Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The tape is proof that Bush is not, and never was, the man of action his spin-masters made him out to be.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

What Does the Katrina Video Say About Bush?

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, Pacific News Service. Posted March 3, 2006.


The tape is proof that Bush is not, and never was, the man of action his spin-masters made him out to be.
Advertisement

The video of President Bush conferring with disaster officials from his Texas ranch the day before Katrina struck is disturbingly similar to the footage of the casual way Bush reacted to news of the Sept. 11 terror attack. This is the same Bush who time and again has primed his public image as a tough-talking, swaggering guy who moves quickly and decisively when a crisis hits. But Bush has been anything but a no-nonsense taskmaster in the face of disaster.

His first reaction to Sept. 11 was befuddlement and fear. It took him days to swing into action. His next response was to duck and dodge criticism of his glacial response to 9/11. His last ploy was to let others take the heat or the fall for his fumbles. Then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice was the perfect patsy for Bush's Sept. 11 failing. At the 9/11 Commission hearing, she fervently defended her boss from the charge that he fell asleep at the national security wheel before, during and after the attacks. She strongly made the case that there was no laxity in the Bush administration's fight against terrorism.

Counter terrorism expert Richard Clarke, who charged that the administration had slumbered on the terrorism fight didn't have a chance to rebut anything Rice said. Rice had the last word, and thus there could be no "he-said, she-said" exchanges between them. Rice was a loyal Bush soldier and shouldered some of the blame for the Sept. 11 lapse. This helped keep some sheen on her boss' Teflon shield.

Now there's Katrina. Bush tore another page from the same dodge-and-blame playbook. It took him days to get relief efforts up to speed in New Orleans. He then ducked criticism that there was incompetence, indifference and even racism in his laggard response to the crisis. Finally, he dumped full blame for the failures on FEMA director Michael Brown. It worked. Much of the public and many in the media hammered Brown for the dire plight of the hurricane devastated evacuees. Bush quickly took the cue and canned Brown. Brown, as Rice, played the fall-guy role well, kept silent and bowed out quietly. Later, and especially with the public surface of the damning Katrina video, he's found his spine, and blames the Katrina bumbles on the "fog of bureaucracy." That's a clever way to avoid saying that the man at the top didn't do his job.

The Katrina video is graphic proof that Bush did more than fumble the preparedness ball. He ignored it. Brown begged those at the government's disaster operation center to do whatever it took to get hurricane relief efforts going. He also urged that National Guard units be prepared to quickly move in and aid relief efforts, since this storm could be "the big one." Brown also showed some sensitivity to those who would have to be herded into the Superdome to escape floodwaters. He demanded that provisions be made for their medical and safety needs. He even worried about the Superdome's roof. Other disaster officials and experts warned urgently about the possibility of the levees being breached.

Bush knew all of this, and seems to have done little except offer verbal reassurances. Four days after the storm hit and floodwaters tore through the city, Bush lied and publicly stated that no one anticipated that the levees would break. Not once during the briefing, as the video shows, did Bush ask one question about the levees.

The worst part of this is that so little has changed in the months since the Katrina debacle. Thousands of evacuees are still scattered in far-flung cities across the country, many without jobs, and living under the daily threat that they can be evicted from the hotels and apartments that they have been temporarily housed in. And thousands of New Orleans and Gulf residents whose homes were severely damaged or destroyed still have not received any compensation for their losses. Bush has maintained mute silence about their predicament.

Mayor Ray Nagin and Louisiana officials were justifiably livid at the disgraceful shots of the president's men in crisis and their boss blithely doing nothing to deal with it. They shouldn't have been. His dumbfounded response to 9/11 offered hints that Bush can't manage a real disaster. The videotape is smoking-gun proof that Bush is not, and never has been, the man of action that the president's spin-masters have made him out too be. His embarrassingly low poll ratings are firm testament that much of the public has finally wised up to his leadership failings.

Digg!

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is the author of 'The Crisis in Black and Black' (Middle Passage Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WHO IS RESPONCIBLE FOR TODAY?
Posted by: AlienSlave on Mar 4, 2006 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey Earl, All that is all fine and good we all know who are at fault for the first response failures we’ve spent the past six months on it. Lets drop the issue and ask why the ninth ward is still a wasteland, why the government is still not responding.
AlienSlave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Mar 4, 2006 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We DO have a sort of Inspector Clouseau in the White House, don't we? Be absolutely sure of yourself, act quickly and rashly much of the time, and always have an excuse. Too bad Peter Sellers is dead; he could play the movie version of Bush II.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: otto Posted by: whoisjoe
Have you seen the video?
Posted by: DaveGood on Mar 5, 2006 2:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok....


So who hasn't seen this video by AP news yet?

The one where Bush, sitting in a room on his toy ranch, is told a bunch of stuff he will lie about, a few days later?

Where he was told that Katrina will be "the Big One"....that the levee's would probably not hold...... that people were going to die.....

Thirteen hundred known dead, over two thousand still missing.

Bush had cut the budget for Levee protection around New Orleans by over a billion dollars in previous years.

He had to know that, as a result, the levee's were rated to withstand a hurricane only up to level three.

He certainly knew Katrina , at the time of the conference, was rated, category Five.

And what was the instinctive first response of the Republican Party to word of just how hard New Orleans had been hit?

I give you (roll of drums please!)

Louisiana Congressman Richard Baker (R-LA)

Who said, after the hurricane, "We finally cleaned up public housing in New Orleans. We couldn't do it, but God did."

What's Bush going to do about the three Katrina's that will roar in this Year?


Or the four next?

View them as further oppertunities for social engineering?

Watch people drown like labatory rats?

Then experiment on the survivors by test-running right wing corporate programs on them designed to slash wages?

What is Dubya's current approval rating?

Someone remind me please...

It gives me a grim, dark pleasure every time I hear it.




DaveGood

http://davewgood.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

None of this matters until...
Posted by: bohdan on Mar 5, 2006 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The news media can write articles and voice opinions about how President George W. Bush has lied about this and that. (In fact, what took them so long to realize that.) But, this still means nothing. Such revelations of Truth have become the back and forth cackle of gossiping spin masters signifying nothing, as nothing has changed.

Although give credit to Democrats in Wisconsin for finally taking action by voting for "impeachment".

But no, the real deal is when one reporter, that first one, upon being chosen by President Bush to ask a question at one of his press opportunities, stands up and summons the Strength and Courage to ask, " Mr. President, when you lied about...!"

That's what it will take --- before the rest of them will do the same. It's time for someone to say that the Emperor has no clothes.

That's also when the evidence for impeachment will be brought forth before the American Public, and that's when it will mean something.

Just as Republicans constantly accused Clinton of lying, together with Clinton's defense of his "private life" lie brought the Public into play, so can the Press bring out the Truth. And let's put Bush and Cheney under oath as well. Only then, will the Wisdom of Truth find its place in our great land.

Until then, lying continues to be our government's national pastime. We have come to expect it. We take it for granted. We kill and die for it. And the shadows of sadness remain our constant companions..

the end

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nobody could have forseen...
Posted by: Crazy H on Mar 6, 2006 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... that the levee would break

... that terrorists would fly planes into buildings

... that we wouldn't be greeted as liberators

... the overwhelming democratic landslide in 2006 & 2008

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]