight practices. Alternet should consider doing a piece he decline of the quality and fairness of News Hour coverage more generally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's very simple....
Posted by: Ellie1 on Aug 22, 2007 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neocons are great at getting elected-probably because they have no scruples and do not consider lying to be illegal or sinful.

But they can't govern worth a darn-probably because they are self centered and care about no one but themselves and their money.

And there is no underestimating the general intelligence of the American public-which is WHY they get elected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]